Advanced search options

Advanced Search Options 🞨

Browse by author name (“Author name starts with…”).

Find ETDs with:

in
/  
in
/  
in
/  
in

Written in Published in Earliest date Latest date

Sorted by

Results per page:

Sorted by: relevance · author · university · dateNew search

You searched for subject:(Young Hegelians). Showing records 1 – 3 of 3 total matches.

Search Limiters

Last 2 Years | English Only

No search limiters apply to these results.

▼ Search Limiters

1. Durand, Anne. L'anthropologie feuerbachienne : philosophie et praxis : Feuerbachian anthropology : philosophy and social praxis.

Degree: Docteur es, Philosophie, 2014, Paris 1; Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität

La critique feuerbachienne de la philosophie idéaliste de Hegel a beaucoup influencé ses contemporains et les matérialistes et humanistes du 19eme siècle. Cependant, les études françaises ne rendent pas compte de sa contribution à l'histoire de la philosophie autant qu'elles le devraient. Le but de ce travail est de présenter l'évolution de la pensée de Feuerbach de sa jeunesse hégélienne jusqu'à son matérialisme anthropologique et humaniste. Cette évolution est le résultat de la remise en cause progressive puis du renversement de la philosophie spéculative. Sa critique de la religion diffère profondément de celle des Lumières françaises dans le sens où loin de ne voir dans la religion qu'erreur, tromperie et fanatisme, il reconnaît que le religion exprime un trait anthropologique essentiel: l'essence de l'homme. La pensée de Feuerbach réside essentiellement alors dans une nouvelle interprétation du phénomène religieux en lui donnant une explication anthropologique. L'être humain est un mélange de rationalité et de sensibilité, d'affectivité et de passivité, qui doit être considéré en même temps en tant qu'individu et qu'être social. En opposition à l'interprétation de Marx, j'étudie plus particulièrement dans cette thèse, le rôle de la praxis sociale dans l'anthropologie feuerbachienne. Enfin, méthodologiquement, en plus d'une lecture attentive de l'ensemble du corpus feuerbachien, je re-contextualise sa pensée au sein du mouvement jeune-hégélien, et après la révolution de 1848.

Feuerbach's anthropological critique of Hegel's idealism has strongly influenced German materialists and humanists in the nineteenth-century as well as the following generations of thinkers. Even so particularly French scholars may still not recognize his contribution as central in the history of thought. The aim of my work is to present the development of Feuerbach's thought in particular how Feuerbach's early Hegelianism evolved into professing an empirical realism and materialist humanism, resulting in what was considered by Feuerbach himself as the negation of speculative German idealism. His critique of religion is fundamentally different from that of the French Enlightenment since according to him religion is not only fraudulent and deceptive, but also an essential anthropological feature. Essentially the thought of Feuerbach consists in a new interpretation of religion's phenomena, giving an anthropological explanation. For Feuerbach, the human subject was a complex weave of rationality and sensuality, affectivity and passivity, sociality and individualism. Contrasting with Marx's interpretation of Feuerbach, in this work 1 will study the role of the social praxis in Feuerbach's anthropology. Besides including a thorough reading of Feuerbach's work, my thesis will present a re-contextualisation of it in the Left Hegelian mouvement and after the March Revolution, as an additional rnaterial for my interpretation.

Advisors/Committee Members: Salem, Jean (thesis director), Reitemeyer-Witt, Ursula (thesis director).

Subjects/Keywords: Histoire des idées; Ludwig Feuerbach; Philosophie allemande; Anthropologie; Athéisme; Humanisme; Matérialisme; Jeune Hégélianisme; History of ideas; German philosophy; Anthropology; Atheism; Humanism; Materialism; Young Hegelians; 190

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Durand, A. (2014). L'anthropologie feuerbachienne : philosophie et praxis : Feuerbachian anthropology : philosophy and social praxis. (Doctoral Dissertation). Paris 1; Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität. Retrieved from http://www.theses.fr/2014PA010544

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Durand, Anne. “L'anthropologie feuerbachienne : philosophie et praxis : Feuerbachian anthropology : philosophy and social praxis.” 2014. Doctoral Dissertation, Paris 1; Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität. Accessed October 19, 2019. http://www.theses.fr/2014PA010544.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Durand, Anne. “L'anthropologie feuerbachienne : philosophie et praxis : Feuerbachian anthropology : philosophy and social praxis.” 2014. Web. 19 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Durand A. L'anthropologie feuerbachienne : philosophie et praxis : Feuerbachian anthropology : philosophy and social praxis. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Paris 1; Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität; 2014. [cited 2019 Oct 19]. Available from: http://www.theses.fr/2014PA010544.

Council of Science Editors:

Durand A. L'anthropologie feuerbachienne : philosophie et praxis : Feuerbachian anthropology : philosophy and social praxis. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Paris 1; Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität; 2014. Available from: http://www.theses.fr/2014PA010544


Virginia Commonwealth University

2. Giessel, Matthew. Richard Wagner's Jesus von Nazareth.

Degree: MA, History, 2013, Virginia Commonwealth University

In addition to his renowned musical output, Richard Wagner produced a logorrhoeic prose oeuvre, including a dramatic sketch of the last weeks of the life of Jesus Christ entitled Jesus von Nazareth. Though drafted in 1848-1849, it was published only posthumously, and has therefore been somewhat neglected in the otherwise voluminous Wagnerian literature. This thesis first examines the origins of Jesus von Nazareth amidst the climate of revolution wherein it was conceived, ascertaining its place within Wagner’s own internal development and amongst the radical thinkers who influenced it. While Ludwig Feuerbach has traditionally been seen as the most prominent of these, this thesis examines Wagner’s sources more broadly. The thesis then summarizes and analyzes Jesus von Nazareth itself, particularly in terms of Wagner’s use of biblical scripture. The thesis demonstrates how his not infrequent misuse thereof constitutes one way in which Wagner transmogrifies Jesus as mutable lens through which his own ideology of social revolution is reflected. It also attempts to provide a critical assessment of the relative dramatic merits of Jesus von Nazareth and looks into Wagner’s ultimate decision not to complete the work. The thesis then briefly summarizes the changes that occurred in Wagner’s mature Christological outlook subsequent to his drafting of Jesus von Nazareth, attempting to concisely demonstrate some developments beyond Wagner’s well-known encounter with the philosophy of Arthur Schopenhauer. The thesis concludes with an evaluation of how Jesus von Nazareth informed Wagner’s general religious outlook and the extent to which this worldview is a productive one. Advisors/Committee Members: Joseph Bendersky.

Subjects/Keywords: Richard Wagner; Jesus; Feuerbach; Schopenhauer; Christology; Exegesis; Hegel; Young Hegelians; Junges Deutschland; Die Sieger; Parsifal; Judaism in Music; Religion and Art; Cosima Wagner; Franz Liszt; Art and Revolution; Artwork of the Future; Martin Luther; Johann Sebastian Bach; Eric Voegelin; Marcionism; Materialism; Love; Revolution; Antinomianism; August Friedrich Gfrörer; Ernest Renan; Johann Gottlieb Fichte; Paul-Gerhard Graap; Mikhail Bakunin; Pierre-Joseph Proudhon; Das Liebesmahl der Apostel; Rienzi; Christ; Arts and Humanities; History

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Giessel, M. (2013). Richard Wagner's Jesus von Nazareth. (Thesis). Virginia Commonwealth University. Retrieved from https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/3284

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Giessel, Matthew. “Richard Wagner's Jesus von Nazareth.” 2013. Thesis, Virginia Commonwealth University. Accessed October 19, 2019. https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/3284.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Giessel, Matthew. “Richard Wagner's Jesus von Nazareth.” 2013. Web. 19 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Giessel M. Richard Wagner's Jesus von Nazareth. [Internet] [Thesis]. Virginia Commonwealth University; 2013. [cited 2019 Oct 19]. Available from: https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/3284.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Giessel M. Richard Wagner's Jesus von Nazareth. [Thesis]. Virginia Commonwealth University; 2013. Available from: https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/3284

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation


Duquesne University

3. Nietlong, Joseph Penlong. Feuerbach in Context: A Philosophical Reassessment.

Degree: PhD, Philosophy, 2004, Duquesne University

Between 1828 and 1872, Ludwig Andreas Feuerbach published a series of works that brought him into the very center of the philosophical and theological debate of his time. Frederick Engels wrote that the "enthusiasm was general; we all became at once Feuerbachians" Richard Wagner hailed him as the "ideal exponent of the radical release of the individual from the thralldom of accepted notions." Karl Marx went to great lengths to criticize, reformulate, and adopt his ideas. "Feuerbach's… insights have been absorbed and transformed, [not only in the works of] Marx, [but also in those of] Freud, Dewey, and Lukacs." "Feuerbach's radical critique of religion has been adopted with almost indecent fervor by radical theology itself, as a way of saving God for mankind and of rescuing religion from total irrelevance to this world. Sartre, Marcel and Buber have taken over Feuerbach's I-Thou as the touchstone of the relation of self to other. The existential psychology and psychiatry of Rogers, Laing, and others had repeated and elaborated the theory and the implicit therapy of Feuerbachian psychology." The intervening period has obscured Feuerbach's importance. When he is mentioned at all, it is mainly in a perfunctory manner, as a mere stepping stone, or as a bridge from Hegel to Marx. According to Feuerbach, God and truth, the purported objects of philosophy and religion were not the real objects of philosophy and religion. Rather, when decoded and unmasked, the real object of both turns out to be human being. Since human beings are intrinsically social, the realization of this anthropological content relates naturally to realizing the needs of the social group, whose freedom and fulfillment is seen as the elimination of the sources of religious alienation. This dissertation aims at presenting a radically fresh view of Feuerbach substantially original and different from the usual way this under-appreciated thinker is portrayed. This dissertation will be arguing that at the core of Feuerbach's thought are two central themes or concerns: the first epistemological and the second, ontological. By the first concern, I mean that which could be gleaned and constructed from his writings as amounting to the outline of a theory of knowledge. The second, or ontological concern, refers to Feuerbach's theory of being in which he inverts the usual understanding of the relationship between being and thought, mind and reality, thus uncovering a principal thread of modern thought: the principle of immanentism. In the first instance, Feuerbach, for the most part follows Hegel in holding that the relation of the thinking subject to its proper object is possible if and only if the subject and object (of knowledge) are of the same nature. However, for Feuerbach, only the senses, and not thought, gives us an object or thing in the true sense, " thus stressing the primacy of sensuousness in knowledge. "The secret of immediate knowledge, " Feuerbach says, is "sensation." One of the tasks of this dissertation will be to clarify why Feuerbach,… Advisors/Committee Members: Thomas Rockmore, Daniel Selcer, Ronald Polanksy.

Subjects/Keywords: alienation; Anthropology; AtheismustStreit; Atheist; Bayle; Critique of Hegel; Das Wessen des Christentums; De Ratione; dialectic; Dorguth; Engels; Essence of Christianity; Essence of Religion; Feuerbach; Fichte; Frederick Engels; Gattung; Gattungswessen; Gedanken uber tod und unterblickheit; Geist; German idealism; Globalization; God; God in exile; Hegel; Hegelians; HEINRICH Heine; infinite; I-Thou relationship; Kant; Karl Barth; Karl Daub; Karl Marx; Karl Rozenkranz; Martin Buber; Marx; Minerva the goddess; Moses Hess; Phillip Marheineke; projection; projection theories; Schelling; secularization; species being; Spirit; Stirner; The Essence of money; The future of humanity; Thoughts on Death and Immortality; Wartofsky; Young Hegelians

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Nietlong, J. P. (2004). Feuerbach in Context: A Philosophical Reassessment. (Doctoral Dissertation). Duquesne University. Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/1606

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Nietlong, Joseph Penlong. “Feuerbach in Context: A Philosophical Reassessment.” 2004. Doctoral Dissertation, Duquesne University. Accessed October 19, 2019. https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/1606.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Nietlong, Joseph Penlong. “Feuerbach in Context: A Philosophical Reassessment.” 2004. Web. 19 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Nietlong JP. Feuerbach in Context: A Philosophical Reassessment. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Duquesne University; 2004. [cited 2019 Oct 19]. Available from: https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/1606.

Council of Science Editors:

Nietlong JP. Feuerbach in Context: A Philosophical Reassessment. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Duquesne University; 2004. Available from: https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/1606

.