Advanced search options

Advanced Search Options 🞨

Browse by author name (“Author name starts with…”).

Find ETDs with:

in
/  
in
/  
in
/  
in

Written in Published in Earliest date Latest date

Sorted by

Results per page:

Sorted by: relevance · author · university · dateNew search

You searched for subject:(Cross Strait Exchanges). Showing records 1 – 3 of 3 total matches.

Search Limiters

Last 2 Years | English Only

No search limiters apply to these results.

▼ Search Limiters


Leiden University

1. Zheng, Lina. Politicised Cultural Exchanges and Signs of Contestation in Cross-Strait Relations: Competing Meanings and Purposes of Culture.

Degree: 2015, Leiden University

There is a strong tendency in mainstream literature to discuss cross-strait relations in terms of security threats or growing economic interdependence. On the other hand, cultural exchanges have received considerably less attention. Nonetheless, scholars that do elaborate on culture conceptualise culture as a fixed set of norms and values that fosters mutual understanding. Similarly, cultural exchanges between the National Palace Museum (NPM) in Taipei and the Palace Museum (PM) in Beijing are lauded as signs of warming cross-strait ties. Michelle Jana Chan (2010) remarked that the museum directors have risen above politics to organise their first joint exhibition in 2009. Yet, this thesis argues that politics is firmly rooted in cultural exchanges across the Strait. Taiwanese and Chinese governments have purposefully (re)constructed culture to determine what “true” culture entails, what goal it serves and what it says about the relationship between people on both sides of the Strait. From a poststructuralist outlook, multiple truths need to be elucidated as “the truth” does not exist. Presidential statements and documentaries about the NPM are analysed from a spatial perspective to explain how culture and the NPM are constructed through the ‘One China’ discourses and the ‘Taiwan-centric’ discourse, struggling to define communities, boundaries and realities rooted in the broader background of the collaborations between the NPM and the PM. This study contends that competing and changing meanings and purposes of culture embedded in these cultural exchanges are the result of power struggles and should be acknowledged as sources of conflict in cross-strait relations. Advisors/Committee Members: Black, Lindsay (advisor).

Subjects/Keywords: Cross-strait relations; cultural exchanges; National Palace Museum; Palace Museum; poststructuralism

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Zheng, L. (2015). Politicised Cultural Exchanges and Signs of Contestation in Cross-Strait Relations: Competing Meanings and Purposes of Culture. (Masters Thesis). Leiden University. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1887/36030

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Zheng, Lina. “Politicised Cultural Exchanges and Signs of Contestation in Cross-Strait Relations: Competing Meanings and Purposes of Culture.” 2015. Masters Thesis, Leiden University. Accessed January 26, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/1887/36030.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Zheng, Lina. “Politicised Cultural Exchanges and Signs of Contestation in Cross-Strait Relations: Competing Meanings and Purposes of Culture.” 2015. Web. 26 Jan 2020.

Vancouver:

Zheng L. Politicised Cultural Exchanges and Signs of Contestation in Cross-Strait Relations: Competing Meanings and Purposes of Culture. [Internet] [Masters thesis]. Leiden University; 2015. [cited 2020 Jan 26]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1887/36030.

Council of Science Editors:

Zheng L. Politicised Cultural Exchanges and Signs of Contestation in Cross-Strait Relations: Competing Meanings and Purposes of Culture. [Masters Thesis]. Leiden University; 2015. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1887/36030


NSYSU

2. Wu, Zheng-zhueng. The Research of joint crime-striking actions across Taiwan Straitï¼Focusing on the mutual repatriation and retrocession of illegally property.

Degree: Master, ICAPS, 2015, NSYSU

After the era of freezing relationship between Taiwan and Mainland China (hereinafter âCross-strait Partiesâ), they have had new connection since 1987, and cross-strait crimes are consequently arising. Meanwhile, the Cross-strait Parties could not end their political confrontations; as a result, cross-strait crimes therefore could not be combated by the cooperation between relevant authorities or any existing judicial mutual assistance mechanism. Definitely, the protection was insufficient for their people. Since the relationship of Cross-strait Parties has had historically critical improvement, they have therefore signed the "Cross-strait Joint Crime-Fighting and Judicial Mutual Assistance Agreement" in April 2009. However, even the Cross-strait Parties have been fighting crimes with and have provided judicial mutual assistance to each other for a while on such a solid legal basis, albeit there are still many difficulties existing currently, so that they are seeking more mutual understanding and well-organized practice. This thesis is aiming to analysis the effectiveness of their Joint Crime-Fighting Mechanism and to explore the impacts on their mutual judicial cooperation, as well as proposing strategies, based on the âAdministrative Law Structureâ, to our governmental authorities in charge of criminal repatriation and retrocession of illegal gains. Advisors/Committee Members: Shuai-Lian Deng (committee member), Yan,Yang-Ching (chair), Chin Fu, Liao (chair).

Subjects/Keywords: Cross-Strait Exchanges; Cross-border crime; Five Major Frameworks of Administrative Law; Mutual legal assistance

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Wu, Z. (2015). The Research of joint crime-striking actions across Taiwan Straitï¼Focusing on the mutual repatriation and retrocession of illegally property. (Thesis). NSYSU. Retrieved from http://etd.lib.nsysu.edu.tw/ETD-db/ETD-search/view_etd?URN=etd-0523115-105454

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Wu, Zheng-zhueng. “The Research of joint crime-striking actions across Taiwan Straitï¼Focusing on the mutual repatriation and retrocession of illegally property.” 2015. Thesis, NSYSU. Accessed January 26, 2020. http://etd.lib.nsysu.edu.tw/ETD-db/ETD-search/view_etd?URN=etd-0523115-105454.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Wu, Zheng-zhueng. “The Research of joint crime-striking actions across Taiwan Straitï¼Focusing on the mutual repatriation and retrocession of illegally property.” 2015. Web. 26 Jan 2020.

Vancouver:

Wu Z. The Research of joint crime-striking actions across Taiwan Straitï¼Focusing on the mutual repatriation and retrocession of illegally property. [Internet] [Thesis]. NSYSU; 2015. [cited 2020 Jan 26]. Available from: http://etd.lib.nsysu.edu.tw/ETD-db/ETD-search/view_etd?URN=etd-0523115-105454.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Wu Z. The Research of joint crime-striking actions across Taiwan Straitï¼Focusing on the mutual repatriation and retrocession of illegally property. [Thesis]. NSYSU; 2015. Available from: http://etd.lib.nsysu.edu.tw/ETD-db/ETD-search/view_etd?URN=etd-0523115-105454

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation


NSYSU

3. Hsia, Wen-Ching. Research on Design of Institutions of Administrative Law on Cross-Strait Exchanges from the Management Point of View.

Degree: Master, ICAPS, 2012, NSYSU

Abstract Cross-strait exchanges have become more frequent since Taiwan abolished the martial law on July 16th, 1987. At the same year, the restriction on family visit to China was deregulated on November 2nd. However, the Act Governing Relations between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area about protection of Mainland peopleâs right is obviously incomplete. For instance, according to Article 95-3 of Act Governing Relations between the People of the Taiwan Area and The Mainland Area, the provisions of the Administrative Procedures Act shall not apply to the handling of the matters related to the dealings between the people of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area. The regulation really retarded the development of cross-strait exchanges. Besides, the researcher found out that the Act Governing Relations between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area is not in accordance with the socialâs status in cross-strait exchanges. Therefore, the Act Governing Relations between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area has to be regulated. In this research, the author reviewed the regulations, mechanisms and social status in managing way on the basis of the five frameworks of administrative laws, including Basic Principle, Administrative Organization, Administrative Competence, Administrative Remedy and Administrative Supervision, and literature review, comparative analysis and historical induction. For the purpose of improving regulations of cross-strait exchanges, the researcher suggested that the Act Governing Relations between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area should be re-legislated. Advisors/Committee Members: Yang-Ching Yen (chair), Xue -Liang Deng (committee member), I-Chan Kao (chair).

Subjects/Keywords: Administrative Organization; Cross-Strait Exchanges; Administrative Relief; Limit of Administrative Rights; Administrative Basic Principles; Administrative Surveillance

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Hsia, W. (2012). Research on Design of Institutions of Administrative Law on Cross-Strait Exchanges from the Management Point of View. (Thesis). NSYSU. Retrieved from http://etd.lib.nsysu.edu.tw/ETD-db/ETD-search/view_etd?URN=etd-0209112-005815

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Hsia, Wen-Ching. “Research on Design of Institutions of Administrative Law on Cross-Strait Exchanges from the Management Point of View.” 2012. Thesis, NSYSU. Accessed January 26, 2020. http://etd.lib.nsysu.edu.tw/ETD-db/ETD-search/view_etd?URN=etd-0209112-005815.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Hsia, Wen-Ching. “Research on Design of Institutions of Administrative Law on Cross-Strait Exchanges from the Management Point of View.” 2012. Web. 26 Jan 2020.

Vancouver:

Hsia W. Research on Design of Institutions of Administrative Law on Cross-Strait Exchanges from the Management Point of View. [Internet] [Thesis]. NSYSU; 2012. [cited 2020 Jan 26]. Available from: http://etd.lib.nsysu.edu.tw/ETD-db/ETD-search/view_etd?URN=etd-0209112-005815.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Hsia W. Research on Design of Institutions of Administrative Law on Cross-Strait Exchanges from the Management Point of View. [Thesis]. NSYSU; 2012. Available from: http://etd.lib.nsysu.edu.tw/ETD-db/ETD-search/view_etd?URN=etd-0209112-005815

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

.