Advanced search options

Advanced Search Options 🞨

Browse by author name (“Author name starts with…”).

Find ETDs with:

in
/  
in
/  
in
/  
in

Written in Published in Earliest date Latest date

Sorted by

Results per page:

Sorted by: relevance · author · university · dateNew search

You searched for subject:(Peer Disagreement). Showing records 1 – 8 of 8 total matches.

Search Limiters

Last 2 Years | English Only

No search limiters apply to these results.

▼ Search Limiters


University of Gothenburg / Göteborgs Universitet

1. Tiozzo, Marco. Moral Disagreement and the Significance of Higher-Order Evidence.

Degree: 2018, University of Gothenburg / Göteborgs Universitet

 Recent years have seen an increasing interest in the philosophy of disagreement, especially in epistemology where there is an intense debate over the epistemic significance… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Moral Disagreement; Higher-Order Evidence; Moral Skepticism; Peer Disagreement; Faultless Disagreement; Moral Intransigence; Epistemic Rationality

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Tiozzo, M. (2018). Moral Disagreement and the Significance of Higher-Order Evidence. (Thesis). University of Gothenburg / Göteborgs Universitet. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2077/57974

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Tiozzo, Marco. “Moral Disagreement and the Significance of Higher-Order Evidence.” 2018. Thesis, University of Gothenburg / Göteborgs Universitet. Accessed October 23, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/2077/57974.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Tiozzo, Marco. “Moral Disagreement and the Significance of Higher-Order Evidence.” 2018. Web. 23 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Tiozzo M. Moral Disagreement and the Significance of Higher-Order Evidence. [Internet] [Thesis]. University of Gothenburg / Göteborgs Universitet; 2018. [cited 2019 Oct 23]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/2077/57974.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Tiozzo M. Moral Disagreement and the Significance of Higher-Order Evidence. [Thesis]. University of Gothenburg / Göteborgs Universitet; 2018. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/2077/57974

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation


University of Arizona

2. Tal, Eyal. Detaching in Peer Disagreement and Higher-Order Evidence .

Degree: 2018, University of Arizona

 In this three-paper project I discuss the detaching problem for principles about the rational response to higher-order evidence. In the first paper, I argue that… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Detaching problem; Higher-order evidence; Peer disagreement

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Tal, E. (2018). Detaching in Peer Disagreement and Higher-Order Evidence . (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Arizona. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10150/627708

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Tal, Eyal. “Detaching in Peer Disagreement and Higher-Order Evidence .” 2018. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Arizona. Accessed October 23, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/627708.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Tal, Eyal. “Detaching in Peer Disagreement and Higher-Order Evidence .” 2018. Web. 23 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Tal E. Detaching in Peer Disagreement and Higher-Order Evidence . [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Arizona; 2018. [cited 2019 Oct 23]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10150/627708.

Council of Science Editors:

Tal E. Detaching in Peer Disagreement and Higher-Order Evidence . [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Arizona; 2018. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10150/627708


University of Rochester

3. Olson, Dustin Z. Reflective equilibrium and reasonable disagreement.

Degree: PhD, 2018, University of Rochester

 Experts often disagree on major issues within their fields of inquiry, despite being epistemic peers—individuals who are equally well informed and equally well equipped to… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Epistemic rationality; Peer disagreement; Social epistemology; Reflective equilibrium

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Olson, D. Z. (2018). Reflective equilibrium and reasonable disagreement. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Rochester. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1802/33887

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Olson, Dustin Z. “Reflective equilibrium and reasonable disagreement.” 2018. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Rochester. Accessed October 23, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/1802/33887.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Olson, Dustin Z. “Reflective equilibrium and reasonable disagreement.” 2018. Web. 23 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Olson DZ. Reflective equilibrium and reasonable disagreement. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Rochester; 2018. [cited 2019 Oct 23]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1802/33887.

Council of Science Editors:

Olson DZ. Reflective equilibrium and reasonable disagreement. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Rochester; 2018. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1802/33887

4. Blaschko, Paul Leonard. Disagreement, Dispositions, and Higher-Order Evidence.

Degree: MA, Philosophy, 2013, University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee

  In opting to consider toy cases of disagreement  – cases that, like Christensen's dinner bill scenario, obviously involve evidence-sharing epistemic peers  – epistemologists have… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Epistemology; Evidence; Peer Disagreement; Philosophy

…admitting that peer disagreement is pervasive raises a worry that… …we’ve been discussing -­‐-­‐ peer disagreement -­‐-­‐ under the… …literature on peer disagreement. While Elga (et al.) claim… …contemporary case of epistemic disagreement: you and I do some mental… …epistemically, significant about the disagreement of equally reliable and… 

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Blaschko, P. L. (2013). Disagreement, Dispositions, and Higher-Order Evidence. (Thesis). University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee. Retrieved from https://dc.uwm.edu/etd/78

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Blaschko, Paul Leonard. “Disagreement, Dispositions, and Higher-Order Evidence.” 2013. Thesis, University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee. Accessed October 23, 2019. https://dc.uwm.edu/etd/78.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Blaschko, Paul Leonard. “Disagreement, Dispositions, and Higher-Order Evidence.” 2013. Web. 23 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Blaschko PL. Disagreement, Dispositions, and Higher-Order Evidence. [Internet] [Thesis]. University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee; 2013. [cited 2019 Oct 23]. Available from: https://dc.uwm.edu/etd/78.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Blaschko PL. Disagreement, Dispositions, and Higher-Order Evidence. [Thesis]. University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee; 2013. Available from: https://dc.uwm.edu/etd/78

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation


University of Notre Dame

5. Nathan L. King. The Epistemology of Disagreement: Puzzles, Solutions, and Applications</h1>.

Degree: PhD, Philosophy, 2009, University of Notre Dame

  This is a dissertation about the epistemology of disagreement. The main questions addressed here are, Can one rationally retain a belief in the face… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: defeaters; total evidence view; Disagreement; epistemic peer; epistemology; equal weight view; moral knowledge; rationality

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

King, N. L. (2009). The Epistemology of Disagreement: Puzzles, Solutions, and Applications</h1>. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Notre Dame. Retrieved from https://curate.nd.edu/show/1z40ks67b58

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

King, Nathan L.. “The Epistemology of Disagreement: Puzzles, Solutions, and Applications</h1>.” 2009. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Notre Dame. Accessed October 23, 2019. https://curate.nd.edu/show/1z40ks67b58.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

King, Nathan L.. “The Epistemology of Disagreement: Puzzles, Solutions, and Applications</h1>.” 2009. Web. 23 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

King NL. The Epistemology of Disagreement: Puzzles, Solutions, and Applications</h1>. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Notre Dame; 2009. [cited 2019 Oct 23]. Available from: https://curate.nd.edu/show/1z40ks67b58.

Council of Science Editors:

King NL. The Epistemology of Disagreement: Puzzles, Solutions, and Applications</h1>. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Notre Dame; 2009. Available from: https://curate.nd.edu/show/1z40ks67b58


Liberty University

6. Molinari, John. Peer Disagreement and Rationality: An Analysis of Richard Feldman's Conciliatory View.

Degree: 2016, Liberty University

 How should one's beliefs be affected by one's knowing that other people, who are equally well-informed, rational, and intelligent – in other words, persons who… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Epistemic Peer; Evidentialism; Higher-Order Evidence; Peer Disagreement; Private Evidence; Skepticism; Comparative Philosophy; Esthetics; Other Philosophy

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Molinari, J. (2016). Peer Disagreement and Rationality: An Analysis of Richard Feldman's Conciliatory View. (Masters Thesis). Liberty University. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/masters/420

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Molinari, John. “Peer Disagreement and Rationality: An Analysis of Richard Feldman's Conciliatory View.” 2016. Masters Thesis, Liberty University. Accessed October 23, 2019. http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/masters/420.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Molinari, John. “Peer Disagreement and Rationality: An Analysis of Richard Feldman's Conciliatory View.” 2016. Web. 23 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Molinari J. Peer Disagreement and Rationality: An Analysis of Richard Feldman's Conciliatory View. [Internet] [Masters thesis]. Liberty University; 2016. [cited 2019 Oct 23]. Available from: http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/masters/420.

Council of Science Editors:

Molinari J. Peer Disagreement and Rationality: An Analysis of Richard Feldman's Conciliatory View. [Masters Thesis]. Liberty University; 2016. Available from: http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/masters/420


Liberty University

7. Molinari, John. Peer Disagreement and Rationality: An Analysis of Richard Feldman's Conciliatory View.

Degree: 2016, Liberty University

 How should one's beliefs be affected by one's knowing that other people, who are equally well-informed, rational, and intelligent – in other words, persons who… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Epistemic Peer; Evidentialism; Higher-Order Evidence; Peer Disagreement; Private Evidence; Skepticism; Comparative Philosophy; Esthetics; Other Philosophy; Philosophy of Mind

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Molinari, J. (2016). Peer Disagreement and Rationality: An Analysis of Richard Feldman's Conciliatory View. (Masters Thesis). Liberty University. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/masters/418

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Molinari, John. “Peer Disagreement and Rationality: An Analysis of Richard Feldman's Conciliatory View.” 2016. Masters Thesis, Liberty University. Accessed October 23, 2019. http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/masters/418.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Molinari, John. “Peer Disagreement and Rationality: An Analysis of Richard Feldman's Conciliatory View.” 2016. Web. 23 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Molinari J. Peer Disagreement and Rationality: An Analysis of Richard Feldman's Conciliatory View. [Internet] [Masters thesis]. Liberty University; 2016. [cited 2019 Oct 23]. Available from: http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/masters/418.

Council of Science Editors:

Molinari J. Peer Disagreement and Rationality: An Analysis of Richard Feldman's Conciliatory View. [Masters Thesis]. Liberty University; 2016. Available from: http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/masters/418

8. Simard Smith, Paul Linton. Logic In Context: An essay on the contextual foundations of logical pluralism.

Degree: 2013, University of Waterloo

 The core pluralist thesis about logic, broadly construed, is the claim that two or more logics are correct. In this thesis I discuss a uniquely… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Logical pluralism; peer disagreement; argumentation theory; contextualism

…155 4.2.1 What is a Reasonable Peer Disagreement… …survey of some current views on peer-disagreement. I follow up this discussion by providing a… …novel account of how reasonable peer disagreement can arise. I argue that some reasonable… …153 4.2 Reasonable Disagreement… …155 4.2.2 Epistemic Significance of Peer Disagreements… 

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Simard Smith, P. L. (2013). Logic In Context: An essay on the contextual foundations of logical pluralism. (Thesis). University of Waterloo. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10012/7986

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Simard Smith, Paul Linton. “Logic In Context: An essay on the contextual foundations of logical pluralism.” 2013. Thesis, University of Waterloo. Accessed October 23, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10012/7986.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Simard Smith, Paul Linton. “Logic In Context: An essay on the contextual foundations of logical pluralism.” 2013. Web. 23 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Simard Smith PL. Logic In Context: An essay on the contextual foundations of logical pluralism. [Internet] [Thesis]. University of Waterloo; 2013. [cited 2019 Oct 23]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10012/7986.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Simard Smith PL. Logic In Context: An essay on the contextual foundations of logical pluralism. [Thesis]. University of Waterloo; 2013. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10012/7986

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

.