Advanced search options

Advanced Search Options 🞨

Browse by author name (“Author name starts with…”).

Find ETDs with:

in
/  
in
/  
in
/  
in

Written in Published in Earliest date Latest date

Sorted by

Results per page:

Sorted by: relevance · author · university · date | New search

You searched for subject:(Judicial recruitment). Showing records 1 – 2 of 2 total matches.

Search Limiters

Last 2 Years | English Only

No search limiters apply to these results.

▼ Search Limiters


Universidade do Rio Grande do Sul

1. Bandeira, Julia Veiga Vieira Mancio. Entre a politização e o autocentrismo : os efeitos do recrutamento judicial na Argentina e no Chile.

Degree: 2017, Universidade do Rio Grande do Sul

O presente artigo tem como objeto as dinâmicas geradas pelos modelos de recrutamento empregados nas Supremas Cortes da Argentina e do Chile. Sendo tais modelos antagônicos, visto que na Argentina o recrutamento se dá por indicação presidencial, enquanto no Chile se configura uma cooptação indireta, busca-se compreender qual é o papel que assumem na institucionalização, hierarquização e independência dos poderes judiciais em questão. Parte-se da hipótese que o recrutamento por indicação presidencial estabeleceu na Argentina uma elite judicial integrada ao desenvolvimento sociopolítico do país, apesar de ter facilitado o cerceamento à independência do Judiciário pelo Executivo. Já a cooptação chilena, ainda que tenha assegurado a independência judicial, incentivou a formação de uma elite com traços aristocráticos, autocentrada e que dificulta a renovação da interpretação judicial, deixando o Judiciário anacrônico. A hipótese do presente artigo será sustentada através da apresentação de um panorama histórico-estrutural da institucionalização dos judiciários em questão, observando o efeito dos modelos de recrutamento adotados, e das disputas para defini-los, em sua hierarquização e independência. Também se recorrerá ao método prosopográfico para aprofundar a apreensão da relação entre os padrões de recrutamento das Corte Suprema e a evolução do poder judicial.

El presente artículo tiene por objeto la dinámica generada por los modelos de reclutamiento empleados en las Cortes Supremas de Argentina y Chile. Una vez que estos modelos son antagónicos, ya que en Argentina el reclutamiento es por indicación presidencial, mientras que en Chile es por una cooptación indirecta, se busca comprender el rol que desempeñan en la institucionalización, la jerarquización y la independencia de los poderes judiciales en cuestión. La principal hipótesis es que el reclutamiento por indicación presidencial estableció en Argentina una élite judicial integrada al desarrollo sociopolítico del país, a pesar de haber facilitado la reducción a la independencia del Poder Judicial por parte del Poder Ejecutivo. Por otro lado, la cooptación de Chile, a pesar de que aseguro la independencia judicial, promovió la formación de una élite con rasgos aristocráticos, centrada en sí misma y que dificulta la renovación de la interpretación judicial, dejando el poder judicial anacrónico. La hipótesis de este artículo será sostenida mediante la presentación de un panorama histórico-estructural de la institucionalización del poder judicial de Argentina y Chile, observando el efecto de los modelos de reclutamiento adoptados, y las disputas para definirlos, en su jerarquización e independencia. También se utilizará el método prosopográfico para profundizar la comprensión de la relación entre los patrones de reclutamiento de la Corte Suprema y la evolución del poder judicial.

This article has as object the dynamics generated by the models of recruitment employed by Supreme Courts in Argentina and Chile. Once these models are antagonistic, since in Argentina's…

Advisors/Committee Members: Engelmann, Fabiano.

Subjects/Keywords: Reclutamiento judicial; Poder judiciário; Corte suprema; Elite judicial; Juiz; Judicial recruitment; Judicial elite; Argentina; Chile

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Bandeira, J. V. V. M. (2017). Entre a politização e o autocentrismo : os efeitos do recrutamento judicial na Argentina e no Chile. (Thesis). Universidade do Rio Grande do Sul. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10183/158338

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Bandeira, Julia Veiga Vieira Mancio. “Entre a politização e o autocentrismo : os efeitos do recrutamento judicial na Argentina e no Chile.” 2017. Thesis, Universidade do Rio Grande do Sul. Accessed March 03, 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/10183/158338.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Bandeira, Julia Veiga Vieira Mancio. “Entre a politização e o autocentrismo : os efeitos do recrutamento judicial na Argentina e no Chile.” 2017. Web. 03 Mar 2021.

Vancouver:

Bandeira JVVM. Entre a politização e o autocentrismo : os efeitos do recrutamento judicial na Argentina e no Chile. [Internet] [Thesis]. Universidade do Rio Grande do Sul; 2017. [cited 2021 Mar 03]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/158338.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Bandeira JVVM. Entre a politização e o autocentrismo : os efeitos do recrutamento judicial na Argentina e no Chile. [Thesis]. Universidade do Rio Grande do Sul; 2017. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/158338

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation


The Ohio State University

2. Peterson, Julie Anne Seeds. From the bar to the bench: judicial recruitment in Ohio.

Degree: PhD, Political Science, 2004, The Ohio State University

The selection of judges is a well researched area of judicial politics. However, there is a gap in the literature when it comes to explaining why some lawyers decide to seek judgeships and others do not. Some lawyers are born to be judges; they are arbitrators by nature and inclination or they have specific ideas about justice and how best to achieve it. Others may never have considered a career on the bench if not for the urging of friends, family, and party members. In contrast, there are lawyers who would love to be judges, who have the drive and ambition, but who, for whatever reason, never pursue the matter. However, not all lawyers who have an interest in serving choose to make the effort to achieve their ambitions. I would like to learn what encourages them and what deters them when they are deciding whether or not to make a run for office. The data for this study were gathered using a mail survey sent out to 1500 members of the Ohio legal community in June, 2002. The respondents were selected by random computer draw from the Ohio State Supreme Court’s lawyer registry, which lists all lawyers practicing in Ohio. The survey consisted of a single mailing with no follow-ups or reminders. Of the 1500 respondents, 655 individuals completed and returned the surveys and sixty two (about 4%) were returned as undeliverable. This gave a response rate of 43.67%. I have developed several hypotheses concerning the ways in which lawyers weigh the costs and benefits of running for judicial office. These hypotheses are divided into two basic categories dealing with internal motivations and politics. Variables of internal motivation are those that relate to career choices, job satisfaction, family life, age, and a lawyer’s current position. Political variables deal with the influence of politics on the lawyer’s choices, whether it is the political identification of the members of the lawyer’s community, the degree to which each person is politically active, or the degree to which his family was involved in politics. Advisors/Committee Members: Baum, Lawrence (Advisor).

Subjects/Keywords: Political Science, General; Ohio politics; state judges; judicial recruitment

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Peterson, J. A. S. (2004). From the bar to the bench: judicial recruitment in Ohio. (Doctoral Dissertation). The Ohio State University. Retrieved from http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1094740912

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Peterson, Julie Anne Seeds. “From the bar to the bench: judicial recruitment in Ohio.” 2004. Doctoral Dissertation, The Ohio State University. Accessed March 03, 2021. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1094740912.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Peterson, Julie Anne Seeds. “From the bar to the bench: judicial recruitment in Ohio.” 2004. Web. 03 Mar 2021.

Vancouver:

Peterson JAS. From the bar to the bench: judicial recruitment in Ohio. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. The Ohio State University; 2004. [cited 2021 Mar 03]. Available from: http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1094740912.

Council of Science Editors:

Peterson JAS. From the bar to the bench: judicial recruitment in Ohio. [Doctoral Dissertation]. The Ohio State University; 2004. Available from: http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1094740912

.