Advanced search options

Advanced Search Options 🞨

Browse by author name (“Author name starts with…”).

Find ETDs with:

in
/  
in
/  
in
/  
in

Written in Published in Earliest date Latest date

Sorted by

Results per page:

Sorted by: relevance · author · university · dateNew search

Country:

You searched for subject:(Disagreement). Showing records 1 – 30 of 46 total matches.

[1] [2]

Search Limiters

Last 2 Years | English Only

▼ Search Limiters

1. Rotondo, Andrew. Standing Your Ground: Epistemic Justification in the Face of Disagreement.

Degree: PhD, Philosophy, 2012, Brown University

 This dissertation is about the epistemic significance of disagreement. Recently, several philosophers have offered some prima facie compelling arguments and thought experiments for a kind… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: disagreement

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Rotondo, A. (2012). Standing Your Ground: Epistemic Justification in the Face of Disagreement. (Doctoral Dissertation). Brown University. Retrieved from https://repository.library.brown.edu/studio/item/bdr:320487/

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Rotondo, Andrew. “Standing Your Ground: Epistemic Justification in the Face of Disagreement.” 2012. Doctoral Dissertation, Brown University. Accessed October 21, 2019. https://repository.library.brown.edu/studio/item/bdr:320487/.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Rotondo, Andrew. “Standing Your Ground: Epistemic Justification in the Face of Disagreement.” 2012. Web. 21 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Rotondo A. Standing Your Ground: Epistemic Justification in the Face of Disagreement. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Brown University; 2012. [cited 2019 Oct 21]. Available from: https://repository.library.brown.edu/studio/item/bdr:320487/.

Council of Science Editors:

Rotondo A. Standing Your Ground: Epistemic Justification in the Face of Disagreement. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Brown University; 2012. Available from: https://repository.library.brown.edu/studio/item/bdr:320487/


University of Oklahoma

2. Bickel, Jewelle. Intellectual Virtues and Reasonable Disagreement.

Degree: PhD, 2019, University of Oklahoma

 The contemporary problem of disagreement has two prominent solutions. The Conciliationists think that after discovering a case of disagreement one should be less certain of… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Disagreement; Epistemology; Virtue; Self-trust

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Bickel, J. (2019). Intellectual Virtues and Reasonable Disagreement. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Oklahoma. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11244/320426

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Bickel, Jewelle. “Intellectual Virtues and Reasonable Disagreement.” 2019. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Oklahoma. Accessed October 21, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/11244/320426.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Bickel, Jewelle. “Intellectual Virtues and Reasonable Disagreement.” 2019. Web. 21 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Bickel J. Intellectual Virtues and Reasonable Disagreement. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Oklahoma; 2019. [cited 2019 Oct 21]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11244/320426.

Council of Science Editors:

Bickel J. Intellectual Virtues and Reasonable Disagreement. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Oklahoma; 2019. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11244/320426


University of Arizona

3. Ballantyne, W Nathan. Why We Disagree and Why It Matters .

Degree: 2011, University of Arizona

 This dissertation investigates whether controversial beliefs concerning a range of topics can be rational or reasonable. It proceeds by developing a series of challenges to… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Controversy; Disagreement; Evidence; Rationality; Skepticism

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Ballantyne, W. N. (2011). Why We Disagree and Why It Matters . (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Arizona. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10150/204303

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Ballantyne, W Nathan. “Why We Disagree and Why It Matters .” 2011. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Arizona. Accessed October 21, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/204303.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Ballantyne, W Nathan. “Why We Disagree and Why It Matters .” 2011. Web. 21 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Ballantyne WN. Why We Disagree and Why It Matters . [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Arizona; 2011. [cited 2019 Oct 21]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10150/204303.

Council of Science Editors:

Ballantyne WN. Why We Disagree and Why It Matters . [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Arizona; 2011. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10150/204303


Duke University

4. Ancell, Aaron James. Public Unreason: Essays on Political Disagreement .

Degree: 2017, Duke University

  Why is political disagreement such a persistent and pervasive feature of contemporary societies? Many political philosophers answer by pointing to moral pluralism and the… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Philosophy; Political science; Ethics; Compromise; Ideal Theory; Moral Disagreement; Political Disagreement

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Ancell, A. J. (2017). Public Unreason: Essays on Political Disagreement . (Thesis). Duke University. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10161/16353

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Ancell, Aaron James. “Public Unreason: Essays on Political Disagreement .” 2017. Thesis, Duke University. Accessed October 21, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10161/16353.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Ancell, Aaron James. “Public Unreason: Essays on Political Disagreement .” 2017. Web. 21 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Ancell AJ. Public Unreason: Essays on Political Disagreement . [Internet] [Thesis]. Duke University; 2017. [cited 2019 Oct 21]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10161/16353.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Ancell AJ. Public Unreason: Essays on Political Disagreement . [Thesis]. Duke University; 2017. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10161/16353

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation


University of California – Berkeley

5. Chen, Stanley Hong-Sen. Matters of Taste Are Not "Mere Matters of Taste".

Degree: Philosophy, 2011, University of California – Berkeley

 It is common to accept subjectivism about matters of gustatory taste, the view that gustatory reasons and the truth of gustatory judgments are essentially dependent… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Philosophy; aesthetics; disagreement; relativism; subjectivism; taste; testimony

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Chen, S. H. (2011). Matters of Taste Are Not "Mere Matters of Taste". (Thesis). University of California – Berkeley. Retrieved from http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/294061xx

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Chen, Stanley Hong-Sen. “Matters of Taste Are Not "Mere Matters of Taste".” 2011. Thesis, University of California – Berkeley. Accessed October 21, 2019. http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/294061xx.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Chen, Stanley Hong-Sen. “Matters of Taste Are Not "Mere Matters of Taste".” 2011. Web. 21 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Chen SH. Matters of Taste Are Not "Mere Matters of Taste". [Internet] [Thesis]. University of California – Berkeley; 2011. [cited 2019 Oct 21]. Available from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/294061xx.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Chen SH. Matters of Taste Are Not "Mere Matters of Taste". [Thesis]. University of California – Berkeley; 2011. Available from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/294061xx

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation


University of Miami

6. Dugas, Micah C. Relativism, Disagreement, and Assertion.

Degree: PhD, Philosophy (Arts and Sciences), 2015, University of Miami

 In this dissertation, I examine the work of several recent relativists with regard to the matters of disagreement and assertion. While I focus on the… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: relativism; disagreement; assertion; contextualism; taste predicates

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Dugas, M. C. (2015). Relativism, Disagreement, and Assertion. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Miami. Retrieved from https://scholarlyrepository.miami.edu/oa_dissertations/1362

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Dugas, Micah C. “Relativism, Disagreement, and Assertion.” 2015. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Miami. Accessed October 21, 2019. https://scholarlyrepository.miami.edu/oa_dissertations/1362.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Dugas, Micah C. “Relativism, Disagreement, and Assertion.” 2015. Web. 21 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Dugas MC. Relativism, Disagreement, and Assertion. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Miami; 2015. [cited 2019 Oct 21]. Available from: https://scholarlyrepository.miami.edu/oa_dissertations/1362.

Council of Science Editors:

Dugas MC. Relativism, Disagreement, and Assertion. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Miami; 2015. Available from: https://scholarlyrepository.miami.edu/oa_dissertations/1362


University of Minnesota

7. Reifen Tagar, Michal. Why Disagreement Obstructs Constructive Dialogue: The Role of Biased Attribution of Moral Motives.

Degree: PhD, Psychology, 2014, University of Minnesota

 Diversity of opinions is often celebrated as an opportunity to learn from one another and to improve decision-making by widening the scope of considerations informing… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Attribution; Conflict; Disagreement; Intolerance; Morality; Political Psychology

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Reifen Tagar, M. (2014). Why Disagreement Obstructs Constructive Dialogue: The Role of Biased Attribution of Moral Motives. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Minnesota. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11299/183337

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Reifen Tagar, Michal. “Why Disagreement Obstructs Constructive Dialogue: The Role of Biased Attribution of Moral Motives.” 2014. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Minnesota. Accessed October 21, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/11299/183337.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Reifen Tagar, Michal. “Why Disagreement Obstructs Constructive Dialogue: The Role of Biased Attribution of Moral Motives.” 2014. Web. 21 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Reifen Tagar M. Why Disagreement Obstructs Constructive Dialogue: The Role of Biased Attribution of Moral Motives. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Minnesota; 2014. [cited 2019 Oct 21]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11299/183337.

Council of Science Editors:

Reifen Tagar M. Why Disagreement Obstructs Constructive Dialogue: The Role of Biased Attribution of Moral Motives. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Minnesota; 2014. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11299/183337


University of Arizona

8. Tal, Eyal. Detaching in Peer Disagreement and Higher-Order Evidence .

Degree: 2018, University of Arizona

 In this three-paper project I discuss the detaching problem for principles about the rational response to higher-order evidence. In the first paper, I argue that… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Detaching problem; Higher-order evidence; Peer disagreement

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Tal, E. (2018). Detaching in Peer Disagreement and Higher-Order Evidence . (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Arizona. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10150/627708

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Tal, Eyal. “Detaching in Peer Disagreement and Higher-Order Evidence .” 2018. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Arizona. Accessed October 21, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/627708.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Tal, Eyal. “Detaching in Peer Disagreement and Higher-Order Evidence .” 2018. Web. 21 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Tal E. Detaching in Peer Disagreement and Higher-Order Evidence . [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Arizona; 2018. [cited 2019 Oct 21]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10150/627708.

Council of Science Editors:

Tal E. Detaching in Peer Disagreement and Higher-Order Evidence . [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Arizona; 2018. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10150/627708


University of Colorado

9. Parks, Russell Martin. From argumentation theory to argument pragmatics: a call to reflect on situated language use.

Degree: MA, Communication, 2011, University of Colorado

  Argumentation theory, as a field, has moved over time from the abstractions of formal logic to a growingly direct concern for more pragmatic ways… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: argumentation theory; disagreement; language use; phronesis; pragmatics; reasoning; Communication

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Parks, R. M. (2011). From argumentation theory to argument pragmatics: a call to reflect on situated language use. (Masters Thesis). University of Colorado. Retrieved from http://scholar.colorado.edu/comm_gradetds/20

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Parks, Russell Martin. “From argumentation theory to argument pragmatics: a call to reflect on situated language use.” 2011. Masters Thesis, University of Colorado. Accessed October 21, 2019. http://scholar.colorado.edu/comm_gradetds/20.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Parks, Russell Martin. “From argumentation theory to argument pragmatics: a call to reflect on situated language use.” 2011. Web. 21 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Parks RM. From argumentation theory to argument pragmatics: a call to reflect on situated language use. [Internet] [Masters thesis]. University of Colorado; 2011. [cited 2019 Oct 21]. Available from: http://scholar.colorado.edu/comm_gradetds/20.

Council of Science Editors:

Parks RM. From argumentation theory to argument pragmatics: a call to reflect on situated language use. [Masters Thesis]. University of Colorado; 2011. Available from: http://scholar.colorado.edu/comm_gradetds/20


The Ohio State University

10. Hutchens, Myiah J. I Think I Can: The Interaction Between Self-Efficacy and Anxiety Predicting Who We Talk To.

Degree: PhD, Communication, 2010, The Ohio State University

  The role of communication has been theorized to be crucial to the development of a functioning democracy; however, not all communication is created equal… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Communication; political discussion; disagreement; political efficacy; political anxiety

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Hutchens, M. J. (2010). I Think I Can: The Interaction Between Self-Efficacy and Anxiety Predicting Who We Talk To. (Doctoral Dissertation). The Ohio State University. Retrieved from http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1275443564

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Hutchens, Myiah J. “I Think I Can: The Interaction Between Self-Efficacy and Anxiety Predicting Who We Talk To.” 2010. Doctoral Dissertation, The Ohio State University. Accessed October 21, 2019. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1275443564.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Hutchens, Myiah J. “I Think I Can: The Interaction Between Self-Efficacy and Anxiety Predicting Who We Talk To.” 2010. Web. 21 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Hutchens MJ. I Think I Can: The Interaction Between Self-Efficacy and Anxiety Predicting Who We Talk To. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. The Ohio State University; 2010. [cited 2019 Oct 21]. Available from: http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1275443564.

Council of Science Editors:

Hutchens MJ. I Think I Can: The Interaction Between Self-Efficacy and Anxiety Predicting Who We Talk To. [Doctoral Dissertation]. The Ohio State University; 2010. Available from: http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1275443564

11. Peters, Matthew M. Hegel and the Problem of the Multiplicity of Conflicting Philosophies.

Degree: 2017, Marquette University

 As Hegel notes in his long Introduction to the Lectures on the History of Philosophy, the problem of the multiplicity of conflicting philosophies presents a… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: consciousness; development; disagreement; Hegel; polymorphism; Philosophy; Philosophy of Mind

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Peters, M. M. (2017). Hegel and the Problem of the Multiplicity of Conflicting Philosophies. (Thesis). Marquette University. Retrieved from https://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu/726

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Peters, Matthew M. “Hegel and the Problem of the Multiplicity of Conflicting Philosophies.” 2017. Thesis, Marquette University. Accessed October 21, 2019. https://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu/726.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Peters, Matthew M. “Hegel and the Problem of the Multiplicity of Conflicting Philosophies.” 2017. Web. 21 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Peters MM. Hegel and the Problem of the Multiplicity of Conflicting Philosophies. [Internet] [Thesis]. Marquette University; 2017. [cited 2019 Oct 21]. Available from: https://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu/726.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Peters MM. Hegel and the Problem of the Multiplicity of Conflicting Philosophies. [Thesis]. Marquette University; 2017. Available from: https://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu/726

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation


George Mason University

12. Smithson, Anne. I BEG TO DIFFER: UNDERSTANDING DISAGREEMENT, AGREEMENT, AND EMOTIONAL APPEALS IN GUBERNATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMUNICATION .

Degree: 2017, George Mason University

 This study explores gubernatorial candidates’ presentation of disagreement, agreement, and use of emotional appeals to frame messages during the 2016 primary and general election periods.… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Communication; candidate communication; election; emotional appeals; governors; political disagreement; social media

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Smithson, A. (2017). I BEG TO DIFFER: UNDERSTANDING DISAGREEMENT, AGREEMENT, AND EMOTIONAL APPEALS IN GUBERNATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMUNICATION . (Thesis). George Mason University. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1920/11135

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Smithson, Anne. “I BEG TO DIFFER: UNDERSTANDING DISAGREEMENT, AGREEMENT, AND EMOTIONAL APPEALS IN GUBERNATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMUNICATION .” 2017. Thesis, George Mason University. Accessed October 21, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/1920/11135.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Smithson, Anne. “I BEG TO DIFFER: UNDERSTANDING DISAGREEMENT, AGREEMENT, AND EMOTIONAL APPEALS IN GUBERNATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMUNICATION .” 2017. Web. 21 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Smithson A. I BEG TO DIFFER: UNDERSTANDING DISAGREEMENT, AGREEMENT, AND EMOTIONAL APPEALS IN GUBERNATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMUNICATION . [Internet] [Thesis]. George Mason University; 2017. [cited 2019 Oct 21]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1920/11135.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Smithson A. I BEG TO DIFFER: UNDERSTANDING DISAGREEMENT, AGREEMENT, AND EMOTIONAL APPEALS IN GUBERNATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMUNICATION . [Thesis]. George Mason University; 2017. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1920/11135

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation


University of Rochester

13. Barnett, Brian C. Higher-order evidence : its nature and epistemic significance.

Degree: PhD, 2016, University of Rochester

 Higher-order evidence is, roughly, evidence of evidence. The idea is that evidence comes in levels. At the first, or lowest, evidential level is evidence of… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Disagreement; Evidence; Evidentialism; Higher-order evidence; Memory; Testimony

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Barnett, B. C. (2016). Higher-order evidence : its nature and epistemic significance. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Rochester. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1802/31474

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Barnett, Brian C. “Higher-order evidence : its nature and epistemic significance.” 2016. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Rochester. Accessed October 21, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/1802/31474.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Barnett, Brian C. “Higher-order evidence : its nature and epistemic significance.” 2016. Web. 21 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Barnett BC. Higher-order evidence : its nature and epistemic significance. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Rochester; 2016. [cited 2019 Oct 21]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1802/31474.

Council of Science Editors:

Barnett BC. Higher-order evidence : its nature and epistemic significance. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Rochester; 2016. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1802/31474


University of Rochester

14. Olson, Dustin Z. Reflective equilibrium and reasonable disagreement.

Degree: PhD, 2018, University of Rochester

 Experts often disagree on major issues within their fields of inquiry, despite being epistemic peers—individuals who are equally well informed and equally well equipped to… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Epistemic rationality; Peer disagreement; Social epistemology; Reflective equilibrium

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Olson, D. Z. (2018). Reflective equilibrium and reasonable disagreement. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Rochester. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1802/33887

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Olson, Dustin Z. “Reflective equilibrium and reasonable disagreement.” 2018. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Rochester. Accessed October 21, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/1802/33887.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Olson, Dustin Z. “Reflective equilibrium and reasonable disagreement.” 2018. Web. 21 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Olson DZ. Reflective equilibrium and reasonable disagreement. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Rochester; 2018. [cited 2019 Oct 21]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1802/33887.

Council of Science Editors:

Olson DZ. Reflective equilibrium and reasonable disagreement. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Rochester; 2018. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1802/33887


University of Michigan

15. Chen, Jason Victor. Geographic Dispersion of Investors and Price Discovery around Earnings Announcements.

Degree: PhD, Business Administration, 2016, University of Michigan

 Past research has documented a geographic role in the information available to investors. Specifically, studies have shown that value relevant information available to investors differs… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: geography; earnings announcement; disagreement; Accounting; Business and Economics

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Chen, J. V. (2016). Geographic Dispersion of Investors and Price Discovery around Earnings Announcements. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Michigan. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/120793

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Chen, Jason Victor. “Geographic Dispersion of Investors and Price Discovery around Earnings Announcements.” 2016. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Michigan. Accessed October 21, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/120793.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Chen, Jason Victor. “Geographic Dispersion of Investors and Price Discovery around Earnings Announcements.” 2016. Web. 21 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Chen JV. Geographic Dispersion of Investors and Price Discovery around Earnings Announcements. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Michigan; 2016. [cited 2019 Oct 21]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/120793.

Council of Science Editors:

Chen JV. Geographic Dispersion of Investors and Price Discovery around Earnings Announcements. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Michigan; 2016. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/120793

16. Caravello, Jonathan Anthony. Empathy, Open-Mindedness and Virtue in Argumentation.

Degree: 2018, University of California – eScholarship, University of California

 Disagreements continue over the most basic epistemic questions. Which logic is correct? What makes an argument good? We need a theory that can both explain… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Philosophy; Epistemology; Ethics; Circularity; Disagreement; Dogmatism; Empathy; Open-Mindedness; Self-Defeat

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Caravello, J. A. (2018). Empathy, Open-Mindedness and Virtue in Argumentation. (Thesis). University of California – eScholarship, University of California. Retrieved from http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/4tk8c2w3

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Caravello, Jonathan Anthony. “Empathy, Open-Mindedness and Virtue in Argumentation.” 2018. Thesis, University of California – eScholarship, University of California. Accessed October 21, 2019. http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/4tk8c2w3.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Caravello, Jonathan Anthony. “Empathy, Open-Mindedness and Virtue in Argumentation.” 2018. Web. 21 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Caravello JA. Empathy, Open-Mindedness and Virtue in Argumentation. [Internet] [Thesis]. University of California – eScholarship, University of California; 2018. [cited 2019 Oct 21]. Available from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/4tk8c2w3.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Caravello JA. Empathy, Open-Mindedness and Virtue in Argumentation. [Thesis]. University of California – eScholarship, University of California; 2018. Available from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/4tk8c2w3

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation


University of Akron

17. Cox, Richard L. PARENT-YOUTH DISAGREEMENT AND THE OHIO SCALES ITEMS ON PROBLEM BEHAVIORS: A SEARCH FOR MEANING.

Degree: PhD, Counselor Education and Supervision, 2007, University of Akron

 Marriage and family therapists often have the opportunity of working with adolescents and their parent(s). Although the adolescent’s problem behaviors are often viewed as intrinsic… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Education, Guidance and Counseling; Ohio Scales; youth; parent and youth disagreement; parent-youth relationship

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Cox, R. L. (2007). PARENT-YOUTH DISAGREEMENT AND THE OHIO SCALES ITEMS ON PROBLEM BEHAVIORS: A SEARCH FOR MEANING. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Akron. Retrieved from http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=akron1175993746

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Cox, Richard L. “PARENT-YOUTH DISAGREEMENT AND THE OHIO SCALES ITEMS ON PROBLEM BEHAVIORS: A SEARCH FOR MEANING.” 2007. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Akron. Accessed October 21, 2019. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=akron1175993746.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Cox, Richard L. “PARENT-YOUTH DISAGREEMENT AND THE OHIO SCALES ITEMS ON PROBLEM BEHAVIORS: A SEARCH FOR MEANING.” 2007. Web. 21 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Cox RL. PARENT-YOUTH DISAGREEMENT AND THE OHIO SCALES ITEMS ON PROBLEM BEHAVIORS: A SEARCH FOR MEANING. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Akron; 2007. [cited 2019 Oct 21]. Available from: http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=akron1175993746.

Council of Science Editors:

Cox RL. PARENT-YOUTH DISAGREEMENT AND THE OHIO SCALES ITEMS ON PROBLEM BEHAVIORS: A SEARCH FOR MEANING. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Akron; 2007. Available from: http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=akron1175993746


Georgia State University

18. Loveall, Bradley. Metaethical Contextualism and the Problem of Disagreement: When Somebody Must Be Wrong.

Degree: MA, Philosophy, 2018, Georgia State University

  Metaethical contextualism is a form of moderate contextualism according to which the truth-conditions of normative utterances are sensitive to some salient standard, norm, or… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Contextualism; Metaethics; Moral realism; Language; Disagreement; Truth-Conditional semantics; Belief holism; Semantic holism

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Loveall, B. (2018). Metaethical Contextualism and the Problem of Disagreement: When Somebody Must Be Wrong. (Thesis). Georgia State University. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/philosophy_theses/232

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Loveall, Bradley. “Metaethical Contextualism and the Problem of Disagreement: When Somebody Must Be Wrong.” 2018. Thesis, Georgia State University. Accessed October 21, 2019. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/philosophy_theses/232.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Loveall, Bradley. “Metaethical Contextualism and the Problem of Disagreement: When Somebody Must Be Wrong.” 2018. Web. 21 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Loveall B. Metaethical Contextualism and the Problem of Disagreement: When Somebody Must Be Wrong. [Internet] [Thesis]. Georgia State University; 2018. [cited 2019 Oct 21]. Available from: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/philosophy_theses/232.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Loveall B. Metaethical Contextualism and the Problem of Disagreement: When Somebody Must Be Wrong. [Thesis]. Georgia State University; 2018. Available from: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/philosophy_theses/232

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

19. Blaschko, Paul Leonard. Disagreement, Dispositions, and Higher-Order Evidence.

Degree: MA, Philosophy, 2013, University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee

  In opting to consider toy cases of disagreement  – cases that, like Christensen's dinner bill scenario, obviously involve evidence-sharing epistemic peers  – epistemologists have… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Epistemology; Evidence; Peer Disagreement; Philosophy

…contemporary case of epistemic disagreement: you and I do some mental… …epistemically, significant about the disagreement of equally reliable and… …insoluble disagreement. Consider the case where I take it that… …accounts of the epistemic significance of disagreement are often… …disagreement can plausibly be claimed to find its genesis in such… 

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Blaschko, P. L. (2013). Disagreement, Dispositions, and Higher-Order Evidence. (Thesis). University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee. Retrieved from https://dc.uwm.edu/etd/78

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Blaschko, Paul Leonard. “Disagreement, Dispositions, and Higher-Order Evidence.” 2013. Thesis, University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee. Accessed October 21, 2019. https://dc.uwm.edu/etd/78.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Blaschko, Paul Leonard. “Disagreement, Dispositions, and Higher-Order Evidence.” 2013. Web. 21 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Blaschko PL. Disagreement, Dispositions, and Higher-Order Evidence. [Internet] [Thesis]. University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee; 2013. [cited 2019 Oct 21]. Available from: https://dc.uwm.edu/etd/78.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Blaschko PL. Disagreement, Dispositions, and Higher-Order Evidence. [Thesis]. University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee; 2013. Available from: https://dc.uwm.edu/etd/78

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation


University of South Carolina

20. Parsons, Bryan Michael. Passionate Political Talk: Social Networks and the Emotional Impact of Political Discussion.

Degree: PhD, Political Science, 2010, University of South Carolina

  The purpose of this dissertation is to develop a psychological theory of interpersonal influence in political networks by examining the impact of political talk… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Political Science; Social and Behavioral Sciences; Emotion; Political disagreement; Political engagement; Political psychology; Social networks

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Parsons, B. M. (2010). Passionate Political Talk: Social Networks and the Emotional Impact of Political Discussion. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of South Carolina. Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/387

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Parsons, Bryan Michael. “Passionate Political Talk: Social Networks and the Emotional Impact of Political Discussion.” 2010. Doctoral Dissertation, University of South Carolina. Accessed October 21, 2019. https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/387.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Parsons, Bryan Michael. “Passionate Political Talk: Social Networks and the Emotional Impact of Political Discussion.” 2010. Web. 21 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Parsons BM. Passionate Political Talk: Social Networks and the Emotional Impact of Political Discussion. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of South Carolina; 2010. [cited 2019 Oct 21]. Available from: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/387.

Council of Science Editors:

Parsons BM. Passionate Political Talk: Social Networks and the Emotional Impact of Political Discussion. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of South Carolina; 2010. Available from: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/387


University of Notre Dame

21. Nathan L. King. The Epistemology of Disagreement: Puzzles, Solutions, and Applications</h1>.

Degree: PhD, Philosophy, 2009, University of Notre Dame

  This is a dissertation about the epistemology of disagreement. The main questions addressed here are, Can one rationally retain a belief in the face… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: defeaters; total evidence view; Disagreement; epistemic peer; epistemology; equal weight view; moral knowledge; rationality

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

King, N. L. (2009). The Epistemology of Disagreement: Puzzles, Solutions, and Applications</h1>. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Notre Dame. Retrieved from https://curate.nd.edu/show/1z40ks67b58

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

King, Nathan L.. “The Epistemology of Disagreement: Puzzles, Solutions, and Applications</h1>.” 2009. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Notre Dame. Accessed October 21, 2019. https://curate.nd.edu/show/1z40ks67b58.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

King, Nathan L.. “The Epistemology of Disagreement: Puzzles, Solutions, and Applications</h1>.” 2009. Web. 21 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

King NL. The Epistemology of Disagreement: Puzzles, Solutions, and Applications</h1>. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Notre Dame; 2009. [cited 2019 Oct 21]. Available from: https://curate.nd.edu/show/1z40ks67b58.

Council of Science Editors:

King NL. The Epistemology of Disagreement: Puzzles, Solutions, and Applications</h1>. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Notre Dame; 2009. Available from: https://curate.nd.edu/show/1z40ks67b58


Cornell University

22. Won, Yuna. Semantic and Metaethical Puzzles about Normative Language .

Degree: 2018, Cornell University

 My three projects here explore some semantic and metaethical problems that are unique to normative language and our normative reasoning. Ch.1 argues that the notion… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Philosophy; Contrary-To-Duty Obligation; Disagreement; Moral Dilemmas; Moral Twin Earth; Ordering Semantics; Ought

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Won, Y. (2018). Semantic and Metaethical Puzzles about Normative Language . (Thesis). Cornell University. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1813/59530

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Won, Yuna. “Semantic and Metaethical Puzzles about Normative Language .” 2018. Thesis, Cornell University. Accessed October 21, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/1813/59530.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Won, Yuna. “Semantic and Metaethical Puzzles about Normative Language .” 2018. Web. 21 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Won Y. Semantic and Metaethical Puzzles about Normative Language . [Internet] [Thesis]. Cornell University; 2018. [cited 2019 Oct 21]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1813/59530.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Won Y. Semantic and Metaethical Puzzles about Normative Language . [Thesis]. Cornell University; 2018. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1813/59530

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation


Duke University

23. Xue, Yuan. Essays on Financial Econometrics .

Degree: 2018, Duke University

  This dissertation consists of three essays. The first essay, "Volume, volatility and Macroeconomic Announcements" studies the relationship between trading intensity and price volatility and… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Economics; Finance; information processing; investor disagreement; investor sentiment; price volatility; stock volume

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Xue, Y. (2018). Essays on Financial Econometrics . (Thesis). Duke University. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10161/16842

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Xue, Yuan. “Essays on Financial Econometrics .” 2018. Thesis, Duke University. Accessed October 21, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10161/16842.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Xue, Yuan. “Essays on Financial Econometrics .” 2018. Web. 21 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Xue Y. Essays on Financial Econometrics . [Internet] [Thesis]. Duke University; 2018. [cited 2019 Oct 21]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10161/16842.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Xue Y. Essays on Financial Econometrics . [Thesis]. Duke University; 2018. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10161/16842

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation


Ohio University

24. Elmore, Luke. Beyond the Limits of Disagreement: Sense and Self-Reference.

Degree: MA, Philosophy (Arts and Sciences), 2019, Ohio University

 In this thesis I develop the skeptical problem of sense and show that two attempts to address this problem either self-defeat or are self-referentially inconsistent.… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Philosophy; Eliminative Materialism; Sense; Disagreement; Epistemology; Wittgenstein; Hinge Proposition; Conceptual Scheme; Skepticism

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Elmore, L. (2019). Beyond the Limits of Disagreement: Sense and Self-Reference. (Masters Thesis). Ohio University. Retrieved from http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ohiou1564529923699644

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Elmore, Luke. “Beyond the Limits of Disagreement: Sense and Self-Reference.” 2019. Masters Thesis, Ohio University. Accessed October 21, 2019. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ohiou1564529923699644.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Elmore, Luke. “Beyond the Limits of Disagreement: Sense and Self-Reference.” 2019. Web. 21 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Elmore L. Beyond the Limits of Disagreement: Sense and Self-Reference. [Internet] [Masters thesis]. Ohio University; 2019. [cited 2019 Oct 21]. Available from: http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ohiou1564529923699644.

Council of Science Editors:

Elmore L. Beyond the Limits of Disagreement: Sense and Self-Reference. [Masters Thesis]. Ohio University; 2019. Available from: http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ohiou1564529923699644


Temple University

25. Fujimoto, Donna T. Agreement and Disagreement: Novice Language Learners in Small Group Discussion.

Degree: 2012, Temple University

English

Ed.D.

While the small group discussion is widely used in language classes, there is little empirical research on its efficacy. This research specifically focuses… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Teacher education; Education; Foreign language instruction; agreement; Conversation Analysis; disagreement; multi-party interaction; small group discussion

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Fujimoto, D. T. (2012). Agreement and Disagreement: Novice Language Learners in Small Group Discussion. (Thesis). Temple University. Retrieved from http://digital.library.temple.edu/u?/p245801coll10,191866

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Fujimoto, Donna T. “Agreement and Disagreement: Novice Language Learners in Small Group Discussion.” 2012. Thesis, Temple University. Accessed October 21, 2019. http://digital.library.temple.edu/u?/p245801coll10,191866.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Fujimoto, Donna T. “Agreement and Disagreement: Novice Language Learners in Small Group Discussion.” 2012. Web. 21 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Fujimoto DT. Agreement and Disagreement: Novice Language Learners in Small Group Discussion. [Internet] [Thesis]. Temple University; 2012. [cited 2019 Oct 21]. Available from: http://digital.library.temple.edu/u?/p245801coll10,191866.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Fujimoto DT. Agreement and Disagreement: Novice Language Learners in Small Group Discussion. [Thesis]. Temple University; 2012. Available from: http://digital.library.temple.edu/u?/p245801coll10,191866

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation


Liberty University

26. Molinari, John. Peer Disagreement and Rationality: An Analysis of Richard Feldman's Conciliatory View.

Degree: 2016, Liberty University

 How should one's beliefs be affected by one's knowing that other people, who are equally well-informed, rational, and intelligent – in other words, persons who… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Epistemic Peer; Evidentialism; Higher-Order Evidence; Peer Disagreement; Private Evidence; Skepticism; Comparative Philosophy; Esthetics; Other Philosophy

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Molinari, J. (2016). Peer Disagreement and Rationality: An Analysis of Richard Feldman's Conciliatory View. (Masters Thesis). Liberty University. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/masters/420

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Molinari, John. “Peer Disagreement and Rationality: An Analysis of Richard Feldman's Conciliatory View.” 2016. Masters Thesis, Liberty University. Accessed October 21, 2019. http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/masters/420.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Molinari, John. “Peer Disagreement and Rationality: An Analysis of Richard Feldman's Conciliatory View.” 2016. Web. 21 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Molinari J. Peer Disagreement and Rationality: An Analysis of Richard Feldman's Conciliatory View. [Internet] [Masters thesis]. Liberty University; 2016. [cited 2019 Oct 21]. Available from: http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/masters/420.

Council of Science Editors:

Molinari J. Peer Disagreement and Rationality: An Analysis of Richard Feldman's Conciliatory View. [Masters Thesis]. Liberty University; 2016. Available from: http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/masters/420


Liberty University

27. Molinari, John. Peer Disagreement and Rationality: An Analysis of Richard Feldman's Conciliatory View.

Degree: 2016, Liberty University

 How should one's beliefs be affected by one's knowing that other people, who are equally well-informed, rational, and intelligent – in other words, persons who… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Epistemic Peer; Evidentialism; Higher-Order Evidence; Peer Disagreement; Private Evidence; Skepticism; Comparative Philosophy; Esthetics; Other Philosophy; Philosophy of Mind

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Molinari, J. (2016). Peer Disagreement and Rationality: An Analysis of Richard Feldman's Conciliatory View. (Masters Thesis). Liberty University. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/masters/418

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Molinari, John. “Peer Disagreement and Rationality: An Analysis of Richard Feldman's Conciliatory View.” 2016. Masters Thesis, Liberty University. Accessed October 21, 2019. http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/masters/418.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Molinari, John. “Peer Disagreement and Rationality: An Analysis of Richard Feldman's Conciliatory View.” 2016. Web. 21 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Molinari J. Peer Disagreement and Rationality: An Analysis of Richard Feldman's Conciliatory View. [Internet] [Masters thesis]. Liberty University; 2016. [cited 2019 Oct 21]. Available from: http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/masters/418.

Council of Science Editors:

Molinari J. Peer Disagreement and Rationality: An Analysis of Richard Feldman's Conciliatory View. [Masters Thesis]. Liberty University; 2016. Available from: http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/masters/418


The Ohio State University

28. Merli, David Allen. Moral disagreement and shared meaning.

Degree: PhD, Philosophy, 2003, The Ohio State University

 In order to have genuine disagreement, interlocutors must share terms, meanings, and concepts. Without this, their dispute is merely verbal; it rests on linguistic confusion.… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Philosophy; metaethics; noncognitivism; realism; expressivism; univocity; univocality; disagreement

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Merli, D. A. (2003). Moral disagreement and shared meaning. (Doctoral Dissertation). The Ohio State University. Retrieved from http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1069810158

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Merli, David Allen. “Moral disagreement and shared meaning.” 2003. Doctoral Dissertation, The Ohio State University. Accessed October 21, 2019. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1069810158.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Merli, David Allen. “Moral disagreement and shared meaning.” 2003. Web. 21 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Merli DA. Moral disagreement and shared meaning. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. The Ohio State University; 2003. [cited 2019 Oct 21]. Available from: http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1069810158.

Council of Science Editors:

Merli DA. Moral disagreement and shared meaning. [Doctoral Dissertation]. The Ohio State University; 2003. Available from: http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1069810158


University of Arkansas

29. Bogosian, Chad Andrew. Steadfastness and the Epistemology of Disagreement.

Degree: PhD, 2012, University of Arkansas

  Suppose that you and an intellectual peer disagree about some proposition P in a field like philosophy, ethics, science, religion, politics, etc. As intellectual… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Philosophy; religion and theology; Disagreement; Everyday lives; Interactions with opponents; Personal discernment; Epistemology; Ethics and Political Philosophy

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Bogosian, C. A. (2012). Steadfastness and the Epistemology of Disagreement. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Arkansas. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/393

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Bogosian, Chad Andrew. “Steadfastness and the Epistemology of Disagreement.” 2012. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Arkansas. Accessed October 21, 2019. https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/393.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Bogosian, Chad Andrew. “Steadfastness and the Epistemology of Disagreement.” 2012. Web. 21 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Bogosian CA. Steadfastness and the Epistemology of Disagreement. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Arkansas; 2012. [cited 2019 Oct 21]. Available from: https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/393.

Council of Science Editors:

Bogosian CA. Steadfastness and the Epistemology of Disagreement. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Arkansas; 2012. Available from: https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/393


Colorado State University

30. Lamb, Matthew. Saving the Equal Weight View from itself : a modest approach to strong conciliation.

Degree: MA, Philosophy, 2007, Colorado State University

 The central question of the epistemology disagreement focuses on how, if at all, we should update our belief about p when we find ourselves party… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: disagreement; epistemology; equal weight view; self-defeat

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Lamb, M. (2007). Saving the Equal Weight View from itself : a modest approach to strong conciliation. (Masters Thesis). Colorado State University. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10217/80258

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Lamb, Matthew. “Saving the Equal Weight View from itself : a modest approach to strong conciliation.” 2007. Masters Thesis, Colorado State University. Accessed October 21, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10217/80258.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Lamb, Matthew. “Saving the Equal Weight View from itself : a modest approach to strong conciliation.” 2007. Web. 21 Oct 2019.

Vancouver:

Lamb M. Saving the Equal Weight View from itself : a modest approach to strong conciliation. [Internet] [Masters thesis]. Colorado State University; 2007. [cited 2019 Oct 21]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10217/80258.

Council of Science Editors:

Lamb M. Saving the Equal Weight View from itself : a modest approach to strong conciliation. [Masters Thesis]. Colorado State University; 2007. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10217/80258

[1] [2]

.