Advanced search options

Advanced Search Options 🞨

Browse by author name (“Author name starts with…”).

Find ETDs with:

in
/  
in
/  
in
/  
in

Written in Published in Earliest date Latest date

Sorted by

Results per page:

Sorted by: relevance · author · university · dateNew search

You searched for subject:(Face Work Theory). Showing records 1 – 3 of 3 total matches.

Search Limiters

Last 2 Years | English Only

No search limiters apply to these results.

▼ Search Limiters


University of Alberta

1. Murad, Muna S. Communication Practices and Face Negotiation in Patient-Pharmacist Interactions.

Degree: PhD, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2015, University of Alberta

Pharmacists’ roles are evolving from dispensing to providing patient-centred care. Appropriate patient-pharmacist communication is important in achieving patient-centred care aims. The research in this dissertation explored audiotaped recordings of pharmacist-patient interactions to determine communicative practices and how pharmacist and patient use strategic communication to achieve instrumental and interpersonal goals. In the first published study of this dissertation, recorded interactions provided insight into the extent of biomedical versus patient-centred communication in patient-pharmacist exchanges. Studies were identified by searching: Medline, Embase, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (IPA), Web of Science, and Academic Search Complete. Inclusion criteria were that studies were published in English. Key search terms included: “audio recording”, “video recording”, “communication”, “patient counselling”, “patient interaction”, “discourse analysis”, “conversation analysis”, “narrative analysis”, and “content analysis”. The review the included 41 studies found that biomedical and patient centred communication focused researches were framed within quantitative, qualitative methods, including conversational analysis. Twenty-three studies presented evidence of a biomedical model, whereas eight studies characterized a patient-centred focus. Respect, dignity, autonomy, and acknowledgment affect patient-pharmacist communication process and no study explored the effect of neither these factors nor the social context on this communication process. In the second study in this thesis, the advantages of using face-work theory to analyze patient-pharmacist interactions were identified. The second study described the concept of face and the three types of face needs. Pharmacists and patients demonstrated these three types of face needs during their interaction with each other and the third study in this thesis explored how these face needs are negotiated and challenged by both parties. The study used an exploratory descriptive design to identify the major contexts of expressing and negotiating face in audio-recorded community pharmacist-patient interactions. Its results explained how certain speech acts linked with face needs in order to avoid or mitigate face threat and how successful pharmacist-patient relationships are established when both pharmacist and patient have mutual understanding of their face needs. The research results contained in this dissertation contribute to knowledge about how pharmacists combine instrumental communication strategies to achieve patience centred goals for patient education, medication assessment and self-care management. Simultaneously, pharmacists attend to interpersonal face needs in the domains of competence, autonomy and solidarity, because without attention to these facets of interaction, instrumental goals are more difficult to achieve. Although the data from the empirical studies in this dissertation are limited by sample size and audio-only recording format, this research…

Subjects/Keywords: Audio recording; Face-Work Theory; Patient-Pharmacist Interactions

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Murad, M. S. (2015). Communication Practices and Face Negotiation in Patient-Pharmacist Interactions. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Alberta. Retrieved from https://era.library.ualberta.ca/files/2z10ws98q

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Murad, Muna S. “Communication Practices and Face Negotiation in Patient-Pharmacist Interactions.” 2015. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Alberta. Accessed January 24, 2020. https://era.library.ualberta.ca/files/2z10ws98q.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Murad, Muna S. “Communication Practices and Face Negotiation in Patient-Pharmacist Interactions.” 2015. Web. 24 Jan 2020.

Vancouver:

Murad MS. Communication Practices and Face Negotiation in Patient-Pharmacist Interactions. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Alberta; 2015. [cited 2020 Jan 24]. Available from: https://era.library.ualberta.ca/files/2z10ws98q.

Council of Science Editors:

Murad MS. Communication Practices and Face Negotiation in Patient-Pharmacist Interactions. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Alberta; 2015. Available from: https://era.library.ualberta.ca/files/2z10ws98q

2. Ictech, Omar Bradley, II. Smartphones and Face-to-Face Interactions: Extending Goffman to 21st Century Conversation.

Degree: MA, Sociology, 2014, University of New Orleans

The Smartphone is a technological innovation that has transformed for the better how billions of people live by enabling them to transcend time and space to remain socially connected to potentially millions of others despite being thousands of miles apart. Although smartphones help people connect from a distance, there has been much concern about how they affect face-to-face interactions. This study explored, drawing on Goffmanian concepts, how and why smartphones affect face-to-face encounters. The findings show there are three types of smartphone cross-talk: exclusive, semi-exclusive, and collaborative. With the addition of smartphone play and solo smartphone activity, interactants can engage in five different types of smartphone use during a social encounter. Smartphones can both disrupt and facilitate face-to-face encounters at any given time. A theory of cross-talk was created as an extension of Goffman’s work to help explain the phenomenon. Advisors/Committee Members: D'Lane Compton, PhD, Pamela Jenkins, PhD, Vern Baxter, PhD.

Subjects/Keywords: Goffman; Face-work; Smartphones; Cell Phones; Cross-talk; Conversation; Social Psychology and Interaction; Sociology of Culture; Theory, Knowledge and Science

…Smartphones can both disrupt and facilitate face-to-face encounters at any given time. A theory of… …Keywords: Goffman, Face-work, Face-to-face, Interaction, Encounter, Smartphones, Cell Phones… …face-work techniques used by millennial students were examined. Three focus groups comprised… …talk affect face-to-face encounters? Goffmanian concepts and dramaturgical theory were used… …WORK While the study of face-to-face interaction is not new to the social sciences and our… 

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Ictech, Omar Bradley, I. (2014). Smartphones and Face-to-Face Interactions: Extending Goffman to 21st Century Conversation. (Thesis). University of New Orleans. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td/1812

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Ictech, Omar Bradley, II. “Smartphones and Face-to-Face Interactions: Extending Goffman to 21st Century Conversation.” 2014. Thesis, University of New Orleans. Accessed January 24, 2020. https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td/1812.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Ictech, Omar Bradley, II. “Smartphones and Face-to-Face Interactions: Extending Goffman to 21st Century Conversation.” 2014. Web. 24 Jan 2020.

Vancouver:

Ictech, Omar Bradley I. Smartphones and Face-to-Face Interactions: Extending Goffman to 21st Century Conversation. [Internet] [Thesis]. University of New Orleans; 2014. [cited 2020 Jan 24]. Available from: https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td/1812.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Ictech, Omar Bradley I. Smartphones and Face-to-Face Interactions: Extending Goffman to 21st Century Conversation. [Thesis]. University of New Orleans; 2014. Available from: https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td/1812

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

3. Lundberg, Christoffer. CoFramer : Ett diskussionsformat för djupa diskussioner på publika forum med låg Information Overload inspirerat av Philosophy for Children.

Degree: Electrical and Space Engineering, 2019, Luleå University of Technology

Syftet med studien är att presentera ett designkoncept för publika diskussioner på nätet med målet att uppnå djupare diskussioner och minska mängden information overload. Arbetet använder metoden Concept Driven Interaction Design (CDID) som går ut på att skapa ett designkoncept utifrån flera olika teorier som appliceras genom interaktionsdesign. Ett designkoncept innehåller tre delar: ett namn, ett syfte och huvudprinciper. CDID innehåller sju steg som arbetet är utformat efter: 1.      Concept Generation – Summeras i en tabell som jämför diskussioner i forum (med flera antagande) och diskussioner med hjälp av metoden Philosophy for Children (P4C), samt annan teori. 2.      Concept Exploration – Åtta olika designaspekter identifieras utifrån jämförelsetabellen. 3.      Internal Concept Critique – Designaspekterna jämförs med två snarlika diskussionsformat. 4.      Design of Artifacts – Designkoncept version 1 skapas. 5.      External Design Critique – Intervjuer utförs för att undersöka intervjupersonerna generella erfarenheter av online diskussioner, testar antagandena från jämförelsetabellen och ge direkt feedback på första versionen av designkonceptet. 6.      Concept Revisited – Ändringar görs baserat på intervjumaterial och direkt feedback. 7.      Concept Contextualization – Designkonceptet kopplas tillbaka till litteraturen. Studien resulterar i ett designkoncept kallat CoFramer och stödjer dessa huvudprinciper som ställs i kontrast till material som identifierats genom intervjuerna: Tabell 1: CoFramers huvudprinciper och faktorer från intervjuer om diskussioner på forum. CoFramers huvudprinciper | Från intervjuer om diskussioner på forum Strukturerad början och slut | Diskussion utan tydligt slut Begränsat antal deltagare | Stor mängd deltagare Minimum antal deltagare | Många inaktiva åskådare Explicita deltagare | Lite information om deltagare Gemensamma förutsättningar | Otydlighet kring deltagares förutsättningar Begränsad informationstäthet per inlägg | Långa inlägg och/eller snabba inlägg Den röda tråden och parallella trådar | Oftast parallella trådar Aktiv samtalsledare | Outredda missförstånd Studien indikerar på att CoFramer bör resultera i mer strukturerade diskussioner och som utsätter användaren för en lägre mängd information overload och mindre grounding cost jämfört med vad som vanligtvis uppstår i publika diskussioner online.

The focus of this essay is to develop a design concept for online public discussions with deep discussions and low information overload. The method used is Concept Driven Interaction Design (CDID) which involves constructing a design concept by applying a variety of theories in tangible interaction design. A design concept has three basic parts: a name, high-level goals and outlines generic principles. CDID includes seven steps which is used in this work: 1.      Concept Generation – Formatted into a table that compare forum discussion (with…

Subjects/Keywords: Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC); Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW); Face to Face (F2F); Communities of Practice (CoP); Lurkers; Linguistic Softeners; Distance Education; Social Presence; Community of Inquiry (CoI); Social-Technical Gap; Philosophy for Children (P4C); Information Overload (IO); Computer-Supported Argument Visualization (CSAV); Media Richness Theory (MRT); Grounding Cost; Grounding Criterion; Grounding; Common Ground; Facilitator; Fallacies; Online Communities; Ex Post; Ex Ante; IBIS (Issue-Based Information System); Information Cocoons; Flame War; Design Concept; Design Aspects; Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC); Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW); Face to Face (F2F); Communities of Practice (CoP); Lurkers; Linguistic Softeners; Distansutbildning; Social Presence; Community of Inquiry (CoI); Social-Technical Gap; Philosophy for Children (P4C); Information Overload (IO); Computer-Supported Argument Visualization (CSAV); Media Richness Theory (MRT); Grounding Cost; Grounding Criterion; Grounding; Common Ground; Samtalsledare (SL); Logiska Felslut; Fallacies; Online Communities; Ex Post; Ex Ante; IBIS (Issue-Based Information System); Information Cocoons; Flame War; Designkoncept; Designaspekter; Philosophy; Filosofi; Information Systems; Systemvetenskap, informationssystem och informatik; Communication Systems; Kommunikationssystem; Human Computer Interaction; Människa-datorinteraktion (interaktionsdesign)

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Lundberg, C. (2019). CoFramer : Ett diskussionsformat för djupa diskussioner på publika forum med låg Information Overload inspirerat av Philosophy for Children. (Thesis). Luleå University of Technology. Retrieved from http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-76277

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Lundberg, Christoffer. “CoFramer : Ett diskussionsformat för djupa diskussioner på publika forum med låg Information Overload inspirerat av Philosophy for Children.” 2019. Thesis, Luleå University of Technology. Accessed January 24, 2020. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-76277.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Lundberg, Christoffer. “CoFramer : Ett diskussionsformat för djupa diskussioner på publika forum med låg Information Overload inspirerat av Philosophy for Children.” 2019. Web. 24 Jan 2020.

Vancouver:

Lundberg C. CoFramer : Ett diskussionsformat för djupa diskussioner på publika forum med låg Information Overload inspirerat av Philosophy for Children. [Internet] [Thesis]. Luleå University of Technology; 2019. [cited 2020 Jan 24]. Available from: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-76277.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Lundberg C. CoFramer : Ett diskussionsformat för djupa diskussioner på publika forum med låg Information Overload inspirerat av Philosophy for Children. [Thesis]. Luleå University of Technology; 2019. Available from: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-76277

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

.