Advanced search options

Advanced Search Options 🞨

Browse by author name (“Author name starts with…”).

Find ETDs with:

in
/  
in
/  
in
/  
in

Written in Published in Earliest date Latest date

Sorted by

Results per page:

Sorted by: relevance · author · university · dateNew search

You searched for subject:(Moral Disagreement). Showing records 1 – 19 of 19 total matches.

Search Limiters

Last 2 Years | English Only

No search limiters apply to these results.

▼ Search Limiters


University of Gothenburg / Göteborgs Universitet

1. Tiozzo, Marco. Moral Disagreement and the Significance of Higher-Order Evidence.

Degree: 2018, University of Gothenburg / Göteborgs Universitet

 Recent years have seen an increasing interest in the philosophy of disagreement, especially in epistemology where there is an intense debate over the epistemic significance… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Moral Disagreement; Higher-Order Evidence; Moral Skepticism; Peer Disagreement; Faultless Disagreement; Moral Intransigence; Epistemic Rationality

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Tiozzo, M. (2018). Moral Disagreement and the Significance of Higher-Order Evidence. (Thesis). University of Gothenburg / Göteborgs Universitet. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2077/57974

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Tiozzo, Marco. “Moral Disagreement and the Significance of Higher-Order Evidence.” 2018. Thesis, University of Gothenburg / Göteborgs Universitet. Accessed October 14, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/2077/57974.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Tiozzo, Marco. “Moral Disagreement and the Significance of Higher-Order Evidence.” 2018. Web. 14 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Tiozzo M. Moral Disagreement and the Significance of Higher-Order Evidence. [Internet] [Thesis]. University of Gothenburg / Göteborgs Universitet; 2018. [cited 2019 Oct 14]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/2077/57974.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Tiozzo M. Moral Disagreement and the Significance of Higher-Order Evidence. [Thesis]. University of Gothenburg / Göteborgs Universitet; 2018. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/2077/57974

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation


Duke University

2. Ancell, Aaron James. Public Unreason: Essays on Political Disagreement .

Degree: 2017, Duke University

  Why is political disagreement such a persistent and pervasive feature of contemporary societies? Many political philosophers answer by pointing to moral pluralism and the… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Philosophy; Political science; Ethics; Compromise; Ideal Theory; Moral Disagreement; Political Disagreement

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Ancell, A. J. (2017). Public Unreason: Essays on Political Disagreement . (Thesis). Duke University. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10161/16353

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Ancell, Aaron James. “Public Unreason: Essays on Political Disagreement .” 2017. Thesis, Duke University. Accessed October 14, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10161/16353.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Ancell, Aaron James. “Public Unreason: Essays on Political Disagreement .” 2017. Web. 14 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Ancell AJ. Public Unreason: Essays on Political Disagreement . [Internet] [Thesis]. Duke University; 2017. [cited 2019 Oct 14]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10161/16353.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Ancell AJ. Public Unreason: Essays on Political Disagreement . [Thesis]. Duke University; 2017. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10161/16353

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation


Australian National University

3. Bugeja, Adam Paul. Fiduciary Non-cognitivism .

Degree: 2017, Australian National University

 I present and defend a novel non-cognitivist theory of our moral thought and practices. It holds that moral judgements depend on the existence of broadly… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Metaethics; Moral Psychology; Moral Judgement; Moral Judgment; Non-cognitivism; Expressivism; Disagreement; Approval; Trust; Moral Forgetting; Non-cognitive Disagreement; Disagreement in Attitude; Normative Uncertainty; Moral Motivation; Moral Reasoning

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Bugeja, A. P. (2017). Fiduciary Non-cognitivism . (Thesis). Australian National University. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1885/146121

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Bugeja, Adam Paul. “Fiduciary Non-cognitivism .” 2017. Thesis, Australian National University. Accessed October 14, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/1885/146121.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Bugeja, Adam Paul. “Fiduciary Non-cognitivism .” 2017. Web. 14 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Bugeja AP. Fiduciary Non-cognitivism . [Internet] [Thesis]. Australian National University; 2017. [cited 2019 Oct 14]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1885/146121.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Bugeja AP. Fiduciary Non-cognitivism . [Thesis]. Australian National University; 2017. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1885/146121

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation


University of Western Ontario

4. Spang, Friderike Marta Gabriela. Dealing with Disagreement: Towards a Conception of Feasible Compromise.

Degree: 2017, University of Western Ontario

 The goal of this dissertation is to specify the feasibility conditions of compromise. More specifically, the goal of this dissertation is to specify the conditions… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Compromise; Disagreement; Scalar Feasibility; Ideal Theory; Deliberation; Moral Judgment; Political Theory

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Spang, F. M. G. (2017). Dealing with Disagreement: Towards a Conception of Feasible Compromise. (Thesis). University of Western Ontario. Retrieved from https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/4919

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Spang, Friderike Marta Gabriela. “Dealing with Disagreement: Towards a Conception of Feasible Compromise.” 2017. Thesis, University of Western Ontario. Accessed October 14, 2019. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/4919.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Spang, Friderike Marta Gabriela. “Dealing with Disagreement: Towards a Conception of Feasible Compromise.” 2017. Web. 14 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Spang FMG. Dealing with Disagreement: Towards a Conception of Feasible Compromise. [Internet] [Thesis]. University of Western Ontario; 2017. [cited 2019 Oct 14]. Available from: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/4919.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Spang FMG. Dealing with Disagreement: Towards a Conception of Feasible Compromise. [Thesis]. University of Western Ontario; 2017. Available from: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/4919

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation


University of Oxford

5. Schaefer, G. Owen. Moral enhancement and moral disagreement.

Degree: PhD, 2014, University of Oxford

 At first glance, the project of moral enhancement (making people more moral) may appear uncontroversial and obviously worth supporting; surely it is a good idea… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: 170; Practical ethics; Ethics (Moral philosophy); Philosophy; moral enhancement; disagreement; Mill; reasoning

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Schaefer, G. O. (2014). Moral enhancement and moral disagreement. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Oxford. Retrieved from http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:cf152e03-a7a0-4877-b519-bd90dd253e89 ; https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.627836

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Schaefer, G Owen. “Moral enhancement and moral disagreement.” 2014. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Oxford. Accessed October 14, 2019. http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:cf152e03-a7a0-4877-b519-bd90dd253e89 ; https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.627836.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Schaefer, G Owen. “Moral enhancement and moral disagreement.” 2014. Web. 14 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Schaefer GO. Moral enhancement and moral disagreement. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Oxford; 2014. [cited 2019 Oct 14]. Available from: http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:cf152e03-a7a0-4877-b519-bd90dd253e89 ; https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.627836.

Council of Science Editors:

Schaefer GO. Moral enhancement and moral disagreement. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Oxford; 2014. Available from: http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:cf152e03-a7a0-4877-b519-bd90dd253e89 ; https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.627836


Cornell University

6. Won, Yuna. Semantic and Metaethical Puzzles about Normative Language .

Degree: 2018, Cornell University

 My three projects here explore some semantic and metaethical problems that are unique to normative language and our normative reasoning. Ch.1 argues that the notion… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Philosophy; Contrary-To-Duty Obligation; Disagreement; Moral Dilemmas; Moral Twin Earth; Ordering Semantics; Ought

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Won, Y. (2018). Semantic and Metaethical Puzzles about Normative Language . (Thesis). Cornell University. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1813/59530

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Won, Yuna. “Semantic and Metaethical Puzzles about Normative Language .” 2018. Thesis, Cornell University. Accessed October 14, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/1813/59530.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Won, Yuna. “Semantic and Metaethical Puzzles about Normative Language .” 2018. Web. 14 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Won Y. Semantic and Metaethical Puzzles about Normative Language . [Internet] [Thesis]. Cornell University; 2018. [cited 2019 Oct 14]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1813/59530.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Won Y. Semantic and Metaethical Puzzles about Normative Language . [Thesis]. Cornell University; 2018. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1813/59530

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation


Georgia State University

7. Loveall, Bradley. Metaethical Contextualism and the Problem of Disagreement: When Somebody Must Be Wrong.

Degree: MA, Philosophy, 2018, Georgia State University

  Metaethical contextualism is a form of moderate contextualism according to which the truth-conditions of normative utterances are sensitive to some salient standard, norm, or… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Contextualism; Metaethics; Moral realism; Language; Disagreement; Truth-Conditional semantics; Belief holism; Semantic holism

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Loveall, B. (2018). Metaethical Contextualism and the Problem of Disagreement: When Somebody Must Be Wrong. (Thesis). Georgia State University. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/philosophy_theses/232

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Loveall, Bradley. “Metaethical Contextualism and the Problem of Disagreement: When Somebody Must Be Wrong.” 2018. Thesis, Georgia State University. Accessed October 14, 2019. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/philosophy_theses/232.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Loveall, Bradley. “Metaethical Contextualism and the Problem of Disagreement: When Somebody Must Be Wrong.” 2018. Web. 14 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Loveall B. Metaethical Contextualism and the Problem of Disagreement: When Somebody Must Be Wrong. [Internet] [Thesis]. Georgia State University; 2018. [cited 2019 Oct 14]. Available from: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/philosophy_theses/232.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Loveall B. Metaethical Contextualism and the Problem of Disagreement: When Somebody Must Be Wrong. [Thesis]. Georgia State University; 2018. Available from: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/philosophy_theses/232

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation


University of Notre Dame

8. Nathan L. King. The Epistemology of Disagreement: Puzzles, Solutions, and Applications</h1>.

Degree: PhD, Philosophy, 2009, University of Notre Dame

  This is a dissertation about the epistemology of disagreement. The main questions addressed here are, Can one rationally retain a belief in the face… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: defeaters; total evidence view; Disagreement; epistemic peer; epistemology; equal weight view; moral knowledge; rationality

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

King, N. L. (2009). The Epistemology of Disagreement: Puzzles, Solutions, and Applications</h1>. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Notre Dame. Retrieved from https://curate.nd.edu/show/1z40ks67b58

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

King, Nathan L.. “The Epistemology of Disagreement: Puzzles, Solutions, and Applications</h1>.” 2009. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Notre Dame. Accessed October 14, 2019. https://curate.nd.edu/show/1z40ks67b58.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

King, Nathan L.. “The Epistemology of Disagreement: Puzzles, Solutions, and Applications</h1>.” 2009. Web. 14 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

King NL. The Epistemology of Disagreement: Puzzles, Solutions, and Applications</h1>. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Notre Dame; 2009. [cited 2019 Oct 14]. Available from: https://curate.nd.edu/show/1z40ks67b58.

Council of Science Editors:

King NL. The Epistemology of Disagreement: Puzzles, Solutions, and Applications</h1>. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Notre Dame; 2009. Available from: https://curate.nd.edu/show/1z40ks67b58

9. TSAI MIAO KUN. MORAL DISPUTE IN EARLY CHINESE THOUGHT: ON A THREE WAY CONVERSATION BETWEEN THE MOHIST, MENCIUS AND ZHUANGZI.

Degree: 2016, National University of Singapore

Subjects/Keywords: Moral Disagreement; Moral Justification; Mencius; The Mohists; Zhuangzi; Pragmatics

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

KUN, T. M. (2016). MORAL DISPUTE IN EARLY CHINESE THOUGHT: ON A THREE WAY CONVERSATION BETWEEN THE MOHIST, MENCIUS AND ZHUANGZI. (Thesis). National University of Singapore. Retrieved from http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/126186

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

KUN, TSAI MIAO. “MORAL DISPUTE IN EARLY CHINESE THOUGHT: ON A THREE WAY CONVERSATION BETWEEN THE MOHIST, MENCIUS AND ZHUANGZI.” 2016. Thesis, National University of Singapore. Accessed October 14, 2019. http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/126186.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

KUN, TSAI MIAO. “MORAL DISPUTE IN EARLY CHINESE THOUGHT: ON A THREE WAY CONVERSATION BETWEEN THE MOHIST, MENCIUS AND ZHUANGZI.” 2016. Web. 14 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

KUN TM. MORAL DISPUTE IN EARLY CHINESE THOUGHT: ON A THREE WAY CONVERSATION BETWEEN THE MOHIST, MENCIUS AND ZHUANGZI. [Internet] [Thesis]. National University of Singapore; 2016. [cited 2019 Oct 14]. Available from: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/126186.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

KUN TM. MORAL DISPUTE IN EARLY CHINESE THOUGHT: ON A THREE WAY CONVERSATION BETWEEN THE MOHIST, MENCIUS AND ZHUANGZI. [Thesis]. National University of Singapore; 2016. Available from: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/126186

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation


Université Paris-Sorbonne – Paris IV

10. Ravat, Jérôme. Philosophie empirique des désaccords moraux. Une théorie de l'imaginaire polémique : Empirical philosophy of moral disagreements. A theory of polemical imagination.

Degree: Docteur es, Philosophie (métaphysique, épistémologie, esthétique), 2012, Université Paris-Sorbonne – Paris IV

Le présent travail entend développer une théorie permettant de décrire, d’expliquer et de réguler les désaccords moraux. Il privilégie une approche empirique du désaccord moral,… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Désaccord moral; Philosophie morale; Psycologie sociale; Psychologie morale; Imaginaire; Analogie; Métaphore; Symbole; Famille; Moral disagreement; Moral philosophy; Social psycology; Moral psycology; Imagination; Analogy; Metaphor; Symbol; Family

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Ravat, J. (2012). Philosophie empirique des désaccords moraux. Une théorie de l'imaginaire polémique : Empirical philosophy of moral disagreements. A theory of polemical imagination. (Doctoral Dissertation). Université Paris-Sorbonne – Paris IV. Retrieved from http://www.theses.fr/2012PA040122

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Ravat, Jérôme. “Philosophie empirique des désaccords moraux. Une théorie de l'imaginaire polémique : Empirical philosophy of moral disagreements. A theory of polemical imagination.” 2012. Doctoral Dissertation, Université Paris-Sorbonne – Paris IV. Accessed October 14, 2019. http://www.theses.fr/2012PA040122.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Ravat, Jérôme. “Philosophie empirique des désaccords moraux. Une théorie de l'imaginaire polémique : Empirical philosophy of moral disagreements. A theory of polemical imagination.” 2012. Web. 14 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Ravat J. Philosophie empirique des désaccords moraux. Une théorie de l'imaginaire polémique : Empirical philosophy of moral disagreements. A theory of polemical imagination. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Université Paris-Sorbonne – Paris IV; 2012. [cited 2019 Oct 14]. Available from: http://www.theses.fr/2012PA040122.

Council of Science Editors:

Ravat J. Philosophie empirique des désaccords moraux. Une théorie de l'imaginaire polémique : Empirical philosophy of moral disagreements. A theory of polemical imagination. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Université Paris-Sorbonne – Paris IV; 2012. Available from: http://www.theses.fr/2012PA040122

11. Turner, Martin. Moral Disagreement and Moral Realism.

Degree: PhD, Philosophy, 2013, Washington University in St. Louis

  This dissertation provides a novel argument from disagreement against moral realism. Moral anti-realists have long suspected that something about the scope and/or nature of… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Epistemology of Disagreement; Moral Anti-Realism; Moral Disagreement; Moral Realism; Philosophy

…which, as I shall argue, is challenged by the phenomenon of moral disagreement. 2. Competing… …Scorekeeping in Metaethics Before I proceed to discuss how disagreement may be a problem for moral… …investigate whether moral realism has some kind of nonnegligible problem due to moral disagreement… …that moral realism is downright unacceptable due to issues surrounding moral disagreement,18… …moral realists have responded that disagreement is essentially no threat to their view at all… 

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Turner, M. (2013). Moral Disagreement and Moral Realism. (Doctoral Dissertation). Washington University in St. Louis. Retrieved from https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/etd/1099

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Turner, Martin. “Moral Disagreement and Moral Realism.” 2013. Doctoral Dissertation, Washington University in St. Louis. Accessed October 14, 2019. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/etd/1099.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Turner, Martin. “Moral Disagreement and Moral Realism.” 2013. Web. 14 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Turner M. Moral Disagreement and Moral Realism. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Washington University in St. Louis; 2013. [cited 2019 Oct 14]. Available from: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/etd/1099.

Council of Science Editors:

Turner M. Moral Disagreement and Moral Realism. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Washington University in St. Louis; 2013. Available from: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/etd/1099


University of Oxford

12. Landau, Christopher. A theology of disagreement.

Degree: PhD, 2017, University of Oxford

 Even the most casual contemporary observer of Christianity must recognise that the notion of Christian community being identifiable through the mutual love of its members… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: 241; Richard Hays; Christian ethics – Biblical teaching; Moral Theology; Christian ethics; Disagreement; Ecclesiology; New Testament ethics; Moral theology; Biblical ethics; New Testament; Ethics; Church unity

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Landau, C. (2017). A theology of disagreement. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Oxford. Retrieved from http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:41a1c20e-64ea-45af-8582-fff22c956b7c ; https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.729124

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Landau, Christopher. “A theology of disagreement.” 2017. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Oxford. Accessed October 14, 2019. http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:41a1c20e-64ea-45af-8582-fff22c956b7c ; https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.729124.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Landau, Christopher. “A theology of disagreement.” 2017. Web. 14 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Landau C. A theology of disagreement. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Oxford; 2017. [cited 2019 Oct 14]. Available from: http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:41a1c20e-64ea-45af-8582-fff22c956b7c ; https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.729124.

Council of Science Editors:

Landau C. A theology of disagreement. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Oxford; 2017. Available from: http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:41a1c20e-64ea-45af-8582-fff22c956b7c ; https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.729124


Montana Tech

13. Cantens, Kristian. How Should we Conceptualize Moral Disagreements about Animals?.

Degree: MA, 2017, Montana Tech

  I intend this paper as a sort of philosophical reflection on my experiences as an animal activist. In my three years of doing outreach… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: animals; animal ethics; animal rights; philosophy; ethics; moral disagreement; iris murdoch; cora diamond; Ethics and Political Philosophy; Feminist Philosophy; Metaphysics; Philosophy of Mind

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Cantens, K. (2017). How Should we Conceptualize Moral Disagreements about Animals?. (Masters Thesis). Montana Tech. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/10978

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Cantens, Kristian. “How Should we Conceptualize Moral Disagreements about Animals?.” 2017. Masters Thesis, Montana Tech. Accessed October 14, 2019. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/10978.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Cantens, Kristian. “How Should we Conceptualize Moral Disagreements about Animals?.” 2017. Web. 14 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Cantens K. How Should we Conceptualize Moral Disagreements about Animals?. [Internet] [Masters thesis]. Montana Tech; 2017. [cited 2019 Oct 14]. Available from: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/10978.

Council of Science Editors:

Cantens K. How Should we Conceptualize Moral Disagreements about Animals?. [Masters Thesis]. Montana Tech; 2017. Available from: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/10978

14. Larson, Carol. A Cognitive Prototype Model of Moral Judgment and Disagreement.

Degree: 2013, University of Illinois – Chicago

 This research presents the groundwork for a cognitive prototype model of moral judgment and disagreement. Within this framework, I investigated the effects of moral properties… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Moral; judgment; prototype; social reasoning; moral disagreement; moral judgment; praise; blame; attribution theory

…viii SUMMARY According to the cognitive prototype model of moral judgment and disagreement… …act as a source of moral disagreement. Using this framework, two studies were performed… …drive moral judgments and how moral disagreement becomes manifest. The proposed research that… …questions: 1.) How does moral disagreement become manifest? 2.) In what ways do these… …situations deviate from the prototype) are more prone to moral disagreement. 7 CHAPTER II… 

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Larson, C. (2013). A Cognitive Prototype Model of Moral Judgment and Disagreement. (Thesis). University of Illinois – Chicago. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10027/9729

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Larson, Carol. “A Cognitive Prototype Model of Moral Judgment and Disagreement.” 2013. Thesis, University of Illinois – Chicago. Accessed October 14, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10027/9729.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Larson, Carol. “A Cognitive Prototype Model of Moral Judgment and Disagreement.” 2013. Web. 14 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Larson C. A Cognitive Prototype Model of Moral Judgment and Disagreement. [Internet] [Thesis]. University of Illinois – Chicago; 2013. [cited 2019 Oct 14]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10027/9729.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Larson C. A Cognitive Prototype Model of Moral Judgment and Disagreement. [Thesis]. University of Illinois – Chicago; 2013. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10027/9729

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

15. Plakias, Alexandra A. The Good and The Gross: Essays in metaethics and moral psychology.

Degree: PhD, Philosophy, 2011, University of Michigan

 The three papers in this dissertation attempt to explore and defend a kind of middle ground with respect to the question of moral objectivity. In… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Moral Psychology; Disgust; Ethics; Moral Disagreement; Metaethics; Moral Objectivity; Philosophy; Humanities

…How Moral Disagreement is a Problem for Realism,’ I show why the argument(s) from… …moral disagreement depend on facts about the actual extent and nature of moral disagreement… …characterize the parties involved in a moral disagreement so as to evaluate which factors are or… …disagreement over, and variation in, the proper objects of moral judgment. So-called ‘purity’ norms… …suite of questions. And as we make progress in understanding moral disagreement, so will our… 

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Plakias, A. A. (2011). The Good and The Gross: Essays in metaethics and moral psychology. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Michigan. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/86268

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Plakias, Alexandra A. “The Good and The Gross: Essays in metaethics and moral psychology.” 2011. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Michigan. Accessed October 14, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/86268.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Plakias, Alexandra A. “The Good and The Gross: Essays in metaethics and moral psychology.” 2011. Web. 14 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Plakias AA. The Good and The Gross: Essays in metaethics and moral psychology. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Michigan; 2011. [cited 2019 Oct 14]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/86268.

Council of Science Editors:

Plakias AA. The Good and The Gross: Essays in metaethics and moral psychology. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Michigan; 2011. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/86268

16. JACKLYN APO CLEOFAS. Fallible Omniscience: Wittgenstein's Argument against Moral Naturalism.

Degree: 2010, National University of Singapore

Subjects/Keywords: full information account of goodness; knowledge argument; moral disagreement; moral naturalism; open question argument; Wittgenstein

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

CLEOFAS, J. A. (2010). Fallible Omniscience: Wittgenstein's Argument against Moral Naturalism. (Thesis). National University of Singapore. Retrieved from http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/22109

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

CLEOFAS, JACKLYN APO. “Fallible Omniscience: Wittgenstein's Argument against Moral Naturalism.” 2010. Thesis, National University of Singapore. Accessed October 14, 2019. http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/22109.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

CLEOFAS, JACKLYN APO. “Fallible Omniscience: Wittgenstein's Argument against Moral Naturalism.” 2010. Web. 14 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

CLEOFAS JA. Fallible Omniscience: Wittgenstein's Argument against Moral Naturalism. [Internet] [Thesis]. National University of Singapore; 2010. [cited 2019 Oct 14]. Available from: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/22109.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

CLEOFAS JA. Fallible Omniscience: Wittgenstein's Argument against Moral Naturalism. [Thesis]. National University of Singapore; 2010. Available from: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/22109

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation


University of Gothenburg / Göteborgs Universitet

17. Francén, Ragnar. Metaethical Relativism : Against the Single Analysis Assumption.

Degree: 2007, University of Gothenburg / Göteborgs Universitet

 This dissertation investigates the plausibility of metaethical relativism, or more specifically, what I call “moral truth-value relativism”: the idea that the truth of a moral(more)

Subjects/Keywords: moral relativism; metaethical relativism; speaker relativism; appraiser relativism; absolutism; cognitivism; non-cognitivism; metaethics; pluralism; internalism; externalism; moral disagreement; motivation; conceptual analysis; methodology

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Francén, R. (2007). Metaethical Relativism : Against the Single Analysis Assumption. (Thesis). University of Gothenburg / Göteborgs Universitet. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2077/8505

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Francén, Ragnar. “Metaethical Relativism : Against the Single Analysis Assumption.” 2007. Thesis, University of Gothenburg / Göteborgs Universitet. Accessed October 14, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/2077/8505.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Francén, Ragnar. “Metaethical Relativism : Against the Single Analysis Assumption.” 2007. Web. 14 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Francén R. Metaethical Relativism : Against the Single Analysis Assumption. [Internet] [Thesis]. University of Gothenburg / Göteborgs Universitet; 2007. [cited 2019 Oct 14]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/2077/8505.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Francén R. Metaethical Relativism : Against the Single Analysis Assumption. [Thesis]. University of Gothenburg / Göteborgs Universitet; 2007. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/2077/8505

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation


University of Lund

18. Strandberg, Caj. Moral Reality. A Defence of Moral Realism.

Degree: 2004, University of Lund

 The main aim of this thesis is to defend moral realism. In chapter 1, I argue that moral realism is best understood as the view… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Filosofi; epistemology; ideology; Praktisk filosofi; ideologi; kunskapsteori; metafysik; estetik; Morallära; Systematic philosophy; Moral science; Gilbert Harman.; Simon Blackburn; Michael Smith; J. L. Mackie; G. E. Moore; David Brink; Nicholas Sturgeon; moral explanation; argument from queerness; metaphysics; supervenience; fetishist argument; externalism; internalism; moral motivation; moral properties; open question argument; moral reason; moral disagreement; naturalism; reductionism; error-theory; Cornell realism; moral realism; non-cognitivism; meta-ethics; ethics; aesthetics

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Strandberg, C. (2004). Moral Reality. A Defence of Moral Realism. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Lund. Retrieved from http://lup.lub.lu.se/record/21857 ; http://portal.research.lu.se/ws/files/5908723/913979.pdf

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Strandberg, Caj. “Moral Reality. A Defence of Moral Realism.” 2004. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Lund. Accessed October 14, 2019. http://lup.lub.lu.se/record/21857 ; http://portal.research.lu.se/ws/files/5908723/913979.pdf.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Strandberg, Caj. “Moral Reality. A Defence of Moral Realism.” 2004. Web. 14 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Strandberg C. Moral Reality. A Defence of Moral Realism. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Lund; 2004. [cited 2019 Oct 14]. Available from: http://lup.lub.lu.se/record/21857 ; http://portal.research.lu.se/ws/files/5908723/913979.pdf.

Council of Science Editors:

Strandberg C. Moral Reality. A Defence of Moral Realism. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Lund; 2004. Available from: http://lup.lub.lu.se/record/21857 ; http://portal.research.lu.se/ws/files/5908723/913979.pdf


University of Melbourne

19. Gaff, Andrew Douglas. On reasons and disagreement in ethics.

Degree: 2007, University of Melbourne

 This thesis explores reasons and disagreement in ethics, and their connection to personal identity. I begin by arguing that reasons are open; what gives them… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: ethics; rationality; reason; reasons for action; internal reasons; disagreement; argument; consistency; dialogue; personal identity; moral necessity; narrative identity; Charles Taylor; Bernard Williams; Peter Winch; Christine Korsgaard; Jonathan Dancy; Christopher Cordner; Hans-Georg Gadamer; Raimond Gaita; Rush Rhees

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Gaff, A. D. (2007). On reasons and disagreement in ethics. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Melbourne. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11343/39497

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Gaff, Andrew Douglas. “On reasons and disagreement in ethics.” 2007. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Melbourne. Accessed October 14, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/11343/39497.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Gaff, Andrew Douglas. “On reasons and disagreement in ethics.” 2007. Web. 14 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Gaff AD. On reasons and disagreement in ethics. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Melbourne; 2007. [cited 2019 Oct 14]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11343/39497.

Council of Science Editors:

Gaff AD. On reasons and disagreement in ethics. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Melbourne; 2007. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11343/39497

.