subject:(comparative constitutional law)

University of Melbourne

1. Carter, Anne Clare. Proportionality and the proof of facts in Australian constitutional adjudication.

Degree: 2018, University of Melbourne

► This thesis examines the relationship between proportionality and facts in constitutional adjudication. The Australian High Court has developed various tests of constitutional validity that incorporate… (more)

▼ This thesis examines the relationship between proportionality and facts in constitutional adjudication. The Australian High Court has developed various tests of constitutional validity that incorporate elements of the tripartite proportionality formula of suitability, necessity and balancing. Yet the scope and content of these tests, including the role of facts, remains uncertain. In addition, while the global spread of proportionality has attracted considerable academic attention, there has been little sustained analysis of the role of facts. In light of this, the thesis seeks to understand the extent to which factual inquiry matters in proportionality reasoning in Australia, both conceptually and in practice. Following this primary research question, the thesis considers how courts currently deal with facts in proportionality reasoning and, second, how an understanding of the nature and significance of facts might assist in the processes of fact-finding. The thesis answers these questions by analysing the conceptual structure of proportionality and the relevance of facts within each of the three stages. To understand the nature of these facts, it evaluates various taxonomies of fact that have been developed and considers how these might apply to proportionality reasoning. Building on this conceptual foundation, the thesis examines how proportionality has been applied by courts in practice. While the primary focus is on Australian constitutional adjudication, the thesis also draws on the experiences of Germany, Canada and South Africa. These comparative perspectives demonstrate how the link between proportionality and facts has been understood in practice, and potentially inform the application and development of proportionality reasoning in Australia. The thesis argues that facts are relevant to all three stages of proportionality reasoning but are likely to be most prominent at the necessity stage. The Australian and comparative jurisprudence illustrates, however, that there is variation in the extent to which questions of fact have been recognised in practice; courts do not always openly acknowledge the factual underpinnings of proportionality and there has been considerable judicial disagreement about whether evidence is necessary or appropriate to inform assessments of proportionality. It is argued, further, that in order to understand the significance of facts there is a need to distinguish more clearly between the types of empirical claims that arise at the different stages of proportionality analysis. While it is possible to draw on existing categorisations of fact that have been developed, such as legislative or constitutional facts, proportionality contains its own distinctive set of questions. It is therefore instructive to consider the facts that arise at each stage separately. The thesis concludes by considering the procedural implications that result from this contextual approach to facts.

Subjects/Keywords: proportionality; facts; constitutional law; comparative constitutional law; evidence law; litigation

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Carter, A. C. (2018). Proportionality and the proof of facts in Australian constitutional adjudication. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Melbourne. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11343/214526

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Carter, Anne Clare. “Proportionality and the proof of facts in Australian constitutional adjudication.” 2018. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Melbourne. Accessed March 06, 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/11343/214526.

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Carter, Anne Clare. “Proportionality and the proof of facts in Australian constitutional adjudication.” 2018. Web. 06 Mar 2021.

Vancouver:

Carter AC. Proportionality and the proof of facts in Australian constitutional adjudication. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Melbourne; 2018. [cited 2021 Mar 06]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11343/214526.

Council of Science Editors:

Carter AC. Proportionality and the proof of facts in Australian constitutional adjudication. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Melbourne; 2018. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11343/214526

University of Toronto

2. BĂŠdard Rubin, Jean-Christophe. Precedents in Canadian and American Constitutional Culture: A Comparative Essay.

Degree: 2016, University of Toronto

URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1807/91259

►

This thesis explores the place of constitutional precedents in contemporary Canadian and American constitutional culture. The author identifies four elements that explain the relative indifference… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Comparative law; constitutional culture; Constitutional law; Precedents; proportionality; stare decisis; 0398

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

BĂŠdard Rubin, J. (2016). Precedents in Canadian and American Constitutional Culture: A Comparative Essay. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Toronto. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1807/91259

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

BĂŠdard Rubin, Jean-Christophe. “Precedents in Canadian and American Constitutional Culture: A Comparative Essay.” 2016. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Toronto. Accessed March 06, 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/1807/91259.

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

BĂŠdard Rubin, Jean-Christophe. “Precedents in Canadian and American Constitutional Culture: A Comparative Essay.” 2016. Web. 06 Mar 2021.

Vancouver:

BĂŠdard Rubin J. Precedents in Canadian and American Constitutional Culture: A Comparative Essay. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Toronto; 2016. [cited 2021 Mar 06]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1807/91259.

Council of Science Editors:

BĂŠdard Rubin J. Precedents in Canadian and American Constitutional Culture: A Comparative Essay. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Toronto; 2016. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1807/91259

University of Oxford

3. Quesada-Alpízar, Tomás. Informal mandates & judicial power : the constitutional courts of Costa Rica, Chile, and Uruguay (1990-2016).

Degree: PhD, 2017, University of Oxford

URL: https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:8c42baa4-cdd4-4e05-86a4-4725074244c5 ; https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.740895

► Standard explanations of judicial behaviour (i.e. legal, rational-choice, attitudinal, and institutional models) are overly static and exogenous, interested in instances of sudden change in judicial… (more)

▼ Standard explanations of judicial behaviour (i.e. legal, rational-choice, attitudinal, and institutional models) are overly static and exogenous, interested in instances of sudden change in judicial behaviour, as triggered by appointments, legal reforms, or shifts in the political context. While these models are useful in understanding the external incentives affecting judicial behaviour, they are unsuitable for explaining sustained judicial empowerment beyond temporary strategic calculations. In response, recent 'ideational' approaches, especially studying constitutional courts, highlight the importance of judges' ideas about their role - not their ideologies or policy preferences - in instilling a mission, rather than an incentive-oriented view of the judicial function. Yet, despite their more dynamic approaches, those methods have overlooked how ideational change in the 'outside' world translates into change 'inside' this type of courts. Due to those limitations, this study proposes a complementary explanation of judicial empowerment: a theory of informal mandates and endogenous empowerment. Viewed through this lens, change and variation in judicial empowerment within and across cases are explained by the construction, expansion, and endurance - or absence and collapse - of collective internal understandings of the court's role and mission. Such understandings are developed as legal doctrines and articulated under broader informal mandates by 'mission leaders'. Gradually, these informal mandates can expand and gather majority support from strategic partnerships formed between 'mission leaders' and 'supporting leaders' - usually justices with high seniority. The more these informal mandates expand and endure inside the court, the less exogenous factors and strategic incentives over-determine its behaviour in the long-run. Judicial empowerment, thus, is better understood as a process that develops and expands gradually, endogenously, and informally, with a mission-oriented purpose. The theory is applied in the constitutional tribunals of Costa Rica, Chile, and Uruguay from 1990 to 2016. These countries have similar rule-of-law conditions, but their constitutional tribunals differ considerably in the strength and endurance of their informal mandates and, as a result, have attained different levels of judicial empowerment.

Subjects/Keywords: 320; Judicial power; Judicial politics; Comparative Constitutional Law; Constitutional courts

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Quesada-Alpízar, T. (2017). Informal mandates & judicial power : the constitutional courts of Costa Rica, Chile, and Uruguay (1990-2016). (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Oxford. Retrieved from https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:8c42baa4-cdd4-4e05-86a4-4725074244c5 ; https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.740895

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Quesada-Alpízar, Tomás. “Informal mandates & judicial power : the constitutional courts of Costa Rica, Chile, and Uruguay (1990-2016).” 2017. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Oxford. Accessed March 06, 2021. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:8c42baa4-cdd4-4e05-86a4-4725074244c5 ; https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.740895.

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Quesada-Alpízar, Tomás. “Informal mandates & judicial power : the constitutional courts of Costa Rica, Chile, and Uruguay (1990-2016).” 2017. Web. 06 Mar 2021.

Vancouver:

Quesada-Alpízar T. Informal mandates & judicial power : the constitutional courts of Costa Rica, Chile, and Uruguay (1990-2016). [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Oxford; 2017. [cited 2021 Mar 06]. Available from: https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:8c42baa4-cdd4-4e05-86a4-4725074244c5 ; https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.740895.

Council of Science Editors:

Quesada-Alpízar T. Informal mandates & judicial power : the constitutional courts of Costa Rica, Chile, and Uruguay (1990-2016). [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Oxford; 2017. Available from: https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:8c42baa4-cdd4-4e05-86a4-4725074244c5 ; https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.740895

University of Notre Dame

4. Kevin G. Vance. American Religious Liberty Jurisprudence in Comparative Perspective</h1>.

Degree: Political Science, 2017, University of Notre Dame

URL: https://curate.nd.edu/show/xw42n58766h

► This dissertation argues that the modern U.S. Supreme Court’s religious liberty jurisprudence is incoherent because its free exercise jurisprudence, which sometimes requires religion to… (more)

▼ This dissertation argues that the modern U.S. Supreme Court’s religious liberty jurisprudence is incoherent because its free exercise jurisprudence, which sometimes requires religion to be shown favor through various accommodations, clashes with its establishment clause jurisprudence, which forbids the state from favoring religion. The instability of the court’s religious liberty precedents manifests itself in the inability of the current court to agree on a clear approach reconciling the two religion clauses. One reason for the current contradictory approach is that there was no consensus about the juridical meaning of religious liberty at the time of the Founding or of the framing of the First Amendment’s religion clauses. While the Founders generally agreed that there was a natural right to religious liberty, they disagreed about how much government should accommodate religion from otherwise valid laws. They also disagreed about the extent to which government could support religion and religious institutions. Given the unsettled nature of American religious liberty jurisprudence, this dissertation proposes looking to the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany’s religious liberty jurisprudence for more insight. The dissertation argues that the German court shows how various aspects of the freedom of religion can be judicially interpreted in a more coherent way. The Federal Constitutional Court has interpreted its analogous constitutional protections for religious liberty to require the state to show favor to the religious and ideological life of the nation’s citizens. Therefore, the German court does not forbid government from showing favor to religion in general, so it avoids a contradiction with its generous approach to religious accommodations. This dissertation argues that the German court’s interpretation is superior, even apart from its internal consistency, and that the American court would be well advised to adopt an approach more like the German Constitutional Court. Advisors/Committee Members: Michael Zuckert, Research Director.

Subjects/Keywords: German Constitutional Court; Jurisprudence; Religious Liberty; Comparative Constitutional Law

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Vance, K. G. (2017). American Religious Liberty Jurisprudence in Comparative Perspective</h1>. (Thesis). University of Notre Dame. Retrieved from https://curate.nd.edu/show/xw42n58766h

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Vance, Kevin G.. “American Religious Liberty Jurisprudence in Comparative Perspective</h1>.” 2017. Thesis, University of Notre Dame. Accessed March 06, 2021. https://curate.nd.edu/show/xw42n58766h.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Vance, Kevin G.. “American Religious Liberty Jurisprudence in Comparative Perspective</h1>.” 2017. Web. 06 Mar 2021.

Vancouver:

Vance KG. American Religious Liberty Jurisprudence in Comparative Perspective</h1>. [Internet] [Thesis]. University of Notre Dame; 2017. [cited 2021 Mar 06]. Available from: https://curate.nd.edu/show/xw42n58766h.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Vance KG. American Religious Liberty Jurisprudence in Comparative Perspective</h1>. [Thesis]. University of Notre Dame; 2017. Available from: https://curate.nd.edu/show/xw42n58766h

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

University of Oxford

5. Wheatle, Se-shauna Monique. The impact of implied constitutional principles on fundamental rights adjudication in common law jurisdictions.

Degree: PhD, 2013, University of Oxford

URL: http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:e97b81cb-13f5-426c-8a94-59c3fc139055 ; https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.658396

► This thesis explores the roles played by implied constitutional principles in fundamental rights cases in the common law jurisdictions of Canada, Australia, the Commonwealth Caribbean,… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: 340.5; Constitutional & administrative law; Human rights; Comparative Law; constitutional principles; implied principles; common law; constitutional law

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Wheatle, S. M. (2013). The impact of implied constitutional principles on fundamental rights adjudication in common law jurisdictions. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Oxford. Retrieved from http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:e97b81cb-13f5-426c-8a94-59c3fc139055 ; https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.658396

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Wheatle, Se-shauna Monique. “The impact of implied constitutional principles on fundamental rights adjudication in common law jurisdictions.” 2013. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Oxford. Accessed March 06, 2021. http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:e97b81cb-13f5-426c-8a94-59c3fc139055 ; https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.658396.

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Wheatle, Se-shauna Monique. “The impact of implied constitutional principles on fundamental rights adjudication in common law jurisdictions.” 2013. Web. 06 Mar 2021.

Vancouver:

Wheatle SM. The impact of implied constitutional principles on fundamental rights adjudication in common law jurisdictions. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Oxford; 2013. [cited 2021 Mar 06]. Available from: http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:e97b81cb-13f5-426c-8a94-59c3fc139055 ; https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.658396.

Council of Science Editors:

Wheatle SM. The impact of implied constitutional principles on fundamental rights adjudication in common law jurisdictions. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Oxford; 2013. Available from: http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:e97b81cb-13f5-426c-8a94-59c3fc139055 ; https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.658396

Columbia University

6. Bar-Siman-Tov, Ittai. Separating Law-Making from Sausage-Making: The Case for Judicial Review of the Legislative Process.

Degree: 2011, Columbia University

URL: https://doi.org/10.7916/D8HM5GMN

► Inspired, perhaps, by the old adage that "people who like sausages and respect the law should never watch either being made," there is significant resistance… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Legislation; Comparative law; Jurisprudence; Constitutional law; Political science; Judicial review; Law

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Bar-Siman-Tov, I. (2011). Separating Law-Making from Sausage-Making: The Case for Judicial Review of the Legislative Process. (Doctoral Dissertation). Columbia University. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.7916/D8HM5GMN

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Bar-Siman-Tov, Ittai. “Separating Law-Making from Sausage-Making: The Case for Judicial Review of the Legislative Process.” 2011. Doctoral Dissertation, Columbia University. Accessed March 06, 2021. https://doi.org/10.7916/D8HM5GMN.

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Bar-Siman-Tov, Ittai. “Separating Law-Making from Sausage-Making: The Case for Judicial Review of the Legislative Process.” 2011. Web. 06 Mar 2021.

Vancouver:

Bar-Siman-Tov I. Separating Law-Making from Sausage-Making: The Case for Judicial Review of the Legislative Process. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Columbia University; 2011. [cited 2021 Mar 06]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.7916/D8HM5GMN.

Council of Science Editors:

Bar-Siman-Tov I. Separating Law-Making from Sausage-Making: The Case for Judicial Review of the Legislative Process. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Columbia University; 2011. Available from: https://doi.org/10.7916/D8HM5GMN

University of Oxford

7. Coxon, Benedict Francis. Interpretive provisions in human rights legislation : a comparative analysis.

Degree: PhD, 2013, University of Oxford

URL: http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:d0a5ddca-9293-4204-b22b-417cdf829464 ; https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.627801

► This thesis considers interpretive provisions in human rights legislation in the United Kingdom (UK), New Zealand and two Australian jurisdictions: the Australian Capital Territory and… (more)

▼ This thesis considers interpretive provisions in human rights legislation in the United Kingdom (UK), New Zealand and two Australian jurisdictions: the Australian Capital Territory and the State of Victoria. It deals with the relationship between certain common law interpretive principles which protect human rights and the rules under the interpretive provisions. It also considers what effect the interpretive provisions have on the overall approach to statutory interpretation, particularly in terms of their impact on the roles of intention and purpose. One of the themes of the thesis is that it is possible to identify a common methodology for the application of the various interpretive provisions. This is facilitated by an emphasis on the concept of purpose, which is flexible and capable of being identified and applied at higher levels of abstraction than the concept of intention as commonly applied by the courts. Despite this common methodology, the results of attempts at legislative rights-consistent interpretation in the relevant jurisdictions differ. We shall see that the UK courts have taken a broader interpretive approach than have their New Zealand and Australian counterparts. This will be explained by reference to the respective contexts of the human rights legislation in each jurisdiction, particularly in terms of legislative history. It will be argued that the purpose of the UK legislation to provide remedies in domestic courts for breaches of the European Convention on Human Rights provides the basis for the UK courts’ approach. The absence of this factor is the primary point of distinction between the UK on the one hand, and New Zealand and Australia on the other, though other issues will be explored. Finally, while as a matter of the interpretation of the UK legislation, and especially of the relevant interpretive provision, the approach of the UK courts is defensible, the significant risk to the principle of legal certainty which it poses will be highlighted.

Subjects/Keywords: 342.08; Law; Comparative Law; Constitutional & administrative law; Human rights; statutory interpretation

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Coxon, B. F. (2013). Interpretive provisions in human rights legislation : a comparative analysis. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Oxford. Retrieved from http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:d0a5ddca-9293-4204-b22b-417cdf829464 ; https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.627801

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Coxon, Benedict Francis. “Interpretive provisions in human rights legislation : a comparative analysis.” 2013. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Oxford. Accessed March 06, 2021. http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:d0a5ddca-9293-4204-b22b-417cdf829464 ; https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.627801.

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Coxon, Benedict Francis. “Interpretive provisions in human rights legislation : a comparative analysis.” 2013. Web. 06 Mar 2021.

Vancouver:

Coxon BF. Interpretive provisions in human rights legislation : a comparative analysis. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Oxford; 2013. [cited 2021 Mar 06]. Available from: http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:d0a5ddca-9293-4204-b22b-417cdf829464 ; https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.627801.

Council of Science Editors:

Coxon BF. Interpretive provisions in human rights legislation : a comparative analysis. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Oxford; 2013. Available from: http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:d0a5ddca-9293-4204-b22b-417cdf829464 ; https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.627801

University of Nairobi

8. Franceschi, Luis G. The constitutional regulation of the foreign affairs power; the Kenyan experience in a comparative perspective .

Degree: 1999, University of Nairobi

URL: http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/15350

No abstract

Subjects/Keywords: Constitutional law; International comparative law

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Franceschi, L. G. (1999). The constitutional regulation of the foreign affairs power; the Kenyan experience in a comparative perspective . (Thesis). University of Nairobi. Retrieved from http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/15350

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Franceschi, Luis G. “The constitutional regulation of the foreign affairs power; the Kenyan experience in a comparative perspective .” 1999. Thesis, University of Nairobi. Accessed March 06, 2021. http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/15350.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Franceschi, Luis G. “The constitutional regulation of the foreign affairs power; the Kenyan experience in a comparative perspective .” 1999. Web. 06 Mar 2021.

Vancouver:

Franceschi LG. The constitutional regulation of the foreign affairs power; the Kenyan experience in a comparative perspective . [Internet] [Thesis]. University of Nairobi; 1999. [cited 2021 Mar 06]. Available from: http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/15350.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Franceschi LG. The constitutional regulation of the foreign affairs power; the Kenyan experience in a comparative perspective . [Thesis]. University of Nairobi; 1999. Available from: http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/15350

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Stellenbosch University

9. Swanepoel, Jan - Harm. Constitutional property law in Central Eastern European jurisdictions: A comparative analysis.

Degree: LLD, Public Law, 2016, Stellenbosch University

URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/100343

►

ENGLISH ABSTRACT : This dissertation investigates three areas of constitutional property law doctrine, namely the concept of property for constitutional purposes, the distinction between deprivation… (more)

▼

ENGLISH ABSTRACT : This dissertation investigates three areas of constitutional property law doctrine, namely the concept of property for constitutional purposes, the distinction between deprivation and expropriation and the application of the proportionality principle as a means of determining the legitimacy of interferences with property. More specifically, it is determined how these three doctrinal areas are approached in the established constitutional democracies of Germany, the United States of America, the principles developed by the European Court of Human Rights, as well as relatively young constitutional democracies in Central Eastern Europe and South Africa. The respective German and US law approaches to the three doctrinal areas differ in certain aspects. Interestingly, while their points of departure differ, they reach similar conclusions in some instances. These two jurisdictions are presented as two points on a continuum of approaches to the three doctrinal areas, with the aim of determining whether the constitutional democracies in Central Eastern Europe and in South Africa resemble an approach closer to German or US law. The principles of the European Court of Human Rights regarding the three doctrinal areas are also investigated because they represent an alternative framework that influences the development of constitutional property law in the younger constitutional democracies, particularly in Central Eastern Europe because of their links to the European Union. Generally speaking, in relation to the three doctrinal areas, the dissertation concludes that on the continuum between German and US law, the constitutional democracies in Central Eastern Europe and South Africa seem to follow an approach that resembles German law rather than US law, although no explicit reference is made in this regard.

AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING : Hierdie proefskrif ondersoek drie gebiede van grondwetlike eiendomsreg-leerstelling, naamlik die konsep van eiendom vir grondwetlike doeleindes, die onderskeid tussen ontneming en onteiening en die toepassing van die proporsionaliteitsbeginsel as meganisme om die legitimiteit van inmenging met eiendom te bepaal. Die ondersoek is verder gerig op hoe hierdie drie leerstellingsgebiede in die meer gevestigde grondwetlike demokrasieë van Duitsland en die Verenigde State van Amerika en die beginsels ontwikkel deur die Europese Hof van Menseregte benader word, vergeleke relatief jong grondwetlike demokrasieë in Sentraal-Oos-Europa en in Suid Afrika. Die onderskeie Duitse en Amerikaanse benaderings verskil met betrekking tot sekere aspekte. Interessant genoeg, verskil hul uitgangspunte in bepaalde opsigte en tog word soortgelykte gevolgtrekkings getref. Wat die drie leerstellingsgebiede betref, verteenwoordig hierdie twee jurisdiksies dus twee punte op ŉ kontinuum. Onderliggend aan hierdie ondersoek is die vraag of demokrasieë van Sentraal-Oos- Europa en Suid-Afrika se benaderings vergelykbaar is met die Duitse of eerder die Amerikaanse reg. Die…

Advisors/Committee Members: Boggenpoel, Zsa-Zsa, Van der Walt, Andre, Stellenbosch University. Faculty of Law. Dept. of Public Law.

Subjects/Keywords: Constitutional law; Property; Comparative law; Central Eastern Europe; Property law; UCTD; Right of property

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Swanepoel, J. -. H. (2016). Constitutional property law in Central Eastern European jurisdictions: A comparative analysis. (Thesis). Stellenbosch University. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/100343

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Swanepoel, Jan - Harm. “Constitutional property law in Central Eastern European jurisdictions: A comparative analysis.” 2016. Thesis, Stellenbosch University. Accessed March 06, 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/100343.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Swanepoel, Jan - Harm. “Constitutional property law in Central Eastern European jurisdictions: A comparative analysis.” 2016. Web. 06 Mar 2021.

Vancouver:

Swanepoel J-H. Constitutional property law in Central Eastern European jurisdictions: A comparative analysis. [Internet] [Thesis]. Stellenbosch University; 2016. [cited 2021 Mar 06]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/100343.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Swanepoel J-H. Constitutional property law in Central Eastern European jurisdictions: A comparative analysis. [Thesis]. Stellenbosch University; 2016. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/100343

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

10. Vouvonikos, Evangelos - Orestis. Η απαγόρευση των κομματικών εκδηλώσεων των δικαστικών λειτουργών σύμφωνα με την Ελληνική και την Ευρωπαϊκή νομοθεσία και νομολογία.

Degree: 2020, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens; Εθνικό και Καποδιστριακό Πανεπιστήμιο Αθηνών (ΕΚΠΑ)

URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10442/hedi/48698

►

The present study deals with the systematic and historical interpretation of the ban on party events of court officials, based on article 29§3 ed. a)… (more)

▼

The present study deals with the systematic and historical interpretation of the ban on party events of court officials, based on article 29§3 ed. a) of the current Constitution. On this basis, the study attempts the interpretive approach of the relevant provisions of the Code of Organization of Courts and the Status of Judicial Officers and mainly of article 91§4 par. in agrrement with the constitutional provisions. In addition, the study includes a comparative study of the conditions for the public expression of the opinion of judicial officials in accordance with the ECHR and the regulations of European legislation. As it can be concluded, a narrow interpretation of the investigated ban is required, which applies to political parties that have been established under the terms of Law 3023/2002 and may not be extended to other forms of aggregation, such as trade unions. At the same time, from the interpretative approach of the ECHR to the protection of the free expression of opinion according to article 10§1 of the ECHR, a peculiar right of judicial officials also emerges in political discourse. A right determined through two well-known criteria of the case law of the ECtHR: the restraint of judicial officers during their out-of-office expression and the risk of being prevented from participating in public debate.

Η παρούσα μελέτη πραγματεύεται τη συστηματική και ιστορική ερμηνεία της απαγόρευσης των κομματικών εκδηλώσεων των δικαστικών λειτουργών, βάσει του άρθρου 29§3 εδ. α’ του ισχύοντος Συντάγματος. Στη βάση αυτής, η μελέτη αποπειράται την ερμηνευτική προσέγγιση των σχετικών διατάξεων του Κώδικα Οργανισμού Δικαστηρίων και Κατάστασης Δικαστικών Λειτουργών και κυρίως του άρθρου 91§4 περ. β) του Κώδικα, ελέγχοντας τη συμφωνία των νομοτυπικών υποστάσεων που οριοθετούν το δικαίωμα έκφρασης των δικαστικών λειτουργών με τις συνταγματικές ρυθμίσεις. Επιπρόσθετα, η μελέτη περιλαμβάνει συγκριτική έρευνα των προϋποθέσεων της δημόσιας έκφρασης γνώμης των δικαστικών λειτουργών σύμφωνα με την ΕΣΔΑ και τις ρυθμίσεων ευρωπαϊκών νομοθεσιών. Όπως συνάγεται, απαιτείται στενή ερμηνεία της διερευνώμενης απαγόρευσης, η οποία ισχύει για τα πολιτικά κόμματα τα οποία έχουν συσταθεί υπό τους όρους του Ν.3023/2002 και δεν επιτρέπεται να επεκταθεί σε άλλες μορφές συσσωματώσεων, όπως οι συνδικαλιστικές οργανώσεις. Παράλληλα, από την ερμηνευτική προσέγγιση του ΕΔΔΑ στην κατ’ άρθρο 10§1 ΕΣΔΑ προστασία της ελεύθερης έκφρασης γνώμης προκύπτει ιδιόμορφο δικαίωμα των δικαστικών λειτουργών και στον πολιτικό λόγο. Δικαίωμα που προσδιορίζεται μέσα από δύο γνωστά κριτήρια της νομολογίας του ΕΔΔΑ: της αυτοσυγκράτησης των δικαστικών λειτουργών κατά την εκτός υπηρεσίας έκφραση και του κινδύνου της αποτροπής από τη συμμετοχή στο δημόσιο διάλογο.

Subjects/Keywords: Συνταγματικό δίκαιο; Συγκριτικό δίκαιο; ΕΣΔΑ; Πειθαρχικό δίκαιο; Constitutional law; Comparative law; ECHR; Disciplinary law

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Vouvonikos, E. -. O. (2020). Η απαγόρευση των κομματικών εκδηλώσεων των δικαστικών λειτουργών σύμφωνα με την Ελληνική και την Ευρωπαϊκή νομοθεσία και νομολογία. (Thesis). National and Kapodistrian University of Athens; Εθνικό και Καποδιστριακό Πανεπιστήμιο Αθηνών (ΕΚΠΑ). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10442/hedi/48698

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Vouvonikos, Evangelos - Orestis. “Η απαγόρευση των κομματικών εκδηλώσεων των δικαστικών λειτουργών σύμφωνα με την Ελληνική και την Ευρωπαϊκή νομοθεσία και νομολογία.” 2020. Thesis, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens; Εθνικό και Καποδιστριακό Πανεπιστήμιο Αθηνών (ΕΚΠΑ). Accessed March 06, 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/10442/hedi/48698.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Vouvonikos, Evangelos - Orestis. “Η απαγόρευση των κομματικών εκδηλώσεων των δικαστικών λειτουργών σύμφωνα με την Ελληνική και την Ευρωπαϊκή νομοθεσία και νομολογία.” 2020. Web. 06 Mar 2021.

Vancouver:

Vouvonikos E-O. Η απαγόρευση των κομματικών εκδηλώσεων των δικαστικών λειτουργών σύμφωνα με την Ελληνική και την Ευρωπαϊκή νομοθεσία και νομολογία. [Internet] [Thesis]. National and Kapodistrian University of Athens; Εθνικό και Καποδιστριακό Πανεπιστήμιο Αθηνών (ΕΚΠΑ); 2020. [cited 2021 Mar 06]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10442/hedi/48698.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Vouvonikos E-O. Η απαγόρευση των κομματικών εκδηλώσεων των δικαστικών λειτουργών σύμφωνα με την Ελληνική και την Ευρωπαϊκή νομοθεσία και νομολογία. [Thesis]. National and Kapodistrian University of Athens; Εθνικό και Καποδιστριακό Πανεπιστήμιο Αθηνών (ΕΚΠΑ); 2020. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10442/hedi/48698

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

University of Melbourne

11. Dziedzic, Anna Maria. The use of foreign judges on courts of constitutional jurisdiction in Pacific island states.

Degree: 2018, University of Melbourne

URL: http://hdl.handle.net/11343/221451

► The global norm is that, by law or by practice, the judges on courts of constitutional jurisdiction will be citizens of the state they serve.… (more)

▼ The global norm is that, by law or by practice, the judges on courts of constitutional jurisdiction will be citizens of the state they serve. However, in the nine independent states of Fiji, Kiribati, Nauru, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Tuvalu and Vanuatu, as in other parts of the world, foreign judges regularly sit on the highest domestic courts. This thesis examines the implications of the use of foreign judges for constitutional adjudication, judicial independence, and the role of judges and judiciaries in Pacific constitutional systems. The thesis presents the findings of an original empirical study of the numbers of foreign judges serving in the Pacific, their nationality and professional background, the processes by which they are recruited, and the terms and conditions of their service. It reveals a transnational movement of judges from common law jurisdictions to Pacific states, to engage in judicial service that is affected by the legal frameworks and practices of the Pacific states that use foreign judges and the policies of the external states and organisations that provide foreign judges. The thesis assesses the implications of the use of foreign judges for the way in which courts approach constitutional adjudication, judicial independence, and the representative qualities of judges and judiciaries in Pacific constitutional systems. First, I argue that foreign judges bring two dimensions of knowledge to the task of constitutional adjudication: knowledge reach that extends beyond the local; and a knowledge gap in relation to local context. I show that predominant features of constitutional adjudication across Pacific jurisdictions are, at least in part, explicable in light of the kinds of knowledge that foreign judges bring. Secondly, I explain how the presumption of distance implied by foreignness feeds into a perception that foreign judges are more impartial than local judges. I argue that this perception is overstated, while the risks to judicial independence resulting from the insecure tenure of foreign judges are not properly addressed. Thirdly, attention to the nationality of judges highlights the significance placed on judges’ allegiance to the state, responsibility to the people, and the expressive functions of the judiciary. I argue that the circumstances of foreign judging limit the extent to which foreign judges are understood to be authorised by, accountable to, speak for, or reflect the people or the state. Instead, greater emphasis is placed on the idea of foreign judges as members of a profession, with expertise, impartiality and a transnational commitment to law. This analysis of the practice of foreign judging and its implications provides the basis to assess the rationales for the use of foreign judges, to identify challenges that the practice poses to the legitimacy of Pacific judiciaries, and to propose good practice initiatives that might inform the laws and policies that regulate the use of foreign judges.

Subjects/Keywords: comparative constitutional law; judges; judiciaries; Pacific island states

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Dziedzic, A. M. (2018). The use of foreign judges on courts of constitutional jurisdiction in Pacific island states. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Melbourne. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11343/221451

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Dziedzic, Anna Maria. “The use of foreign judges on courts of constitutional jurisdiction in Pacific island states.” 2018. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Melbourne. Accessed March 06, 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/11343/221451.

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Dziedzic, Anna Maria. “The use of foreign judges on courts of constitutional jurisdiction in Pacific island states.” 2018. Web. 06 Mar 2021.

Vancouver:

Dziedzic AM. The use of foreign judges on courts of constitutional jurisdiction in Pacific island states. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Melbourne; 2018. [cited 2021 Mar 06]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11343/221451.

Council of Science Editors:

Dziedzic AM. The use of foreign judges on courts of constitutional jurisdiction in Pacific island states. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Melbourne; 2018. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11343/221451

University of Queensland

12. Ireland-Piper, Danielle. Accountability in extraterritoriality: principles, means and ends.

Degree: School of Law, 2014, University of Queensland

URL: http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:344868

► States are increasingly asserting jurisdiction over criminal offences that occur extraterritorially. To some extent, this is a response to transnational criminal activity. The assertion of… (more)

▼ States are increasingly asserting jurisdiction over criminal offences that occur extraterritorially. To some extent, this is a response to transnational criminal activity. The assertion of jurisdiction by States outside their territory, however, has been a source of continuing controversy and legal uncertainty. This is because the principles of jurisdiction under international law do not adequately resolve competing claims to jurisdiction and are primarily concerned with the relationship between States and not as between the State and the individual. In that context, this thesis considers principles of jurisdiction and mechanisms by which to achieve jurisdictional restraint under international law. In so doing, the means by which assertions of extraterritorial criminal jurisdiction are regulated in Australia, India and the United States are assessed. A chosen conception of the rule of law is used to provide the criteria by which to measure such regulation. The criteria drawn from the chosen conception of the rule of law is that it requires: 1) that the law must be both readily known and available, and certain and clear; 2) that the law should be applied to all people equally, and operate uniformly in circumstances which are not materially different; and 3) that there must be some capacity for judicial review of executive action. This thesis measures the regulation of extraterritorial jurisdiction by Australia, India and the United States against these three criteria. In so doing, the relationship between municipal law and international law in each jurisdiction is considered, as is the potential utility of the ‗abuse of rights‘ doctrine as a regulator of extraterritorial criminal jurisdiction. The thesis then presents three tiers of conclusions. The first tier relates to the regulation of extraterritorial jurisdiction by Australia, India and United States, respectively. The second tier is concerned with conclusions as to the regulation of extraterritorial jurisdiction in common-law jurisdictions. The third tier identifies contributions this thesis makes to the broader dialogue on extraterritorial jurisdiction. Ultimately, this thesis argues that exercises of extraterritorial criminal jurisdiction can be useful in seeking to achieve some ends, such as the regulation of transnational crimes. There must, however, be some accountability in extraterritoriality. Principles of jurisdiction under both international and municipal law are generally permissive. Therefore, the means by which jurisdiction is exercised must be better regulated and domestic courts need tools with which to so. This thesis suggests that the abuse of rights doctrine may be a useful tool in such regulation and if so, could result in the emergence of a specialist abuse of jurisdictional rights doctrine.

Subjects/Keywords: Extraterritorial jurisdiction; International Law; Transnational Crime; Constitutional law; Comparative law; Abuse of rights doctrine; 180108 Constitutional Law; 180110 Criminal Law and Procedure; 180116 International Law (excl. International Trade Law)

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Ireland-Piper, D. (2014). Accountability in extraterritoriality: principles, means and ends. (Thesis). University of Queensland. Retrieved from http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:344868

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Ireland-Piper, Danielle. “Accountability in extraterritoriality: principles, means and ends.” 2014. Thesis, University of Queensland. Accessed March 06, 2021. http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:344868.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Ireland-Piper, Danielle. “Accountability in extraterritoriality: principles, means and ends.” 2014. Web. 06 Mar 2021.

Vancouver:

Ireland-Piper D. Accountability in extraterritoriality: principles, means and ends. [Internet] [Thesis]. University of Queensland; 2014. [cited 2021 Mar 06]. Available from: http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:344868.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Ireland-Piper D. Accountability in extraterritoriality: principles, means and ends. [Thesis]. University of Queensland; 2014. Available from: http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:344868

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

13. Cadinot, Clément. Les Préambules des constitutions : approche comparative : Constitutionnal Preamble's : A Comparativ Study.

Degree: Docteur es, Droit public, 2018, Bordeaux

URL: http://www.theses.fr/2018BORD0340

►

Les préambules constitutionnels sont répandus à travers le monde, depuis le constitutionnalisme de la fin du XVIIIème. A ce jour, plus de deux constitutions sur… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Préambule; Constitution; Droit comparé; Constitutional Law; Preamble; Constitution; Comparative Law; Droit constitutionnel; 340

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Cadinot, C. (2018). Les Préambules des constitutions : approche comparative : Constitutionnal Preamble's : A Comparativ Study. (Doctoral Dissertation). Bordeaux. Retrieved from http://www.theses.fr/2018BORD0340

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Cadinot, Clément. “Les Préambules des constitutions : approche comparative : Constitutionnal Preamble's : A Comparativ Study.” 2018. Doctoral Dissertation, Bordeaux. Accessed March 06, 2021. http://www.theses.fr/2018BORD0340.

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Cadinot, Clément. “Les Préambules des constitutions : approche comparative : Constitutionnal Preamble's : A Comparativ Study.” 2018. Web. 06 Mar 2021.

Vancouver:

Cadinot C. Les Préambules des constitutions : approche comparative : Constitutionnal Preamble's : A Comparativ Study. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Bordeaux; 2018. [cited 2021 Mar 06]. Available from: http://www.theses.fr/2018BORD0340.

Council of Science Editors:

Cadinot C. Les Préambules des constitutions : approche comparative : Constitutionnal Preamble's : A Comparativ Study. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Bordeaux; 2018. Available from: http://www.theses.fr/2018BORD0340

University of Illinois – Urbana-Champaign

14. Arlota, Carolina Sales Cabral. The interplay of judicial review and federalism choices in Brazil after the Republican Constitution of 1988.

Degree: J.S.D., Law, 2015, University of Illinois – Urbana-Champaign

URL: http://hdl.handle.net/2142/88157

► This thesis investigates how federalism choices adopted by the Brazilian Constitution of 1988 impacts judicial review. In order to address this central question, this work… (more)

▼ This thesis investigates how federalism choices adopted by the Brazilian Constitution of 1988 impacts judicial review. In order to address this central question, this work was structured in three sub-questions designed to study specific federalism constitutional options pertinent to all distinct levels of Brazilian federalism, namely: federal union, states, and municipalities. The first sub-question targets the inclusion of local governments as autonomous constitutional agents. It considers annexation law as a proxy for local powers, comparing the decisions of the Brazilian Supreme Court (STF) to its U.S. counterpart (U.S.S.C.) in annexation cases. We conclude that the inclusion of municipalities in the Constitution of 1988, as of today, is not necessarily an example of successful design. We also find, counter-intuitively, that the USSC has been more active in the protection of rights than the STF. The second sub-question refers to the constitutional option granted to state supreme courts in creating specialized panels – and if differences across Brazilian state supreme courts when deciding cases of abstract review can be attributed to specialization. Using empirical methods, we find some evidence that the existence of specialized panels matters for the likelihood and rates of dissent as well as duration of procedures, but not for other variables. The final sub-question addresses the constitutional mechanisms of appointing justices to the Brazilian Supreme Court (which was transplanted from the U.S. Constitution) and its consequences for the adjudication of federative conflicts. Our research focuses on the alignment between revealed judicial preferences when adjudicating cases and presidential appointments in Brazil. We find some empirical evidence that judicial preferences do matter, but the patterns of politicization are weaker than in other similar courts. Our findings are sufficient to dismiss legalist accounts as well as accounts based on the Roman-Germanic tradition. Federal dynamics and constitutional politics are intrinsically related to the three sub-sets of problems proposed and are considered in light of political economy factors. Advisors/Committee Members: Garoupa, Nuno (advisor), Garoupa, Nuno (Committee Chair), Reynolds, Laurie (committee member), Cheibub, José Antonio (committee member), Ginsburg, Thomas (committee member).

Subjects/Keywords: Brazil; Constitution of 1988; federalism; judicial review; constitutional review; federative conflicts; courts; Brazilian judiciary; court specialization; state supreme courts; abstract review; constitutional courts; constitutional politics; constitutional design; local government; municipalities; annexation law; comparative constitutional law; comparative law

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Arlota, C. S. C. (2015). The interplay of judicial review and federalism choices in Brazil after the Republican Constitution of 1988. (Thesis). University of Illinois – Urbana-Champaign. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2142/88157

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Arlota, Carolina Sales Cabral. “The interplay of judicial review and federalism choices in Brazil after the Republican Constitution of 1988.” 2015. Thesis, University of Illinois – Urbana-Champaign. Accessed March 06, 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/2142/88157.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Arlota, Carolina Sales Cabral. “The interplay of judicial review and federalism choices in Brazil after the Republican Constitution of 1988.” 2015. Web. 06 Mar 2021.

Vancouver:

Arlota CSC. The interplay of judicial review and federalism choices in Brazil after the Republican Constitution of 1988. [Internet] [Thesis]. University of Illinois – Urbana-Champaign; 2015. [cited 2021 Mar 06]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/2142/88157.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Arlota CSC. The interplay of judicial review and federalism choices in Brazil after the Republican Constitution of 1988. [Thesis]. University of Illinois – Urbana-Champaign; 2015. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/2142/88157

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

University of Oxford

15. Manikis, Marie. Rhetoric or reality? : victims' enforcement mechanisms in England and Wales and the United States.

Degree: PhD, 2014, University of Oxford

URL: http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:3232cd82-c9d6-486d-b841-25528cd294ba ; https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.618483

► Recent policies in England and Wales and the United States have recognised for the first time enforcement mechanisms for victims of crime under the Crime… (more)

▼ Recent policies in England and Wales and the United States have recognised for the first time enforcement mechanisms for victims of crime under the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA) in the United States as well the Code of Practice for Victims of Crime in England and Wales (the Code). Although very different from one another, these policies ostensibly aimed to provide a stronger commitment to victims’ rights, by recognising an accessible, timely and impartial process that recognises accountability and provides individual remedies in cases of breaches. This thesis engages in a careful in-depth analysis of these mechanisms and their implementation based on elite qualitative interviews, case law analysis and a multidisciplinary examination of the relevant literature. It argues that on the whole, these mechanisms have presented a number of limitations, and thus in many respects cannot and have not delivered accessible, and timely means to respond to victims’ rights breaches. Most importantly, it demonstrates that for certain types of breaches and in certain contextual settings, these mechanisms have recognised only limited or no redress at all for breaches. This research takes the available victims’ literature further by arguing that many of these promises have been closer to rhetoric than reality and providing a more nuanced portrait of the substantial difficulties and limitations that relate to these enforcement mechanisms. In effect, these limitations can be understood in light of the nature and structural components of these selected mechanisms, as well as the ways they have been implemented by the main actors involved in these processes and the different contexts under which the different types of breaches take place. Finally, despite their limitations, when compared to one another, each mechanism can be considered a better option for access, timeliness and redress – depending on context and the type of breach. Following from this analysis, a complementary approach is developed which can facilitate and increase opportunity for redress for a wider range of situations. It is important to bear in mind however the limits of the complementary approach; namely, that it only includes elements inspired from the two mechanisms examined in this thesis and that there are several limitations that relate to transplants and policy transfers.

Subjects/Keywords: 344.03; Social Sciences; Law; Comparative Law; Constitutional & administrative law; Criminal Law; Criminology; Criminology ? Victims; Socio-legal studies; victims; rights; enforcement

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Manikis, M. (2014). Rhetoric or reality? : victims' enforcement mechanisms in England and Wales and the United States. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Oxford. Retrieved from http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:3232cd82-c9d6-486d-b841-25528cd294ba ; https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.618483

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Manikis, Marie. “Rhetoric or reality? : victims' enforcement mechanisms in England and Wales and the United States.” 2014. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Oxford. Accessed March 06, 2021. http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:3232cd82-c9d6-486d-b841-25528cd294ba ; https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.618483.

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Manikis, Marie. “Rhetoric or reality? : victims' enforcement mechanisms in England and Wales and the United States.” 2014. Web. 06 Mar 2021.

Vancouver:

Manikis M. Rhetoric or reality? : victims' enforcement mechanisms in England and Wales and the United States. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Oxford; 2014. [cited 2021 Mar 06]. Available from: http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:3232cd82-c9d6-486d-b841-25528cd294ba ; https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.618483.

Council of Science Editors:

Manikis M. Rhetoric or reality? : victims' enforcement mechanisms in England and Wales and the United States. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Oxford; 2014. Available from: http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:3232cd82-c9d6-486d-b841-25528cd294ba ; https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.618483

University of Kansas

16. Jun, Woo-Suk. A STUDY ON THE INCAPACITATION MECHANISM MODEL OF THE JUCHIST AND MARXIST-LENINIST ARTICLES AGAINST THE CORE IMPLEMENTATION MECHANISM MODEL OF THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS ARTICLES IN THE NORTH KOREAN CONSTITUTION: NORTH KOREA'S VIOLATIONS OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS TREATIES.

Degree: S.J.D., Law, 2014, University of Kansas

URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1808/14547

► In this dissertation, I systematically study whether the arguments of the North Korean government regarding its protection of domestic human rights and its adherence to… (more)

▼ In this dissertation, I systematically study whether the arguments of the North Korean government regarding its protection of domestic human rights and its adherence to international human rights treaties in the DPRK Official Reports are accurate. My starting point is the analysis of the sharp conflict of argument on the human rights issue between North Korea and the liberal democratic camp, which includes the U.S., U.K., and South Korea. In the DPRK Official Reports, North Korea uses a theoretical approach, focusing on the presence of Fundamental Rights Articles of its Constitution, to argue that the fundamental rights of the people have been protected internally, and that the particular rights prescribed in the international human rights treaties are guaranteed successfully. In contrast, the liberal democratic camp, in their reports on North Korean human rights compliance, contend that the government of North Korea has seriously infringed the fundamental freedoms of its people and has severely violated the international human rights treaties to which it is party. To make their arguments about North Korea's human rights practices, the U.S., South Korea, and the U.K. use a factual approach, centering on the analyses of testimony by North Korean refugees in the report. This situation leads the North Korean government to aggressively rebuff the arguments of the U.S., U.K., and South Korea by denying and discounting the contents of their annual reports. North Korea especially concentrates on casting doubt on the credibility of the testimony. Notably, the LDC Annual Reports do not thoroughly analyze the core implementation mechanism of the Fundamental Rights Articles of the North Korean Constitution and contain very few logical rebuttals. However, considering that North Korea has attempted to deceive the world under the guise of claiming to provide human rights protections through its core implementation mechanism, the methodology of the liberal democratic camp in dealing with North Korea's claims in defense of its human rights practices is inarguably unsuccessful. Thus, in such a debate, a neutral third party, who does not possess actual information regarding the human rights situation in North Korea, may not only believe that North Korea's arguments are true, but may also believe that the liberal democratic camp's demand for an improvement of North Korea's human rights practices are merely politically-motivated fabrications. Additionally, the fundamental difference in the method of argumentation between the North Korean government and the liberal democratic countries means that there are necessarily few points of direct collision within their arguments. That is to say, these two opposing sides do not actually collide but run parallel, and are left without the real opportunity to challenge each other's arguments as to the fundamental difference between their methodologies. The most effective way to solve the problems inherent in the overreliance by the LDC on a factual approach is to form an opposition structure of a… Advisors/Committee Members: Gottlieb, David J. (advisor), Phillips, Jean K. Gilles (cmtemember), Lambertson, David F. (cmtemember), Cateforis, Elizabeth S. (cmtemember).

Subjects/Keywords: Law; Comparative constitutional law; International human rights law; Juche ideology; Law as ideology; Marxism-Leninism; North Korean constitution

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Jun, W. (2014). A STUDY ON THE INCAPACITATION MECHANISM MODEL OF THE JUCHIST AND MARXIST-LENINIST ARTICLES AGAINST THE CORE IMPLEMENTATION MECHANISM MODEL OF THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS ARTICLES IN THE NORTH KOREAN CONSTITUTION: NORTH KOREA'S VIOLATIONS OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS TREATIES. (Thesis). University of Kansas. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1808/14547

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Jun, Woo-Suk. “A STUDY ON THE INCAPACITATION MECHANISM MODEL OF THE JUCHIST AND MARXIST-LENINIST ARTICLES AGAINST THE CORE IMPLEMENTATION MECHANISM MODEL OF THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS ARTICLES IN THE NORTH KOREAN CONSTITUTION: NORTH KOREA'S VIOLATIONS OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS TREATIES.” 2014. Thesis, University of Kansas. Accessed March 06, 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/1808/14547.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Jun, Woo-Suk. “A STUDY ON THE INCAPACITATION MECHANISM MODEL OF THE JUCHIST AND MARXIST-LENINIST ARTICLES AGAINST THE CORE IMPLEMENTATION MECHANISM MODEL OF THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS ARTICLES IN THE NORTH KOREAN CONSTITUTION: NORTH KOREA'S VIOLATIONS OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS TREATIES.” 2014. Web. 06 Mar 2021.

Vancouver:

Jun W. A STUDY ON THE INCAPACITATION MECHANISM MODEL OF THE JUCHIST AND MARXIST-LENINIST ARTICLES AGAINST THE CORE IMPLEMENTATION MECHANISM MODEL OF THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS ARTICLES IN THE NORTH KOREAN CONSTITUTION: NORTH KOREA'S VIOLATIONS OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS TREATIES. [Internet] [Thesis]. University of Kansas; 2014. [cited 2021 Mar 06]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1808/14547.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Jun W. A STUDY ON THE INCAPACITATION MECHANISM MODEL OF THE JUCHIST AND MARXIST-LENINIST ARTICLES AGAINST THE CORE IMPLEMENTATION MECHANISM MODEL OF THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS ARTICLES IN THE NORTH KOREAN CONSTITUTION: NORTH KOREA'S VIOLATIONS OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS TREATIES. [Thesis]. University of Kansas; 2014. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1808/14547

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

University of Oxford

17. Sengupta, Arghya. Independence and accountability of the Indian higher judiciary.

Degree: PhD, 2014, University of Oxford

URL: http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:d16c344d-ba44-454f-9606-456b8524071e ; https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.684943

► There is currently no satisfactory account of how judges of the Supreme Court of India and High Courts in the states are appointed, transferred, impeached… (more)

▼ There is currently no satisfactory account of how judges of the Supreme Court of India and High Courts in the states are appointed, transferred, impeached or employed postretirement. For a higher judiciary commanding immense public attention, enjoying wide constitutional powers of judicial review, this is a conspicuous gulf in academic literature. This thesis intends to bridge this gulf by providing such an account. Part I extracts the Constituent Assembly Debates pertaining to these four facets of judicial functioning, describes key developments over time and analyses the extant processes in operation today. On this basis it makes three arguments: first, appointments to the higher judiciary and transfer of judges between High Courts follow processes that are indefensible as a matter of constitutional law; second, impeachment operates in an excessively slow and inefficacious manner; third, the pervasiveness of post-retirement employment of judges in government-appointed positions demonstrates inadequate attention to institutional design. Most crucially, each of these four aspects gives rise to significant concerns pertaining to judicial independence, accountability or both. This is not a peculiarly Indian problem— in several countries, the values of judicial independence and accountability have been deemed to be in tension, often irreconcilably. Part II tackles this widely articulated tension by providing a conceptual framework to understand these concepts. Its main argument is that both judicial independence and accountability are necessary for 'an effective judiciary'. Whether indeed the processes governing the four selected facets of judicial functioning in India lead to an effective judiciary is assessed in Part III. Where they are found lacking, appropriate reform is suggested. Such reform is intended to ensure that the selected processes operate in a manner that is justifiable in terms of judicial independence and accountability in principle and is efficacious in practice.

Subjects/Keywords: 347; Law; Comparative Law; Constitutional & administrative law; judicial independence; judicial accountability; India; constitutional law; judicial appointments; appointment of judges; Supreme Court of India; separation of powers; checks and balances

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Sengupta, A. (2014). Independence and accountability of the Indian higher judiciary. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Oxford. Retrieved from http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:d16c344d-ba44-454f-9606-456b8524071e ; https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.684943

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Sengupta, Arghya. “Independence and accountability of the Indian higher judiciary.” 2014. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Oxford. Accessed March 06, 2021. http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:d16c344d-ba44-454f-9606-456b8524071e ; https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.684943.

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Sengupta, Arghya. “Independence and accountability of the Indian higher judiciary.” 2014. Web. 06 Mar 2021.

Vancouver:

Sengupta A. Independence and accountability of the Indian higher judiciary. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Oxford; 2014. [cited 2021 Mar 06]. Available from: http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:d16c344d-ba44-454f-9606-456b8524071e ; https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.684943.

Council of Science Editors:

Sengupta A. Independence and accountability of the Indian higher judiciary. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Oxford; 2014. Available from: http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:d16c344d-ba44-454f-9606-456b8524071e ; https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.684943

University of Oxford

18. Hilly, Laura Ellen. Experienced justice : gender, judging and appellate courts.

Degree: PhD, 2014, University of Oxford

URL: http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:d3f64853-898a-4c01-a17e-819d6a095f52 ; http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.647640

► The under-representation of women in the senior appellate judiciary in common law jurisdictions remains an enduring problem. Much has been written about the lack of… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: 347; Law; Comparative Law; Socio-legal studies; Legal philosophy; Constitutional & administrative law; Gender; Women; judiciary; judges; South Africa; Australia; United Kingdom

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Hilly, L. E. (2014). Experienced justice : gender, judging and appellate courts. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Oxford. Retrieved from http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:d3f64853-898a-4c01-a17e-819d6a095f52 ; http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.647640

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Hilly, Laura Ellen. “Experienced justice : gender, judging and appellate courts.” 2014. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Oxford. Accessed March 06, 2021. http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:d3f64853-898a-4c01-a17e-819d6a095f52 ; http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.647640.

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Hilly, Laura Ellen. “Experienced justice : gender, judging and appellate courts.” 2014. Web. 06 Mar 2021.

Vancouver:

Hilly LE. Experienced justice : gender, judging and appellate courts. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Oxford; 2014. [cited 2021 Mar 06]. Available from: http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:d3f64853-898a-4c01-a17e-819d6a095f52 ; http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.647640.

Council of Science Editors:

Hilly LE. Experienced justice : gender, judging and appellate courts. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Oxford; 2014. Available from: http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:d3f64853-898a-4c01-a17e-819d6a095f52 ; http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.647640

University of Washington

19. Roberts, Christopher. A Contest of Legitimacy: The Supreme Court, Congress, and Foreign Law.

Degree: PhD, 2013, University of Washington

URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1773/21769

► Before 2003, the Justices on the United States Supreme Court routinely, if infrequently, cited foreign or international jurisprudence in their written opinions. Neither the media,… (more)

▼ Before 2003, the Justices on the United States Supreme Court routinely, if infrequently, cited foreign or international jurisprudence in their written opinions. Neither the media, nor members of Congress paid much, if any attention to the practice. However, after the decisions in Lawrence v. Texas (2003) and Roper v. Simmons (2005), what was an uncontroversial citation practice became a hotly contested issue in Congress, the media, and among conservative political activists. This debate had an effect on the Justices. In Kennedy v. Louisiana (2008), Justice Kennedy refrained from citing case law from the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights even though they were discussed in the briefs and in oral arguments. In 2012, Justice Sotomayor authored a dissent in Blueford v. Arkansas that explicitly omitted an 1861 decision of the Queens Bench in England that was discussed in the Court's opinion in Arizona v. Washington (1978) and in the petitioner's brief while simultaneously citing the other cases contained in both documents, including several decisions from English courts issued before America's independence. In this dissertation, I explain how this uncontroversial citation practice became controversial. I analyze how The New York Times, The Washington Post, USA Today, The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Times covered the Court's use of foreign law. I examine the resolutions and legislation introduced by members of Congress and the questioning of Supreme Court nominees by members of the Senate Judiciary Committee about the use of foreign law. I discuss how the Justices of the United States Supreme Court are less likely to cite foreign law than other courts with constitutional review powers. The Justices are sensitive and respond to the reaction of external audiences (Baum 2006). The reaction of the Justices to this controversy indicates that the Justices care more about cases than just their disposition or particular policy agendas, and provides further evidence that the Justices take into account their relationships with other actors and audiences Advisors/Committee Members: Cichowski, Rachel (advisor).

Subjects/Keywords: Comparative Law; Constitutional Interpretation; Foreign Law; Judges and Judging; United States Supreme Court; Political Science; Law; Political science

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Roberts, C. (2013). A Contest of Legitimacy: The Supreme Court, Congress, and Foreign Law. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Washington. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1773/21769

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Roberts, Christopher. “A Contest of Legitimacy: The Supreme Court, Congress, and Foreign Law.” 2013. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Washington. Accessed March 06, 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/1773/21769.

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Roberts, Christopher. “A Contest of Legitimacy: The Supreme Court, Congress, and Foreign Law.” 2013. Web. 06 Mar 2021.

Vancouver:

Roberts C. A Contest of Legitimacy: The Supreme Court, Congress, and Foreign Law. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Washington; 2013. [cited 2021 Mar 06]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1773/21769.

Council of Science Editors:

Roberts C. A Contest of Legitimacy: The Supreme Court, Congress, and Foreign Law. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Washington; 2013. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1773/21769

University of Oxford

20. Zhou, Han-Ru. Implied constitutional principles.

Degree: PhD, 2012, University of Oxford

URL: http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:ca2491fc-a372-4adc-afe0-2f832fcc7082 ; https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.580923

► This thesis challenges some of the current limits to the grounds for judicial review of legislation accepted by most Canadian jurists. More specifically, it makes… (more)

▼ This thesis challenges some of the current limits to the grounds for judicial review of legislation accepted by most Canadian jurists. More specifically, it makes a common law-based argument in favour of the priority over legislation of principles which are implied from the Imperial Constitution Acts 1867-1982 and which originally derive from the English constitution – namely implied constitutional principles. The argument faces two main interrelated legal objections: Parliamentary sovereignty and the Framers’ intentions. The first objection is rebutted by arguing that Parliamentary sovereignty possesses an ability to change in a way that can incorporate substantive legal limitations. The most prevalent common law-based theories of change to Parliamentary sovereignty suggest that the courts can authoritatively determine if implied constitutional principles can check legislation. The second objection is rebutted by reference to the notion of progressive interpretation as conceived under Hartian and Dworkinian theories of law and adjudication. Under these theories, progressive interpretation is an aspect of the courts’ best overall interpretation of the constitution, which includes implied constitutional principles. Such progressive interpretation can result in these principles constraining legislative authority. Justification of the progressive interpretation of implied constitutional principles can be based on the rule of law from which derive a number of these principles. One plausible conception of the Canadian rule of law is that it rejects the view that implied constitutional principles can prevail when in conflict with legislation. However, the better conception is that, as an attempt to adapt implied constitutional principles to relevant changes in society and to protect their underlying values, the judiciary should interpret these principles as capable of checking legislation to the extent that they form part of the core content of the rule of law. Such a conception and an operation of implied constitutional principles can properly be explained by Hartian or Dworkinian common law-based progressive interpretation of these principles and by their relationship with legislative authority.

Subjects/Keywords: 342; Comparative Law; Constitutional & administrative law; parliamentary sovereignty; HLA Hart; Ronald Dworkin; rule of recognition; constitutional interpretation; living tree; rule of law; judicial independence; implied bill of rights; unwritten constitution

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Zhou, H. (2012). Implied constitutional principles. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Oxford. Retrieved from http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:ca2491fc-a372-4adc-afe0-2f832fcc7082 ; https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.580923

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Zhou, Han-Ru. “Implied constitutional principles.” 2012. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Oxford. Accessed March 06, 2021. http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:ca2491fc-a372-4adc-afe0-2f832fcc7082 ; https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.580923.

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Zhou, Han-Ru. “Implied constitutional principles.” 2012. Web. 06 Mar 2021.

Vancouver:

Zhou H. Implied constitutional principles. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Oxford; 2012. [cited 2021 Mar 06]. Available from: http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:ca2491fc-a372-4adc-afe0-2f832fcc7082 ; https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.580923.

Council of Science Editors:

Zhou H. Implied constitutional principles. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Oxford; 2012. Available from: http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:ca2491fc-a372-4adc-afe0-2f832fcc7082 ; https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.580923

21. Lebedel, Sophie. Le précédent dans les décisions des cours constitutionnelles : Étude comparée des expériences française, espagnole et italienne de justice constitutionnelle : Precedent in the decisions of constitutional courts : Comparative study of french, italian and spanish experiences of constitutional.

Degree: Docteur es, Droit public, 2012, Toulon

URL: http://www.theses.fr/2012TOUL0067

►

La règle du précédent, clé de voûte de la Common law, impose au juge de respecter les décisions analogues précédentes, en l’absence de justification pour… (more)

▼

La règle du précédent, clé de voûte de la Common law, impose au juge de respecter les décisions analogues précédentes, en l’absence de justification pour se départir de celles-ci. Cette règle est donc logiquement absente de la théorie du droit romano-germanique, selon laquelle, schématiquement, le juge n’est soumis qu’à la loi. Pourtant, l’étude des décisions des juridictions de tradition romaniste et, plus précisément, des cours constitutionnelles montrent que ces dernières n’hésitent pas à appliquer la règle du précédent. Il ne s’agit pas d’une volonté de se soumettre à un précédent contraignant et obligatoire, mais de juger en conformité et dans la logique des solutions antérieurement adoptées. L’autorité du précédent constitutionnel est donc, le plus souvent, psychologique et le juge constitutionnel peut renoncer à l’appliquer lorsqu’il l’estime nécessaire. Le précédent devient ainsi un instrument judiciaire universel, permettant d’assurer, indifféremment du système juridique, l’uniformité et la cohérence de la jurisprudence.

Precedent, the key-stone of Common law, obliges the Court to comply with analogous preceding decisions, in the absence of justification for abandoning them. This rule is therefore logically absent from the theory of Civil law, according to which, schematically, the Court is only bound by written law. Nevertheless, the study of court decisions in Civil law systems and, more exactly, those of constitutional courts show that they do not hesitate to apply the rules of precedent. It is not a question of a will to be held by a binding and obligatory precedent, but to judge in conformity and within the logic of previously adopted solutions. The authority of constitutional precedent is therefore, more often than not, psychological and the constitutional court can desist from applying it when it deems necessary. Precedent thus becomes a universal judicial instrument, enabling to ensure, regardless of the legal system, the uniformity and the coherence of case-law.

Advisors/Committee Members: Di Manno, Thierry (thesis director), Baudrez, Maryse (thesis director).

Subjects/Keywords: Conseil constitutionnel; Cour constitutionnelle italienne; Cour suprême américaine; Droit consitutionnel comparé; Jurisprudence; Justice constitutionnelle; Précédent; Tribunal constitutionnel espagnol; French constitutional counci; Italian constitutional court; Case-law; Constitutional justice; American supreme court; Comparative constitutional law; Precedent; Spanish Constitutional court; 342

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Lebedel, S. (2012). Le précédent dans les décisions des cours constitutionnelles : Étude comparée des expériences française, espagnole et italienne de justice constitutionnelle : Precedent in the decisions of constitutional courts : Comparative study of french, italian and spanish experiences of constitutional. (Doctoral Dissertation). Toulon. Retrieved from http://www.theses.fr/2012TOUL0067

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Lebedel, Sophie. “Le précédent dans les décisions des cours constitutionnelles : Étude comparée des expériences française, espagnole et italienne de justice constitutionnelle : Precedent in the decisions of constitutional courts : Comparative study of french, italian and spanish experiences of constitutional.” 2012. Doctoral Dissertation, Toulon. Accessed March 06, 2021. http://www.theses.fr/2012TOUL0067.

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Lebedel, Sophie. “Le précédent dans les décisions des cours constitutionnelles : Étude comparée des expériences française, espagnole et italienne de justice constitutionnelle : Precedent in the decisions of constitutional courts : Comparative study of french, italian and spanish experiences of constitutional.” 2012. Web. 06 Mar 2021.

Vancouver:

Lebedel S. Le précédent dans les décisions des cours constitutionnelles : Étude comparée des expériences française, espagnole et italienne de justice constitutionnelle : Precedent in the decisions of constitutional courts : Comparative study of french, italian and spanish experiences of constitutional. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Toulon; 2012. [cited 2021 Mar 06]. Available from: http://www.theses.fr/2012TOUL0067.

Council of Science Editors:

Lebedel S. Le précédent dans les décisions des cours constitutionnelles : Étude comparée des expériences française, espagnole et italienne de justice constitutionnelle : Precedent in the decisions of constitutional courts : Comparative study of french, italian and spanish experiences of constitutional. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Toulon; 2012. Available from: http://www.theses.fr/2012TOUL0067

22. Iftimiei, Andra. La constitutionnalisation du droit pénal roumain et français : étude de droit comparé : The constitutionalization of Romanian and French criminal law : comparative law study.

Degree: Docteur es, Droit, 2014, Bordeaux; Universitatea Alexandru Ioan Cuza (Iaşi, Roumanie). Facultatea de drept

URL: http://www.theses.fr/2014BORD0103

►

La constitutionnalisation représente “une action qui consiste en l’octroide la nature constitutionnelle à un règle ou en la confirmation d’une institution par larègle constitutionnelle ”1.… (more)

▼

La constitutionnalisation représente “une action qui consiste en l’octroide la nature constitutionnelle à un règle ou en la confirmation d’une institution par larègle constitutionnelle ”1. La définition trouvée dans le Vocabulaire juridique este trèsrestreinte et incomplète. Le phénomène de constitutionnalisation est complexe et semanifeste dans toutes les branches du droit, tant par l’entremise de la doctrine quepar des moyens jurisprudentielles, qui seront mises en évidence à travers cetouvrage.De nos jours, le procès de constitutionnalisation du droit en général et du droit pénalen particulaire, comporte d’intérêt par les méthodes utilisées, par les effets qu’ilproduit, mais également par la nécessité de la différentiation d’autres conceptssimilaires, comme constitutionalité ou constitutionalisme.L’importance du thème se focalise sur la nécessité de l’élimination des confusionscrées autour du terme de constitutionnalisation. En égale mesure, on se propose àmettre en valeur les prémisses du phénomène de constitutionnalisation, mais aussiles moyens par lesquels le procès en soi-même produit ses effets.Le thème choisi comporte l’intérêt d’une approche interdisciplinaire, tels quel’approche de la perspective du droit comparé, ce qui confère d’originalité, maiségalement une vision innovatrice sur l’intersection des deux branches du droit.Le plan binaire suppose une analyse concernant les premisses de laconstitutionnalisation du droit pénal et les moyens et les effets de laconstitutionnalisation du droit pénal roumain et français.

The chosen topic sets forward the interest of an interdisciplinaryapproach as well as the approach from the perspective of comparative law, thusconferring originality, but also an innovating vision on the intersection of two lawbranches. We propose the analysis of criminal law constitutionalization due to thegeneral trend in which criminal law is equally subscribed, namely that ofinternationalization, Europeanization and constitutionalization of law. Moreover, thestudy of the two law branches is relevant given the highly intimate connectionsbetween them, through rendering more effective the protection of fundamental rightsand liberties.As research method we subscribed the entire thesis to a well-known method ofRomanian and French university school which embraces a new binary structure:problematization – solutions or hypothesis – demonstrations. The problem orhypothesis raised by the thesis is ”What is the starting point and how does the process of constitutionalization of the criminal law acts/functions?”, implicitlyadmitting the existence of such a phenomenon. The solutions or demonstrations arereflected as answers to the central questions, forged on the research plan of thethesis: highlighting the relations between criminal law and the Constitution,respectively of the means of constitutionalization and the effects of this phenomenon.Following the principles exposed by Legal Sociology regarding the integration of aprocess in the limits of a phenomenon, we reached the conclusion that in the…

Advisors/Committee Members: Saint-Pau, Jean-Christophe (thesis director), Toader, Tudorel (thesis director).

Subjects/Keywords: Constitutionnalisation; Phénomène juridique; Droit pénal; Droit comparé; Justice constitutionnelle; Constitutionalization; Juridical phenomenon; Criminal law; Comparative law; Constitutional justice; 340

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Iftimiei, A. (2014). La constitutionnalisation du droit pénal roumain et français : étude de droit comparé : The constitutionalization of Romanian and French criminal law : comparative law study. (Doctoral Dissertation). Bordeaux; Universitatea Alexandru Ioan Cuza (Iaşi, Roumanie). Facultatea de drept. Retrieved from http://www.theses.fr/2014BORD0103

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Iftimiei, Andra. “La constitutionnalisation du droit pénal roumain et français : étude de droit comparé : The constitutionalization of Romanian and French criminal law : comparative law study.” 2014. Doctoral Dissertation, Bordeaux; Universitatea Alexandru Ioan Cuza (Iaşi, Roumanie). Facultatea de drept. Accessed March 06, 2021. http://www.theses.fr/2014BORD0103.

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Iftimiei, Andra. “La constitutionnalisation du droit pénal roumain et français : étude de droit comparé : The constitutionalization of Romanian and French criminal law : comparative law study.” 2014. Web. 06 Mar 2021.

Vancouver:

Iftimiei A. La constitutionnalisation du droit pénal roumain et français : étude de droit comparé : The constitutionalization of Romanian and French criminal law : comparative law study. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Bordeaux; Universitatea Alexandru Ioan Cuza (Iaşi, Roumanie). Facultatea de drept; 2014. [cited 2021 Mar 06]. Available from: http://www.theses.fr/2014BORD0103.

Council of Science Editors:

Iftimiei A. La constitutionnalisation du droit pénal roumain et français : étude de droit comparé : The constitutionalization of Romanian and French criminal law : comparative law study. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Bordeaux; Universitatea Alexandru Ioan Cuza (Iaşi, Roumanie). Facultatea de drept; 2014. Available from: http://www.theses.fr/2014BORD0103

23. JULIETTE GREGORY DUARA. PROPORTIONALITY ANALYSES ON GENDER EQUALITY : A MULTIJURISDICTIONAL COMPARISON WITH A VIEW TOWARD AN INDIAN MIGRATION.

Degree: 2015, National University of Singapore

URL: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/119895

Subjects/Keywords: Comparative Law; Constitutional Law; Gender; Equality; Proportionality

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

DUARA, J. G. (2015). PROPORTIONALITY ANALYSES ON GENDER EQUALITY : A MULTIJURISDICTIONAL COMPARISON WITH A VIEW TOWARD AN INDIAN MIGRATION. (Thesis). National University of Singapore. Retrieved from http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/119895

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

DUARA, JULIETTE GREGORY. “PROPORTIONALITY ANALYSES ON GENDER EQUALITY : A MULTIJURISDICTIONAL COMPARISON WITH A VIEW TOWARD AN INDIAN MIGRATION.” 2015. Thesis, National University of Singapore. Accessed March 06, 2021. http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/119895.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

DUARA, JULIETTE GREGORY. “PROPORTIONALITY ANALYSES ON GENDER EQUALITY : A MULTIJURISDICTIONAL COMPARISON WITH A VIEW TOWARD AN INDIAN MIGRATION.” 2015. Web. 06 Mar 2021.

Vancouver:

DUARA JG. PROPORTIONALITY ANALYSES ON GENDER EQUALITY : A MULTIJURISDICTIONAL COMPARISON WITH A VIEW TOWARD AN INDIAN MIGRATION. [Internet] [Thesis]. National University of Singapore; 2015. [cited 2021 Mar 06]. Available from: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/119895.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

DUARA JG. PROPORTIONALITY ANALYSES ON GENDER EQUALITY : A MULTIJURISDICTIONAL COMPARISON WITH A VIEW TOWARD AN INDIAN MIGRATION. [Thesis]. National University of Singapore; 2015. Available from: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/119895

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

24. Kavanagh, Matthew M. Constitutionalizing Health: Rights, Democracy And The Political Economy Of Health Policy.

Degree: 2017, University of Pennsylvania

URL: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2863

► In recent decades there has been an increasing trend toward “constitutionalizing” health—identifying health as a right in national constitutions. Today more than half of written… (more)

▼ In recent decades there has been an increasing trend toward “constitutionalizing” health—identifying health as a right in national constitutions. Today more than half of written constitutions in the world contain such a right. Whether that is good, bad, or immaterial for the production of population health, however, is much debated. Does constitutionalization improve wellbeing or might it simply distract from or distort good health policy? This dissertation uses a nested analysis that pairs a large-N statistical analysis of 40 years of global health data with in-depth interviews with over 165 policymakers, activists, elected officials, lawyers, and judges in South Africa, India, Malawi, and Thailand. Empirical evidence shows that constitutionalizing health is a significant development in the institutions of health governance and can contribute to improved wellbeing. Over forty years of global health data, we can observe a small but significant health dividend for countries that have adopted the right to health, when controlling for the major alternative explanations of cross-national variation in mortality. Tracing health policy issues in South Africa and India reveals a right that operates as a “policy anchor”—tying health to the fundamental national political bargain and providing an innovation in the institutions of governance that helps policy entrepreneurs gain a foothold from which to drive policy to expand health capabilities. Shadow cases in Thailand and Malawi show that this shift can matter even without judicial intervention but depends on sufficient support structure to enable the full institutionalization of health as a right. These findings contribute to literature on law and rights, sharpen models of the public policy process, and respond to the need to better understanding the broader set of institutions in the political economy of development that drive improvements in population health. In a broader context, this study suggests that constitution-writing is health policymaking. Greater attention to constitutions and the process of institutionalizing rights is warranted for those engaged in global health, with implications for the U.S. and other countries of the global North as well.

Subjects/Keywords: Comparative Constitutional Law; Global Health; HIV; Human Rights; Public Health; Public Policy Process; Law; Political Science; Public Health Education and Promotion

11 more images…

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Kavanagh, M. M. (2017). Constitutionalizing Health: Rights, Democracy And The Political Economy Of Health Policy. (Thesis). University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2863

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Kavanagh, Matthew M. “Constitutionalizing Health: Rights, Democracy And The Political Economy Of Health Policy.” 2017. Thesis, University of Pennsylvania. Accessed March 06, 2021. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2863.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Kavanagh, Matthew M. “Constitutionalizing Health: Rights, Democracy And The Political Economy Of Health Policy.” 2017. Web. 06 Mar 2021.

Vancouver:

Kavanagh MM. Constitutionalizing Health: Rights, Democracy And The Political Economy Of Health Policy. [Internet] [Thesis]. University of Pennsylvania; 2017. [cited 2021 Mar 06]. Available from: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2863.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Kavanagh MM. Constitutionalizing Health: Rights, Democracy And The Political Economy Of Health Policy. [Thesis]. University of Pennsylvania; 2017. Available from: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2863

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

University of Oxford

25. Diaz de Valdes, Jose Manuel. The constitutionality of electoral quotas for women.

Degree: PhD, 2015, University of Oxford

URL: http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:724b51c5-8686-4b44-aae9-4f67e05b6628 ; https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.668709

► This thesis explores the constitutionality of compulsory electoral quotas for women imposed by law. The central question this thesis attempts to answer is what makes… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: 342.08; Constitutional & administrative law; Comparative Law; European and comparative law; Human rights; Quotas; Affirmative Action; Equality; Political Representation; Political Rights; Women Rights; Parity

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Diaz de Valdes, J. M. (2015). The constitutionality of electoral quotas for women. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Oxford. Retrieved from http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:724b51c5-8686-4b44-aae9-4f67e05b6628 ; https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.668709

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Diaz de Valdes, Jose Manuel. “The constitutionality of electoral quotas for women.” 2015. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Oxford. Accessed March 06, 2021. http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:724b51c5-8686-4b44-aae9-4f67e05b6628 ; https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.668709.

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Diaz de Valdes, Jose Manuel. “The constitutionality of electoral quotas for women.” 2015. Web. 06 Mar 2021.

Vancouver:

Diaz de Valdes JM. The constitutionality of electoral quotas for women. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Oxford; 2015. [cited 2021 Mar 06]. Available from: http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:724b51c5-8686-4b44-aae9-4f67e05b6628 ; https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.668709.

Council of Science Editors:

Diaz de Valdes JM. The constitutionality of electoral quotas for women. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Oxford; 2015. Available from: http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:724b51c5-8686-4b44-aae9-4f67e05b6628 ; https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.668709

University of Queensland

26. Wijaya, Pan Mohamad Faiz Kusuma. The role of the constitutional court in securing constitutional government in Indonesia.

Degree: T.C. Beirne School of Law, 2016, University of Queensland

URL: http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:412310

Subjects/Keywords: Comparative Constitutional Law; Constitutionalism; Constitutional Court; Constitutional Government; Indonesian Law; 180106 Comparative Law; 180108 Constitutional Law; 180120 Legal Institutions (incl. Courts and Justice Systems)

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Wijaya, P. M. F. K. (2016). The role of the constitutional court in securing constitutional government in Indonesia. (Thesis). University of Queensland. Retrieved from http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:412310

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Wijaya, Pan Mohamad Faiz Kusuma. “The role of the constitutional court in securing constitutional government in Indonesia.” 2016. Thesis, University of Queensland. Accessed March 06, 2021. http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:412310.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Wijaya, Pan Mohamad Faiz Kusuma. “The role of the constitutional court in securing constitutional government in Indonesia.” 2016. Web. 06 Mar 2021.

Vancouver:

Wijaya PMFK. The role of the constitutional court in securing constitutional government in Indonesia. [Internet] [Thesis]. University of Queensland; 2016. [cited 2021 Mar 06]. Available from: http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:412310.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Wijaya PMFK. The role of the constitutional court in securing constitutional government in Indonesia. [Thesis]. University of Queensland; 2016. Available from: http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:412310

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

27. Wade, Mame Ndiaga. Accès au juge constitutionnel et constitutionnalisation du droit : approche comparée avec l'Allemagne, l'Italie et l'Espagne : Access to the constitutional judge and constitutionnalisation of law : comparative approach with Germany, Italy and Spain.

Degree: Docteur es, Droit public, 2015, Aix Marseille Université

URL: http://www.theses.fr/2015AIXM1071

►

L'accès direct des individus à la justice constitutionnelle a tendance en Allemagne et Espagne, contrairement à la France et à Italie où il n’est pas… (more)

▼

L'accès direct des individus à la justice constitutionnelle a tendance en Allemagne et Espagne, contrairement à la France et à Italie où il n’est pas prévu, à modifier la nature classiquement objective de la mission de constitutionnalisation du juge constitutionnel par les buts subjectifs poursuivis par les recours individuels directs. Il déclenche, le cas échéant, chez le juge constitutionnel une fonction autre que la simple constitutionnalisation du droit, qui demeure objective dans le cadre de l’accès indirect et l'entraîne sur le terrain de la fondamentalisation du droit, qui revêt des caractéristiques très subjectives. C'est ce qui explique la concurrence entre le juge constitutionnel et les juges ordinaires et européens, et conduit le premier à se comporter en cour suprême en Allemagne et en Espagne où existent ces voies de recours. La fondamentalisation, qui est un processus plus vaste que la constitutionnalisation, oblige également le juge constitutionnel à s’adapter et à prendre part à la "circulation des solutions juridiques"

The direct access of individuals to constitutional justice has the tendency in Germany and Spain, contrary to France and Italy where it does not exist, to modify the current and objective nature of the mission of constitutionalisation of the constitutional judge through the subjective goals individual and direct recourses. It triggers, on the other hand, on the side of the constitutional judge another function than the simple constitutionalisation of law that remains objective in the case of the indirect access, which is leading to the fundamentalisation of law, which has very subjective features. This is explaining the competition between the constitutional judge and the ordinary and European courts that leads the first to behave in Supreme Court in Germany and Spain where those review procedures exist. The fundamentalisation, which is a wider process than the constitutionalisation one, also oblige the constitutional judge to adapt and to get involved in the “circulation of legal solutions”

Advisors/Committee Members: Fatin-Rouge Stéfanini, Marthe (thesis director).

Subjects/Keywords: Accès des individus; Justice constitutionnelle; Droit constitutionnel; Droit comparé; Droits fondamentaux; Mission du juge constitutionnel; Contrôle de constitutionnalité; Access of individuals to constitutional justice; Constitutional justice; Constitutional law; Comparative Law; Fundamental rights; Function of the constitutional judge; Constitutionality review

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Wade, M. N. (2015). Accès au juge constitutionnel et constitutionnalisation du droit : approche comparée avec l'Allemagne, l'Italie et l'Espagne : Access to the constitutional judge and constitutionnalisation of law : comparative approach with Germany, Italy and Spain. (Doctoral Dissertation). Aix Marseille Université. Retrieved from http://www.theses.fr/2015AIXM1071

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Wade, Mame Ndiaga. “Accès au juge constitutionnel et constitutionnalisation du droit : approche comparée avec l'Allemagne, l'Italie et l'Espagne : Access to the constitutional judge and constitutionnalisation of law : comparative approach with Germany, Italy and Spain.” 2015. Doctoral Dissertation, Aix Marseille Université. Accessed March 06, 2021. http://www.theses.fr/2015AIXM1071.

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Wade, Mame Ndiaga. “Accès au juge constitutionnel et constitutionnalisation du droit : approche comparée avec l'Allemagne, l'Italie et l'Espagne : Access to the constitutional judge and constitutionnalisation of law : comparative approach with Germany, Italy and Spain.” 2015. Web. 06 Mar 2021.

Vancouver:

Wade MN. Accès au juge constitutionnel et constitutionnalisation du droit : approche comparée avec l'Allemagne, l'Italie et l'Espagne : Access to the constitutional judge and constitutionnalisation of law : comparative approach with Germany, Italy and Spain. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Aix Marseille Université 2015. [cited 2021 Mar 06]. Available from: http://www.theses.fr/2015AIXM1071.

Council of Science Editors:

Wade MN. Accès au juge constitutionnel et constitutionnalisation du droit : approche comparée avec l'Allemagne, l'Italie et l'Espagne : Access to the constitutional judge and constitutionnalisation of law : comparative approach with Germany, Italy and Spain. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Aix Marseille Université 2015. Available from: http://www.theses.fr/2015AIXM1071

University of Toronto

28. Taeput, Tina K. Delinquent Democracy: Examining the Nature, Scope, and Effects of the Trend towards Greater Criminal Enfranchisement.

Degree: 2012, University of Toronto

URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1807/33550

►

Universal suffrage is a guiding principle of democracy. However, it has a long history of being selectively denied. While many of these exclusions have dissipated… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Criminal Disenfranchisement; Transnational Judicial Dialogue; Comparative Constitutional Law; History of Criminal Disenfranchisement; Trend Towards Criminal Enfranchisement; 0398

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Taeput, T. K. (2012). Delinquent Democracy: Examining the Nature, Scope, and Effects of the Trend towards Greater Criminal Enfranchisement. (Masters Thesis). University of Toronto. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1807/33550

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Taeput, Tina K. “Delinquent Democracy: Examining the Nature, Scope, and Effects of the Trend towards Greater Criminal Enfranchisement.” 2012. Masters Thesis, University of Toronto. Accessed March 06, 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/1807/33550.

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Taeput, Tina K. “Delinquent Democracy: Examining the Nature, Scope, and Effects of the Trend towards Greater Criminal Enfranchisement.” 2012. Web. 06 Mar 2021.

Vancouver:

Taeput TK. Delinquent Democracy: Examining the Nature, Scope, and Effects of the Trend towards Greater Criminal Enfranchisement. [Internet] [Masters thesis]. University of Toronto; 2012. [cited 2021 Mar 06]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1807/33550.

Council of Science Editors:

Taeput TK. Delinquent Democracy: Examining the Nature, Scope, and Effects of the Trend towards Greater Criminal Enfranchisement. [Masters Thesis]. University of Toronto; 2012. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1807/33550

Universidade do Rio Grande do Sul

29. Cristovam, Thaiane Correa. A supremacia judicial e a teoria dos diálogos constitucionais : sobre a implementação de mecanismos de diálogo no panorama constitucional brasileiro.

Degree: 2017, Universidade do Rio Grande do Sul

URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/163607

►

A presente dissertação tem por objetivo apresentar ferramentas que fomentem a implementação de uma espécie de controle de constitucionalidade dialógico no ordenamento jurídico brasileiro, de… (more)

▼

A presente dissertação tem por objetivo apresentar ferramentas que fomentem a implementação de uma espécie de controle de constitucionalidade dialógico no ordenamento jurídico brasileiro, de forma a mitigar a supremacia judicial ostentada pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal. Para isso, foi organizado em três capítulos. Os dois primeiros dirigem-se a realizar uma abordagem comparada, por meio de um breve apanhado histórico e análise jurisprudencial, entre os sistemas constitucionais dos Estados Unidos, da Colômbia, da Costa Rica e do Brasil e entre os seus respetivos Tribunais imbuídos da função da realização do controle de constitucionalidade. Com isto, busca-se demonstrar o assentamento da supremacia judicial em uma visão mais ampla, bem como em uma realidade latino-americana. O terceiro capítulo, por sua vez, tem o escopo de explorar as diversas vertentes da teoria dos diálogos constitucionais, elaborar um conceito de diálogo substancial e, por fim, elaborar proposições de instrumentos dialógicos ainda não existentes no ordenamento jurídico pátrio, bem como sugerir a reformulação de alguns já existentes. O intuito primordial da parte final da dissertação é a busca da promoção de uma ressignificação do controle de constitucionalidade, de forma a democratiza-lo, mitigando a supremacia judicial, incluindo no debate sobre o significado da Constituição, além do Poder Judiciário, os Poderes Executivo e Legislativo, e a sociedade como um todo.

This master’s dissertation aims do present tools that provide the implementation of a kind of dialogic judicial review in the Brazilian legal framework, so as to mitigate the judicial supremacy displayed by the Supremo Tribunal Federal. In order to do that, it was organized in three chapters. The first two chapters carry out a comparative approach, through a short historical description e and jurisprudential analyses, between the American, the Colombian, the Costa Rican and the Brazilian constitutional systems and its respective Courts that perform judicial review. In that manner, it is the objective to demonstrate the settlement of judicial supremacy in a broad vision, and also in a Latin American reality. The third chapter, by its turn, aims to explore the different aspects of the constitutional dialogue theory, elaborate a concept of substantial dialogue and, in conclusion, elaborate propositions of dialogical instruments not yet existent in the native legal order, and also suggest a reformulation of others that already exist. The paramount intention of dissertation’s final part is the promotion of a resignification of judicial review, so as to democratize it, mitigating judicial supremacy, incorporating in the debate about the significance of the Constitution, other than the Judicial power, the Executive and the Legislative powers, and the society as a hole.

Advisors/Committee Members: Baggio, Roberta Camineiro.

Subjects/Keywords: Judicial activism; Ativismo judicial; Judicial supremacy; Supremacia do direito; Controle de constitucionalidade; Constitutional dialogues; Judicial review; Comparative law

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Cristovam, T. C. (2017). A supremacia judicial e a teoria dos diálogos constitucionais : sobre a implementação de mecanismos de diálogo no panorama constitucional brasileiro. (Thesis). Universidade do Rio Grande do Sul. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10183/163607

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Cristovam, Thaiane Correa. “A supremacia judicial e a teoria dos diálogos constitucionais : sobre a implementação de mecanismos de diálogo no panorama constitucional brasileiro.” 2017. Thesis, Universidade do Rio Grande do Sul. Accessed March 06, 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/10183/163607.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Cristovam, Thaiane Correa. “A supremacia judicial e a teoria dos diálogos constitucionais : sobre a implementação de mecanismos de diálogo no panorama constitucional brasileiro.” 2017. Web. 06 Mar 2021.

Vancouver:

Cristovam TC. A supremacia judicial e a teoria dos diálogos constitucionais : sobre a implementação de mecanismos de diálogo no panorama constitucional brasileiro. [Internet] [Thesis]. Universidade do Rio Grande do Sul; 2017. [cited 2021 Mar 06]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/163607.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Cristovam TC. A supremacia judicial e a teoria dos diálogos constitucionais : sobre a implementação de mecanismos de diálogo no panorama constitucional brasileiro. [Thesis]. Universidade do Rio Grande do Sul; 2017. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/163607

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

University of Georgia

30. Kim, Myeong-sik. An end to the political question doctrine in Korea? : a comparative analysis.

Degree: 2014, University of Georgia

URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10724/20604

► The political question doctrine is one of the controversial issues in Korea and U.S. The most important point is, however, that the current trend on… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: The University of Georgia; Master of Laws; Comparative analysis; Constitutional law; Political question doctrine; Justiciability; Independence of the Judiciary; Korea

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Kim, M. (2014). An end to the political question doctrine in Korea? : a comparative analysis. (Thesis). University of Georgia. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10724/20604

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Kim, Myeong-sik. “An end to the political question doctrine in Korea? : a comparative analysis.” 2014. Thesis, University of Georgia. Accessed March 06, 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/10724/20604.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Kim, Myeong-sik. “An end to the political question doctrine in Korea? : a comparative analysis.” 2014. Web. 06 Mar 2021.

Vancouver:

Kim M. An end to the political question doctrine in Korea? : a comparative analysis. [Internet] [Thesis]. University of Georgia; 2014. [cited 2021 Mar 06]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10724/20604.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Kim M. An end to the political question doctrine in Korea? : a comparative analysis. [Thesis]. University of Georgia; 2014. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10724/20604

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Open Access Theses and Dissertations