Advanced search options

Advanced Search Options 🞨

Browse by author name (“Author name starts with…”).

Find ETDs with:

in
/  
in
/  
in
/  
in

Written in Published in Earliest date Latest date

Sorted by

Results per page:

You searched for subject:(ustavni sud). One record found.

Search Limiters

Last 2 Years | English Only

No search limiters apply to these results.

▼ Search Limiters

1. Kandić Tatjana. Judicial authority in the constitutional and legislative development of the Republic of Serbia.

Degree: PhD, Law, 2013, University of Belgrade

Independence of judicial authority and a capacity of judicial protection of each citizen is an important effect of the distribution of power. The judicial authority is established according to professional standards, as professional and neutral authority. It establishes itself and renders accounts to itself. Each political act, even the smallest one, directed towards the holders of the judicial authority shall be considered as a breach of the principle of the distribution of power and a step away from the rule of law. A theoretical goal of the research about the judicial authority is to offer responds to the theoretical disputes about the normative model of judicial authority and about the execution of the judicial authority, as well as to analyse the relation of the judicial authority to the executive and legislative authority. A practical goal of the research is to trigger a public debate over the creation of conditions, mechanisms and assumptions for successful, independent and autonomous judicial authority. On the other hand, the research triggers a debate about the problems of the judicial authority in the Republic of Serbia, the passing of resolutions by the Constitutional Court on retaining the executive and legislative authority within the law, as well as the prospects for the further development of judicial authority, thus the research being a possible cornerstone of the forthcoming normative reforms. The scientific methods of research used in this paper are: classic, independent legal methods (dogmatic, normative and comparable), while some auxiliary, independent methods of other social sciences are also used (historical, politicological and sociological). This paper should contribute, in our scientific legal thought, to a more complete and comprehensive research of the power distribution, but particularly the judicial authority in the Republic of Serbia. It provides the genesis of the judicial authority in the constitutional and legislative development of Serbia from 1804 to 1990, assuming the most important social and economic characteristics and political relations in the society. The research of the judicial authority by means of constitutional texts and laws of Serbia, is a task that illuminates the understanding of the power in our region and becomes a thread which is interweaved into two hundred years of constitutionality in our country. It particularly analyses the normative regulations of judicial authority in the Republic of Serbia, the High Judiciary Council of the Republic of Serbia (2001 – 2006) (as an advisory and consultative authority), but also constitutional and legislative regulations of the first and permanent High Council of Justice (2006 – 2012), the authority of judicial authority and judicial administration. It also investigates the composition of the High Council of Justice, the selection procedure, competences, the passing of enactments and resolutions, and the manner of its work. This collective, government authority has a polyvalent nature,…

Subjects/Keywords: distribution of power; judicial authority; judicial administration; permitted impact; independance and continuity of judicial authority; constitutional court; constitutive element of development; podela vlasti; sudska vlast; sudska uprava; dozvoljen uticaj; nezavisnost i stalnost ljudske vlasti; ustavni sud; konstitutivni element razvoja

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Tatjana, K. (2013). Judicial authority in the constitutional and legislative development of the Republic of Serbia. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Belgrade. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/BG20130415KANDIC ; http://eteze.bg.ac.rs/application/showtheses?thesesId=388 ; https://fedorabg.bg.ac.rs/fedora/get/o:6074/bdef:Content/get ; http://vbs.rs/scripts/cobiss?command=SEARCH&base=99999&select=ID=512729009

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Tatjana, Kandić. “Judicial authority in the constitutional and legislative development of the Republic of Serbia.” 2013. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Belgrade. Accessed November 18, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/BG20130415KANDIC ; http://eteze.bg.ac.rs/application/showtheses?thesesId=388 ; https://fedorabg.bg.ac.rs/fedora/get/o:6074/bdef:Content/get ; http://vbs.rs/scripts/cobiss?command=SEARCH&base=99999&select=ID=512729009.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Tatjana, Kandić. “Judicial authority in the constitutional and legislative development of the Republic of Serbia.” 2013. Web. 18 Nov 2019.

Vancouver:

Tatjana K. Judicial authority in the constitutional and legislative development of the Republic of Serbia. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Belgrade; 2013. [cited 2019 Nov 18]. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/BG20130415KANDIC ; http://eteze.bg.ac.rs/application/showtheses?thesesId=388 ; https://fedorabg.bg.ac.rs/fedora/get/o:6074/bdef:Content/get ; http://vbs.rs/scripts/cobiss?command=SEARCH&base=99999&select=ID=512729009.

Council of Science Editors:

Tatjana K. Judicial authority in the constitutional and legislative development of the Republic of Serbia. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Belgrade; 2013. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/BG20130415KANDIC ; http://eteze.bg.ac.rs/application/showtheses?thesesId=388 ; https://fedorabg.bg.ac.rs/fedora/get/o:6074/bdef:Content/get ; http://vbs.rs/scripts/cobiss?command=SEARCH&base=99999&select=ID=512729009

.