subject:(Judicial review)

University of Georgia

1. Li, Xiao. Imports or made-in-China: comparison of two constitutional cases in China and the United States.

Degree: LLM, Law, 2007, University of Georgia

URL: http://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/li_xiao_200712_llm

► When its economic increase attracts the global attention, China is also looking for a break-through in its judicial reform. The Qi v. Chen case (2001)… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: judicial review

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Li, X. (2007). Imports or made-in-China: comparison of two constitutional cases in China and the United States. (Thesis). University of Georgia. Retrieved from http://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/li_xiao_200712_llm

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Li, Xiao. “Imports or made-in-China: comparison of two constitutional cases in China and the United States.” 2007. Thesis, University of Georgia. Accessed November 14, 2019. http://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/li_xiao_200712_llm.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Li, Xiao. “Imports or made-in-China: comparison of two constitutional cases in China and the United States.” 2007. Web. 14 Nov 2019.

Vancouver:

Li X. Imports or made-in-China: comparison of two constitutional cases in China and the United States. [Internet] [Thesis]. University of Georgia; 2007. [cited 2019 Nov 14]. Available from: http://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/li_xiao_200712_llm.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Li X. Imports or made-in-China: comparison of two constitutional cases in China and the United States. [Thesis]. University of Georgia; 2007. Available from: http://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/li_xiao_200712_llm

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

University of Zambia

2. Lamaswala, Mukelabai. Judicial review: A mechanism for attaining Constitutionalism, with special reference to Zambia .

Degree: 2015, University of Zambia

URL: http://dspace.unza.zm:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4268

► Like many other commonwealth countries, Zambia has a written Constitution to offer guidance on how the country should be governed. Despite the availability of the… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Judicial Review – Zambia

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Lamaswala, M. (2015). Judicial review: A mechanism for attaining Constitutionalism, with special reference to Zambia . (Thesis). University of Zambia. Retrieved from http://dspace.unza.zm:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4268

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Lamaswala, Mukelabai. “Judicial review: A mechanism for attaining Constitutionalism, with special reference to Zambia .” 2015. Thesis, University of Zambia. Accessed November 14, 2019. http://dspace.unza.zm:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4268.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Lamaswala, Mukelabai. “Judicial review: A mechanism for attaining Constitutionalism, with special reference to Zambia .” 2015. Web. 14 Nov 2019.

Vancouver:

Lamaswala M. Judicial review: A mechanism for attaining Constitutionalism, with special reference to Zambia . [Internet] [Thesis]. University of Zambia; 2015. [cited 2019 Nov 14]. Available from: http://dspace.unza.zm:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4268.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Lamaswala M. Judicial review: A mechanism for attaining Constitutionalism, with special reference to Zambia . [Thesis]. University of Zambia; 2015. Available from: http://dspace.unza.zm:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4268

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

University of Georgia

3. Byrne, Jennifer Eileen. Judicial review and judicial decision making : a multivariate model of U.S. Supreme Court behavior.

Degree: MA, Political Science, 2002, University of Georgia

URL: http://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/byrne_jennifer_e_200208_ma

► This paper examines the characteristics that influence U.S. Supreme Court decision making. These factors are grouped into the attitudinal, institutional, and legal models respectively. The… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Judicial Review

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Byrne, J. E. (2002). Judicial review and judicial decision making : a multivariate model of U.S. Supreme Court behavior. (Masters Thesis). University of Georgia. Retrieved from http://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/byrne_jennifer_e_200208_ma

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Byrne, Jennifer Eileen. “Judicial review and judicial decision making : a multivariate model of U.S. Supreme Court behavior.” 2002. Masters Thesis, University of Georgia. Accessed November 14, 2019. http://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/byrne_jennifer_e_200208_ma.

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Byrne, Jennifer Eileen. “Judicial review and judicial decision making : a multivariate model of U.S. Supreme Court behavior.” 2002. Web. 14 Nov 2019.

Vancouver:

Byrne JE. Judicial review and judicial decision making : a multivariate model of U.S. Supreme Court behavior. [Internet] [Masters thesis]. University of Georgia; 2002. [cited 2019 Nov 14]. Available from: http://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/byrne_jennifer_e_200208_ma.

Council of Science Editors:

Byrne JE. Judicial review and judicial decision making : a multivariate model of U.S. Supreme Court behavior. [Masters Thesis]. University of Georgia; 2002. Available from: http://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/byrne_jennifer_e_200208_ma

University of Zambia

4. Mwelwa, Moses. The legal fiction of judicial review- A critique .

Degree: 2013, University of Zambia

URL: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2921

Subjects/Keywords: Judicial Review

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Mwelwa, M. (2013). The legal fiction of judicial review- A critique . (Thesis). University of Zambia. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2921

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Mwelwa, Moses. “The legal fiction of judicial review- A critique .” 2013. Thesis, University of Zambia. Accessed November 14, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2921.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Mwelwa, Moses. “The legal fiction of judicial review- A critique .” 2013. Web. 14 Nov 2019.

Vancouver:

Mwelwa M. The legal fiction of judicial review- A critique . [Internet] [Thesis]. University of Zambia; 2013. [cited 2019 Nov 14]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2921.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Mwelwa M. The legal fiction of judicial review- A critique . [Thesis]. University of Zambia; 2013. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2921

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

University of Edinburgh

5. Daly, Thomas Gerald. Judging democratisation : courts as democracy builders in the post-war world.

Degree: PhD, 2015, University of Edinburgh

URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1842/28687

► Can courts really build democracy in a state emerging from undemocratic rule? If so, how they do this, and what are their limits in this… (more)

▼ Can courts really build democracy in a state emerging from undemocratic rule? If so, how they do this, and what are their limits in this regard? This thesis seeks to explore the development since 1945 of a global model of democracy-building for post-authoritarian states, which accords a central position to courts. In essence, constitutional courts and regional human rights courts have come to be viewed as integral to the achievement of, or even constitutive of, a functioning democratic state. The roles courts play in supporting a democratisation process are onerous, and differ starkly from the roles of such courts in long-established democracies of the Global North. Courts in the new democracies of the post-war world have been freighted with weighty expectations to ‘deliver’ on the promises of a new democratic order, while navigating their own place within that developing order–or, in the case of regional human rights courts, inserting themselves into the democratisation process from without. At both the domestic and regional levels, from within and without the state, they are somehow expected to ‘judge’ democratisation. They are required to assess what is needed to support the democratisation process at any given point, especially in light of key deficiencies of the newly democratic order, and to judge when the democratisation context requires a different approach than may be appropriate in a mature democracy, such as the US or Ireland. However, the grand claims made for these courts as democracy-builders in existing scholarship have never been subjected to systematic analysis, nor have the overlapping roles of constitutional courts and regional human rights courts been considered in tandem. This thesis addresses a very significant research gap by drawing together a scattered and fragmented scholarship on the roles of courts in new democracies, integrating discussion of regional human rights courts, providing an innovative conceptual framework for how courts at each level act and interact as democracy-builders, and tracing connections between different normative arguments concerning the roles courts should play. As the first attempt at a wholesale exploration of the effectiveness and viability of the existing global court-centric model for democratisation, this thesis examines what we think courts do as democracy-builders, what they actually do, and what they should do. In doing so, it argues for a significant re-evaluation of how we conceive of, and employ, courts as democracy-builders.

Subjects/Keywords: courts; judicial review; democratisation

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Daly, T. G. (2015). Judging democratisation : courts as democracy builders in the post-war world. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Edinburgh. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1842/28687

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Daly, Thomas Gerald. “Judging democratisation : courts as democracy builders in the post-war world.” 2015. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Edinburgh. Accessed November 14, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/1842/28687.

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Daly, Thomas Gerald. “Judging democratisation : courts as democracy builders in the post-war world.” 2015. Web. 14 Nov 2019.

Vancouver:

Daly TG. Judging democratisation : courts as democracy builders in the post-war world. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Edinburgh; 2015. [cited 2019 Nov 14]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1842/28687.

Council of Science Editors:

Daly TG. Judging democratisation : courts as democracy builders in the post-war world. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Edinburgh; 2015. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1842/28687

University of Edinburgh

6. Latham, Alexander George. Visions of self-government : constitutional symbolism and the question of judicial review.

Degree: PhD, 2016, University of Edinburgh

URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1842/31012

► This thesis investigates the question of whether judicial review of legislation is a hindrance to democracy. My main claim is that the existing literature on… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: veto; judicial review; legislation; democracy; democratic agency

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Latham, A. G. (2016). Visions of self-government : constitutional symbolism and the question of judicial review. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Edinburgh. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1842/31012

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Latham, Alexander George. “Visions of self-government : constitutional symbolism and the question of judicial review.” 2016. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Edinburgh. Accessed November 14, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/1842/31012.

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Latham, Alexander George. “Visions of self-government : constitutional symbolism and the question of judicial review.” 2016. Web. 14 Nov 2019.

Vancouver:

Latham AG. Visions of self-government : constitutional symbolism and the question of judicial review. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Edinburgh; 2016. [cited 2019 Nov 14]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1842/31012.

Council of Science Editors:

Latham AG. Visions of self-government : constitutional symbolism and the question of judicial review. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Edinburgh; 2016. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1842/31012

Victoria University of Wellington

7. Hulley, Nicola Jane. New Zealand’s Public Trust Doctrine.

Degree: 2018, Victoria University of Wellington

URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10063/8072

► This paper presents an argument that there is a public trust doctrine which is part of New Zealand’s common law. The public doctrine imposes an… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Public trust doctrine; Judicial review; Environmental law

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Hulley, N. J. (2018). New Zealand’s Public Trust Doctrine. (Masters Thesis). Victoria University of Wellington. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10063/8072

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Hulley, Nicola Jane. “New Zealand’s Public Trust Doctrine.” 2018. Masters Thesis, Victoria University of Wellington. Accessed November 14, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10063/8072.

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Hulley, Nicola Jane. “New Zealand’s Public Trust Doctrine.” 2018. Web. 14 Nov 2019.

Vancouver:

Hulley NJ. New Zealand’s Public Trust Doctrine. [Internet] [Masters thesis]. Victoria University of Wellington; 2018. [cited 2019 Nov 14]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10063/8072.

Council of Science Editors:

Hulley NJ. New Zealand’s Public Trust Doctrine. [Masters Thesis]. Victoria University of Wellington; 2018. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10063/8072

University of Edinburgh

8. Thomson, Stephen. The constitutional basis of judicial review in Scotland.

Degree: PhD, 2014, University of Edinburgh

URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1842/25785

► The thesis examines the constitutional position of the Court of Session's supervisory jurisdiction. It begins by emphasising the methodological and substantive importance of the historicality… (more)

▼ The thesis examines the constitutional position of the Court of Session's supervisory jurisdiction. It begins by emphasising the methodological and substantive importance of the historicality and traditionality of law. It then provides a detailed historical account of the emergence of the Court's supervisory jurisdiction, from its inheritance of supervisory functions from emanations of the King's Council to the present-day law of judicial review. Throughout, emphasis is placed on the Court's strong sense of self-orientation in the wider legal and constitutional order, and the extent to which it defined its own supervisory jurisdiction. The court was a powerful constitutional actor and played a strong role in the increasing centralisation and systematisation of the legal order, expanding its supervisory purview through a powerful triumvirate of remedies (advocation, suspension and reduction) and a comprehensive approach to the supervision of a wide range of bodies. The thesis then frames tensions between Parliament and the Court in the context of judicial review of ouster clauses, chosen as a point of heightened inter-institutional tension. This is demonstrated to be an area in which divergent visions of the constitution are evident – Parliament regarding itself as entitled to oust the jurisdiction of the Court to judicially review, and the Court regarding itself as entitled to examine and pronounce on the extent of ouster, including its limitation or exclusion. In attempting to conciliate these divergent constitutional worldviews, the thesis rejects a “last word” approach which prevails in the English judicial review literature. It considers (and rejects), as alternatives, dialogue theories and functional departmentalism. The thesis then advances constitutional narratology as its preferred analytical framework for the accommodation of those inter-institutional tensions, and conciliation of their divergent worldviews. The Court's performance of a constitutional-narratological function facilitates the integration, conciliation and synthesis of legal norms with an existing law and legal system; weaves and coagulates multifarious legal norms into a unified and univocal body of norms; and executes a chronicling, expository and explanatory storytelling function which sets a legally-authoritative narrative to the law. In doing so, the Court performs a distinctive and indispensable constitutional function incapable of fulfilment by Parliament. It is argued that traditionality and functional necessity provide the legal-systemic legitimation for the Court's performance of the constitutional-narratological function. Finally, the thesis considers the institutional specificity of the function, concluding that it is the function, rather than the institution, that is indispensable. However, neither the advent of the Upper Tribunal nor the U.K. Supreme Court suggest at this stage that the Court's performance of that function is waning.

Subjects/Keywords: law; judicial review; constitutional law; administrative law

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Thomson, S. (2014). The constitutional basis of judicial review in Scotland. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Edinburgh. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1842/25785

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Thomson, Stephen. “The constitutional basis of judicial review in Scotland.” 2014. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Edinburgh. Accessed November 14, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/1842/25785.

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Thomson, Stephen. “The constitutional basis of judicial review in Scotland.” 2014. Web. 14 Nov 2019.

Vancouver:

Thomson S. The constitutional basis of judicial review in Scotland. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Edinburgh; 2014. [cited 2019 Nov 14]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1842/25785.

Council of Science Editors:

Thomson S. The constitutional basis of judicial review in Scotland. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Edinburgh; 2014. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1842/25785

University of New South Wales

9. Donnelly, Jason. Use of a National Interest Criterion in Commonwealth Legislation – Suggested Reforms for Greater Accountability in Executive Decision-Making.

Degree: Law, 2018, University of New South Wales

URL: http://handle.unsw.edu.au/1959.4/61177 ; https://unsworks.unsw.edu.au/fapi/datastream/unsworks:54575/SOURCE02?view=true

► Since Federation, the national interest concept has progressively been invoked in Australia's legal and political tradition in various respects. One such usage of the concept… (more)

▼ Since Federation, the national interest concept has progressively been invoked in Australia's legal and political tradition in various respects. One such usage of the concept has been the increasing designation of a national interest criterion in Commonwealth legislation, providing the repository of such a statutory power with a broad authority to make executive decisions that can significantly affect rights and interests of individuals and legal entities.After surveying the usage of the national interest concept across all Commonwealth statutes and delegated legislation in Australia, this thesis identifies a number of apparent deficiencies in the use of the concept under Australian law. This thesis broadly argues for more considerable legal and political accountability mechanisms in the application of a national interest statutory criterion by Commonwealth Ministers.First, the thesis offers a number of structural legislative changes regarding the application of a national interest test under Commonwealth law. The thesis argues that only Commonwealth Ministers should be able to exercise such a statutory standard. This thesis contends for a 'mandatory parliamentary tabling obligation' of all decisions that concern the application of a national interest criterion, with the relevant Minister having to table the decision (and reasons for so acting) before both Houses of Parliament.Secondly, this thesis offers a definition of a national interest statutory criterion. Where a Commonwealth Minister has regard to a consideration of the national interest not reflected in the proposed statutory definition, it would be mandatory for that matter to be clearly put to the aggrieved party. These proposed legislative structural changes, it is argued, will generate greater consistency in Ministerial decision-making that more amply apply the procedural fairness doctrine.Thirdly, this thesis argues for the potential of greater judicial intervention in decisions made by Commonwealth Ministers that apply a national interest statutory criterion. The thesis offers a working model of judicial and manageable standards that can be used by the federal judiciary in the context of judicial review cases in Australia that consider national interest decisions. The net result is greater accountability for the exercise of a national interest statutory criterion by the executive. Advisors/Committee Members: Joyce , Daniel, Law, Faculty of Law, UNSW, Halliday , Simon, University of York, York Law School, Weeks , Greg , Australian National University, ANU Law School.

Subjects/Keywords: role in judicial review; national interest; accountability

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Donnelly, J. (2018). Use of a National Interest Criterion in Commonwealth Legislation – Suggested Reforms for Greater Accountability in Executive Decision-Making. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of New South Wales. Retrieved from http://handle.unsw.edu.au/1959.4/61177 ; https://unsworks.unsw.edu.au/fapi/datastream/unsworks:54575/SOURCE02?view=true

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Donnelly, Jason. “Use of a National Interest Criterion in Commonwealth Legislation – Suggested Reforms for Greater Accountability in Executive Decision-Making.” 2018. Doctoral Dissertation, University of New South Wales. Accessed November 14, 2019. http://handle.unsw.edu.au/1959.4/61177 ; https://unsworks.unsw.edu.au/fapi/datastream/unsworks:54575/SOURCE02?view=true.

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Donnelly, Jason. “Use of a National Interest Criterion in Commonwealth Legislation – Suggested Reforms for Greater Accountability in Executive Decision-Making.” 2018. Web. 14 Nov 2019.

Vancouver:

Donnelly J. Use of a National Interest Criterion in Commonwealth Legislation – Suggested Reforms for Greater Accountability in Executive Decision-Making. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of New South Wales; 2018. [cited 2019 Nov 14]. Available from: http://handle.unsw.edu.au/1959.4/61177 ; https://unsworks.unsw.edu.au/fapi/datastream/unsworks:54575/SOURCE02?view=true.

Council of Science Editors:

Donnelly J. Use of a National Interest Criterion in Commonwealth Legislation – Suggested Reforms for Greater Accountability in Executive Decision-Making. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of New South Wales; 2018. Available from: http://handle.unsw.edu.au/1959.4/61177 ; https://unsworks.unsw.edu.au/fapi/datastream/unsworks:54575/SOURCE02?view=true

University of Missouri – Columbia

10. Gao, Yuan. Judicial Impact on Bureaucratic Decision-Making : The Case of Public Procurement and Contracting.

Degree: 2015, University of Missouri – Columbia

URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10355/46856

► This study examines whether and how much the bureaucracy responds to the judiciary. Specifically, I utilize cross-sectional, time-series data to analyze the extent to which… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Judicial review; Affirmative action programs; Public contracts

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Gao, Y. (2015). Judicial Impact on Bureaucratic Decision-Making : The Case of Public Procurement and Contracting. (Thesis). University of Missouri – Columbia. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10355/46856

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Gao, Yuan. “Judicial Impact on Bureaucratic Decision-Making : The Case of Public Procurement and Contracting.” 2015. Thesis, University of Missouri – Columbia. Accessed November 14, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10355/46856.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Gao, Yuan. “Judicial Impact on Bureaucratic Decision-Making : The Case of Public Procurement and Contracting.” 2015. Web. 14 Nov 2019.

Vancouver:

Gao Y. Judicial Impact on Bureaucratic Decision-Making : The Case of Public Procurement and Contracting. [Internet] [Thesis]. University of Missouri – Columbia; 2015. [cited 2019 Nov 14]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10355/46856.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Gao Y. Judicial Impact on Bureaucratic Decision-Making : The Case of Public Procurement and Contracting. [Thesis]. University of Missouri – Columbia; 2015. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10355/46856

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Queens University

11. Atupare, Peter Atudiwe. Judicial review and the enforcement of human rights : the red and blue lights of the judiciary of Ghana .

Degree: Law, 2008, Queens University

URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1974/1319

► Constitutional democracy requires a constitutionalisation of Human Rights and the empowerment of judiciaries to enforce and protect such rights. In Ghana, these requirements have been… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Law; Judicial review

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Atupare, P. A. (2008). Judicial review and the enforcement of human rights : the red and blue lights of the judiciary of Ghana . (Thesis). Queens University. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1974/1319

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Atupare, Peter Atudiwe. “Judicial review and the enforcement of human rights : the red and blue lights of the judiciary of Ghana .” 2008. Thesis, Queens University. Accessed November 14, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/1974/1319.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Atupare, Peter Atudiwe. “Judicial review and the enforcement of human rights : the red and blue lights of the judiciary of Ghana .” 2008. Web. 14 Nov 2019.

Vancouver:

Atupare PA. Judicial review and the enforcement of human rights : the red and blue lights of the judiciary of Ghana . [Internet] [Thesis]. Queens University; 2008. [cited 2019 Nov 14]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1974/1319.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Atupare PA. Judicial review and the enforcement of human rights : the red and blue lights of the judiciary of Ghana . [Thesis]. Queens University; 2008. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1974/1319

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

12. Avelino, Pedro Buck. Fidelidade, álibi ou traição: ressignificação e perspectivas sobre o comportamento decisório do STF.

Degree: PhD, Direito do Estado, 2015, University of São Paulo

URL: http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/2/2134/tde-09122015-074432/ ;

►

A tese apresenta modelo de classificação de ações judiciais categorias e de ressignificação escalas da decisão judicial em categoria dicotômica (Liberal e Garantista), calcada em… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Ação judicial (análise); Analytic models; Decisão judicial; Direito constitucional; Judicial behavior; Judicial politics; Judicial review; Tribunal superior

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Avelino, P. B. (2015). Fidelidade, álibi ou traição: ressignificação e perspectivas sobre o comportamento decisório do STF. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of São Paulo. Retrieved from http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/2/2134/tde-09122015-074432/ ;

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Avelino, Pedro Buck. “Fidelidade, álibi ou traição: ressignificação e perspectivas sobre o comportamento decisório do STF.” 2015. Doctoral Dissertation, University of São Paulo. Accessed November 14, 2019. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/2/2134/tde-09122015-074432/ ;.

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Avelino, Pedro Buck. “Fidelidade, álibi ou traição: ressignificação e perspectivas sobre o comportamento decisório do STF.” 2015. Web. 14 Nov 2019.

Vancouver:

Avelino PB. Fidelidade, álibi ou traição: ressignificação e perspectivas sobre o comportamento decisório do STF. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of São Paulo; 2015. [cited 2019 Nov 14]. Available from: http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/2/2134/tde-09122015-074432/ ;.

Council of Science Editors:

Avelino PB. Fidelidade, álibi ou traição: ressignificação e perspectivas sobre o comportamento decisório do STF. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of São Paulo; 2015. Available from: http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/2/2134/tde-09122015-074432/ ;

University of Tennessee – Knoxville

13. Smith, Andrew H. The Effect of Ideology and Litigant Advantage on Appeals to, and Grants of Certiorari by, the US Supreme Court.

Degree: 2018, University of Tennessee – Knoxville

URL: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/4909

► Scholars examining the relationship between the federal appellate courts and the US Supreme Court have heretofore explored a myriad of explanations for how the Supreme… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: judicial review; federal courts; law; judicial politics; resource inequality; appeals

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Smith, A. H. (2018). The Effect of Ideology and Litigant Advantage on Appeals to, and Grants of Certiorari by, the US Supreme Court. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Tennessee – Knoxville. Retrieved from https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/4909

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Smith, Andrew H. “The Effect of Ideology and Litigant Advantage on Appeals to, and Grants of Certiorari by, the US Supreme Court.” 2018. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Tennessee – Knoxville. Accessed November 14, 2019. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/4909.

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Smith, Andrew H. “The Effect of Ideology and Litigant Advantage on Appeals to, and Grants of Certiorari by, the US Supreme Court.” 2018. Web. 14 Nov 2019.

Vancouver:

Smith AH. The Effect of Ideology and Litigant Advantage on Appeals to, and Grants of Certiorari by, the US Supreme Court. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Tennessee – Knoxville; 2018. [cited 2019 Nov 14]. Available from: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/4909.

Council of Science Editors:

Smith AH. The Effect of Ideology and Litigant Advantage on Appeals to, and Grants of Certiorari by, the US Supreme Court. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Tennessee – Knoxville; 2018. Available from: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/4909

Louisiana State University

14. Sill, Kaitlyn Louise. Institutional design and the economy: disentangling the effects of judicial independence and judicial review on economic development.

Degree: PhD, Political Science, 2010, Louisiana State University

URL: etd-04142010-134016 ; https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/3494

► Scholars, politicians, and economic leaders widely believe that an independent, efficient judiciary facilitates economic growth. However, relatively few empirical studies have been conducted to evaluate… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Credible Commitment; Comparative Judicial Politics; Judiciary; Economic Growth; Judicial Independence; Judicial Review

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Sill, K. L. (2010). Institutional design and the economy: disentangling the effects of judicial independence and judicial review on economic development. (Doctoral Dissertation). Louisiana State University. Retrieved from etd-04142010-134016 ; https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/3494

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Sill, Kaitlyn Louise. “Institutional design and the economy: disentangling the effects of judicial independence and judicial review on economic development.” 2010. Doctoral Dissertation, Louisiana State University. Accessed November 14, 2019. etd-04142010-134016 ; https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/3494.

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Sill, Kaitlyn Louise. “Institutional design and the economy: disentangling the effects of judicial independence and judicial review on economic development.” 2010. Web. 14 Nov 2019.

Vancouver:

Sill KL. Institutional design and the economy: disentangling the effects of judicial independence and judicial review on economic development. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Louisiana State University; 2010. [cited 2019 Nov 14]. Available from: etd-04142010-134016 ; https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/3494.

Council of Science Editors:

Sill KL. Institutional design and the economy: disentangling the effects of judicial independence and judicial review on economic development. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Louisiana State University; 2010. Available from: etd-04142010-134016 ; https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/3494

Deakin University

15. Skaik, Samer Hisham. Introducing review mechanisms into statutory construction adjudication.

Degree: School of Architecture and Built Environment, 2017, Deakin University

URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30103435

► The study examines adjudication scheme introduced within security of payment laws to resolve payment disputes in the construction industry. The study provides guidelines for introducing… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: security of payment; statutory adjudication; Australia; judicial review; review mechanism

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Skaik, S. H. (2017). Introducing review mechanisms into statutory construction adjudication. (Thesis). Deakin University. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30103435

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Skaik, Samer Hisham. “Introducing review mechanisms into statutory construction adjudication.” 2017. Thesis, Deakin University. Accessed November 14, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30103435.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Skaik, Samer Hisham. “Introducing review mechanisms into statutory construction adjudication.” 2017. Web. 14 Nov 2019.

Vancouver:

Skaik SH. Introducing review mechanisms into statutory construction adjudication. [Internet] [Thesis]. Deakin University; 2017. [cited 2019 Nov 14]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30103435.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Skaik SH. Introducing review mechanisms into statutory construction adjudication. [Thesis]. Deakin University; 2017. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30103435

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Universidade do Rio Grande do Sul

16. Cristovam, Thaiane Correa. A supremacia judicial e a teoria dos diálogos constitucionais : sobre a implementação de mecanismos de diálogo no panorama constitucional brasileiro.

Degree: 2017, Universidade do Rio Grande do Sul

URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/163607

►

A presente dissertação tem por objetivo apresentar ferramentas que fomentem a implementação de uma espécie de controle de constitucionalidade dialógico no ordenamento jurídico brasileiro, de… (more)

▼

A presente dissertação tem por objetivo apresentar ferramentas que fomentem a implementação de uma espécie de controle de constitucionalidade dialógico no ordenamento jurídico brasileiro, de forma a mitigar a supremacia judicial ostentada pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal. Para isso, foi organizado em três capítulos. Os dois primeiros dirigem-se a realizar uma abordagem comparada, por meio de um breve apanhado histórico e análise jurisprudencial, entre os sistemas constitucionais dos Estados Unidos, da Colômbia, da Costa Rica e do Brasil e entre os seus respetivos Tribunais imbuídos da função da realização do controle de constitucionalidade. Com isto, busca-se demonstrar o assentamento da supremacia judicial em uma visão mais ampla, bem como em uma realidade latino-americana. O terceiro capítulo, por sua vez, tem o escopo de explorar as diversas vertentes da teoria dos diálogos constitucionais, elaborar um conceito de diálogo substancial e, por fim, elaborar proposições de instrumentos dialógicos ainda não existentes no ordenamento jurídico pátrio, bem como sugerir a reformulação de alguns já existentes. O intuito primordial da parte final da dissertação é a busca da promoção de uma ressignificação do controle de constitucionalidade, de forma a democratiza-lo, mitigando a supremacia judicial, incluindo no debate sobre o significado da Constituição, além do Poder Judiciário, os Poderes Executivo e Legislativo, e a sociedade como um todo.

This master’s dissertation aims do present tools that provide the implementation of a kind of dialogic judicial review in the Brazilian legal framework, so as to mitigate the judicial supremacy displayed by the Supremo Tribunal Federal. In order to do that, it was organized in three chapters. The first two chapters carry out a comparative approach, through a short historical description e and jurisprudential analyses, between the American, the Colombian, the Costa Rican and the Brazilian constitutional systems and its respective Courts that perform judicial review. In that manner, it is the objective to demonstrate the settlement of judicial supremacy in a broad vision, and also in a Latin American reality. The third chapter, by its turn, aims to explore the different aspects of the constitutional dialogue theory, elaborate a concept of substantial dialogue and, in conclusion, elaborate propositions of dialogical instruments not yet existent in the native legal order, and also suggest a reformulation of others that already exist. The paramount intention of dissertation’s final part is the promotion of a resignification of judicial review, so as to democratize it, mitigating judicial supremacy, incorporating in the debate about the significance of the Constitution, other than the Judicial power, the Executive and the Legislative powers, and the society as a hole.

Advisors/Committee Members: Baggio, Roberta Camineiro.

Subjects/Keywords: Judicial activism; Ativismo judicial; Judicial supremacy; Supremacia do direito; Controle de constitucionalidade; Constitutional dialogues; Judicial review; Comparative law

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Cristovam, T. C. (2017). A supremacia judicial e a teoria dos diálogos constitucionais : sobre a implementação de mecanismos de diálogo no panorama constitucional brasileiro. (Thesis). Universidade do Rio Grande do Sul. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10183/163607

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Cristovam, Thaiane Correa. “A supremacia judicial e a teoria dos diálogos constitucionais : sobre a implementação de mecanismos de diálogo no panorama constitucional brasileiro.” 2017. Thesis, Universidade do Rio Grande do Sul. Accessed November 14, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10183/163607.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Cristovam, Thaiane Correa. “A supremacia judicial e a teoria dos diálogos constitucionais : sobre a implementação de mecanismos de diálogo no panorama constitucional brasileiro.” 2017. Web. 14 Nov 2019.

Vancouver:

Cristovam TC. A supremacia judicial e a teoria dos diálogos constitucionais : sobre a implementação de mecanismos de diálogo no panorama constitucional brasileiro. [Internet] [Thesis]. Universidade do Rio Grande do Sul; 2017. [cited 2019 Nov 14]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/163607.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Cristovam TC. A supremacia judicial e a teoria dos diálogos constitucionais : sobre a implementação de mecanismos de diálogo no panorama constitucional brasileiro. [Thesis]. Universidade do Rio Grande do Sul; 2017. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/163607

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

The Ohio State University

17. Pacelle, Richard L. The Supreme Court agenda across time : dynamics and determinants of change.

Degree: PhD, Graduate School, 1985, The Ohio State University

URL: http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1487259580263227

Subjects/Keywords: Political Science; Judicial process; Judicial review

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Pacelle, R. L. (1985). The Supreme Court agenda across time : dynamics and determinants of change. (Doctoral Dissertation). The Ohio State University. Retrieved from http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1487259580263227

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Pacelle, Richard L. “The Supreme Court agenda across time : dynamics and determinants of change.” 1985. Doctoral Dissertation, The Ohio State University. Accessed November 14, 2019. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1487259580263227.

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Pacelle, Richard L. “The Supreme Court agenda across time : dynamics and determinants of change.” 1985. Web. 14 Nov 2019.

Vancouver:

Pacelle RL. The Supreme Court agenda across time : dynamics and determinants of change. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. The Ohio State University; 1985. [cited 2019 Nov 14]. Available from: http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1487259580263227.

Council of Science Editors:

Pacelle RL. The Supreme Court agenda across time : dynamics and determinants of change. [Doctoral Dissertation]. The Ohio State University; 1985. Available from: http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1487259580263227

Université de Montréal

18. aguilon, claire. Justice constitutionnelle et subsidiarité : l'apport de l'expérience canadienne pour la construction européenne .

Degree: 2015, Université de Montréal

URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1866/12301

► La précision des critères d’application du principe de subsidiarité et le développement de son contrôle par les institutions politiques constituent un progrès vers un plus… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: subsidiarité; contrôle juridictionnel; partage des compétences; proportionnalité; subsidiarity; judicial review; judicial interpretation; proportionnality

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

aguilon, c. (2015). Justice constitutionnelle et subsidiarité : l'apport de l'expérience canadienne pour la construction européenne . (Thesis). Université de Montréal. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1866/12301

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

aguilon, claire. “Justice constitutionnelle et subsidiarité : l'apport de l'expérience canadienne pour la construction européenne .” 2015. Thesis, Université de Montréal. Accessed November 14, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/1866/12301.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

aguilon, claire. “Justice constitutionnelle et subsidiarité : l'apport de l'expérience canadienne pour la construction européenne .” 2015. Web. 14 Nov 2019.

Vancouver:

aguilon c. Justice constitutionnelle et subsidiarité : l'apport de l'expérience canadienne pour la construction européenne . [Internet] [Thesis]. Université de Montréal; 2015. [cited 2019 Nov 14]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1866/12301.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

aguilon c. Justice constitutionnelle et subsidiarité : l'apport de l'expérience canadienne pour la construction européenne . [Thesis]. Université de Montréal; 2015. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1866/12301

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

NSYSU

19. Hsu, Liang-wei. Comparison of Constitutional Review- Taiwan and the France.

Degree: PhD, ICAPS, 2013, NSYSU

URL: http://etd.lib.nsysu.edu.tw/ETD-db/ETD-search/view_etd?URN=etd-0326113-153715

► Judicial review is the core of the "jurisdiction" of state power, the establishment of a constitutional review authority. Use of âConstitution of sovereigntyâ to replace… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Constitutional Review; Judicial Review; Constitutional Judge; Constitutional Interpretation; Constitutional Council; The Honorable Justice; A priori review

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Hsu, L. (2013). Comparison of Constitutional Review- Taiwan and the France. (Doctoral Dissertation). NSYSU. Retrieved from http://etd.lib.nsysu.edu.tw/ETD-db/ETD-search/view_etd?URN=etd-0326113-153715

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Hsu, Liang-wei. “Comparison of Constitutional Review- Taiwan and the France.” 2013. Doctoral Dissertation, NSYSU. Accessed November 14, 2019. http://etd.lib.nsysu.edu.tw/ETD-db/ETD-search/view_etd?URN=etd-0326113-153715.

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Hsu, Liang-wei. “Comparison of Constitutional Review- Taiwan and the France.” 2013. Web. 14 Nov 2019.

Vancouver:

Hsu L. Comparison of Constitutional Review- Taiwan and the France. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. NSYSU; 2013. [cited 2019 Nov 14]. Available from: http://etd.lib.nsysu.edu.tw/ETD-db/ETD-search/view_etd?URN=etd-0326113-153715.

Council of Science Editors:

Hsu L. Comparison of Constitutional Review- Taiwan and the France. [Doctoral Dissertation]. NSYSU; 2013. Available from: http://etd.lib.nsysu.edu.tw/ETD-db/ETD-search/view_etd?URN=etd-0326113-153715

University of KwaZulu-Natal

20. [No author]. The judicial defense for affirmative action measures : a critique of the rationality standard of judicial review.

Degree: 2015, University of KwaZulu-Natal

URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10413/13575

► The South African Constitution states that in order to promote the achievement of equality, legislative and other measures designed to protect those disadvantaged by unfair… (more)

▼ The South African Constitution states that in order to promote the achievement of equality, legislative and other measures designed to protect those disadvantaged by unfair discrimination may be taken. One of these measures is affirmative action. For the constitutionality of measures in disputes the Court has opted for the ‘rationality’ standard of judicial review. This dissertation aims to critically analyse the rationality standard in the judicial defense of affirmative action measures through an examination of court cases and government legislation. It was found, firstly, that the role of rationality in the Constitution value structure as a whole is superficially confined to the legitimacy of governmental purpose. Its result excludes the full spectrum of competing interests and a determination of their relative weight in terms of an integrative account of the Constitution structure. Secondly, it was found that promoting the achievement of equality has proved to be problematic within the strictures of a rationality standard. It is concluded that to promote the achievement of equality requires a judicial review during affirmative action disputes to have regard to the impact of measures in their implementation within the ambit of right and value to equality. Legal standards are supposed to provide the basis to choose amongst varying competing ends or relate them in a meaningful way to an integrating normative standard in order to claim democratic justificatory and legitimizing value. The rationality standard needs to be amended to introduce a more substantive normative standard which ensures that the implementation of measures which passes constitutional muster also takes into account how it may affect other constitutional rights and values. The proportionality standard provides the degree of democratic accountability expected of rights- limiting measures by considering the impact which such measures may have on competing rights and the interests of those detrimentally affected by it. Advisors/Committee Members: Cohen, Tamara (advisor).

Subjects/Keywords: Affirmative action programs.; Judicial review.; Unfair labor practices.; Law.

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

author], [. (2015). The judicial defense for affirmative action measures : a critique of the rationality standard of judicial review. (Thesis). University of KwaZulu-Natal. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10413/13575

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

author], [No. “The judicial defense for affirmative action measures : a critique of the rationality standard of judicial review. ” 2015. Thesis, University of KwaZulu-Natal. Accessed November 14, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10413/13575.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

author], [No. “The judicial defense for affirmative action measures : a critique of the rationality standard of judicial review. ” 2015. Web. 14 Nov 2019.

Vancouver:

author] [. The judicial defense for affirmative action measures : a critique of the rationality standard of judicial review. [Internet] [Thesis]. University of KwaZulu-Natal; 2015. [cited 2019 Nov 14]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10413/13575.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

author] [. The judicial defense for affirmative action measures : a critique of the rationality standard of judicial review. [Thesis]. University of KwaZulu-Natal; 2015. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10413/13575

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

21. Silva, Ricson Moreira Coelho da. A mutabilidade das normas constitucionais e os limites de atuação do juiz.

Degree: Mestrado, Direito do Estado, 2014, University of São Paulo

URL: http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/2/2134/tde-27012015-162357/ ;

►

Este trabalho é uma análise crítica do tema da mutação constitucional. Buscouse a partir da revisitação de temas como o constitucionalismo e do conceito de… (more)

▼

Este trabalho é uma análise crítica do tema da mutação constitucional. Buscouse a partir da revisitação de temas como o constitucionalismo e do conceito de Constituição, construir uma dogmática da mutabilidade das normas constitucionais e assim procedendo, verificar empiricamente, com base em precedentes da jurisprudência do Supremo Tribunal Federal, o acerto desta construção. Uma vez estabelecidas as bases para a verificação do fenômeno da mutação constitucional, foi possível parametrizar os limites possíveis a esta hipótese de atualização das normas constitucionais. Pois bem, nesses termos, fixado o conceito, verificado a sua aplicabilidade na jurisprudência, bem como estabelecidos os limites de sua utilização, foi possível ainda a partir da análise do contexto atual em que se insere o instituto, vislumbrar as hipóteses de sua aplicação futura. Em suma, trata-se de um trabalho no qual se tenta compreender o papel da jurisdição constitucional com respeito ao tema de mutabilidade das normas constitucionais, sobretudo diante da realidade pós-moderna circundante, que pela sua complexidade, influencia, sensivelmente, a normatividade dos preceitos legais e, notadamente, dos constitucionais, objeto principal do estudo.

This work is a critical analysis of the issue of constitutional change. We sought from revisiting issues such as constitutionalism and the concept of constitution building a dogmatic mutability of constitutional norms and in so doing, to verify empirically, based on the precedents jurisprudence of the Supreme Court, the correctness of this construction. Once established the basis for the verification of the phenomenon of constitutional change, it was possible to parameterize the possible limits to this hypothesis update of constitutional norms . Well , in these terms , the concept set, verifying their applicability in case law as well as established the limits of their use, it was still possible from the analysis of the current context in which it appears the institute, envision the chances of its future application. In short, it is a work in which one tries to understand the role of constitutional jurisdiction with respect to the theme of mutability of constitutional norms, particularly in the surrounding postmodern reality, which by their complexity, significantly influences the normativity of legal precepts and especially, constitutional, the main object of study.

Advisors/Committee Members: Ramos, Elival da Silva.

Subjects/Keywords: Boundaries interpretativism; Constitucion mutability; Constituição; Culpabilidade; Judicial review; Judiciary power; Mutação

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Silva, R. M. C. d. (2014). A mutabilidade das normas constitucionais e os limites de atuação do juiz. (Masters Thesis). University of São Paulo. Retrieved from http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/2/2134/tde-27012015-162357/ ;

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Silva, Ricson Moreira Coelho da. “A mutabilidade das normas constitucionais e os limites de atuação do juiz.” 2014. Masters Thesis, University of São Paulo. Accessed November 14, 2019. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/2/2134/tde-27012015-162357/ ;.

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Silva, Ricson Moreira Coelho da. “A mutabilidade das normas constitucionais e os limites de atuação do juiz.” 2014. Web. 14 Nov 2019.

Vancouver:

Silva RMCd. A mutabilidade das normas constitucionais e os limites de atuação do juiz. [Internet] [Masters thesis]. University of São Paulo; 2014. [cited 2019 Nov 14]. Available from: http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/2/2134/tde-27012015-162357/ ;.

Council of Science Editors:

Silva RMCd. A mutabilidade das normas constitucionais e os limites de atuação do juiz. [Masters Thesis]. University of São Paulo; 2014. Available from: http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/2/2134/tde-27012015-162357/ ;

Universidade de Brasília

22. Marcelo Casseb Continentino. Revisitando os fundamentos do controle de constitucionalidade : uma crítica democratizante à prática judicial brasileira.

Degree: 2006, Universidade de Brasília

URL: http://bdtd.bce.unb.br/tedesimplificado/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=704

►

Uma das principais discussões do direito constitucional contemporâneo recai sobre a tensão entre Democracia e jurisdição constitucional. A grande questão a envolver constitucionalistas e filósofos… (more)

▼

Uma das principais discussões do direito constitucional contemporâneo recai sobre a tensão entre Democracia e jurisdição constitucional. A grande questão a envolver constitucionalistas e filósofos reside em como justificar a legitimidade da jurisdição constitucional numa Democracia, regida pelo princípio do autogoverno, se a "última palavra" sobre o que a Constituição significa é atribuída ao Poder Judiciário. Partindo-se do pressuposto de que Estado de Direito, Democracia e Constituição são conceitos intrinsecamente ligados, a presente dissertação objetiva analisar criticamente tais noções em face da relação existente entre Democracia e jurisdição constitucional, com especial atenção à prática brasileira. Nessa perspectiva, adota-se o conceito de Democracia com base na teoria discursiva de JÜRGEN HABERMAS, explorando-se a importância da cidadania ativa e participativa para legitimar o processo de criação e interpretação das leis e da Constituição. Essa peculiar característica do processo legislativo democrático reclama do Poder Judiciário o asseguramento das condições para o exercício da autonomia dos cidadãos, através da jurisdição constitucional. No entanto, em face da atual configuração do modelo de controle brasileiro, a investigação demonstra que a jurisdição constitucional não tem sido legitimamente exercida, porque, de um lado, os juízes do Supremo Tribunal Federal autocompreendem-se como intérpretes últimos da Constituição e, de outro, com a crescente concentração do controle judicial, os cidadãos vêem-se cada vez mais afastados do exercício de sua autonomia, no que tange à interpretação da Constituição. Dessa forma, destacando a feição democrática do controle difuso e a necessidade de revitalizá-lo, a dissertação sugere como alternativa a essa prática ilegítima a institucionalização de um "controle judicial fraco" (weak-form judicial review) com a adoção da "cláusula não obstante" (notwithstanding clause), cujo principal mérito é atribuir ao Poder Legislativo a autoridade de dizer a "última palavra" sobre a Constituição e ao Poder Judiciário, a "penúltima palavra". Por fim, defende-se que esse mecanismo institucional possibilita a preservação da autonomia dos cidadãos, na definição do conteúdo das normas constitucionais, além de gerar uma legítima relação de complementaridade entre Democracia e jurisdição constitucional.

One of the principal contemporary discussions of constitutional law falls on the tension between Democracy and judicial review. The big question involving constitutionalists and philosophers resides in how to justify the legitimacy of the judicial review in a Democracy, ruled by the principle of self-government, if the last word on what Constitution means is attributed to Judiciary Power. Starting from the presupposition that Rule of Law, Democracy and Constitution are intrinsically linked concepts, the objective of the present dissertation is to analyze critically such notions in view of the existing relationship between Democracy and judicial review, with special attention to Brazilian…

Advisors/Committee Members: Marcus Faro de Castro, Jose Ribas Vieira, Cristiano Otavio Paixão Araujo Pinto.

Subjects/Keywords: Legitimacy; Direito constitucional; Jurisdição - Democracia; DIREITO; Democracy; Judicial Review

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Continentino, M. C. (2006). Revisitando os fundamentos do controle de constitucionalidade : uma crítica democratizante à prática judicial brasileira. (Thesis). Universidade de Brasília. Retrieved from http://bdtd.bce.unb.br/tedesimplificado/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=704

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Continentino, Marcelo Casseb. “Revisitando os fundamentos do controle de constitucionalidade : uma crítica democratizante à prática judicial brasileira.” 2006. Thesis, Universidade de Brasília. Accessed November 14, 2019. http://bdtd.bce.unb.br/tedesimplificado/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=704.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Continentino, Marcelo Casseb. “Revisitando os fundamentos do controle de constitucionalidade : uma crítica democratizante à prática judicial brasileira.” 2006. Web. 14 Nov 2019.

Vancouver:

Continentino MC. Revisitando os fundamentos do controle de constitucionalidade : uma crítica democratizante à prática judicial brasileira. [Internet] [Thesis]. Universidade de Brasília; 2006. [cited 2019 Nov 14]. Available from: http://bdtd.bce.unb.br/tedesimplificado/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=704.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Continentino MC. Revisitando os fundamentos do controle de constitucionalidade : uma crítica democratizante à prática judicial brasileira. [Thesis]. Universidade de Brasília; 2006. Available from: http://bdtd.bce.unb.br/tedesimplificado/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=704

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

23. Ansari, Md. Nafees Ahmad. A study of judicial review of administrative actions in India; -.

Degree: Political Science, 1994, Aligarh Muslim University

URL: http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/handle/10603/51989

Abstract available newline newline

Bibliography p. 224-236

Advisors/Committee Members: Khan, Mohammad Murtaza.

Subjects/Keywords: Judicial Review; Administrative Actions; India

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Ansari, M. N. A. (1994). A study of judicial review of administrative actions in India; -. (Thesis). Aligarh Muslim University. Retrieved from http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/handle/10603/51989

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Ansari, Md Nafees Ahmad. “A study of judicial review of administrative actions in India; -.” 1994. Thesis, Aligarh Muslim University. Accessed November 14, 2019. http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/handle/10603/51989.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Ansari, Md Nafees Ahmad. “A study of judicial review of administrative actions in India; -.” 1994. Web. 14 Nov 2019.

Vancouver:

Ansari MNA. A study of judicial review of administrative actions in India; -. [Internet] [Thesis]. Aligarh Muslim University; 1994. [cited 2019 Nov 14]. Available from: http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/handle/10603/51989.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Ansari MNA. A study of judicial review of administrative actions in India; -. [Thesis]. Aligarh Muslim University; 1994. Available from: http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/handle/10603/51989

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Universiteit Utrecht

24. van Eijken, Hanneke. European citizenship and the constitutionalisation of the European Union.

Degree: 2014, Universiteit Utrecht

URL: http://dspace.library.uu.nl:8080/handle/1874/300550

► The concept of citizenship in relatively new legal order of the European Union has its own meaning and dynamics compared to national citizenship. One of… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: European citizenship; constitutionalisation; fundamental rights; democracy; judicial review; divison of powers

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

van Eijken, H. (2014). European citizenship and the constitutionalisation of the European Union. (Doctoral Dissertation). Universiteit Utrecht. Retrieved from http://dspace.library.uu.nl:8080/handle/1874/300550

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

van Eijken, Hanneke. “European citizenship and the constitutionalisation of the European Union.” 2014. Doctoral Dissertation, Universiteit Utrecht. Accessed November 14, 2019. http://dspace.library.uu.nl:8080/handle/1874/300550.

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

van Eijken, Hanneke. “European citizenship and the constitutionalisation of the European Union.” 2014. Web. 14 Nov 2019.

Vancouver:

van Eijken H. European citizenship and the constitutionalisation of the European Union. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Universiteit Utrecht; 2014. [cited 2019 Nov 14]. Available from: http://dspace.library.uu.nl:8080/handle/1874/300550.

Council of Science Editors:

van Eijken H. European citizenship and the constitutionalisation of the European Union. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Universiteit Utrecht; 2014. Available from: http://dspace.library.uu.nl:8080/handle/1874/300550

Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University

25. Boyens, Marthinus Johannes. Sidumo revisited.

Degree: Faculty of Law, 2015, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University

URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/d1020117

► The primary purpose of this treatise is to revisit and reconsider the development of the review test set out in the Constitutional Court judgment of… (more)

▼ The primary purpose of this treatise is to revisit and reconsider the development of the review test set out in the Constitutional Court judgment of Sidumo & another v Rustenburg Platinum Mines Ltd & Others (2007) 28 ILJ 2405 (CC) and consequently ascertain the correct approach to be adopted by our Labour Courts in the application of such test. The secondary purpose, entail the determination of the extent to which Labour Court judges interfere with the merits of awards and the resulting impact on the distinction between appeal and review. In order to establish whether the test for review was correctly developed and to determine whether our review proceedings deter recurrent interference by our judges, an edifying consideration of judicial review in South Africa, an extensive analysis of various judgements pertaining to such development, followed by a comprehensive comparison with the United Kingdom`s application of review proceedings and judicial composition are made. The research methodology is based on a contour of Sidumo, commencing with the Sidumo judgment, followed by three contentious Labour Appeal Court judgments and concluding with a Supreme Court of Appeal judgement, which clarifies the operation of the review test. The contour is interlinked with the notion of reasonableness. The primary research findings are identified in the judgment of Herholdt v Nedbank Ltd (2013) 34 ILJ 2795 (SCA). The judgment, concluding the Sidumo contour, underlines the current position in our law and consequent narrower approach. A comparison made with the United Kingdom, differentiate between such approach implemented by our courts and the strict gross unreasonableness approach applied by Employment Appeal Tribunals, recognising the finding, that our Labour Court judges ardently interfere with the merits of awards. In the conclusion it is submitted that our labour law jurisprudence will constantly evolve, dictated by our courts interpretation of lawfulness, reasonableness and fairness.

Subjects/Keywords: Judicial review – South Africa; Judgments – South Africa; Labor courts – South Africa

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Boyens, M. J. (2015). Sidumo revisited. (Thesis). Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10948/d1020117

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Boyens, Marthinus Johannes. “Sidumo revisited.” 2015. Thesis, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University. Accessed November 14, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10948/d1020117.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Boyens, Marthinus Johannes. “Sidumo revisited.” 2015. Web. 14 Nov 2019.

Vancouver:

Boyens MJ. Sidumo revisited. [Internet] [Thesis]. Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University; 2015. [cited 2019 Nov 14]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/d1020117.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Boyens MJ. Sidumo revisited. [Thesis]. Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University; 2015. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/d1020117

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

McMaster University

26. Kanko, Sarah. Incompatibilists, Critics, and Living Trees: the compatibility of international law and constitutional democracy.

Degree: MA, 2017, McMaster University

URL: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/22342

►

In this thesis, I address two issues. First, I reject the supposed conflict between international law and constitutional democracy. And second, I explore the role… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Philosophy of Law; Constitutional Democracy; International Law; Judicial Review

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Kanko, S. (2017). Incompatibilists, Critics, and Living Trees: the compatibility of international law and constitutional democracy. (Masters Thesis). McMaster University. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11375/22342

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Kanko, Sarah. “Incompatibilists, Critics, and Living Trees: the compatibility of international law and constitutional democracy.” 2017. Masters Thesis, McMaster University. Accessed November 14, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/11375/22342.

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Kanko, Sarah. “Incompatibilists, Critics, and Living Trees: the compatibility of international law and constitutional democracy.” 2017. Web. 14 Nov 2019.

Vancouver:

Kanko S. Incompatibilists, Critics, and Living Trees: the compatibility of international law and constitutional democracy. [Internet] [Masters thesis]. McMaster University; 2017. [cited 2019 Nov 14]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/22342.

Council of Science Editors:

Kanko S. Incompatibilists, Critics, and Living Trees: the compatibility of international law and constitutional democracy. [Masters Thesis]. McMaster University; 2017. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/22342

University of the Western Cape

27. Fisseha, Yonatan Tesfaye. Who interprets the constitution: A descriptive and normative discourse on the Ethiopian approach to constitutional review .

Degree: 2005, University of the Western Cape

URL: http://hdl.handle.net/11394/1537

► This study explored the process of constitutional interpretation and constitutional review in Ethiopia and determined the role of the courts. It examined the different suggestions… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Constitutional law; Judicial review; Ethiopia

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Fisseha, Y. T. (2005). Who interprets the constitution: A descriptive and normative discourse on the Ethiopian approach to constitutional review . (Thesis). University of the Western Cape. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11394/1537

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Fisseha, Yonatan Tesfaye. “Who interprets the constitution: A descriptive and normative discourse on the Ethiopian approach to constitutional review .” 2005. Thesis, University of the Western Cape. Accessed November 14, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/11394/1537.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Fisseha, Yonatan Tesfaye. “Who interprets the constitution: A descriptive and normative discourse on the Ethiopian approach to constitutional review .” 2005. Web. 14 Nov 2019.

Vancouver:

Fisseha YT. Who interprets the constitution: A descriptive and normative discourse on the Ethiopian approach to constitutional review . [Internet] [Thesis]. University of the Western Cape; 2005. [cited 2019 Nov 14]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11394/1537.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Fisseha YT. Who interprets the constitution: A descriptive and normative discourse on the Ethiopian approach to constitutional review . [Thesis]. University of the Western Cape; 2005. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11394/1537

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Columbia University

28. Bar-Siman-Tov, Ittai. Separating Law-Making from Sausage-Making: The Case for Judicial Review of the Legislative Process.

Degree: 2011, Columbia University

URL: https://doi.org/10.7916/D8HM5GMN

► Inspired, perhaps, by the old adage that "people who like sausages and respect the law should never watch either being made," there is significant resistance… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Legislation; Comparative law; Jurisprudence; Constitutional law; Political science; Judicial review; Law

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Bar-Siman-Tov, I. (2011). Separating Law-Making from Sausage-Making: The Case for Judicial Review of the Legislative Process. (Doctoral Dissertation). Columbia University. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.7916/D8HM5GMN

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Bar-Siman-Tov, Ittai. “Separating Law-Making from Sausage-Making: The Case for Judicial Review of the Legislative Process.” 2011. Doctoral Dissertation, Columbia University. Accessed November 14, 2019. https://doi.org/10.7916/D8HM5GMN.

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Bar-Siman-Tov, Ittai. “Separating Law-Making from Sausage-Making: The Case for Judicial Review of the Legislative Process.” 2011. Web. 14 Nov 2019.

Vancouver:

Bar-Siman-Tov I. Separating Law-Making from Sausage-Making: The Case for Judicial Review of the Legislative Process. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Columbia University; 2011. [cited 2019 Nov 14]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.7916/D8HM5GMN.

Council of Science Editors:

Bar-Siman-Tov I. Separating Law-Making from Sausage-Making: The Case for Judicial Review of the Legislative Process. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Columbia University; 2011. Available from: https://doi.org/10.7916/D8HM5GMN

29. Jordao, Eduardo. L'adaptation de l'intensité du contrôle juridictionnel aux caractéristiques de l'action administrative contrôlée : No English title available.

Degree: Docteur es, Droit public, 2014, Paris 1; Università degli studi La Sapienza (Rome)

URL: http://www.theses.fr/2014PA010310

►

L’objet de cette étude est l’adaptation de l’intensité du contrôle juridictionnel aux caractéristiques de l’action administrative contrôlée. L’examen est fait à la lumière de quatre… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Contrôle juridictionnel; Administration publique; Droit administratif; Judicial review; Administrative law; 340

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

Jordao, E. (2014). L'adaptation de l'intensité du contrôle juridictionnel aux caractéristiques de l'action administrative contrôlée : No English title available. (Doctoral Dissertation). Paris 1; Università degli studi La Sapienza (Rome). Retrieved from http://www.theses.fr/2014PA010310

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

Jordao, Eduardo. “L'adaptation de l'intensité du contrôle juridictionnel aux caractéristiques de l'action administrative contrôlée : No English title available.” 2014. Doctoral Dissertation, Paris 1; Università degli studi La Sapienza (Rome). Accessed November 14, 2019. http://www.theses.fr/2014PA010310.

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

Jordao, Eduardo. “L'adaptation de l'intensité du contrôle juridictionnel aux caractéristiques de l'action administrative contrôlée : No English title available.” 2014. Web. 14 Nov 2019.

Vancouver:

Jordao E. L'adaptation de l'intensité du contrôle juridictionnel aux caractéristiques de l'action administrative contrôlée : No English title available. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Paris 1; Università degli studi La Sapienza (Rome); 2014. [cited 2019 Nov 14]. Available from: http://www.theses.fr/2014PA010310.

Council of Science Editors:

Jordao E. L'adaptation de l'intensité du contrôle juridictionnel aux caractéristiques de l'action administrative contrôlée : No English title available. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Paris 1; Università degli studi La Sapienza (Rome); 2014. Available from: http://www.theses.fr/2014PA010310

30. NOONAN, ROBERT. Declarations of Unconstitutionality in the Common Law Tradition: A Comparative and Theoretical Analysis.

Degree: School of Law. Discipline of Law, 2019, Trinity College Dublin

URL: http://hdl.handle.net/2262/86117

► This thesis is a comparative and theoretical study of declarations of unconstitutionality. It combines a comparative analysis of the laws of Ireland, Canada, the United… (more)

▼ This thesis is a comparative and theoretical study of declarations of unconstitutionality. It combines a comparative analysis of the laws of Ireland, Canada, the United States, India and South Africa with a jurisprudential analysis of philosophical issues that inform unconstitutionality as a general legal phenomenon. Constitutional orders in which judges have a full power of judicial review of legislation must invariably confront the difficulty of unconstitutional law. Through comparative doctrinal analysis, I argue that there are three questions a theory of unconstitutionality must answer: the derivation question, the effects question, and the temporal question. The derivation question accounts for the source of unconstitutionality and answers, from a more technocratic point of view, how unconstitutionality is brought about in the first place. The effects question addresses how unconstitutionality modifies the properties of legal norms. Finally, the temporal question attends to when unconstitutionality begins, and for how long it is effective. Using these questions, I present a scheme for rationalising the practice of the studied jurisdictions, and I propose a new model of unconstitutionality. The thesis thus both deepens knowledge of the law as it stands and makes normative proposals for improving theory and practice in this area. The comparative analysis highlights the common treatment of unconstitutional law as being invalid and void ab initio. This view of unconstitutional law is widespread, and invariably generates difficulty. The thesis criticises this view, though the framework of unconstitutionality generated by the three questions above, and proposes an alternative theory as a possible replacement. The thesis proposes that legal validity should not be treated as entailing fixed answers to the applicability of unconstitutional legal norms. The thesis demonstrates, using theoretical argument and data from the comparative study, how legal validity and applicability are distinct properties of legal norms, and how treating these properties separately can deepen understanding of unconstitutionality and produce less severe contagion effects where unconstitutionality is apprehended. It can also assist in developing a more sophisticated understanding of important public law remedies, such as the suspended declaration of invalidity. This inspires both a more edifying theory of unconstitutionality and a more equitable practice. The preferred model of unconstitutionality in this thesis is developed on a ?choice of law? analogy that coheres with a detailed theory of legal systems also endorsed by this thesis. This model is both theoretically and practically preferable to competitor models and, if adopted by courts, it would produce new legal doctrines that deal more sensibly with the moral dimensions of retrospectively imposing changes to legal rules. This would provide much-needed clarity in this important area of public law. Advisors/Committee Members: Doyle, Oran.

Subjects/Keywords: constitutional law; law; unconstitutionality; jurisprudence; legal validity; public law; judicial review

Record Details Similar Records Cite « Share

❌

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6^th Edition):

NOONAN, R. (2019). Declarations of Unconstitutionality in the Common Law Tradition: A Comparative and Theoretical Analysis. (Thesis). Trinity College Dublin. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2262/86117

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16^th Edition):

NOONAN, ROBERT. “Declarations of Unconstitutionality in the Common Law Tradition: A Comparative and Theoretical Analysis.” 2019. Thesis, Trinity College Dublin. Accessed November 14, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/2262/86117.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7^th Edition):

NOONAN, ROBERT. “Declarations of Unconstitutionality in the Common Law Tradition: A Comparative and Theoretical Analysis.” 2019. Web. 14 Nov 2019.

Vancouver:

NOONAN R. Declarations of Unconstitutionality in the Common Law Tradition: A Comparative and Theoretical Analysis. [Internet] [Thesis]. Trinity College Dublin; 2019. [cited 2019 Nov 14]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/2262/86117.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

NOONAN R. Declarations of Unconstitutionality in the Common Law Tradition: A Comparative and Theoretical Analysis. [Thesis]. Trinity College Dublin; 2019. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/2262/86117

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Open Access Theses and Dissertations