Advanced search options

Advanced Search Options 🞨

Browse by author name (“Author name starts with…”).

Find ETDs with:

in
/  
in
/  
in
/  
in

Written in Published in Earliest date Latest date

Sorted by

Results per page:

Sorted by: relevance · author · university · dateNew search

You searched for subject:(an arbitrator). Showing records 1 – 2 of 2 total matches.

Search Limiters

Last 2 Years | English Only

No search limiters apply to these results.

▼ Search Limiters

1. Starc, Borut. NEODVISNOST IN NEPRISTRANSKOST ARBITROV.

Degree: 2013, Univerza v Mariboru

Medsebojne spore, kot sestavni del gospodarskih aktivnosti, ki jih stranke želijo rešiti na manj formalen postopek, kot je postopek pred sodiščem in želijo, da je odločitev tovrstnega razsodišča kljub temu zavezujoča in dokončna, izberejo arbitražo, kot alternativo sodnemu postopku. Temeljna razlika arbitraže od sodnega postopka je, da arbitraža omogoča hitre, strokovne, navadno cenejše, kreativne in interesom strank prilagojene rešitve. Dejstvo je, da stranke izberejo vsaka svojega arbitra povsem avtonomno, pri čemer velja, da izbrani arbitri ne zastopajo interesov svojih strank, temveč sledijo višjim ciljem, s katerimi bi se spor rešil karseda objektivno. Na podlagi tovrstnega imenovanja arbiter prične opravljati funkcijo, ki zajema določene pravice in obveznosti oz. dolžnosti. V arbitražnem postopku tako mora spoštovati različna procesna pravila, med katerimi je tudi temeljno načelo neodvisnosti in nepristranskosti arbitrov, kar je ključni element samega postopka in ga različni avtorji definirajo zelo različno. Na podlagi analize temeljnega pojma arbitraže, temeljnih načel in značilnosti arbitražnega postopka, izpeljemo osnovno vodilo pojma »neodvisnosti in nepristranskosti arbitrov«. Gre za temeljno načelo, glede katerega se ni težko strinjati, vendar moramo znati pravilno ločevati in uporabiti oba pojma, tako neodvisnost, kot nepristranskost arbitra. Kljub temu pa je v konkretnih primerih prakse pogosto težko oceniti, ali določeno stanje, ravnanje ali obnašanje arbitra predstavlja tako resno grožnjo, da bi lahko ogrozilo neodvisnost, nepristranskost in učinkovitost arbitražnega postopka. V praksi je zato potrebno pravilno uporabiti merila, ki so pomembna za presojo neodvisnosti in nepristranskosti, kar lahko v končni posledici pripelje tudi do izločitvenega razloga in postopka izločitve posameznega arbitra.

In mutual disputes, as an integral part of economic activity, where customers wish the solution by a less formal procedure than the procedure before the court and wish that the decision of such court may nevertheless be binding and final, arbitration is chosen as an alternative to judicial process. A fundamental difference between the arbitration proceedings and judicial process is that arbitration allows for quick, professional, usually cheaper, creative and customized solutions to clients’ interests. The fact is that the parties each choose an arbitrator completely autonomous, with the understanding that the selected arbitrators do not represent the interests of their clients, but representing the interests wider. On these grounds, the designated arbitrator starts performing the function, covering certain rights and obligations or duties. In arbitration proceeding, the arbitrator must comply with various procedural rules, including the fundamental principle of independence and impartiality of arbitrators, which is a key element of the process itself and is defined very differently by various authors. Based on analysis of the basic concept of arbitration, fundamental principles and…

Advisors/Committee Members: Rijavec, Vesna.

Subjects/Keywords: arbitraža; arbitražno pravo; arbiter; izločitev; izvensodno reševanje sporov; mednarodna arbitraža; neodvisnost; nepristranskost; procesna pravila; razveljavitev arbitražne odločbe; temeljna načela arbitražnega postopka; arbitration; arbitration law; an arbitrator; exclusion of arbitrator; out-of-court settlement of disputes; international arbitration; independence; impartiality; procedural rules; cancellation of arbitration decision; the fundamental principles of arbitration proceedings; info:eu-repo/classification/udc/347.918(043.2)

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Starc, B. (2013). NEODVISNOST IN NEPRISTRANSKOST ARBITROV. (Masters Thesis). Univerza v Mariboru. Retrieved from https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=38996 ; https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?id=52431&dn= ; https://plus.si.cobiss.net/opac7/bib/4480811?lang=sl

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Starc, Borut. “NEODVISNOST IN NEPRISTRANSKOST ARBITROV.” 2013. Masters Thesis, Univerza v Mariboru. Accessed January 21, 2020. https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=38996 ; https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?id=52431&dn= ; https://plus.si.cobiss.net/opac7/bib/4480811?lang=sl.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Starc, Borut. “NEODVISNOST IN NEPRISTRANSKOST ARBITROV.” 2013. Web. 21 Jan 2020.

Vancouver:

Starc B. NEODVISNOST IN NEPRISTRANSKOST ARBITROV. [Internet] [Masters thesis]. Univerza v Mariboru; 2013. [cited 2020 Jan 21]. Available from: https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=38996 ; https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?id=52431&dn= ; https://plus.si.cobiss.net/opac7/bib/4480811?lang=sl.

Council of Science Editors:

Starc B. NEODVISNOST IN NEPRISTRANSKOST ARBITROV. [Masters Thesis]. Univerza v Mariboru; 2013. Available from: https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=38996 ; https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?id=52431&dn= ; https://plus.si.cobiss.net/opac7/bib/4480811?lang=sl

2. Elatafy, Sherif. La responsabilité des centres d'arbitrage : The liability of arbitral instituions.

Degree: Docteur es, Droit, 2016, Lyon

Les litigants sollicitent les centres d’arbitrage pour diriger l’arbitrage dans toutes ses phases afin de donner une garantie supplémentaire qui assure la validité de la sentence arbitrale. Compte tenu du rôle important que les centres d’arbitrage jouent pendant l’instance arbitrale, les litigants mécontents de la sentence arbitrale ou du jugement annulant la sentence tentent d’engager la responsabilité du centre d’arbitrage dès lors qu’il a surveillé, dirigé et participé au rendu de la sentence.De plus en plus la responsabilité des centres d’arbitrage est mise en cause devant les juridictions étatiques différentes, les fonctions et les pouvoirs exercés par les centres d’arbitrage ainsi que le régime de responsabilité leur est applicable font l’objet d’une attention critique de la part de la doctrine dans plusieurs systèmes juridiques. On s’interroge sur l’origine des rapports qui lient les centres d’arbitrage aux autres acteurs de l’arbitrage, sur les obligations et les pouvoirs conférés aux centres d’arbitrage, et sur les fonctions exercées par les centres d’arbitrage pour établir enfin un régime de responsabilité homogène et pertinent à l’égard des fonctions exercées par les centres d’arbitrage qui a une vocation à s’appliquer dans la majorité des systèmes juridiques

Parties to arbitration seek arbitral institutions to administrate their arbitration in order to have an extra guarantee that ensures the validity of the arbitral award. Given the role that arbitral institutions play during the arbitral procedure, parties unsatisfied either by the arbitral award or the annulment of the award tend to claim the liability of arbitral institution for the awards it had supervised, administered and participated in.The more the allegations of liability raise against the arbitral institutions before courts, the more the issue of arbitral institutions’ functions, powers and liability becomes controversial in different jurisdictions. Therefore, the present study tends to clarify the origin of the relationship existing between arbitral institutions and other parties involved in the arbitration at issue, the duties and powers assigned to the arbitral institutions and the functions performed by the arbitral intuitions, which helps eventually in establishing a kind of liability that complies with the functions performed by the arbitral institutions and can be applied in many jurisdictions.

Advisors/Committee Members: Nourissat, Cyril (thesis director).

Subjects/Keywords: Centre d’arbitrage; Arbitrage institutionnel; Fonctions administratives; Fonctions juridictionnelles; Sentence arbitrale; Acte juridictionnel; Responsabilité civile; Contrat d’entreprise; Contrat de direction d’arbitrage; Décision institutionnelle; Faute lourde; Faute intentionnelle; Clause exclusive de responsabilité; Immunité; Récusation d’arbitre; Examen prima facie; Approbation; Protection conventionnelle; Arbitral institutions; Institutional arbitration; Administrative functions; Judicial functions; Arbitral award; Judicial conduct; Civil liability; Business contract; Agreement to administrate an arbitration; Institutional decision; Gross negligence; Willful misconduct; Condition excluding liability; Immunity; Forum; Challenging arbitrator; Prima facie examination; Consensual protection; 340

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Elatafy, S. (2016). La responsabilité des centres d'arbitrage : The liability of arbitral instituions. (Doctoral Dissertation). Lyon. Retrieved from http://www.theses.fr/2016LYSE3013

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Elatafy, Sherif. “La responsabilité des centres d'arbitrage : The liability of arbitral instituions.” 2016. Doctoral Dissertation, Lyon. Accessed January 21, 2020. http://www.theses.fr/2016LYSE3013.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Elatafy, Sherif. “La responsabilité des centres d'arbitrage : The liability of arbitral instituions.” 2016. Web. 21 Jan 2020.

Vancouver:

Elatafy S. La responsabilité des centres d'arbitrage : The liability of arbitral instituions. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Lyon; 2016. [cited 2020 Jan 21]. Available from: http://www.theses.fr/2016LYSE3013.

Council of Science Editors:

Elatafy S. La responsabilité des centres d'arbitrage : The liability of arbitral instituions. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Lyon; 2016. Available from: http://www.theses.fr/2016LYSE3013

.