Advanced search options

Advanced Search Options 🞨

Browse by author name (“Author name starts with…”).

Find ETDs with:

in
/  
in
/  
in
/  
in

Written in Published in Earliest date Latest date

Sorted by

Results per page:

Sorted by: relevance · author · university · dateNew search

You searched for subject:(Decision for others). Showing records 1 – 2 of 2 total matches.

Search Limiters

Last 2 Years | English Only

No search limiters apply to these results.

▼ Search Limiters


Wake Forest University

1. Smout, Ryan. The Role of Shoulds in Self-Other Differences in Decision Making.

Degree: 2019, Wake Forest University

When deciding for others, people often make different decisions than when deciding for themselves in the same situation (Atanasov, Smout, & Stone, 2019). Although a number of theories seek to explain these differences, none has explored whether they arise from beliefs about what people should do. This paper investigates whether such beliefs, which we term shoulds, account for self-other differences in decision making through two possible avenues: mediation, in which self-other differences in shoulds cause self-other differences in decisions, or moderation, in which the target of a decision (self or other) moderates the relationship between shoulds and decisions. Participants made decisions and reported shoulds either for self or other in relationship and physical health scenarios. Results replicated previous research that decisions for others are more risk-seeking in relationship scenarios but more risk-averse in health scenarios. We also found that shoulds differ for self and other in relationship scenarios, fully mediating the relationship between self-other and decisions. However, shoulds failed to explain self-other differences in health scenarios. We found no evidence of moderation effects, suggesting that shoulds and decisions are equally connected for self and other in both domains. We discuss how these results relate to prevailing theories in the literature.

Subjects/Keywords: decision making for others

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Smout, R. (2019). The Role of Shoulds in Self-Other Differences in Decision Making. (Thesis). Wake Forest University. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10339/93981

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Smout, Ryan. “The Role of Shoulds in Self-Other Differences in Decision Making.” 2019. Thesis, Wake Forest University. Accessed January 19, 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/10339/93981.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Smout, Ryan. “The Role of Shoulds in Self-Other Differences in Decision Making.” 2019. Web. 19 Jan 2021.

Vancouver:

Smout R. The Role of Shoulds in Self-Other Differences in Decision Making. [Internet] [Thesis]. Wake Forest University; 2019. [cited 2021 Jan 19]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10339/93981.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Smout R. The Role of Shoulds in Self-Other Differences in Decision Making. [Thesis]. Wake Forest University; 2019. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10339/93981

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

2. Miceli, Pamela. Dilemmes familiaux de la prise en charge de la maladie d’Alzheimer : principes, relations et émotions : Family dilemma about taking care of Alzheimer's disease : principles, relationships and emotions.

Degree: Docteur es, Sociologie, 2013, Lille 3

À partir d'un modèle d’analyse alliant les apports théoriques des sociologies de l'aide familiale et des émotions, nous analysons l'expérience de la prise en charge familiale de la maladie d’Alzheimer à travers trois dilemmes : l’exercice de la toilette du malade, le recours aux structures d'accueil et d’hébergement et l’intervention dans sa vie privée. Ces dilemmes sont appréhendés au prisme de trois registres d'interprétation, d'action et de justification : un registre principiel, un registre relationnel et un registre émotionnel. Nos analyses éclairent ainsi la singularité plurielle des expériences et des implications des proches familiaux des malades.

From an analytical model, combining the theoretical contributions of the sociology of family support and the sociology of emotions, we analyze the experience of family care of Alzheimer’s disease through three dilemmas: the exercise of the patient’s toilet, the use of reception and housing structures by families and intervention in the patient’s private life. Theses dilemmas are understood through the prism of three registers of interpretation, action and justification: a register of principles, a relational register and an emotional register. Our analysis light up the plural singularity of experiences and implications of relatives of Alzheimer’s patients.

A partir de un modelo analítico que combina las contribuciones teóricas de las sociologías del apoyo familiar y de las emociones, se analiza la experiencia de la atención familiar de la enfermedad de Alzheimer a través de tres dilemas: el ejercicio del baño del enfermo, el uso de centros de día y residencias, y la intervención en su vida privada. Estos dilemas se entienden bajo el prisma de tres registros de interpretación, acción y justificación: un registro de principios, un registro relacional y un registro emocional. Nuestros análisis aclaran la singularidad plural de las experiencias e implicaciones de los familiares de los enfermos.

Advisors/Committee Members: Caradec, Vincent (thesis director).

Subjects/Keywords: Maladie d'Alzheimer; Aide familiale; Dilemme; Principes; Relations; Emotions; Révision; Toilette; Délégation; Décision pour autrui; Alzheimer’s disease; Family support; Dilemma; Principles; Relationships; Emotions; Revision; Toilet; Delegation; Decision for others; Enfermedad de Alzheimer,; Atención familiar; Dilema; Principios; Relaciones; Emociones; Revisión; Aseo; Delegación; Decisión para otros

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Miceli, P. (2013). Dilemmes familiaux de la prise en charge de la maladie d’Alzheimer : principes, relations et émotions : Family dilemma about taking care of Alzheimer's disease : principles, relationships and emotions. (Doctoral Dissertation). Lille 3. Retrieved from http://www.theses.fr/2013LIL30042

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Miceli, Pamela. “Dilemmes familiaux de la prise en charge de la maladie d’Alzheimer : principes, relations et émotions : Family dilemma about taking care of Alzheimer's disease : principles, relationships and emotions.” 2013. Doctoral Dissertation, Lille 3. Accessed January 19, 2021. http://www.theses.fr/2013LIL30042.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Miceli, Pamela. “Dilemmes familiaux de la prise en charge de la maladie d’Alzheimer : principes, relations et émotions : Family dilemma about taking care of Alzheimer's disease : principles, relationships and emotions.” 2013. Web. 19 Jan 2021.

Vancouver:

Miceli P. Dilemmes familiaux de la prise en charge de la maladie d’Alzheimer : principes, relations et émotions : Family dilemma about taking care of Alzheimer's disease : principles, relationships and emotions. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Lille 3; 2013. [cited 2021 Jan 19]. Available from: http://www.theses.fr/2013LIL30042.

Council of Science Editors:

Miceli P. Dilemmes familiaux de la prise en charge de la maladie d’Alzheimer : principes, relations et émotions : Family dilemma about taking care of Alzheimer's disease : principles, relationships and emotions. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Lille 3; 2013. Available from: http://www.theses.fr/2013LIL30042

.