Advanced search options

Advanced Search Options 🞨

Browse by author name (“Author name starts with…”).

Find ETDs with:

in
/  
in
/  
in
/  
in

Written in Published in Earliest date Latest date

Sorted by

Results per page:

Sorted by: relevance · author · university · dateNew search

You searched for subject:(third party identity). Showing records 1 – 3 of 3 total matches.

Search Limiters

Last 2 Years | English Only

No search limiters apply to these results.

▼ Search Limiters

1. Le Barreau, Lucie. L’Etat tiers en relations internationales : déclinaisons d’identités stratégiques médianes : neutralisation, finlandisation, neutralité : The Third State in International Relations : declensions of median strategic identities : neutralization, Finlandization, neutrality.

Degree: Docteur es, Science politique, 2015, Université Jean Moulin – Lyon III

La notion de « tiers » est complexe et relève d’une grande transdisciplinarité. Les définitions afférentes ont cependant pour trait commun de l’envisager comme qualifiant la posture d’un Etat à l’écart d’un processus politique ou juridique. Relégué ainsi à un rang subsidiaire, le tiers semble désigner l’Etat considéré comme étranger au mécanisme principal à l’œuvre. Le propos de ce travail de recherche a été de s’interroger sur l’acception stratégique du tiers en tant que dépassement de la posture passive classique. Ainsi, le tiers incarne l’expression d’une identité stratégique médiane pour certains Etats développant une réponse particulière à l’égard des contraintes auxquelles leur environnement les soumet. La voie du tiers s’affirme alors comme une alternative à la lecture classique des logiques de puissance en relations internationales. Rétablissant le tiers dans sa dimension stratégique, il s’agit d’écarter la vision d’un Etat tiers exclusivement subi et d’en appréhender les différentes déclinaisons, du tiers objet au tiers sujet.Dans cette perspective, trois modèles de tiers sont convoqués à titre illustratif. La neutralisation de l’Autriche, la finlandisation de la Finlande, et la neutralité de la Suisse. Ces trois cas d’étude ont pour vocation de démontrer de la capacité stratégique de la dénomination d’ « Etat tiers » par la mise en pratique de la grille d’analyse théorique élaborée en première instance.

The notion of "third party" is complex and pertains to a certain transdisciplinarity. The concerned definitions have however for common line to envisage it as qualifying the posture of a State away from a political or legal process. Relegated so to a supplementary rank, the third-party seems to indicate the State considered as foreign to the main mechanism at work.The purpose of this research work was to wonder about the strategic dimension of the meaning of the third as overtaking of the classic passive posture. So, the third embodies the expression of a median strategic identity for some States developing a particular answer towards the constraints to which their environment submits them. The way of the third asserts itself then as an alternative in the classic reading of the logics of power in international relations. Restoring the third in its strategic dimension, it is a question of deviating from the vision of an exclusively undergone third State and of considering the various declensions, from the third as object to the third as subject.In this perspective, three models of third are summoned to illustrative title. The neutralization of Austria, the Finlandization of Finland, and the neutrality of Switzerland. This three study cases have for vocation to demonstrate of the strategic capacity of the category of "third State" by the implementation of theoretical framework established at first instance.

Advisors/Committee Members: Cumin, David (thesis director).

Subjects/Keywords: Etat; Tiers; Stratégie; Identité stratégique; Neutralisation; Finlandisation; Neutralité; State; Third; Third-Party; Strategic identity; Neutralization; Finlandization; Neutrality; Strategy; 320

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Le Barreau, L. (2015). L’Etat tiers en relations internationales : déclinaisons d’identités stratégiques médianes : neutralisation, finlandisation, neutralité : The Third State in International Relations : declensions of median strategic identities : neutralization, Finlandization, neutrality. (Doctoral Dissertation). Université Jean Moulin – Lyon III. Retrieved from http://www.theses.fr/2015LYO30008

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Le Barreau, Lucie. “L’Etat tiers en relations internationales : déclinaisons d’identités stratégiques médianes : neutralisation, finlandisation, neutralité : The Third State in International Relations : declensions of median strategic identities : neutralization, Finlandization, neutrality.” 2015. Doctoral Dissertation, Université Jean Moulin – Lyon III. Accessed November 18, 2019. http://www.theses.fr/2015LYO30008.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Le Barreau, Lucie. “L’Etat tiers en relations internationales : déclinaisons d’identités stratégiques médianes : neutralisation, finlandisation, neutralité : The Third State in International Relations : declensions of median strategic identities : neutralization, Finlandization, neutrality.” 2015. Web. 18 Nov 2019.

Vancouver:

Le Barreau L. L’Etat tiers en relations internationales : déclinaisons d’identités stratégiques médianes : neutralisation, finlandisation, neutralité : The Third State in International Relations : declensions of median strategic identities : neutralization, Finlandization, neutrality. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Université Jean Moulin – Lyon III; 2015. [cited 2019 Nov 18]. Available from: http://www.theses.fr/2015LYO30008.

Council of Science Editors:

Le Barreau L. L’Etat tiers en relations internationales : déclinaisons d’identités stratégiques médianes : neutralisation, finlandisation, neutralité : The Third State in International Relations : declensions of median strategic identities : neutralization, Finlandization, neutrality. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Université Jean Moulin – Lyon III; 2015. Available from: http://www.theses.fr/2015LYO30008


Georgia State University

2. Rojas, Ines Nayhari. Who, How, and What? Third-Party Intervention in Venezuela.

Degree: MA, Political Science, 2007, Georgia State University

This thesis examines the impact that third-party identity and techniques have on mediation outcome. The roles of the OAS and the Carter Center in the negotiations between the Venezuelan government and the opposition (DC), during the period 2002-2003, and the implementation of the agreement in 2004 are compared as representing track I and track II actors and styles. Using a process-tracing methodology, five conflict mappings and stages of conflict are combined with the results of focused interviews to main participants of the negotiation process. The analysis shows a significant impact of third-party identity and strategies on the outcome of mediation. Moreover, the outcome is more likely to be successful when track II actors, actually track I ½, participate as mediators in the actual negotiations. The most effective strategies used by third parties, dependent on the timing of the intervention and the stage of conflict, are communication and formulation strategies. Advisors/Committee Members: Dr. Jennifer L. McCoy - Chair, Dr. Henry Carey, Dr. William Downs.

Subjects/Keywords: third-party identity; third-party strategies; communication and formulation strategies

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Rojas, I. N. (2007). Who, How, and What? Third-Party Intervention in Venezuela. (Thesis). Georgia State University. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/political_science_theses/16

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Rojas, Ines Nayhari. “Who, How, and What? Third-Party Intervention in Venezuela.” 2007. Thesis, Georgia State University. Accessed November 18, 2019. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/political_science_theses/16.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Rojas, Ines Nayhari. “Who, How, and What? Third-Party Intervention in Venezuela.” 2007. Web. 18 Nov 2019.

Vancouver:

Rojas IN. Who, How, and What? Third-Party Intervention in Venezuela. [Internet] [Thesis]. Georgia State University; 2007. [cited 2019 Nov 18]. Available from: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/political_science_theses/16.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Rojas IN. Who, How, and What? Third-Party Intervention in Venezuela. [Thesis]. Georgia State University; 2007. Available from: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/political_science_theses/16

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation


Louisiana State University

3. Porter, Marcus Allen. Third-party imagined interactions: expanding imagined interactions as false memories in understanding interactions.

Degree: PhD, Communication, 2009, Louisiana State University

Previous studies have found imagined interactions (IIs) help individuals recall past interactions and plan for future interactions. Those studies have not investigated what occurs when individuals imagine the interactions of others (third-party imagined interactions hereafter TPIIs), how the II varies with the party imagined or what happens when those imagined interactions create false views of what happened. To fill this research gap, this study proposed one research question and nine hypotheses investigating TPIIs, how they vary with the individual in the TPII, if they contribute to false memories and how they affect communication plans. A survey was conducted to gain information about the use of TPIIs and IIs to investigate the similarities. An experiment using an induced TPII, with a prisoner’s dilemma and an iterated chicken game was conducted to learn the effect of the TPII on plans to communicate. The research question found that TPIIs exist and are mostly similar to IIs in topics, imagined targets characteristics and functions. T-tests indicated a difference in frequency, valence, and variety characteristics and the catharsis function. Equivalence testing found other characteristics and functions to be equivalent. Based on social identity theory a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) found TPIIs do vary in valence and specificity with the individual’s group status. The odds of planning to cooperate with the other party in the prisoner’s dilemma when the other party was visualized cooperating was 5.6 times the odds of not. T-tests indicated greater mental effort in the TPII among individuals who developed false memories. Those with false memories were 1.8 times more likely to be competitive in the manner they communicated than those who did not have a false memory in the TPII, while A logistic regression showed people who had greater positive valence in the TPII were more likely to communicate with the other party. These results indicate in-group members are harder to imagine if no relational history is present. The more involved the TPII is the more likely the person will develop a false memory. TPIIs are used in planning for future interactions. The implication for conflict resolution is discussed.

Subjects/Keywords: Third-party imagined interactions; social identity theory; conflict; false memory; social cognition; interpersonal communication; intrapersonal communication; imagined interactions; prisoner’s dilemma; game theory; intercultural communication; intergroup communication

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Porter, M. A. (2009). Third-party imagined interactions: expanding imagined interactions as false memories in understanding interactions. (Doctoral Dissertation). Louisiana State University. Retrieved from etd-10302009-131200 ; https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1382

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Porter, Marcus Allen. “Third-party imagined interactions: expanding imagined interactions as false memories in understanding interactions.” 2009. Doctoral Dissertation, Louisiana State University. Accessed November 18, 2019. etd-10302009-131200 ; https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1382.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Porter, Marcus Allen. “Third-party imagined interactions: expanding imagined interactions as false memories in understanding interactions.” 2009. Web. 18 Nov 2019.

Vancouver:

Porter MA. Third-party imagined interactions: expanding imagined interactions as false memories in understanding interactions. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Louisiana State University; 2009. [cited 2019 Nov 18]. Available from: etd-10302009-131200 ; https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1382.

Council of Science Editors:

Porter MA. Third-party imagined interactions: expanding imagined interactions as false memories in understanding interactions. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Louisiana State University; 2009. Available from: etd-10302009-131200 ; https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1382

.