Advanced search options

Advanced Search Options 🞨

Browse by author name (“Author name starts with…”).

Find ETDs with:

in
/  
in
/  
in
/  
in

Written in Published in Earliest date Latest date

Sorted by

Results per page:

Sorted by: relevance · author · university · dateNew search

You searched for subject:(action for declaration). Showing records 1 – 2 of 2 total matches.

Search Limiters

Last 2 Years | English Only

No search limiters apply to these results.

▼ Search Limiters


University of Waterloo

1. Khan, Reshem. Progress or the Status Quo? Systems-thinking and Targeted Practice in Development.

Degree: 2016, University of Waterloo

The policy space in which development happens spans the globe and innumerable contexts depending on the geographical, cultural, or normative scope of the intervention. Taking the complexity of the policy space, the agents of development and the tension between objectivity and orthodox practice and subjective contextual practice, it comes as no surprise that development features a significant degree of unpredictability in outcome. While some element of unpredictability is taken as a given in practice, I argue that theorists and practitioners should not yield so readily to the unknown. The framework presented here with which practitioners may improve upon their analytical capacities offers an introductory road-map for the types of pre-intervention research necessary to anticipate and mitigate the effects of unintended externalities. In this paper, I apply structuration theory to analyse failures in World Bank development practice. I argue that the structural configurations of recipient states constrain the potential of externally-directed development initiatives that in turn can reinforce the very institutional features of ‘underdevelopment’ that are targeted for change. Developing structural and institutional profiles of recipient states in anticipation of development activity will reduce the very prevalent risk of failed development initiatives.

Subjects/Keywords: International Development; Aid Effectiveness; Accra Agenda for Action; Program Evaluation; Structures and Institutions; Structuration Theory; The Global South; The World Bank; The Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Khan, R. (2016). Progress or the Status Quo? Systems-thinking and Targeted Practice in Development. (Thesis). University of Waterloo. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10012/11104

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Khan, Reshem. “Progress or the Status Quo? Systems-thinking and Targeted Practice in Development.” 2016. Thesis, University of Waterloo. Accessed September 17, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10012/11104.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Khan, Reshem. “Progress or the Status Quo? Systems-thinking and Targeted Practice in Development.” 2016. Web. 17 Sep 2019.

Vancouver:

Khan R. Progress or the Status Quo? Systems-thinking and Targeted Practice in Development. [Internet] [Thesis]. University of Waterloo; 2016. [cited 2019 Sep 17]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10012/11104.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Khan R. Progress or the Status Quo? Systems-thinking and Targeted Practice in Development. [Thesis]. University of Waterloo; 2016. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10012/11104

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

2. Rojko, Katja. Analiza celovitosti sistema sodnega varstva Sodišč EU.

Degree: 2014, Univerza v Mariboru

Zasnovani sistem varstva pravic prava EU je, kljub velikim spremembam na gospodarsko ekonomskem področju in tudi na socialnem področju, saj se je družba in posameznikov položaj v njej v tem času zelo spremenil, dolga leta deloval brezhibno. Odrekanje pravnega varstva oziroma pomanjkanje učinkovitega pravnega sredstva kot pomanjkljivost sistema ni bilo zaznano vse do zadeve Jégo-Quéré. Po opravljeni analizi pravnih sredstev, ki so v okvirih varstva pravic v zasebnem interesu, javnem interesu in v okviru ustavnega varstva pravic na voljo posamezniku, je zaključiti, da je za posameznika daleč najprimernejše varstvo pravic v zasebnem interesu. Direktna ničnostna tožba na podlagi četrtega odstavka 263. člena Pogodbe o delovanju EU pa je tisti institut varstva pravic EU, ki je za posameznika, če le izpolnjuje stroge legitimacijske pogoje, ki so po spremembi z Lizbonsko pogodbo upoštevaje interpretacijo pojma predpis, ki jo je Sodišče EU poudarilo v zadevi C-583/11 P, postali za posameznika, ki želi izpodbijani splošne akte, z izjemo zakonodajnih aktov, manj strogi, daleč najprimernejši. Kljub vsem možnostim varstva pravic, ki so posamezniku neposredno ali posredno na voljo, da bi lahko učinkovito zavaroval svoje pravic, ki izvirajo iz prava EU, se postavlja vprašanje ali se lahko vseeno znajde v situaciji, ko mu ustrezno oziroma učinkovito varstvo pravic (po načelu effet utile) ni zagotovljeno? Odgovor je pritrdilen. Varstvo pravic posameznika preko Sodišča EU je kljub namenu spremembe četrtega odstavka 263. člena PDEU, da se posameznikom omogoči, da pod manj strogimi pogoji vložijo ničnostno tožbo zoper predpise, omejeno in ni opaziti interesa, ne s strani Sodišča EU, kot tudi ne s strani držav članic (sodeč po Lizbonski pogodbi), da bi v prihodnje prišlo do širitve tega obsega na tak način, da bi posameznikom v okviru pojma predpis bila dana možnost izpodbijanja splošnih zakonodajnih aktov. Naloga je sestavljena iz treh poglavij. Prvo poglavje predstavlja kratek uvod v sisteme varstva pravic. V drugem poglavju sledi opis značilnosti posameznega sistem varstva pravic, s pregledom bistvenih lastnosti pravnih sredstev, znotraj vsakega izmed sistemov varstva pravic. Tretje poglavje je jedro magistrske naloge. V njem so najprej predstavljene možnosti, kako lahko posameznik zaščiti svoje pravice, ali se lahko odloči za uveljavljanje varstva pravic le znotraj enega sistema varstva pravic, na primer zasebnopravnega, ali pa lahko hkrati uporabi tudi pravna sredstva, ki mu jih nudi sistem javnega varstva pravic. Sledi analiza podobnosti in razlik ter medsebojne povezanosti posameznih pravnih sredstev, ki daje podlago za pregled prednosti in slabosti za posameznika, pri uveljavljanju varstva pravic. Magistrska naloga doseže svoj vrh pri presoji, ali je posamezniku, glede na novo ureditev po Lizbonski pogodbi in kljub pomanjkljivostim sistema varstva pravic, zagotovljeno učinkovito varstvo pravic prava EU. Temu pa sledijo še sklepne misli.

System designed to protect the rights of EU law has for many years, despite significant…

Advisors/Committee Members: Knez, Rajko.

Subjects/Keywords: Pravo EU; načelo primarnosti; načelo neposrednega učinka; sistem varstva pravic prava EU; varstvo pravic v zasebnem interesu; varstvo v javnem interesu; ustavno varstvo pravic; značilnosti posameznega sistem varstva pravic; pravna sredstva znotraj vsakega izmed sistemov varstva pravic; prednosti in slabosti za posameznika; učinkovito varstvo pravic prava EU; Lizbonska pogodba; direktna ničnostna tožba na podlagi četrtega odstavka 263. člena PDEU; strogi pogoji legitimacije pomanjkljivostim sistema; EU law; rule of primacy; rule of direct effect; system of protection of the rights of EU law; protection of private interests; protection of public interests; constitutional protection; remedies within each of the systems of protection of rights; effective legal judicial protection; advantages and disadvantages for the individual; effective protection of EU law; Lisbon Treaty; direct action under the fourth paragraph 263 Article TFEU; strict legitimation conditions; denial of justice; preliminary ruling; exception of illegality; breach of EU Law; member state liability; Köbler case; Upa case; Jégo – Quéré case; action for declaration; info:eu-repo/classification/udc/341(043.2)

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Rojko, K. (2014). Analiza celovitosti sistema sodnega varstva Sodišč EU. (Masters Thesis). Univerza v Mariboru. Retrieved from https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=43743 ; https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?id=62420&dn= ; https://plus.si.cobiss.net/opac7/bib/4684587?lang=sl

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Rojko, Katja. “Analiza celovitosti sistema sodnega varstva Sodišč EU.” 2014. Masters Thesis, Univerza v Mariboru. Accessed September 17, 2019. https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=43743 ; https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?id=62420&dn= ; https://plus.si.cobiss.net/opac7/bib/4684587?lang=sl.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Rojko, Katja. “Analiza celovitosti sistema sodnega varstva Sodišč EU.” 2014. Web. 17 Sep 2019.

Vancouver:

Rojko K. Analiza celovitosti sistema sodnega varstva Sodišč EU. [Internet] [Masters thesis]. Univerza v Mariboru; 2014. [cited 2019 Sep 17]. Available from: https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=43743 ; https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?id=62420&dn= ; https://plus.si.cobiss.net/opac7/bib/4684587?lang=sl.

Council of Science Editors:

Rojko K. Analiza celovitosti sistema sodnega varstva Sodišč EU. [Masters Thesis]. Univerza v Mariboru; 2014. Available from: https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=43743 ; https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?id=62420&dn= ; https://plus.si.cobiss.net/opac7/bib/4684587?lang=sl

.