Advanced search options

Advanced Search Options 🞨

Browse by author name (“Author name starts with…”).

Find ETDs with:

in
/  
in
/  
in
/  
in

Written in Published in Earliest date Latest date

Sorted by

Results per page:

Sorted by: relevance · author · university · dateNew search

You searched for subject:(Ephialtes). Showing records 1 – 2 of 2 total matches.

Search Limiters

Last 2 Years | English Only

No search limiters apply to these results.

▼ Search Limiters


Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore

1. ORANGES, ANNABELLA. PER UNA STORIA DELL'EUTHYNA: L'EVOLUZIONE DELLA PROCEDURA DAL V SECOLO AD ARISTOTELE.

Degree: 2015, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore

Il presente lavoro di tesi verte sulla procedura di euthyna, rendiconto di fine mandato cui erano tenuti a sottoporsi tutti i magistrati e i cittadini ateniesi incaricati di svolgere ad hoc incarichi per la città. L’unica fonte che documenta questa procedura è l’Athenaion Politeia, il cui resoconto, valido per il IV secolo, pone alcuni problemi rispetto all’epoca precedente. Partendo dall’analisi sistematica delle testimonianze sulla storia dell’euthyna e sul suo impiego, lo studio affronta il tema del rendiconto rispetto agli snodi istituzionali della storia ateniese e raccoglie in un catalogo ragionato le testimonianze relative ai processi sorti dall’euthyna. Viene inoltre affrontato il tema del rapporto fra l’euthyna e le altre procedure previste dal diritto attico (graphai, dikai, eisangheliai), rispetto alle quali il rendiconto avrebbe svolto una funzione di procedura preliminare. La tesi è strutturata in due sezioni. Nella prima, viene tracciato il profilo storico della procedura di eÜquna dalle sue origini (probabilmente di epoca soloniana) fino alla riforma di Efialte e alla fine del V secolo. La seconda sezione è costituita dal catalogo dei casi di rendiconto, ove riceve dettagliata discussione ogni singola vicenda giudiziaria. Per agevolare la consultazione, i risultati sono raccolti in due tabelle riassuntive, che chiudono il lavoro.

This work focuses on euthyna, the accountability procedure to which all people who performed an official task for the community, both Athenian magistrates and citizens occasionally assigned to particular tasks, were required to undergo at the end of their office. The only source that illustrates this procedure is Athenaion Politeia, whose account arouses problems in comparison with the period preceding the fourth century. Starting from a systematic analysis of evidence, this thesis addresses the issue of euthyna history, following the turning points of Athenian institutional history and collecting the evidence of euthyna trials in a catalog raisonne. Moreover, this thesis deals with the issue of connections between euthyna and other procedures prescribed by Athenian law (graphai, dikai, eisangheliai), in respect of which euthyna seems to have played a preliminary function. The work is divided into two sections. The first part includes an historical profile of the euthyna procedure from its origins to the Ephialtes’ reform and the end of the fifth century. The second section consists of a detailed discussion of trials perì ton euthynón, collected in the catalog raisonne. To make the consultation facilitated, the results are collected in two tables, which close the work.

Advisors/Committee Members: BEARZOT, CINZIA SUSANNA, BEARZOT, CINZIA.

Subjects/Keywords: L-ANT/02: STORIA GRECA; rendiconto, euthyna, eisangelia, magistrati, strateghi, ambasciatori, Athenaion Politeia, Schol. in Aeschinem, Areopago, riforma di Efialte, accounting, accountability, eisangelia, euthyna, officials, generals, envoys, Athenaion Politeia, Schol. in Aeschinem, Areopagos, Ephialtes’ reform

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

ORANGES, A. (2015). PER UNA STORIA DELL'EUTHYNA: L'EVOLUZIONE DELLA PROCEDURA DAL V SECOLO AD ARISTOTELE. (Doctoral Dissertation). Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10280/6258

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

ORANGES, ANNABELLA. “PER UNA STORIA DELL'EUTHYNA: L'EVOLUZIONE DELLA PROCEDURA DAL V SECOLO AD ARISTOTELE.” 2015. Doctoral Dissertation, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore. Accessed January 24, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/10280/6258.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

ORANGES, ANNABELLA. “PER UNA STORIA DELL'EUTHYNA: L'EVOLUZIONE DELLA PROCEDURA DAL V SECOLO AD ARISTOTELE.” 2015. Web. 24 Jan 2020.

Vancouver:

ORANGES A. PER UNA STORIA DELL'EUTHYNA: L'EVOLUZIONE DELLA PROCEDURA DAL V SECOLO AD ARISTOTELE. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore; 2015. [cited 2020 Jan 24]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10280/6258.

Council of Science Editors:

ORANGES A. PER UNA STORIA DELL'EUTHYNA: L'EVOLUZIONE DELLA PROCEDURA DAL V SECOLO AD ARISTOTELE. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore; 2015. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10280/6258


Texas A&M University

2. Tyler, John. A Pragmatic Standard of Legal Validity.

Degree: 2012, Texas A&M University

American jurisprudence currently applies two incompatible validity standards to determine which laws are enforceable. The natural law tradition evaluates validity by an uncertain standard of divine law, and its methodology relies on contradictory views of human reason. Legal positivism, on the other hand, relies on a methodology that commits the analytic fallacy, separates law from its application, and produces an incomplete model of law. These incompatible standards have created a schism in American jurisprudence that impairs the delivery of justice. This dissertation therefore formulates a new standard for legal validity. This new standard rejects the uncertainties and inconsistencies inherent in natural law theory. It also rejects the narrow linguistic methodology of legal positivism. In their stead, this dissertation adopts a pragmatic methodology that develops a standard for legal validity based on actual legal experience. This approach focuses on the operations of law and its effects upon ongoing human activities, and it evaluates legal principles by applying the experimental method to the social consequences they produce. Because legal history provides a long record of past experimentation with legal principles, legal history is an essential feature of this method. This new validity standard contains three principles. The principle of reason requires legal systems to respect every subject as a rational creature with a free will. The principle of reason also requires procedural due process to protect against the punishment of the innocent and the tyranny of the majority. Legal systems that respect their subjects' status as rational creatures with free wills permit their subjects to orient their own behavior. The principle of reason therefore requires substantive due process to ensure that laws provide dependable guideposts to individuals in orienting their behavior. The principle of consent recognizes that the legitimacy of law derives from the consent of those subject to its power. Common law custom, the doctrine of stare decisis, and legislation sanctioned by the subjects' legitimate representatives all evidence consent. The principle of autonomy establishes the authority of law. Laws must wield supremacy over political rulers, and political rulers must be subject to the same laws as other citizens. Political rulers may not arbitrarily alter the law to accord to their will. Legal history demonstrates that, in the absence of a validity standard based on these principles, legal systems will not treat their subjects as ends in themselves. They will inevitably treat their subjects as mere means to other ends. Once laws do this, men have no rest from evil. Advisors/Committee Members: McDermott, John J. (advisor), Pappas, Gregory (committee member), Austin, Scott W. (committee member), Welch, Ben D. (committee member).

Subjects/Keywords: natural law theory; legal positivism; HLA Hart; William Blackstone; John Locke; Jeremy Bentham; John Austin; Galileo; Socrates; Trotsky; Athens; Soviet law; Stuart dynasty; John Dewey; Dewey Commission; Sidney Hook; Congregation of the Holy Office; Galileo Affair; trial of Socrates; Moscow Trials; trial of Galileo; heresy; trial of Trotsky; reason; autonomy; consent; philosophy of law; pragmatism; Kant; Inquisition; ostracism; Anaxagoras; Protagoras; Alcibiades; Arginusae; Pericles; Peloponnesian War; Solon; Ephialtes; Apology; Plato; Herodotus; Xenophon; Plutarch; Roscoe Pound; common law; Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.; The Common Law; The Path of the Law; Learned Hand; Christopher Columbus Langdell; Ronald Dworkin; Lon Fuller; Lenin; Stalin; King Rex; Sergei Kirov; Permanent Revolution; Socialism in One Country; Great Terror; Dekulakization; Holomodor; Terror Famine; Italian positivist school; Harold J. Berman; Gustav Radbruch; Ramon Mercader; Trotsky assassination; Marteman Ryutin; Old Bolsheviks; Genrikh Yagoda; Pope Urban VIII; Walter Duranty; Harold Denny; New York Times; Joseph E. Davies; Mission to Moscow; New Republic; John F. Finerty; Lev Sedov; Military Collegium; Vasili Ulrikh; Gaspare Borgia; Cardinal Robert Bellarmine; Pericles; Father Commissary Michelangelo Segizzi; Cardinal Francesco Barberini; Cardinal Maffeo Barberini; Dialogue on the Two Chief World Systems, Ptolemaic and Copernican; Siderius Nuncius; Starry Messenger; Accademia dei Lincei; Letters on Sunspots; Friar Tommaso Caccini; Niccolo Lorini; Commentaries on the Laws of England; Second Treatise on Civil Government; Henry de Bracton; Sir Edward Coke; Sir John Fortescue; Matthew Hale; Ranulf de Glanvil; James I; Charles I; James II; Charles II; ship money; forest fines; distraint of knighthood; impositions; dispensing power; royal prerogative; Duke of Buckingham; Oliver Cromwell; Bishops Wars; William Prynne; Great Migration; Declaration of Indulgence; Settlement Act; Test Act; Protectorate; Clarendon Code; Quaker Act; William and Mary; English Civil War; Puritan Revolution; Glorious Revolution; Thirty Years' War; Earl of Shaftesbuty; William Laud; Historiomatrix; Long Parliament; Rump Parliament; Barebones Parliament; sociological jurisprudence; Red Terror; war communism; New Economic Policy; 1926 Criminal Code; Kirov Amendments; judicial discretion; semantic sting; The Concept of Law; Fragments on Government; The Province of Jurisprudence Determined; A Fragment on Government; Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals; Anarchical Fallacies; primary rules; secondary rules; rule of recognition; legal validity; internal point of view; external point of view; law as prediction; the bad man perspective on law; life of the law; page of history; Basilikon Doron; Trew Law of Free Monarchies

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Tyler, J. (2012). A Pragmatic Standard of Legal Validity. (Thesis). Texas A&M University. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2012-05-10885

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Tyler, John. “A Pragmatic Standard of Legal Validity.” 2012. Thesis, Texas A&M University. Accessed January 24, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2012-05-10885.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Tyler, John. “A Pragmatic Standard of Legal Validity.” 2012. Web. 24 Jan 2020.

Vancouver:

Tyler J. A Pragmatic Standard of Legal Validity. [Internet] [Thesis]. Texas A&M University; 2012. [cited 2020 Jan 24]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2012-05-10885.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Tyler J. A Pragmatic Standard of Legal Validity. [Thesis]. Texas A&M University; 2012. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2012-05-10885

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

.