Advanced search options

Advanced Search Options 🞨

Browse by author name (“Author name starts with…”).

Find ETDs with:

in
/  
in
/  
in
/  
in

Written in Published in Earliest date Latest date

Sorted by

Results per page:

You searched for subject:(HPD testing). One record found.

Search Limiters

Last 2 Years | English Only

No search limiters apply to these results.

▼ Search Limiters


Virginia Tech

1. Perala, Chuck H. Active noise reduction headphone measurement: Comparison of physical and psychophysical protocols and effects of microphone placement.

Degree: PhD, Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2006, Virginia Tech

Currently in the United States, Active Noise Reduction (ANR) headphones cannot be tested and labeled as hearing protection devices (HPDs) due to inherent limitations with the existing psychophysical headphone testing standard, real-ear attenuation at threshold (REAT). This research focused on the use of a standard, for physical, microphone-in-real-ear testing, (MIRE, ANSI S12.42-1995), to determine if MIRE may be appropriately used to measure the total attenuation (i.e., passive + active) of ANR headphones. The REAT â Method B, Subject-Fit protocol,â ANSI S12.6-1997(R2002), was also used to assess passive attenuation (and used for comparison with the MIRE data), as this is the current standard for passive Headphone attenuation testing. The MIRE protocol currently does not specify a standardized location for measurement microphone placement. Prior research is mixed as to the potential benefits and shortcomings of placing the measurement microphone outside versus inside the ear canal. This study captured and compared acoustic spectral data at three different microphone locations: in concha, in ear canal-shallow depth, and in ear canal-deep depth (with a probe tube microphone positioned near the tympanic membrane), using human test participants and five ANR headphones of differing design. Results indicate that the MIRE protocol may be used to supplant the REAT protocol for the measurement of passive attenuation, although differences were observed at the lowest-tested frequency of 125 Hz. Microphone placement analysis revealed no significant difference among the three locations specified, with a noted caveat for the probe tube microphone location at the highest tested frequency of 8000 Hz. Overall findings may be useful to standards-making committees for evaluating a viable solution and standardized method for testing and labeling ANR headphones for use as hearing protection devices. Microphone placement results may assist the practitioner in determining where to place measurement microphones to best suit their particular needs when using MIRE. Discussion includes an in-depth interpretation of the data, comparisons within and between each protocol, and recommendations for further avenues to explore based on the data presented. Advisors/Committee Members: Casali, John Gordon (committeechair), Lancaster, Jeff A. (committee member), Kalb, Joel T. (committee member), Kleiner, Brian M. (committee member), Haas, Ellen (committee member).

Subjects/Keywords: active noise reduction; HPD testing; Microphone placement; REAT vs. MIRE; ANR

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Perala, C. H. (2006). Active noise reduction headphone measurement: Comparison of physical and psychophysical protocols and effects of microphone placement. (Doctoral Dissertation). Virginia Tech. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10919/27053

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Perala, Chuck H. “Active noise reduction headphone measurement: Comparison of physical and psychophysical protocols and effects of microphone placement.” 2006. Doctoral Dissertation, Virginia Tech. Accessed January 21, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/27053.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Perala, Chuck H. “Active noise reduction headphone measurement: Comparison of physical and psychophysical protocols and effects of microphone placement.” 2006. Web. 21 Jan 2020.

Vancouver:

Perala CH. Active noise reduction headphone measurement: Comparison of physical and psychophysical protocols and effects of microphone placement. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Virginia Tech; 2006. [cited 2020 Jan 21]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10919/27053.

Council of Science Editors:

Perala CH. Active noise reduction headphone measurement: Comparison of physical and psychophysical protocols and effects of microphone placement. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Virginia Tech; 2006. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10919/27053

.