Advanced search options

Advanced Search Options 🞨

Browse by author name (“Author name starts with…”).

Find ETDs with:

in
/  
in
/  
in
/  
in

Written in Published in Earliest date Latest date

Sorted by

Results per page:

Sorted by: relevance · author · university · dateNew search

You searched for subject:(us supreme court). Showing records 1 – 5 of 5 total matches.

Search Limiters

Last 2 Years | English Only

No search limiters apply to these results.

▼ Search Limiters


Texas A&M University

1. Craig, Mckinzie. Legal Doctrine and Self Imposed Norms: Examining the Politics of Stare Decisis.

Degree: 2012, Texas A&M University

 The "law versus politics" debate is central in the study of the Supreme Court's institutional role in US democracy and law making. Research has sought… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: judicial politics; stare decisis; gender equal protection; us supreme court

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Craig, M. (2012). Legal Doctrine and Self Imposed Norms: Examining the Politics of Stare Decisis. (Thesis). Texas A&M University. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2012-08-11588

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Craig, Mckinzie. “Legal Doctrine and Self Imposed Norms: Examining the Politics of Stare Decisis.” 2012. Thesis, Texas A&M University. Accessed July 04, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2012-08-11588.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Craig, Mckinzie. “Legal Doctrine and Self Imposed Norms: Examining the Politics of Stare Decisis.” 2012. Web. 04 Jul 2020.

Vancouver:

Craig M. Legal Doctrine and Self Imposed Norms: Examining the Politics of Stare Decisis. [Internet] [Thesis]. Texas A&M University; 2012. [cited 2020 Jul 04]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2012-08-11588.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Craig M. Legal Doctrine and Self Imposed Norms: Examining the Politics of Stare Decisis. [Thesis]. Texas A&M University; 2012. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2012-08-11588

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

2. Bundzen, Anna. The United States Supreme Court and the European Court of Justice : A Comparative Study of Compliance.

Degree: Psychology and Social Work, 2011, Örebro University

  This paper comparatively compares compliance to the rulings of the United States Supreme Court and the ECJ by the state/member state courts. Besides comparing… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: supreme; court; us; ecj; european; court of justice; comparative; study; compliance; lower; courts; Law; Juridik

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Bundzen, A. (2011). The United States Supreme Court and the European Court of Justice : A Comparative Study of Compliance. (Thesis). Örebro University. Retrieved from http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-20655

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Bundzen, Anna. “The United States Supreme Court and the European Court of Justice : A Comparative Study of Compliance.” 2011. Thesis, Örebro University. Accessed July 04, 2020. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-20655.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Bundzen, Anna. “The United States Supreme Court and the European Court of Justice : A Comparative Study of Compliance.” 2011. Web. 04 Jul 2020.

Vancouver:

Bundzen A. The United States Supreme Court and the European Court of Justice : A Comparative Study of Compliance. [Internet] [Thesis]. Örebro University; 2011. [cited 2020 Jul 04]. Available from: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-20655.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Bundzen A. The United States Supreme Court and the European Court of Justice : A Comparative Study of Compliance. [Thesis]. Örebro University; 2011. Available from: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-20655

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation


Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu

3. Ziński, Tomasz. Domniemanie konstytucyjności ustaw w Stanach Zjednoczonych Ameryki .

Degree: 2015, Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu

 Rozprawa doktorska podejmuje problematykę jednej z reguł prawnych, wykształconych w praktycje jurysdykcyjnej Sądu Najwyższego, rządzących procesem konstytucyjnego wyrokowania, tj. zasady domniemania konstytucyjności. Zgodnie z jej… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Domniemanie konstytucyjności; Presumption of constitutionality; Sądowa wstrzemięźliwość; Judicial selfrestraint; Kontrola konstytucyjności; Judicial review; US Supreme Court; Sąd Najwyższy USA

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Ziński, T. (2015). Domniemanie konstytucyjności ustaw w Stanach Zjednoczonych Ameryki . (Doctoral Dissertation). Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10593/12881

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Ziński, Tomasz. “Domniemanie konstytucyjności ustaw w Stanach Zjednoczonych Ameryki .” 2015. Doctoral Dissertation, Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu. Accessed July 04, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/10593/12881.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Ziński, Tomasz. “Domniemanie konstytucyjności ustaw w Stanach Zjednoczonych Ameryki .” 2015. Web. 04 Jul 2020.

Vancouver:

Ziński T. Domniemanie konstytucyjności ustaw w Stanach Zjednoczonych Ameryki . [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu; 2015. [cited 2020 Jul 04]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10593/12881.

Council of Science Editors:

Ziński T. Domniemanie konstytucyjności ustaw w Stanach Zjednoczonych Ameryki . [Doctoral Dissertation]. Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu; 2015. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10593/12881

4. Winters, Kathleen H. Motivations for the Use of Concurring Opinions on the U.S. Supreme Court.

Degree: PhD, Political Science, 2011, The Ohio State University

 While some behavior on the United States Supreme Court is formally required, other choices are wholly up to the discretion of each individual justice. One… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Political Science; US Supreme Court; judicial decision-making

…219 xiii Chapter 1: Introduction On March 25, 1980, the Supreme Court announced its… …of cases brought before the Supreme Court, the justices unanimously decided against… …Supreme Court justices to make the choices they do? Unlike elected officials, Supreme 3 Court… …act, as they are appointed to life terms. Instead, the primary motivation of Supreme Court… …that Supreme Court justices can unilaterally affect legal policy; instead, Supreme Court… 

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Winters, K. H. (2011). Motivations for the Use of Concurring Opinions on the U.S. Supreme Court. (Doctoral Dissertation). The Ohio State University. Retrieved from http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1306777128

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Winters, Kathleen H. “Motivations for the Use of Concurring Opinions on the U.S. Supreme Court.” 2011. Doctoral Dissertation, The Ohio State University. Accessed July 04, 2020. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1306777128.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Winters, Kathleen H. “Motivations for the Use of Concurring Opinions on the U.S. Supreme Court.” 2011. Web. 04 Jul 2020.

Vancouver:

Winters KH. Motivations for the Use of Concurring Opinions on the U.S. Supreme Court. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. The Ohio State University; 2011. [cited 2020 Jul 04]. Available from: http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1306777128.

Council of Science Editors:

Winters KH. Motivations for the Use of Concurring Opinions on the U.S. Supreme Court. [Doctoral Dissertation]. The Ohio State University; 2011. Available from: http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1306777128


University of St Andrews

5. Miles, David Jonathan. Stability or renewal : the judicialisation of representative democracy in American and German constitutionalism.

Degree: PhD, 2017, University of St Andrews

 This thesis examines how American and German constitutionalism, as shaped by the U.S. Supreme Court and the German Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht), have mediated the tension… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: 327.73043; Constitutionalism; American constitutionalism; German constitutionalism; US Supreme Court; Civic society; European Parliament; Democracy; Politics; Elections; Citizenship; European Convention on Human Rights; Universal Declaration of Human Rights

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Miles, D. J. (2017). Stability or renewal : the judicialisation of representative democracy in American and German constitutionalism. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of St Andrews. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10023/11056

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Miles, David Jonathan. “Stability or renewal : the judicialisation of representative democracy in American and German constitutionalism.” 2017. Doctoral Dissertation, University of St Andrews. Accessed July 04, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/10023/11056.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Miles, David Jonathan. “Stability or renewal : the judicialisation of representative democracy in American and German constitutionalism.” 2017. Web. 04 Jul 2020.

Vancouver:

Miles DJ. Stability or renewal : the judicialisation of representative democracy in American and German constitutionalism. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of St Andrews; 2017. [cited 2020 Jul 04]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/11056.

Council of Science Editors:

Miles DJ. Stability or renewal : the judicialisation of representative democracy in American and German constitutionalism. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of St Andrews; 2017. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/11056

.