Advanced search options

Advanced Search Options 🞨

Browse by author name (“Author name starts with…”).

Find ETDs with:

in
/  
in
/  
in
/  
in

Written in Published in Earliest date Latest date

Sorted by

Results per page:

Sorted by: relevance · author · university · dateNew search

You searched for subject:(Unevangelized). Showing records 1 – 2 of 2 total matches.

Search Limiters

Last 2 Years | English Only

No search limiters apply to these results.

▼ Search Limiters


Liberty University

1. Breitenbach, Zachary Paul. Would an Omnibenevolent God Allow Some to Be Lost Who Would Have Been Saved in Different Circumstances? A New Molinist Theodicy against the Problem of the Contingently Lost.

Degree: 2019, Liberty University

This dissertation addresses a particular issue within the soteriological problem of evil: Would an omnibenevolent God allow anyone to be lost who would have freely chosen to be saved in other circumstances? It critiques various Molinist theodicies that respond to this issue, especially the prominent theodicy of William Lane Craig. Ultimately a new Molinist theodicy is proposed. An argument is also given for how this soteriological theodicy can help to reduce concerns in the broader problem of evil relating to the amount of evil observed in this life and the apparent gratuitousness of some evil.

Subjects/Keywords: William Lane Craig; Unevangelized; Molinism; Soteriological Problem of Evil; Christianity; Religion; Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Breitenbach, Z. P. (2019). Would an Omnibenevolent God Allow Some to Be Lost Who Would Have Been Saved in Different Circumstances? A New Molinist Theodicy against the Problem of the Contingently Lost. (Doctoral Dissertation). Liberty University. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/doctoral/2195

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Breitenbach, Zachary Paul. “Would an Omnibenevolent God Allow Some to Be Lost Who Would Have Been Saved in Different Circumstances? A New Molinist Theodicy against the Problem of the Contingently Lost.” 2019. Doctoral Dissertation, Liberty University. Accessed September 19, 2019. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/doctoral/2195.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Breitenbach, Zachary Paul. “Would an Omnibenevolent God Allow Some to Be Lost Who Would Have Been Saved in Different Circumstances? A New Molinist Theodicy against the Problem of the Contingently Lost.” 2019. Web. 19 Sep 2019.

Vancouver:

Breitenbach ZP. Would an Omnibenevolent God Allow Some to Be Lost Who Would Have Been Saved in Different Circumstances? A New Molinist Theodicy against the Problem of the Contingently Lost. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Liberty University; 2019. [cited 2019 Sep 19]. Available from: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/doctoral/2195.

Council of Science Editors:

Breitenbach ZP. Would an Omnibenevolent God Allow Some to Be Lost Who Would Have Been Saved in Different Circumstances? A New Molinist Theodicy against the Problem of the Contingently Lost. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Liberty University; 2019. Available from: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/doctoral/2195


Liberty University

2. Covert, Joshua. A Response to Clark Pinnock's Hope for the Unevangelized as Seen in a Wideness in God's Mercy.

Degree: 2013, Liberty University

This paper will offer a response to Clark H. Pinnock's hope for the unevangelized as seen in A Wideness in God's Mercy. Pinnock argues that God saves individuals based upon their faith not primarily their knowledge. Pinnock develops a concept called the faith principle which he uses to support his claims. Pinnock provides five examples of unevangelized persons who are saved through faith without knowledge of Christ. Through Pinnock's faith principle and these five examples he argues that the unevangelized do not need special revelation - knowledge of Christ. It will be argued that the five examples provided by Pinnock contain serious hermeneutical mistakes that invalidate his argument. It will be argued that no individual has ever been saved without special revelation. This will be proven through exposing the hermeneutical errors of Pinnock's five examples.

Subjects/Keywords: Clark H. Pinnock; Exclusivism; Hermeneutics; Inclusivism; Special Revelation; Unevangelized; Theology; Religion, General; Religion, Philosophy of; Philosophy; Christianity; Comparative Methodologies and Theories; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Religion; Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Covert, J. (2013). A Response to Clark Pinnock's Hope for the Unevangelized as Seen in a Wideness in God's Mercy. (Masters Thesis). Liberty University. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/masters/269

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Covert, Joshua. “A Response to Clark Pinnock's Hope for the Unevangelized as Seen in a Wideness in God's Mercy.” 2013. Masters Thesis, Liberty University. Accessed September 19, 2019. http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/masters/269.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Covert, Joshua. “A Response to Clark Pinnock's Hope for the Unevangelized as Seen in a Wideness in God's Mercy.” 2013. Web. 19 Sep 2019.

Vancouver:

Covert J. A Response to Clark Pinnock's Hope for the Unevangelized as Seen in a Wideness in God's Mercy. [Internet] [Masters thesis]. Liberty University; 2013. [cited 2019 Sep 19]. Available from: http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/masters/269.

Council of Science Editors:

Covert J. A Response to Clark Pinnock's Hope for the Unevangelized as Seen in a Wideness in God's Mercy. [Masters Thesis]. Liberty University; 2013. Available from: http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/masters/269

.