Advanced search options

Advanced Search Options 🞨

Browse by author name (“Author name starts with…”).

Find ETDs with:

in
/  
in
/  
in
/  
in

Written in Published in Earliest date Latest date

Sorted by

Results per page:

Sorted by: relevance · author · university · date | New search

Dates: Last 2 Years

You searched for subject:(Procedural freedom). Showing records 1 – 2 of 2 total matches.

Search Limiters

Last 2 Years | English Only

No search limiters apply to these results.

▼ Search Limiters


Uppsala University

1. Maamri, Sara. Europadomstolen och slöjan : En kvinnas möjlighet till upprättelse.

Degree: 2019, Uppsala University

Det finns en utbredd kritik riktad mot Europadomstolen och dess tillämpning av religionsfriheten (artikel 9 i Europakonventionen). Akademiker har anklagat domstolen för att ha demonstrerat enbiasi fall som rör islam och slöjan. Domstolens bedömningar har upplevts som godtyckliga. Muslimer har framhävt att de upplever att de inte kan räkna med att få en rättvis domstolsprocess. Denna allvarliga kritik mot Europadomstolen ligger till grund för studiens övergripande syfte som är att undersöka vilka förutsättningar som finns för rättvisa i fall som rör religionsfriheten och slöjan.                       Forskare har uppmanat domstolen att anamma fyra proceduriella rättvisekriterier (deltagande, neutralitet, respekt och tillit) i syfte att åstadkomma rättvisa domstolsprocesser. Studien börjar därför med att analysera det huvudsakliga materialet, fyra rättsfall som alla behandlar en slöjbärande muslimsk kvinna utifrån de proceduriella rättvisekriterierna. Dessa kriterier kompletteras med en moralfilosofisk förståelse för alla individers grundläggande rätt till rättfärdigande. Studiens tes är dock att en proceduriell förståelse av rättvisa riskerar att vara otillräcklig. Det teoretiska ramverket består därför även av en substantiell förståelse av rättvisa, som istället för att fokusera på domstolens tillvägagångssätt fokuserar på utfall. Resultatet bekräftar denna tes genom att först anamma en förståelse för att vårt praktiska förnuft riskerar att vara invävt med ideologi. Det är inte förrän vi tillämpar ett dekonstruerande och dekoloniserande perspektiv som vi ser vad det är som hindrar domstolen från att upprätta substantiell rättvisa för slöjbärande kvinnor. Slöjan som symbol och sekularism som begrepp har tillskrivits särskilda värden vilket gör att domstolen förstår dessa som i direkt strid med varandra. Det är inte förrän domstolen självkritiskt reflekterar över och dekonstruerar dessa inneboende värden som substantiell rättvisa är möjligt. Studiens uppfattning är att muslimska slöjbärande kvinnor systematiskt nekas en verklig möjlighet till upprättelse i Europadomstolen.

The European Court of the Human Rights has been widely criticized regarding its implementation of the freedom of religion (article 9 in the European Convention on Human Rights). Researchers have noticed that the Court has demonstrated a bias in cases concerning Islam and the Islamic veil. The Courts judgements have been understood as arbitrary and European Muslims have argued that they do not have a fair chance to a just court procedure. This serious critique aimed at the Court grounds the aim of this study which is to explore the conditions for justice regarding freedom of religion cases and the Islamic veil in the European Court of Human Rights.                        Researchers have advised the court to apply four procedural justice criteria (participation, neutrality, respect and trust) in order to secure just and fair court procedures. Therefore, from a procedural understanding of justice, the study starts with…

Subjects/Keywords: Procedural justice; substantive justice; Freedom of Religion; Islamic veil; secularism; Islam; European Court of Human Rights; justification; Proceduriell rättvisa; substantiell rättvisa; religionsfrihet; slöja; sekularism; islam; Europadomstolen; rättfärdigande; Social Sciences; Samhällsvetenskap; Social Sciences Interdisciplinary; Tvärvetenskapliga studier inom samhällsvetenskap; Philosophy, Ethics and Religion; Filosofi, etik och religion; Law and Society; Juridik och samhälle

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Maamri, S. (2019). Europadomstolen och slöjan : En kvinnas möjlighet till upprättelse. (Thesis). Uppsala University. Retrieved from http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-384845

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Maamri, Sara. “Europadomstolen och slöjan : En kvinnas möjlighet till upprättelse.” 2019. Thesis, Uppsala University. Accessed October 31, 2020. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-384845.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Maamri, Sara. “Europadomstolen och slöjan : En kvinnas möjlighet till upprättelse.” 2019. Web. 31 Oct 2020.

Vancouver:

Maamri S. Europadomstolen och slöjan : En kvinnas möjlighet till upprättelse. [Internet] [Thesis]. Uppsala University; 2019. [cited 2020 Oct 31]. Available from: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-384845.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Maamri S. Europadomstolen och slöjan : En kvinnas möjlighet till upprättelse. [Thesis]. Uppsala University; 2019. Available from: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-384845

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

2. Arvanitis, Dominikos. Συνεργασία σε ποινικές υποθέσεις στην Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση και δικαιώματα του ανθρώπου: η περίπτωση της ευρωπαϊκής εντολής έρευνας.

Degree: 2019, Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences; Πάντειο Πανεπιστήμιο Κοινωνικών και Πολιτικών Επιστημών

The necessity for the “European Investigation Order” (EIO), the instrument established by Directive 2014/41/EU, occurred because the preexisting framework for gathering and transferring criminal evidence in other Member States –mostly through mutual legal assistance– was too fragmented and partially effective. It thus needed to be replaced by a single comprehensive instrument. The EIO is based on the principle of mutual recognition of judgements and judicial decisions (article 82§1 TFEU) and is to be issued by judicial authorities of the “issuing State” mainly for the purpose of having one or several specific investigative measures carried out in another EU country, the “executing State”. Unavoidably, many issues concerning human rights and their potential violation are raised by the application of such an instrument. In this PhD thesis, we firstly analyse –for comparative reasons– the traditional instruments of mutual legal assistance in criminal matters deriving from the legal framework of the Council of Europe concerning the “international cooperation in criminal matters”. Furthermore, the evolution of the EU “judicial cooperation on criminal matters” is presented and the EU framework concerning fundamental rights is approached. Moreover, the EU legal framework for the mutual legal assistance in criminal matters is being considered. Then follows an in-depth study of the EIO as a tool to perform a broad scope of investigative measures and to obtain evidence. This study is necessary but also of growing practical importance in order to verify the compatibility of the new regime with the human rights standards guaranteed by the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and, respectively, the ECHR. More specifically, through this thesis we attempt to critically review and analyse the characteristics of Directive 2014/41/EU as well as Law № 4489/2017, by which it has been transposed in the Greek legislation. Within this context, we examine the following main characteristics of the EIO: the procedures for its issuing, its recognition and execution, the grounds for non-recognition or non-execution of it, its function concerning the “certain investigative measures” and the provisions for safeguarding the procedural rights of the concerned persons. To this end, protective measures are emphasized, taking into account that national judicial authorities have the obligation, while implementing the Directive, to nonetheless respect the EU public order and, consequently, the fundamental rights. In the end of each chapter, some concluding remarks are given – especially in regard to the affected fundamental rights of the suspects, the defendants or of the third parties. In epilogue, we deal with the searching of truth via the EIO and the rights of the person against whom it is issued.

Mε την Οδηγία 2014/41/ΕΕ θεσπίστηκε η «ευρωπαϊκή εντολή έρευνας» (ΕΕΕ), ως μέσο συνεργασίας μεταξύ των κρατών μελών της ΕΕ. Με αυτή αντικαταστάθηκε σε μεγάλο βαθμό το προϊσχύσαν νομικό πλαίσιο για τη συγκέντρωση και διαβίβαση αποδεικτικών μέσων για την…

Subjects/Keywords: Χώρος ελευθερίας, ασφάλειας και δικαιοσύνης; Δικαστική συνεργασία; Ποινικό δικονομικό δίκαιο; Area of freedom, security and justice; Judicial cooperation; Criminal procedural law

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Arvanitis, D. (2019). Συνεργασία σε ποινικές υποθέσεις στην Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση και δικαιώματα του ανθρώπου: η περίπτωση της ευρωπαϊκής εντολής έρευνας. (Thesis). Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences; Πάντειο Πανεπιστήμιο Κοινωνικών και Πολιτικών Επιστημών. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10442/hedi/46535

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Arvanitis, Dominikos. “Συνεργασία σε ποινικές υποθέσεις στην Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση και δικαιώματα του ανθρώπου: η περίπτωση της ευρωπαϊκής εντολής έρευνας.” 2019. Thesis, Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences; Πάντειο Πανεπιστήμιο Κοινωνικών και Πολιτικών Επιστημών. Accessed October 31, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/10442/hedi/46535.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Arvanitis, Dominikos. “Συνεργασία σε ποινικές υποθέσεις στην Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση και δικαιώματα του ανθρώπου: η περίπτωση της ευρωπαϊκής εντολής έρευνας.” 2019. Web. 31 Oct 2020.

Vancouver:

Arvanitis D. Συνεργασία σε ποινικές υποθέσεις στην Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση και δικαιώματα του ανθρώπου: η περίπτωση της ευρωπαϊκής εντολής έρευνας. [Internet] [Thesis]. Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences; Πάντειο Πανεπιστήμιο Κοινωνικών και Πολιτικών Επιστημών; 2019. [cited 2020 Oct 31]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10442/hedi/46535.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Arvanitis D. Συνεργασία σε ποινικές υποθέσεις στην Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση και δικαιώματα του ανθρώπου: η περίπτωση της ευρωπαϊκής εντολής έρευνας. [Thesis]. Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences; Πάντειο Πανεπιστήμιο Κοινωνικών και Πολιτικών Επιστημών; 2019. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10442/hedi/46535

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

.