Advanced search options

Advanced Search Options 🞨

Browse by author name (“Author name starts with…”).

Find ETDs with:


Written in Published in Earliest date Latest date

Sorted by

Results per page:

You searched for subject:(gestational arrest). One record found.

Search Limiters

Last 2 Years | English Only

No search limiters apply to these results.

▼ Search Limiters

Vanderbilt University

1. Mukherjee, Sudeshna. Timing of gestational arrest prior to miscarriage.

Degree: PhD, Epidemiology, 2014, Vanderbilt University

Risk of miscarriage (i.e. a pregnancy loss before 20 completed weeks of gestation) is known to differ by race but timing of loss is not well established in the literature. The gap between biological pregnancy loss identified by ultrasound and clinical manifestation of that loss may bias effect estimates for early-pregnancy exposures associated with miscarriage. Right from the Start (RFTS) is a unique and diverse prospective pregnancy cohort that captures uniform early first-trimester ultrasound information and pregnancy-related behaviors from first-trimester interviews in order to study the distribution of this gap. Nearly 13% of women in this cohort experienced a pregnancy loss (n=697), the majority of whom have ultrasound data available (73%, n=509). Ultrasounds were conducted between 40 and 95 days gestation from last menstrual period (LMP) for this cohort. Gestational arrest prior to miscarriage was observed in 38.7% of losses (n=197). The mean gap between LMP and estimated gestational age at arrested development (GAAD) was 19.3 ± 15.0 days (median GAAD gap was 19 days). The GAAD gap did not differ by race or pregnancy intention. In order to determine if failing to account for this gap influences effect estimates we assessed exposures commonly associated with pregnancy loss. We compared models that estimated gestational age based on self-reported LMP and models that incorporated gestational age at time of arrested development (GAAD). We used bootstrap methods to determine the magnitude of bias for both models. Smoking during pregnancy was not modified by race and was not associated with miscarriage risk within this cohort for either current or former smokers compared to never smokers in either model. Stratified by race and adjusted for confounding, the protective effect of vitamin use on miscarriage risk was stronger among White women than Black women when using the LMP models (Whites aHR=0.34, 95% CI [0.21, 0.54]; Blacks aHR=0.53, 95% CI [0.33, 0.84]), while no substantial difference by race was observed with the GAAD models (Whites aHR=0.43, 95% CI [0.24, 0.76]; Blacks aHR=0.44, 95% CI [0.26, 0.74]). Models that use self-reported LMP to estimate gestational age underestimate the true value of first-trimester smoking exposure on miscarriage risk by as much as 15% for current smokers and 5% of former smokers when compared to models that use GAAD (the bootstrap bias ratio between models for current smokers ratio=0.85, 95% CI [0.75, 0.94]; for former smokers ratio=0.95, 95% CI [0.92, 0.97]). When stratified by race, the bias was nearly 20% for both Whites and Blacks for miscarriage risk associated with early pregnancy vitamin exposure (Whites bias ratio= 0.79, 95% CI [0.62, 0.87]; Blacks bias ratio=1.19, 95% CI [1.13, 1.45]). These results suggest that early-pregnancy exposures associated with miscarriage risk are influenced by proper classification of gestational arrest prior to loss, and that the magnitude and direction of bias differs by race. By more accurately identifying which insults have occurred… Advisors/Committee Members: Katherine E. Hartmann (committee member), Aaron M. Kipp (committee member), Pingsheng Wu (committee member), Digna R. Velez Edwards (Committee Chair).

Subjects/Keywords: reproductive epidemiology; misclassification and bias; miscarriage; gestational arrest

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Mukherjee, S. (2014). Timing of gestational arrest prior to miscarriage. (Doctoral Dissertation). Vanderbilt University. Retrieved from

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Mukherjee, Sudeshna. “Timing of gestational arrest prior to miscarriage.” 2014. Doctoral Dissertation, Vanderbilt University. Accessed April 16, 2021.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Mukherjee, Sudeshna. “Timing of gestational arrest prior to miscarriage.” 2014. Web. 16 Apr 2021.


Mukherjee S. Timing of gestational arrest prior to miscarriage. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Vanderbilt University; 2014. [cited 2021 Apr 16]. Available from:

Council of Science Editors:

Mukherjee S. Timing of gestational arrest prior to miscarriage. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Vanderbilt University; 2014. Available from: