Advanced search options

Advanced Search Options 🞨

Browse by author name (“Author name starts with…”).

Find ETDs with:

in
/  
in
/  
in
/  
in

Written in Published in Earliest date Latest date

Sorted by

Results per page:

Sorted by: relevance · author · university · dateNew search

You searched for subject:(United States Supreme Court History ). Showing records 1 – 30 of 89086 total matches.

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] … [2970]

Search Limiters

Last 2 Years | English Only

Degrees

Levels

Languages

Country

▼ Search Limiters

1. Calvert, Robert A. The Supreme Court in Crisis : Four Selected Cases.

Degree: 1960, North Texas State College

 In view of the ability of the Court to retain and increase its power in the face of criticism, a study of past historical precedents… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: supreme court; United States. Supreme Court  – History.

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Calvert, R. A. (1960). The Supreme Court in Crisis : Four Selected Cases. (Thesis). North Texas State College. Retrieved from https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc108093/

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Calvert, Robert A. “The Supreme Court in Crisis : Four Selected Cases.” 1960. Thesis, North Texas State College. Accessed July 08, 2020. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc108093/.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Calvert, Robert A. “The Supreme Court in Crisis : Four Selected Cases.” 1960. Web. 08 Jul 2020.

Vancouver:

Calvert RA. The Supreme Court in Crisis : Four Selected Cases. [Internet] [Thesis]. North Texas State College; 1960. [cited 2020 Jul 08]. Available from: https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc108093/.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Calvert RA. The Supreme Court in Crisis : Four Selected Cases. [Thesis]. North Texas State College; 1960. Available from: https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc108093/

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation


University of Texas – Austin

2. Saylor, Joseph Rice, 1911-. The constitutional crisis of 1937.

Degree: PhD, Government, 1945, University of Texas – Austin

Subjects/Keywords: United States. Supreme Court – History; Constitutional history – United States

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Saylor, Joseph Rice, 1. (1945). The constitutional crisis of 1937. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Texas – Austin. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.26153/tsw/3407

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Saylor, Joseph Rice, 1911-. “The constitutional crisis of 1937.” 1945. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Texas – Austin. Accessed July 08, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.26153/tsw/3407.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Saylor, Joseph Rice, 1911-. “The constitutional crisis of 1937.” 1945. Web. 08 Jul 2020.

Vancouver:

Saylor, Joseph Rice 1. The constitutional crisis of 1937. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Texas – Austin; 1945. [cited 2020 Jul 08]. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.26153/tsw/3407.

Council of Science Editors:

Saylor, Joseph Rice 1. The constitutional crisis of 1937. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Texas – Austin; 1945. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.26153/tsw/3407


University of North Texas

3. Haynie, Stacia L. (Stacia Lyn). A Time Series Analysis of the Functional Performance of the United States Supreme Court.

Degree: 1990, University of North Texas

 The focus of this investigation is the relationship of the United States Supreme Court's functional performance to its environment. Three functions of courts are noted… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: United States Supreme Court; United States  – Supreme Court  – History  – 20th century.; functional court performance; Supreme Court history

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Haynie, S. L. (. L. (1990). A Time Series Analysis of the Functional Performance of the United States Supreme Court. (Thesis). University of North Texas. Retrieved from https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc330980/

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Haynie, Stacia L (Stacia Lyn). “A Time Series Analysis of the Functional Performance of the United States Supreme Court.” 1990. Thesis, University of North Texas. Accessed July 08, 2020. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc330980/.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Haynie, Stacia L (Stacia Lyn). “A Time Series Analysis of the Functional Performance of the United States Supreme Court.” 1990. Web. 08 Jul 2020.

Vancouver:

Haynie SL(L. A Time Series Analysis of the Functional Performance of the United States Supreme Court. [Internet] [Thesis]. University of North Texas; 1990. [cited 2020 Jul 08]. Available from: https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc330980/.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Haynie SL(L. A Time Series Analysis of the Functional Performance of the United States Supreme Court. [Thesis]. University of North Texas; 1990. Available from: https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc330980/

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation


University of Toledo

4. Dennison, Amanda. Struggle to Define the Power of the Court: President Thomas Jefferson v. Chief Justice John Marshall.

Degree: MA, History, 2005, University of Toledo

 This thesis will examine four events that shaped the court and the executive's power between 1801 to 1807. The first three, the Marbury v. Madison… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: History, United States; Jefferson; Marshall; Supreme Court

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Dennison, A. (2005). Struggle to Define the Power of the Court: President Thomas Jefferson v. Chief Justice John Marshall. (Masters Thesis). University of Toledo. Retrieved from http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=toledo1122299790

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Dennison, Amanda. “Struggle to Define the Power of the Court: President Thomas Jefferson v. Chief Justice John Marshall.” 2005. Masters Thesis, University of Toledo. Accessed July 08, 2020. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=toledo1122299790.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Dennison, Amanda. “Struggle to Define the Power of the Court: President Thomas Jefferson v. Chief Justice John Marshall.” 2005. Web. 08 Jul 2020.

Vancouver:

Dennison A. Struggle to Define the Power of the Court: President Thomas Jefferson v. Chief Justice John Marshall. [Internet] [Masters thesis]. University of Toledo; 2005. [cited 2020 Jul 08]. Available from: http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=toledo1122299790.

Council of Science Editors:

Dennison A. Struggle to Define the Power of the Court: President Thomas Jefferson v. Chief Justice John Marshall. [Masters Thesis]. University of Toledo; 2005. Available from: http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=toledo1122299790


Michigan State University

5. Bowman, Eileen Marie. Walter Lippmann's reaction to Franklin D. Roosevelt's 1937 court packing plan.

Degree: MA, 1978, Michigan State University

Subjects/Keywords: Lippmann, Walter, 1889-1974; United States. Supreme Court – History

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Bowman, E. M. (1978). Walter Lippmann's reaction to Franklin D. Roosevelt's 1937 court packing plan. (Masters Thesis). Michigan State University. Retrieved from http://etd.lib.msu.edu/islandora/object/etd:44914

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Bowman, Eileen Marie. “Walter Lippmann's reaction to Franklin D. Roosevelt's 1937 court packing plan.” 1978. Masters Thesis, Michigan State University. Accessed July 08, 2020. http://etd.lib.msu.edu/islandora/object/etd:44914.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Bowman, Eileen Marie. “Walter Lippmann's reaction to Franklin D. Roosevelt's 1937 court packing plan.” 1978. Web. 08 Jul 2020.

Vancouver:

Bowman EM. Walter Lippmann's reaction to Franklin D. Roosevelt's 1937 court packing plan. [Internet] [Masters thesis]. Michigan State University; 1978. [cited 2020 Jul 08]. Available from: http://etd.lib.msu.edu/islandora/object/etd:44914.

Council of Science Editors:

Bowman EM. Walter Lippmann's reaction to Franklin D. Roosevelt's 1937 court packing plan. [Masters Thesis]. Michigan State University; 1978. Available from: http://etd.lib.msu.edu/islandora/object/etd:44914


The Ohio State University

6. Ivanchenko, Roman. Interactions Between Congress and the Supreme Court.

Degree: PhD, Political Science, 2007, The Ohio State University

 The scholarship on the interactions between Congress and Supreme Court typically incorporates two assumptions: Congress has the final word so that legislative actions constrain the… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Political Science, General; United States Supreme Court; Congress; judicial decision making

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Ivanchenko, R. (2007). Interactions Between Congress and the Supreme Court. (Doctoral Dissertation). The Ohio State University. Retrieved from http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1180455617

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Ivanchenko, Roman. “Interactions Between Congress and the Supreme Court.” 2007. Doctoral Dissertation, The Ohio State University. Accessed July 08, 2020. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1180455617.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Ivanchenko, Roman. “Interactions Between Congress and the Supreme Court.” 2007. Web. 08 Jul 2020.

Vancouver:

Ivanchenko R. Interactions Between Congress and the Supreme Court. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. The Ohio State University; 2007. [cited 2020 Jul 08]. Available from: http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1180455617.

Council of Science Editors:

Ivanchenko R. Interactions Between Congress and the Supreme Court. [Doctoral Dissertation]. The Ohio State University; 2007. Available from: http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1180455617


Michigan State University

7. Renstrom, Peter, 1943-. The dimensionality of decision making of the 1941-1945 Stone Court : a computer dependent analysis of Supreme Court behavior.

Degree: PhD, Department of Political Science, 1972, Michigan State University

Subjects/Keywords: United States. Supreme Court

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Renstrom, Peter, 1. (1972). The dimensionality of decision making of the 1941-1945 Stone Court : a computer dependent analysis of Supreme Court behavior. (Doctoral Dissertation). Michigan State University. Retrieved from http://etd.lib.msu.edu/islandora/object/etd:35064

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Renstrom, Peter, 1943-. “The dimensionality of decision making of the 1941-1945 Stone Court : a computer dependent analysis of Supreme Court behavior.” 1972. Doctoral Dissertation, Michigan State University. Accessed July 08, 2020. http://etd.lib.msu.edu/islandora/object/etd:35064.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Renstrom, Peter, 1943-. “The dimensionality of decision making of the 1941-1945 Stone Court : a computer dependent analysis of Supreme Court behavior.” 1972. Web. 08 Jul 2020.

Vancouver:

Renstrom, Peter 1. The dimensionality of decision making of the 1941-1945 Stone Court : a computer dependent analysis of Supreme Court behavior. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Michigan State University; 1972. [cited 2020 Jul 08]. Available from: http://etd.lib.msu.edu/islandora/object/etd:35064.

Council of Science Editors:

Renstrom, Peter 1. The dimensionality of decision making of the 1941-1945 Stone Court : a computer dependent analysis of Supreme Court behavior. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Michigan State University; 1972. Available from: http://etd.lib.msu.edu/islandora/object/etd:35064


Texas Tech University

8. Nicodemus, Sara. An analysis of the five to four decisions of the Supreme Court.

Degree: Political Science, 1948, Texas Tech University

Subjects/Keywords: United States.  – Supreme Court

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Nicodemus, S. (1948). An analysis of the five to four decisions of the Supreme Court. (Thesis). Texas Tech University. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2346/14471

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Nicodemus, Sara. “An analysis of the five to four decisions of the Supreme Court.” 1948. Thesis, Texas Tech University. Accessed July 08, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/2346/14471.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Nicodemus, Sara. “An analysis of the five to four decisions of the Supreme Court.” 1948. Web. 08 Jul 2020.

Vancouver:

Nicodemus S. An analysis of the five to four decisions of the Supreme Court. [Internet] [Thesis]. Texas Tech University; 1948. [cited 2020 Jul 08]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/2346/14471.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Nicodemus S. An analysis of the five to four decisions of the Supreme Court. [Thesis]. Texas Tech University; 1948. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/2346/14471

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation


University of North Texas

9. Ogundele, Ayodeji O. The United States Supreme Court's Volitional Agendas, 1801-1993: Historical Claims versus Empirical Findings.

Degree: 2000, University of North Texas

 In this study, I examined the Supreme Court's agenda from 1801 to 1993 to determine the composition and dynamics of the issues that have dominated… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: United States. Supreme Court  – History.; Constitutional law  – United States  – History.; U. S. Supreme Court; U. S. constitutional history

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Ogundele, A. O. (2000). The United States Supreme Court's Volitional Agendas, 1801-1993: Historical Claims versus Empirical Findings. (Thesis). University of North Texas. Retrieved from https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc2458/

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Ogundele, Ayodeji O. “The United States Supreme Court's Volitional Agendas, 1801-1993: Historical Claims versus Empirical Findings.” 2000. Thesis, University of North Texas. Accessed July 08, 2020. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc2458/.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Ogundele, Ayodeji O. “The United States Supreme Court's Volitional Agendas, 1801-1993: Historical Claims versus Empirical Findings.” 2000. Web. 08 Jul 2020.

Vancouver:

Ogundele AO. The United States Supreme Court's Volitional Agendas, 1801-1993: Historical Claims versus Empirical Findings. [Internet] [Thesis]. University of North Texas; 2000. [cited 2020 Jul 08]. Available from: https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc2458/.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Ogundele AO. The United States Supreme Court's Volitional Agendas, 1801-1993: Historical Claims versus Empirical Findings. [Thesis]. University of North Texas; 2000. Available from: https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc2458/

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

10. Yurs, Dale Edward Paul. From a weak tribual to a branch of government: The Supreme Court of the United States from 1789 to Marshall.

Degree: 2011, University of Northern Iowa

1 PDF file (iv, 103 pages) Advisors/Committee Members: John W. Johnson, Chair, Thesis Committee.

Subjects/Keywords: United States. Supreme Court – History – 18th century; United States. Supreme Court – History – 19th century

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Yurs, D. E. P. (2011). From a weak tribual to a branch of government: The Supreme Court of the United States from 1789 to Marshall. (Thesis). University of Northern Iowa. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.uni.edu/etd/551

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Yurs, Dale Edward Paul. “From a weak tribual to a branch of government: The Supreme Court of the United States from 1789 to Marshall.” 2011. Thesis, University of Northern Iowa. Accessed July 08, 2020. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/etd/551.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Yurs, Dale Edward Paul. “From a weak tribual to a branch of government: The Supreme Court of the United States from 1789 to Marshall.” 2011. Web. 08 Jul 2020.

Vancouver:

Yurs DEP. From a weak tribual to a branch of government: The Supreme Court of the United States from 1789 to Marshall. [Internet] [Thesis]. University of Northern Iowa; 2011. [cited 2020 Jul 08]. Available from: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/etd/551.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Yurs DEP. From a weak tribual to a branch of government: The Supreme Court of the United States from 1789 to Marshall. [Thesis]. University of Northern Iowa; 2011. Available from: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/etd/551

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation


Michigan State University

11. Schutte, Rachel A. The making of U.S. Supreme Court majority opinions.

Degree: 2015, Michigan State University

Thesis Ph. D. Michigan State University. Political Science - Doctor of Philosophy 2015

Upon deciding a case, the Supreme Court issues an opinion that contains… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: United States. Supreme Court; Judicial opinions – United States; Judges – United States – Decision making; Negotiation; Political science

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Schutte, R. A. (2015). The making of U.S. Supreme Court majority opinions. (Thesis). Michigan State University. Retrieved from http://etd.lib.msu.edu/islandora/object/etd:3597

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Schutte, Rachel A. “The making of U.S. Supreme Court majority opinions.” 2015. Thesis, Michigan State University. Accessed July 08, 2020. http://etd.lib.msu.edu/islandora/object/etd:3597.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Schutte, Rachel A. “The making of U.S. Supreme Court majority opinions.” 2015. Web. 08 Jul 2020.

Vancouver:

Schutte RA. The making of U.S. Supreme Court majority opinions. [Internet] [Thesis]. Michigan State University; 2015. [cited 2020 Jul 08]. Available from: http://etd.lib.msu.edu/islandora/object/etd:3597.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Schutte RA. The making of U.S. Supreme Court majority opinions. [Thesis]. Michigan State University; 2015. Available from: http://etd.lib.msu.edu/islandora/object/etd:3597

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

12. van Wouwe, Bastiaan Willem. Afwijzingen van rechters in het Amerikaanse Hooggerechtshof: Toeval of bestaat er een verband?.

Degree: 2013, Leiden University

 In this study the relation between the most recent failed nominations of the U.S. Supreme Court judges Clement Haynsworth, G. Harrold Carswell, Robert Bork and… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: The American Supreme Court; The U.S. Supreme Court; Supreme Court of the United States; Failed nominations of the U.S. Supreme Court; U.S. Supreme Court judges; Senatorial hearings on Supreme Court judges; American history; History of the Supreme Court

…Parker to be Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States (Washington 1930… …veranderend imago van de Supreme Court en zijn rechters? Hiervoor zal in dit onderzoek allereerst… …afwijzingen die hadden plaatsgevonden vanaf de oprichting van de Supreme Court in 1789 tot en met de… …United States Government Printing Office. 8 1. Nominatieproces In 1789 werd er door… …systeem was vastgelegd. Met deze wet kreeg de Supreme Court exclusieve overkoepelende… 

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

van Wouwe, B. W. (2013). Afwijzingen van rechters in het Amerikaanse Hooggerechtshof: Toeval of bestaat er een verband?. (Masters Thesis). Leiden University. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1887/20543

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

van Wouwe, Bastiaan Willem. “Afwijzingen van rechters in het Amerikaanse Hooggerechtshof: Toeval of bestaat er een verband?.” 2013. Masters Thesis, Leiden University. Accessed July 08, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/1887/20543.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

van Wouwe, Bastiaan Willem. “Afwijzingen van rechters in het Amerikaanse Hooggerechtshof: Toeval of bestaat er een verband?.” 2013. Web. 08 Jul 2020.

Vancouver:

van Wouwe BW. Afwijzingen van rechters in het Amerikaanse Hooggerechtshof: Toeval of bestaat er een verband?. [Internet] [Masters thesis]. Leiden University; 2013. [cited 2020 Jul 08]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1887/20543.

Council of Science Editors:

van Wouwe BW. Afwijzingen van rechters in het Amerikaanse Hooggerechtshof: Toeval of bestaat er een verband?. [Masters Thesis]. Leiden University; 2013. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1887/20543

13. Crane, James D. Decisions of the Supreme Court Necessitating a New Type of Police Power.

Degree: 1958, North Texas State College

This study will remain with the role of the Supreme Court, and then only with its role in the character of interpretation as far as the necessitation of a new type of police power is concerned. Advisors/Committee Members: McAlister, Samuel Bertram, 1898-1963, Scroggs, Jack B., 1919-.

Subjects/Keywords: Supreme Court; decisions; police power; United States. Supreme Court.; Police power  – United States.

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Crane, J. D. (1958). Decisions of the Supreme Court Necessitating a New Type of Police Power. (Thesis). North Texas State College. Retrieved from https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc108001/

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Crane, James D. “Decisions of the Supreme Court Necessitating a New Type of Police Power.” 1958. Thesis, North Texas State College. Accessed July 08, 2020. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc108001/.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Crane, James D. “Decisions of the Supreme Court Necessitating a New Type of Police Power.” 1958. Web. 08 Jul 2020.

Vancouver:

Crane JD. Decisions of the Supreme Court Necessitating a New Type of Police Power. [Internet] [Thesis]. North Texas State College; 1958. [cited 2020 Jul 08]. Available from: https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc108001/.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Crane JD. Decisions of the Supreme Court Necessitating a New Type of Police Power. [Thesis]. North Texas State College; 1958. Available from: https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc108001/

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation


University of Arizona

14. Schultz, Dorothy Christine Hankins, 1940-. THE MAKING OF THE MODERN COURT SYSTEM .

Degree: 1978, University of Arizona

Subjects/Keywords: Judicial discretion  – United States  – Cases.; Law reform  – United States  – History.; Law  – United States  – Interpretation and construction.; United States. Supreme Court.

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Schultz, Dorothy Christine Hankins, 1. (1978). THE MAKING OF THE MODERN COURT SYSTEM . (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Arizona. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10150/298704

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Schultz, Dorothy Christine Hankins, 1940-. “THE MAKING OF THE MODERN COURT SYSTEM .” 1978. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Arizona. Accessed July 08, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/298704.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Schultz, Dorothy Christine Hankins, 1940-. “THE MAKING OF THE MODERN COURT SYSTEM .” 1978. Web. 08 Jul 2020.

Vancouver:

Schultz, Dorothy Christine Hankins 1. THE MAKING OF THE MODERN COURT SYSTEM . [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Arizona; 1978. [cited 2020 Jul 08]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10150/298704.

Council of Science Editors:

Schultz, Dorothy Christine Hankins 1. THE MAKING OF THE MODERN COURT SYSTEM . [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Arizona; 1978. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10150/298704


Leiden University

15. de Lange, Sara. JUST JUSTICES? AN ANALYSIS OF THE ARGUMENTS OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT JUSTICES IN THE OBAMACARE CASES.

Degree: 2016, Leiden University

Subjects/Keywords: Supreme Court; United States; Justices; Obamacare

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

de Lange, S. (2016). JUST JUSTICES? AN ANALYSIS OF THE ARGUMENTS OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT JUSTICES IN THE OBAMACARE CASES. (Masters Thesis). Leiden University. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1887/41852

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

de Lange, Sara. “JUST JUSTICES? AN ANALYSIS OF THE ARGUMENTS OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT JUSTICES IN THE OBAMACARE CASES.” 2016. Masters Thesis, Leiden University. Accessed July 08, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/1887/41852.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

de Lange, Sara. “JUST JUSTICES? AN ANALYSIS OF THE ARGUMENTS OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT JUSTICES IN THE OBAMACARE CASES.” 2016. Web. 08 Jul 2020.

Vancouver:

de Lange S. JUST JUSTICES? AN ANALYSIS OF THE ARGUMENTS OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT JUSTICES IN THE OBAMACARE CASES. [Internet] [Masters thesis]. Leiden University; 2016. [cited 2020 Jul 08]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1887/41852.

Council of Science Editors:

de Lange S. JUST JUSTICES? AN ANALYSIS OF THE ARGUMENTS OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT JUSTICES IN THE OBAMACARE CASES. [Masters Thesis]. Leiden University; 2016. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1887/41852


University of Vienna

16. Kaufmann, Carina Susanna. Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit - ein Vergleich zwischen USA und Österreich.

Degree: 2018, University of Vienna

 Die Masterarbeit behandelt die Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit in den USA und in Österreich – sie vergleicht den Supreme Court of the United States mit dem österreichischen Verfassungsgerichtshof.… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: 01.00 Allgemeines; Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit / Österreich / USA / österreichischer Verfassungsgerichtshof / Supreme Court of the United States

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Kaufmann, C. S. (2018). Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit - ein Vergleich zwischen USA und Österreich. (Thesis). University of Vienna. Retrieved from http://othes.univie.ac.at/54543/

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Kaufmann, Carina Susanna. “Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit - ein Vergleich zwischen USA und Österreich.” 2018. Thesis, University of Vienna. Accessed July 08, 2020. http://othes.univie.ac.at/54543/.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Kaufmann, Carina Susanna. “Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit - ein Vergleich zwischen USA und Österreich.” 2018. Web. 08 Jul 2020.

Vancouver:

Kaufmann CS. Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit - ein Vergleich zwischen USA und Österreich. [Internet] [Thesis]. University of Vienna; 2018. [cited 2020 Jul 08]. Available from: http://othes.univie.ac.at/54543/.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Kaufmann CS. Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit - ein Vergleich zwischen USA und Österreich. [Thesis]. University of Vienna; 2018. Available from: http://othes.univie.ac.at/54543/

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation


Michigan State University

17. Rathjen, Gregory J., 1947-. A theory of intracourt influence.

Degree: PhD, Department of Political Science, 1972, Michigan State University

Subjects/Keywords: United States. Supreme Court; Influence (Psychology)

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Rathjen, Gregory J., 1. (1972). A theory of intracourt influence. (Doctoral Dissertation). Michigan State University. Retrieved from http://etd.lib.msu.edu/islandora/object/etd:37392

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Rathjen, Gregory J., 1947-. “A theory of intracourt influence.” 1972. Doctoral Dissertation, Michigan State University. Accessed July 08, 2020. http://etd.lib.msu.edu/islandora/object/etd:37392.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Rathjen, Gregory J., 1947-. “A theory of intracourt influence.” 1972. Web. 08 Jul 2020.

Vancouver:

Rathjen, Gregory J. 1. A theory of intracourt influence. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Michigan State University; 1972. [cited 2020 Jul 08]. Available from: http://etd.lib.msu.edu/islandora/object/etd:37392.

Council of Science Editors:

Rathjen, Gregory J. 1. A theory of intracourt influence. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Michigan State University; 1972. Available from: http://etd.lib.msu.edu/islandora/object/etd:37392


Michigan State University

18. Hurwitz, Mark S. The nature of agenda in the United States Supreme Court and Courts of Appeals.

Degree: PhD, Department of Political Science, 1998, Michigan State University

Subjects/Keywords: United States. Supreme Court; Judicial process

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Hurwitz, M. S. (1998). The nature of agenda in the United States Supreme Court and Courts of Appeals. (Doctoral Dissertation). Michigan State University. Retrieved from http://etd.lib.msu.edu/islandora/object/etd:26849

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Hurwitz, Mark S. “The nature of agenda in the United States Supreme Court and Courts of Appeals.” 1998. Doctoral Dissertation, Michigan State University. Accessed July 08, 2020. http://etd.lib.msu.edu/islandora/object/etd:26849.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Hurwitz, Mark S. “The nature of agenda in the United States Supreme Court and Courts of Appeals.” 1998. Web. 08 Jul 2020.

Vancouver:

Hurwitz MS. The nature of agenda in the United States Supreme Court and Courts of Appeals. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Michigan State University; 1998. [cited 2020 Jul 08]. Available from: http://etd.lib.msu.edu/islandora/object/etd:26849.

Council of Science Editors:

Hurwitz MS. The nature of agenda in the United States Supreme Court and Courts of Appeals. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Michigan State University; 1998. Available from: http://etd.lib.msu.edu/islandora/object/etd:26849


Western Washington University

19. Steele, Logan. Judging Sodom: gay identity in Bowers, Romer & Lawrence.

Degree: MA, Political Science, 2014, Western Washington University

  This paper presents a novel method for understanding how the Supreme Court constructs identities. Applying Michel Foucault’s concept of governmentality to pivotal Supreme Court(more)

Subjects/Keywords: Political Science; United States. Supreme Court – Decision making; United States. Supreme Court – Cases; Judicial process – United States – Public opinion; Gays – United States – Identity; Gays – Legal status, laws, etc. – United States; United States; masters theses

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Steele, L. (2014). Judging Sodom: gay identity in Bowers, Romer & Lawrence. (Masters Thesis). Western Washington University. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.25710/9gfk-7222 ; https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwuet/389

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Steele, Logan. “Judging Sodom: gay identity in Bowers, Romer & Lawrence.” 2014. Masters Thesis, Western Washington University. Accessed July 08, 2020. https://doi.org/10.25710/9gfk-7222 ; https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwuet/389.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Steele, Logan. “Judging Sodom: gay identity in Bowers, Romer & Lawrence.” 2014. Web. 08 Jul 2020.

Vancouver:

Steele L. Judging Sodom: gay identity in Bowers, Romer & Lawrence. [Internet] [Masters thesis]. Western Washington University; 2014. [cited 2020 Jul 08]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.25710/9gfk-7222 ; https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwuet/389.

Council of Science Editors:

Steele L. Judging Sodom: gay identity in Bowers, Romer & Lawrence. [Masters Thesis]. Western Washington University; 2014. Available from: https://doi.org/10.25710/9gfk-7222 ; https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwuet/389


Baylor University

20. Lynn, Nathan R. Coexistent inconsistency: the Supreme Court, Jehovah's Witnesses, and the expansion of religious liberties.

Degree: MA, Church and State., 2007, Baylor University

 During the course of the Twentieth Century, the Jehovah’s Witnesses went before the United States Supreme Court over twenty times in an effort to further… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Jehovah's Witnesses  – United States  – History  – 20th century.; United States. Supreme Court.; Freedom of religion  – United States  – History  – 20th century.

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Lynn, N. R. (2007). Coexistent inconsistency: the Supreme Court, Jehovah's Witnesses, and the expansion of religious liberties. (Masters Thesis). Baylor University. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2104/5099

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Lynn, Nathan R. “Coexistent inconsistency: the Supreme Court, Jehovah's Witnesses, and the expansion of religious liberties.” 2007. Masters Thesis, Baylor University. Accessed July 08, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/2104/5099.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Lynn, Nathan R. “Coexistent inconsistency: the Supreme Court, Jehovah's Witnesses, and the expansion of religious liberties.” 2007. Web. 08 Jul 2020.

Vancouver:

Lynn NR. Coexistent inconsistency: the Supreme Court, Jehovah's Witnesses, and the expansion of religious liberties. [Internet] [Masters thesis]. Baylor University; 2007. [cited 2020 Jul 08]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/2104/5099.

Council of Science Editors:

Lynn NR. Coexistent inconsistency: the Supreme Court, Jehovah's Witnesses, and the expansion of religious liberties. [Masters Thesis]. Baylor University; 2007. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/2104/5099


Michigan State University

21. Murley, David Edmund. Judicial neglect : the Supreme Court and the red scare 1949-1961.

Degree: PhD, Department of History, 2005, Michigan State University

Subjects/Keywords: United States. Supreme Court – History; Anti-communist movements – United States – History; Governmental investigations – United States – History; United States – Politics and government; United States – Politics and government

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Murley, D. E. (2005). Judicial neglect : the Supreme Court and the red scare 1949-1961. (Doctoral Dissertation). Michigan State University. Retrieved from http://etd.lib.msu.edu/islandora/object/etd:47425

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Murley, David Edmund. “Judicial neglect : the Supreme Court and the red scare 1949-1961.” 2005. Doctoral Dissertation, Michigan State University. Accessed July 08, 2020. http://etd.lib.msu.edu/islandora/object/etd:47425.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Murley, David Edmund. “Judicial neglect : the Supreme Court and the red scare 1949-1961.” 2005. Web. 08 Jul 2020.

Vancouver:

Murley DE. Judicial neglect : the Supreme Court and the red scare 1949-1961. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Michigan State University; 2005. [cited 2020 Jul 08]. Available from: http://etd.lib.msu.edu/islandora/object/etd:47425.

Council of Science Editors:

Murley DE. Judicial neglect : the Supreme Court and the red scare 1949-1961. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Michigan State University; 2005. Available from: http://etd.lib.msu.edu/islandora/object/etd:47425


Michigan State University

22. Dalton, Patrick James. The effects of Supreme Court decisions upon New Deal legislation.

Degree: MA, 1952, Michigan State University

Subjects/Keywords: United States. Supreme Court; United States – Politics and government

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Dalton, P. J. (1952). The effects of Supreme Court decisions upon New Deal legislation. (Masters Thesis). Michigan State University. Retrieved from http://etd.lib.msu.edu/islandora/object/etd:7303

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Dalton, Patrick James. “The effects of Supreme Court decisions upon New Deal legislation.” 1952. Masters Thesis, Michigan State University. Accessed July 08, 2020. http://etd.lib.msu.edu/islandora/object/etd:7303.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Dalton, Patrick James. “The effects of Supreme Court decisions upon New Deal legislation.” 1952. Web. 08 Jul 2020.

Vancouver:

Dalton PJ. The effects of Supreme Court decisions upon New Deal legislation. [Internet] [Masters thesis]. Michigan State University; 1952. [cited 2020 Jul 08]. Available from: http://etd.lib.msu.edu/islandora/object/etd:7303.

Council of Science Editors:

Dalton PJ. The effects of Supreme Court decisions upon New Deal legislation. [Masters Thesis]. Michigan State University; 1952. Available from: http://etd.lib.msu.edu/islandora/object/etd:7303


Michigan State University

23. Segal, Jeffrey Allan. Predicting supreme court cases probabilistically : the search and seizure cases, 1962-1981.

Degree: PhD, Department of Political Science, 1983, Michigan State University

Subjects/Keywords: United States. Supreme Court; Searches and seizures – United States

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Segal, J. A. (1983). Predicting supreme court cases probabilistically : the search and seizure cases, 1962-1981. (Doctoral Dissertation). Michigan State University. Retrieved from http://etd.lib.msu.edu/islandora/object/etd:36725

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Segal, Jeffrey Allan. “Predicting supreme court cases probabilistically : the search and seizure cases, 1962-1981.” 1983. Doctoral Dissertation, Michigan State University. Accessed July 08, 2020. http://etd.lib.msu.edu/islandora/object/etd:36725.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Segal, Jeffrey Allan. “Predicting supreme court cases probabilistically : the search and seizure cases, 1962-1981.” 1983. Web. 08 Jul 2020.

Vancouver:

Segal JA. Predicting supreme court cases probabilistically : the search and seizure cases, 1962-1981. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Michigan State University; 1983. [cited 2020 Jul 08]. Available from: http://etd.lib.msu.edu/islandora/object/etd:36725.

Council of Science Editors:

Segal JA. Predicting supreme court cases probabilistically : the search and seizure cases, 1962-1981. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Michigan State University; 1983. Available from: http://etd.lib.msu.edu/islandora/object/etd:36725


Texas Tech University

24. Daniel, William R. An analysis of criminal procedure cases before the United States Supreme Court, 1961-1968: with emphasis on disagreement and dissent.

Degree: Government, 1968, Texas Tech University

Subjects/Keywords: Criminal procedure  – United States  – Cases; United States.  – Supreme Court

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Daniel, W. R. (1968). An analysis of criminal procedure cases before the United States Supreme Court, 1961-1968: with emphasis on disagreement and dissent. (Thesis). Texas Tech University. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2346/18388

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Daniel, William R. “An analysis of criminal procedure cases before the United States Supreme Court, 1961-1968: with emphasis on disagreement and dissent.” 1968. Thesis, Texas Tech University. Accessed July 08, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/2346/18388.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Daniel, William R. “An analysis of criminal procedure cases before the United States Supreme Court, 1961-1968: with emphasis on disagreement and dissent.” 1968. Web. 08 Jul 2020.

Vancouver:

Daniel WR. An analysis of criminal procedure cases before the United States Supreme Court, 1961-1968: with emphasis on disagreement and dissent. [Internet] [Thesis]. Texas Tech University; 1968. [cited 2020 Jul 08]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/2346/18388.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Daniel WR. An analysis of criminal procedure cases before the United States Supreme Court, 1961-1968: with emphasis on disagreement and dissent. [Thesis]. Texas Tech University; 1968. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/2346/18388

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation


University of Arizona

25. BOWERS, MICHAEL WAYNE. ZURCHER V. STANFORD DAILY: THE SUPREME COURT AND THE LIMITS OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT.

Degree: 1983, University of Arizona

 The ratification of the Bill of Rights in 1791 brought freedom of the press into the sphere of constitutional legitimacy such that it could not… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: United States. Supreme Court.; United States. Constitution. 1st Amendment.

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

BOWERS, M. W. (1983). ZURCHER V. STANFORD DAILY: THE SUPREME COURT AND THE LIMITS OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Arizona. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10150/187080

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

BOWERS, MICHAEL WAYNE. “ZURCHER V. STANFORD DAILY: THE SUPREME COURT AND THE LIMITS OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT. ” 1983. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Arizona. Accessed July 08, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/187080.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

BOWERS, MICHAEL WAYNE. “ZURCHER V. STANFORD DAILY: THE SUPREME COURT AND THE LIMITS OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT. ” 1983. Web. 08 Jul 2020.

Vancouver:

BOWERS MW. ZURCHER V. STANFORD DAILY: THE SUPREME COURT AND THE LIMITS OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Arizona; 1983. [cited 2020 Jul 08]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10150/187080.

Council of Science Editors:

BOWERS MW. ZURCHER V. STANFORD DAILY: THE SUPREME COURT AND THE LIMITS OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Arizona; 1983. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10150/187080


Portland State University

26. McMahon, Adam Michael. From Blooming Judicial Philosophies to Castrated Legislation: Sexuality, Desire, and Nominations to the Supreme Court of the United States.

Degree: MS(M.S.) in Political Science, Political Science, 2011, Portland State University

  Society and institutions of government reinforce norms that constrain the behavior of individuals. Heteropatriarchal norms traditionally favor the perspective of white, male, heterosexual, reason,… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Queer new institutionalism; United States Supreme Court  – Officials and employees  – Selection and appointment; Judges  – Selection and appointment  – United States; Political questions and judicial power  – United States; Queer theory  – United States

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

McMahon, A. M. (2011). From Blooming Judicial Philosophies to Castrated Legislation: Sexuality, Desire, and Nominations to the Supreme Court of the United States. (Masters Thesis). Portland State University. Retrieved from https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds/288

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

McMahon, Adam Michael. “From Blooming Judicial Philosophies to Castrated Legislation: Sexuality, Desire, and Nominations to the Supreme Court of the United States.” 2011. Masters Thesis, Portland State University. Accessed July 08, 2020. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds/288.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

McMahon, Adam Michael. “From Blooming Judicial Philosophies to Castrated Legislation: Sexuality, Desire, and Nominations to the Supreme Court of the United States.” 2011. Web. 08 Jul 2020.

Vancouver:

McMahon AM. From Blooming Judicial Philosophies to Castrated Legislation: Sexuality, Desire, and Nominations to the Supreme Court of the United States. [Internet] [Masters thesis]. Portland State University; 2011. [cited 2020 Jul 08]. Available from: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds/288.

Council of Science Editors:

McMahon AM. From Blooming Judicial Philosophies to Castrated Legislation: Sexuality, Desire, and Nominations to the Supreme Court of the United States. [Masters Thesis]. Portland State University; 2011. Available from: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds/288


University of New Orleans

27. Boudreaux, Sybil Ann. The First Minute Book of the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana 1813 to May, 1818: An Annotated Edition.

Degree: MA, History, 1983, University of New Orleans

  The Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana, established by the first state constitution (1812) as the only appellate court in the judicial system,… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana; Louisiana Supreme Court; Cour suprême de Louisiane; Courts; History; Law; Legal; State and Local Government Law; United States History

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Boudreaux, S. A. (1983). The First Minute Book of the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana 1813 to May, 1818: An Annotated Edition. (Thesis). University of New Orleans. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td/1683

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Boudreaux, Sybil Ann. “The First Minute Book of the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana 1813 to May, 1818: An Annotated Edition.” 1983. Thesis, University of New Orleans. Accessed July 08, 2020. https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td/1683.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Boudreaux, Sybil Ann. “The First Minute Book of the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana 1813 to May, 1818: An Annotated Edition.” 1983. Web. 08 Jul 2020.

Vancouver:

Boudreaux SA. The First Minute Book of the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana 1813 to May, 1818: An Annotated Edition. [Internet] [Thesis]. University of New Orleans; 1983. [cited 2020 Jul 08]. Available from: https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td/1683.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Boudreaux SA. The First Minute Book of the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana 1813 to May, 1818: An Annotated Edition. [Thesis]. University of New Orleans; 1983. Available from: https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td/1683

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation


University of North Carolina – Greensboro

28. Stockard, Robert Moore. The United States Supreme Court and the legal aspects of busing for public school desegregation.

Degree: 1978, University of North Carolina – Greensboro

 This study was made to determine the legal basis of court ordered busing in order to desegregate public schools. The results of this study can… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: United States. – Supreme Court – History – 20th century; Busing for school integration – Law and legislation – United States

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Stockard, R. M. (1978). The United States Supreme Court and the legal aspects of busing for public school desegregation. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of North Carolina – Greensboro. Retrieved from http://libres.uncg.edu/ir/listing.aspx?styp=ti&id=24517

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Stockard, Robert Moore. “The United States Supreme Court and the legal aspects of busing for public school desegregation.” 1978. Doctoral Dissertation, University of North Carolina – Greensboro. Accessed July 08, 2020. http://libres.uncg.edu/ir/listing.aspx?styp=ti&id=24517.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Stockard, Robert Moore. “The United States Supreme Court and the legal aspects of busing for public school desegregation.” 1978. Web. 08 Jul 2020.

Vancouver:

Stockard RM. The United States Supreme Court and the legal aspects of busing for public school desegregation. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of North Carolina – Greensboro; 1978. [cited 2020 Jul 08]. Available from: http://libres.uncg.edu/ir/listing.aspx?styp=ti&id=24517.

Council of Science Editors:

Stockard RM. The United States Supreme Court and the legal aspects of busing for public school desegregation. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of North Carolina – Greensboro; 1978. Available from: http://libres.uncg.edu/ir/listing.aspx?styp=ti&id=24517

29. NC DOCKS at The University of North Carolina at Greensboro; Stockard, Robert Moore. The United States Supreme Court and the legal aspects of busing for public school desegregation.

Degree: 1978, NC Docks

 This study was made to determine the legal basis of court ordered busing in order to desegregate public schools. The results of this study can… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: United States. $b Supreme Court $x History $y 20th century; Busing for school integration $x Law and legislation $z United States

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

NC DOCKS at The University of North Carolina at Greensboro; Stockard, R. M. (1978). The United States Supreme Court and the legal aspects of busing for public school desegregation. (Thesis). NC Docks. Retrieved from http://libres.uncg.edu/ir/uncg/f/Stockard_uncg_7824903.PDF

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

NC DOCKS at The University of North Carolina at Greensboro; Stockard, Robert Moore. “The United States Supreme Court and the legal aspects of busing for public school desegregation.” 1978. Thesis, NC Docks. Accessed July 08, 2020. http://libres.uncg.edu/ir/uncg/f/Stockard_uncg_7824903.PDF.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

NC DOCKS at The University of North Carolina at Greensboro; Stockard, Robert Moore. “The United States Supreme Court and the legal aspects of busing for public school desegregation.” 1978. Web. 08 Jul 2020.

Vancouver:

NC DOCKS at The University of North Carolina at Greensboro; Stockard RM. The United States Supreme Court and the legal aspects of busing for public school desegregation. [Internet] [Thesis]. NC Docks; 1978. [cited 2020 Jul 08]. Available from: http://libres.uncg.edu/ir/uncg/f/Stockard_uncg_7824903.PDF.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

NC DOCKS at The University of North Carolina at Greensboro; Stockard RM. The United States Supreme Court and the legal aspects of busing for public school desegregation. [Thesis]. NC Docks; 1978. Available from: http://libres.uncg.edu/ir/uncg/f/Stockard_uncg_7824903.PDF

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation


Michigan State University

30. Benesh, Sara Catherine. Principal-agency in American courts : perspectives on the hierarchy of justice.

Degree: PhD, Department of Political Science, 1999, Michigan State University

Subjects/Keywords: United States. Supreme Court; Appellate courts – United States; Judgments – United States; Agency (Law)

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Benesh, S. C. (1999). Principal-agency in American courts : perspectives on the hierarchy of justice. (Doctoral Dissertation). Michigan State University. Retrieved from http://etd.lib.msu.edu/islandora/object/etd:28092

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Benesh, Sara Catherine. “Principal-agency in American courts : perspectives on the hierarchy of justice.” 1999. Doctoral Dissertation, Michigan State University. Accessed July 08, 2020. http://etd.lib.msu.edu/islandora/object/etd:28092.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Benesh, Sara Catherine. “Principal-agency in American courts : perspectives on the hierarchy of justice.” 1999. Web. 08 Jul 2020.

Vancouver:

Benesh SC. Principal-agency in American courts : perspectives on the hierarchy of justice. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Michigan State University; 1999. [cited 2020 Jul 08]. Available from: http://etd.lib.msu.edu/islandora/object/etd:28092.

Council of Science Editors:

Benesh SC. Principal-agency in American courts : perspectives on the hierarchy of justice. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Michigan State University; 1999. Available from: http://etd.lib.msu.edu/islandora/object/etd:28092

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] … [2970]

.