Advanced search options

Advanced Search Options 🞨

Browse by author name (“Author name starts with…”).

Find ETDs with:

in
/  
in
/  
in
/  
in

Written in Published in Earliest date Latest date

Sorted by

Results per page:

Sorted by: relevance · author · university · dateNew search

You searched for subject:(court historiography). Showing records 1 – 3 of 3 total matches.

Search Limiters

Last 2 Years | English Only

No search limiters apply to these results.

▼ Search Limiters

1. Crelier, Damien. L’écriture des passions dans les Mémoires du duc de Saint-Simon : The Writting of the Passions in the Mémoires of the Duke of Saint-Simon.

Degree: Docteur es, Littérature et civilisation française, 2018, Sorbonne université

Notre thèse se propose de faire la lumière sur ce que nous appelons l’écriture des passions dans les Mémoires de Saint-Simon, au double sens de passions qui imprègnent (et infléchissent) l’écriture du mémorialiste et de passions de cour, qui sont l’un des objets privilégiés du récit historique. Il ne s’agit pas là d’une juxtaposition de sens qui serait fortuite ou contingente : notre postulat est à l’inverse que le lien entre les deux questions est essentiel et profondément dynamique. Saint Simon est assurément le produit d’une culture et d’un milieu qui le déterminent en partie ; mais, en retour, les faits et les personnages sont sous sa plume saisis à l’aune d’une sensibilité irréductiblement singulière. L’enjeu de ce travail est de montrer que la cour, telle qu’elle est évoquée et même ressuscitée par les Mémoires, est le lieu d’une effervescence passionnelle sans la prise en compte de laquelle la causalité historique est vouée à demeurer inintelligible. Dans un tel contexte, ce sont les questions hiérarchiques qui suscitent l’investissement affectif le plus intense. Cela a pour corollaire que la passion amoureuse fait de la part de Saint-Simon l’objet d’une méfiance d’ordre éthique aussi bien qu’historiographique. Il s’agit en outre de chercher à cerner la nature de l’investissement de Saint Simon dans l’écriture, et de comprendre l’un des plus grands paradoxes des Mémoires : l’exceptionnel engagement passionnel dont le récit saint-simonien est le lieu n’exclut pas qu’il soit par ailleurs traversé par un discours du dégagement, auquel nous avons souhaité restituer toute son importance.

Our doctoral thesis aims to shed light upon the writing of the passions in the “Mémoires” of the Duke of Saint Simon, and this with regard not only to the emotions which permeate (and direct) the Memorialist’s writing practices, but also with regard to the passions which dominate the Court, and which constitute one of the historical narrative’s main points of investigation. This double motif is not to be regarded as contingent or fortuitous : to the contrary, we argue that the relationship between these two questions is both essential and dynamic. Saint-Simon is assuredly the product of a cultural environment that determines him in part ; in return, however, the deeds and characters he consigns are penned with an irreducibly unique sensitivity. The issue at hand is to illustrate that the Court, as it is described and even ressuscitated by the “Mémoires”, is the scene of a passionate effervescence which must be taken into account if elements of historical causality are to be understood. In this context, it is in issues of courtly hierarchy that the greatest emotional stakes are invested ; conversely, love as a passion is portrayed as an object of suspicion that is both ethical and historiographical in nature. Finally, we have sought to define the character of Saint-Simon’s own involvement in the writing process, and to understand one of the greatest paradoxes of the “Mémoires” : the Memorialist’s extraordinarily impassioned…

Advisors/Committee Members: Dandrey, Patrick (thesis director).

Subjects/Keywords: Saint-Simon; Mémoires; Passions; Historiographie; Émotions; Affectivité; Cour; Louis XIV; Saint-Simon; Mémoires; Passions; Historiography; Emotions; Affectivity; Court; Louis XIV

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Crelier, D. (2018). L’écriture des passions dans les Mémoires du duc de Saint-Simon : The Writting of the Passions in the Mémoires of the Duke of Saint-Simon. (Doctoral Dissertation). Sorbonne université. Retrieved from http://www.theses.fr/2018SORUL016

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Crelier, Damien. “L’écriture des passions dans les Mémoires du duc de Saint-Simon : The Writting of the Passions in the Mémoires of the Duke of Saint-Simon.” 2018. Doctoral Dissertation, Sorbonne université. Accessed April 05, 2020. http://www.theses.fr/2018SORUL016.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Crelier, Damien. “L’écriture des passions dans les Mémoires du duc de Saint-Simon : The Writting of the Passions in the Mémoires of the Duke of Saint-Simon.” 2018. Web. 05 Apr 2020.

Vancouver:

Crelier D. L’écriture des passions dans les Mémoires du duc de Saint-Simon : The Writting of the Passions in the Mémoires of the Duke of Saint-Simon. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Sorbonne université; 2018. [cited 2020 Apr 05]. Available from: http://www.theses.fr/2018SORUL016.

Council of Science Editors:

Crelier D. L’écriture des passions dans les Mémoires du duc de Saint-Simon : The Writting of the Passions in the Mémoires of the Duke of Saint-Simon. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Sorbonne université; 2018. Available from: http://www.theses.fr/2018SORUL016

2. Deželak Trojar, Monika. Janez Ludvik Schönleben (1618-1681) v luči arhivskih virov, njegovega zgodovinskega in retoričnega opusa.

Degree: 2015, Univerza v Mariboru

Doktorska disertacija ima tri glavne dele. Prvi del disertacije izrisuje življenjsko pot Janeza Ludvika Schönlebna, ki se je začela 16. novembra 1618 v Ljubljani. Janez Ludvik Schönleben je v letih 1629/30–1634/35 obiskoval jezuitsko gimnazijo Ljubljani in 26. oktobra 1635 vstopil v jezuitski red. V času šolanja in redovne formacije v letih 1635–1653 je bival in deloval v različnih kolegijih Avstrijske jezuitske province: na Dunaju, v Leobnu, Gradcu, Kremsu, Linzu, Passauu, Judenburgu in Ljubljani. Po končanem študiju teologije je bil najpozneje novembra 1648 na Dunaju posvečen v duhovnika in je nato v šolskem letu 1648/49 v tamkajšnjem kolegiju poučeval retoriko in bil hkrati notar Filozofske fakultete. Z Dunaja je odšel v Judenburg, od tam je oktobra 1650 prišel za šolskega prefekta v Ljubljano. Iz Ljubljane je oktobra 1651 odšel v Gradec. V tem obdobju se je začela kriza v njegovem jezuitskem poslanstvu, zato je po 20. aprilu 1652 odšel v Linz, od tam pa nekoliko pozneje na Dunaj. V šolskem letu 1652/53 je na dunajski Filozofski fakulteti poučeval logiko, septembra 1653 pa je izstopil iz reda. Z Dunaja je odšel v Padovo, kjer je že 19. decembra 1653 opravil doktorski izpit iz teologije. Spomladi leta 1654 se je vrnil v Ljubljano in bil 6. maja 1654 imenovan za ljubljanskega stolnega dekana. To poslanstvo je opravljal do 3. julija 1667. Schönleben je do leta 1669 ostal v Ljubljani, 13. oktobra 1669 pa ga je cesar izbral za dolenjskega arhidiakona in župnika v Ribnici. V Ribnici je kljub težavam vztrajal do konca leta 1675 ali začetka leta 1676. Po vrnitvi v Ljubljano se je v letih 1676–1681 posvečal predvsem pripravi zgodovinskih in genealoških del. Schönleben je umrl 15. oktobra 1681 v Ljubljani. Biografskemu delu sledi pregledna predstavitev Schönlebnovega opusa. Poglavje o Schönlebnu kot zgodovinarju se začne s kratkim pregledom zgodovinopisja v 16. in 17. stoletju. Poudarek tega dela je na predstavitvi in ovrednotenju njegovih natisnjenih del. V ospredju je njegovo najpomembnejše zgodovinsko delo Carniolia antiqua et nova, sledi pa mu spis Aemona vindicata. Posebej sta izpostavljeni njegovi deli, ki obravnavata izvor in veličino habsburške vladarske hiše: Dissertatio polemica de prima origine augustissimae domus Habspurgo-Austriacae in Annus sanctus Habspurgo-Austriacus. Predstavitev natisnjenega opusa zaključujejo njegove genealogije kranjskih plemiških družin Gallenberg, Ursini-Blagaj, Attems in Auersperg. Poseben doprinos k poznavanju Schönlebna kot zgodovinarja prinaša pregled in oris njegovih del, ki so ostala v rokopisu. Disertacijo zaključuje poglavje o Schönlebnu kot literatu, pozornost je namenjena njegovim zgodnjim govorom iz jezuitskega obdobja in njegovim zbirkam pridig. Postopek zorenja Schönlebna kot pridigarja je prikazan skozi tri obdobja: zgodnje obdobje (1642–1653), obdobje aktivnega pridiganja (1654–1676) in obdobje zmanjšane pridigarske aktivnosti (po letu 1676). Predstavljeni so Schönlebnovi ohranjeni jezuitski govori, temu pa je dodan tudi popis po naslovu znanih, a neohranjenih govorov.… Advisors/Committee Members: Hozjan, Andrej.

Subjects/Keywords: Kranjska; Ljubljana; 17. stoletje; Avstrijska jezuitska provinca; jezuiti; Janez Ludvik Schönleben (1618–1681); (Schönlebnova) biografija; (Schönlebnov) opus; barok; zgodovinopisje; deželno zgodovinopisje; dvorno zgodovinopisje; retorika; retorska proza; pridiga; jezuitska pridiga; Carniola; Ljubljana; seventeenth century; Austrian Jesuit Province; Jesuits; Johann Ludwig Schönleben (1618–1681); (Schönleben’s) biography; (Schönleben’s) oeuvre; Baroque; historiography; provincial historiography; court historiography; rhetoric; rhetorical prose; sermon; Jesuit sermon; info:eu-repo/classification/udc/27-789.5:929Schönleben J. L.:930.2(043.3)

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Deželak Trojar, M. (2015). Janez Ludvik Schönleben (1618-1681) v luči arhivskih virov, njegovega zgodovinskega in retoričnega opusa. (Doctoral Dissertation). Univerza v Mariboru. Retrieved from https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=55468 ; https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?id=83084&dn= ; https://plus.si.cobiss.net/opac7/bib/21744904?lang=sl

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Deželak Trojar, Monika. “Janez Ludvik Schönleben (1618-1681) v luči arhivskih virov, njegovega zgodovinskega in retoričnega opusa.” 2015. Doctoral Dissertation, Univerza v Mariboru. Accessed April 05, 2020. https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=55468 ; https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?id=83084&dn= ; https://plus.si.cobiss.net/opac7/bib/21744904?lang=sl.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Deželak Trojar, Monika. “Janez Ludvik Schönleben (1618-1681) v luči arhivskih virov, njegovega zgodovinskega in retoričnega opusa.” 2015. Web. 05 Apr 2020.

Vancouver:

Deželak Trojar M. Janez Ludvik Schönleben (1618-1681) v luči arhivskih virov, njegovega zgodovinskega in retoričnega opusa. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Univerza v Mariboru; 2015. [cited 2020 Apr 05]. Available from: https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=55468 ; https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?id=83084&dn= ; https://plus.si.cobiss.net/opac7/bib/21744904?lang=sl.

Council of Science Editors:

Deželak Trojar M. Janez Ludvik Schönleben (1618-1681) v luči arhivskih virov, njegovega zgodovinskega in retoričnega opusa. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Univerza v Mariboru; 2015. Available from: https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=55468 ; https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?id=83084&dn= ; https://plus.si.cobiss.net/opac7/bib/21744904?lang=sl

3. Mekeel, Lance. From Irreverent to Revered: How Alfred Jarry¿s <i>Ubu Roi</i> and the "U-Effect" Changed Theatre History.

Degree: PhD, Theatre and Film, 2013, Bowling Green State University

For decades, theatre history textbooks and other influential studies on theatre history have positioned <i>Ubu Roi</i>, Alfred Jarry’s 1896 avant-garde “classic,” as the beginning or originator of the historical avant-garde and precursor to the playwrights considered as part of Martin Esslin’s “Theatre of the Absurd.” Much of this reputation is built on inaccurate accounts of the premiere production, put down by those involved or in attendance, who had particular aims in reporting the event in the ways they did. Those accounts would end up being put to use as the base on which various scholars would establish the premiere of <i>Ubu Roi</i> as the ignition of the historical avant-garde. This dissertation is a poststructuralist historiographical study in which I analyze the various statements made, first by participants and witnesses to the premiere production, and then by scholars and critics who take those accounts as factual, that place <i>Ubu Roi</i> on a path to legitimization and inclusion in the Western canon. In my research, I examine initial accounts of the premiere production, early post mortem accounts of Jarry’s life, the proliferation of the character Ubu in early twentieth century French society, French and English critical and biographical studies of Jarry and <i>Ubu Roi</i>, anthologies and edited collections of <i>Ubu Roi</i>, and reviews and other related materials of several key French revivals and over fifteen English-language revivals of the play.I mark the emergence of three specific strategies that grew out of tactics Jarry employed at the premiere. I demonstrate how the conflation of Jarry with his character Ubu, made possible by his extraordinary performance of self at the premiere, the notion of the production’s innate ability to produce scandal, and the idea of Jarry’s implementation of a “revolutionary” dramaturgy, are all used to make <i>Ubu Roi</i> the example par excellence of avant-garde drama. I unite these three strategies under the title “U-Effect” to describe the subject position assumed by those scholars and critics that privilege <i>Ubu Roi</i> as the epitome of the theatrical avant-garde. With this as my guiding mode of critique, I examine such issues as the practice of writing Jarry’s biography, how the inclusion of <i>Ubu Roi</i> in anthologies of drama and histories of the avant-garde has affected the construction of theatre history, and how productions of the play reinforce, maintain, or subvert the play’s power in scholarly and cultural discourse. Encouragingly, some recent studies have challenged <i>Ubu Roi</i>’s seat at the head of the avant-garde, and in this study I underline how scholars have posed those challenges. It is important to expose the process through which <i>Ubu Roi</i> has attained its chief position in the avant-garde in order to be able to see more clearly whether there are other narratives that may provide students of theatre history—if not a complete image or story of the avant-garde—at least a more nuanced, and varied one. Advisors/Committee Members: Chambers, Jonathan (Advisor).

Subjects/Keywords: Theater; Theater History; Theater Studies; theatre history; theatre historiography; Modernism; avant-garde; Alfred Jarry; Ubu Roi; avant-garde theatre; post-structuralism; Royal Court Theatre; Peter Brook; Lincoln Center Theater; theatre studies

…172 ix Section B: Ubu and his Royal Court: Ubu Makes His Presence Known in the UK… …Historiography. I realized that in his second chapter, “Cultural Histories: The Case of Alfred Jarry’s… …Iain Cuthbertson’s Royal Court Theatre production of Ubu Roi; Peter Brook’s 1977, 1978, and… …or events in The Cambridge Introduction to Theatre Historiography. 8 creation of a… …Magelssen argue in the introduction to their book, Theater Historiography: Critical Interventions… 

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Mekeel, L. (2013). From Irreverent to Revered: How Alfred Jarry¿s <i>Ubu Roi</i> and the "U-Effect" Changed Theatre History. (Doctoral Dissertation). Bowling Green State University. Retrieved from http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1371827527

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Mekeel, Lance. “From Irreverent to Revered: How Alfred Jarry¿s <i>Ubu Roi</i> and the "U-Effect" Changed Theatre History.” 2013. Doctoral Dissertation, Bowling Green State University. Accessed April 05, 2020. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1371827527.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Mekeel, Lance. “From Irreverent to Revered: How Alfred Jarry¿s <i>Ubu Roi</i> and the "U-Effect" Changed Theatre History.” 2013. Web. 05 Apr 2020.

Vancouver:

Mekeel L. From Irreverent to Revered: How Alfred Jarry¿s <i>Ubu Roi</i> and the "U-Effect" Changed Theatre History. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Bowling Green State University; 2013. [cited 2020 Apr 05]. Available from: http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1371827527.

Council of Science Editors:

Mekeel L. From Irreverent to Revered: How Alfred Jarry¿s <i>Ubu Roi</i> and the "U-Effect" Changed Theatre History. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Bowling Green State University; 2013. Available from: http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1371827527

.