Advanced search options

Advanced Search Options 🞨

Browse by author name (“Author name starts with…”).

Find ETDs with:

in
/  
in
/  
in
/  
in

Written in Published in Earliest date Latest date

Sorted by

Results per page:

You searched for subject:(bed mning). One record found.

Search Limiters

Last 2 Years | English Only

No search limiters apply to these results.

▼ Search Limiters

1. Levander, Åsa. Kunskapskraven i religionskunskap 1 - grund för likvärdig bedömning? : Fyra kvalitativa intervjuer med religionslärare på gymnasiet.

Degree: Education, 2013, Linnaeus University

The purpose of this study is to explore how teachers at Swedish upper secondary schools perceive the so-called value words and knowledge requirements of religious studies 1 as defined by the present curriculum for upper secondary school 2011 (Gy11) how they consider themselves to apply these value words in their teaching, and whether they consider the knowledge requirements as alegitimate basis for equivalentassessment. My studyis based oninterviewswithfour teachers in religious studies at four different upper swcondary schools in the municipalityof Jönköping, Sweden. The results of my study show that the interviewed teachers perceive the value words in the knowledge requirements of religious studies 1,as defined by the present curriculum Gy11, aredifficult to interpret and that the value wordsare not definitive, but interpretable. All teachers use the knowledge requirements in theirplanning of teaching,but also in teaching where they are to concretize the knowledge requirements and value wordsthrough their own examples. Half of the teachers, however, experienced a lack of interest in the knowledge requirements by the pupils, which make it even more important to discuss knowledge requirementswith them, while the teachers’assessment has to rely on these knowledge requirements. All teachers apply the knowledge requirementsin their assessments, but three of the interviewees perceive the knowledge requirementsas unfavorable or unfair, since the knowledgerequirements and the present curriculum, Gy11expressa view of knowledge,whichaccording to several teachers,emphasizes qualitative rather than quantitative aspects. The knowledge requirements are considered as a basis for equivalentassessment to some degree, but full equivalence is not possible since the guiding documents can always be interpreted in multiple ways by the teachers. More importantly, the interviewed teachersin this study emphasized the importance oftime to discuss knowledgerequirements and assessment with colleagues, which could increase the chances of more equivalence.The results of this studycontribute withnew empiricalinsight into howteachers in religious studiesperceive,useandconsider based onthe knowledge requirementsinreligious studies1, in the the present cirruculum Gy11, andif they perceivethe knowledgerequirements as the basis forequivalentassessment.

Subjects/Keywords: kunskapskrav; värdeord; läroplan; religionskunskap; Gy11; betyg; bed ö mning; likvärdighet; kunskapssyn; gymnasiet; Didactics; Didaktik

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Sample image

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Levander, . (2013). Kunskapskraven i religionskunskap 1 - grund för likvärdig bedömning? : Fyra kvalitativa intervjuer med religionslärare på gymnasiet. (Thesis). Linnaeus University. Retrieved from http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-32282

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Levander, Åsa. “Kunskapskraven i religionskunskap 1 - grund för likvärdig bedömning? : Fyra kvalitativa intervjuer med religionslärare på gymnasiet.” 2013. Thesis, Linnaeus University. Accessed February 16, 2020. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-32282.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Levander, Åsa. “Kunskapskraven i religionskunskap 1 - grund för likvärdig bedömning? : Fyra kvalitativa intervjuer med religionslärare på gymnasiet.” 2013. Web. 16 Feb 2020.

Vancouver:

Levander . Kunskapskraven i religionskunskap 1 - grund för likvärdig bedömning? : Fyra kvalitativa intervjuer med religionslärare på gymnasiet. [Internet] [Thesis]. Linnaeus University; 2013. [cited 2020 Feb 16]. Available from: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-32282.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Levander . Kunskapskraven i religionskunskap 1 - grund för likvärdig bedömning? : Fyra kvalitativa intervjuer med religionslärare på gymnasiet. [Thesis]. Linnaeus University; 2013. Available from: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-32282

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

.