Advanced search options

Advanced Search Options 🞨

Browse by author name (“Author name starts with…”).

Find ETDs with:

in
/  
in
/  
in
/  
in

Written in Published in Earliest date Latest date

Sorted by

Results per page:

Sorted by: relevance · author · university · dateNew search

You searched for subject:(Adversarial principle). Showing records 1 – 13 of 13 total matches.

Search Limiters

Last 2 Years | English Only

No search limiters apply to these results.

▼ Search Limiters


Vytautas Magnus University

1. Kulionytė, Kristina. Ar procesinė taisyklė, leidžianti apylinkių teismams nagrinėjant administracinių teisės pažeidimų bylas savo iniciatyva neribotai rinkti įrodymus, pažeidžia šalių lygiateisiškumo ir rungimosi principus?.

Degree: Master, Law, 2008, Vytautas Magnus University

Darbe keliama hipotezė – procesinė taisyklė, leidžianti apylinkių teismams nagrinėjant administracinių teisės pažeidimų bylas, savo iniciatyva neribotai rinkti įrodymus, pažeidžia proceso šalių lygiateisiškumo ir rungimosi… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Šalių lygiateisiškumo principas; Rungimosi principas; Administracinis teisės pažeidimas; Principle of equal rights; Adversarial principle; Administrative law offences

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Kulionytė, Kristina. (2008). Ar procesinė taisyklė, leidžianti apylinkių teismams nagrinėjant administracinių teisės pažeidimų bylas savo iniciatyva neribotai rinkti įrodymus, pažeidžia šalių lygiateisiškumo ir rungimosi principus?. (Masters Thesis). Vytautas Magnus University. Retrieved from http://vddb.laba.lt/obj/LT-eLABa-0001:E.02~2008~D_20080807_144215-47181 ;

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Author name may be incomplete

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Kulionytė, Kristina. “Ar procesinė taisyklė, leidžianti apylinkių teismams nagrinėjant administracinių teisės pažeidimų bylas savo iniciatyva neribotai rinkti įrodymus, pažeidžia šalių lygiateisiškumo ir rungimosi principus?.” 2008. Masters Thesis, Vytautas Magnus University. Accessed April 21, 2019. http://vddb.laba.lt/obj/LT-eLABa-0001:E.02~2008~D_20080807_144215-47181 ;.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Author name may be incomplete

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Kulionytė, Kristina. “Ar procesinė taisyklė, leidžianti apylinkių teismams nagrinėjant administracinių teisės pažeidimų bylas savo iniciatyva neribotai rinkti įrodymus, pažeidžia šalių lygiateisiškumo ir rungimosi principus?.” 2008. Web. 21 Apr 2019.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Author name may be incomplete

Vancouver:

Kulionytė, Kristina. Ar procesinė taisyklė, leidžianti apylinkių teismams nagrinėjant administracinių teisės pažeidimų bylas savo iniciatyva neribotai rinkti įrodymus, pažeidžia šalių lygiateisiškumo ir rungimosi principus?. [Internet] [Masters thesis]. Vytautas Magnus University; 2008. [cited 2019 Apr 21]. Available from: http://vddb.laba.lt/obj/LT-eLABa-0001:E.02~2008~D_20080807_144215-47181 ;.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Author name may be incomplete

Council of Science Editors:

Kulionytė, Kristina. Ar procesinė taisyklė, leidžianti apylinkių teismams nagrinėjant administracinių teisės pažeidimų bylas savo iniciatyva neribotai rinkti įrodymus, pažeidžia šalių lygiateisiškumo ir rungimosi principus?. [Masters Thesis]. Vytautas Magnus University; 2008. Available from: http://vddb.laba.lt/obj/LT-eLABa-0001:E.02~2008~D_20080807_144215-47181 ;

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Author name may be incomplete

2. Vieira, Ana Márcia do Amaral. Centralidade da citação em processo civil no contexto judicial: Relatório profissional.

Degree: 2016, RCAAP

A citação traduz-se num dos principais actos processuais, o qual no contexto das acções cíveis, muitas vezes conduz a uma extrema ou notória morosidade processual… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Citação em processo civil; Morosidade; Eficácia; Segurança; Princípio do contraditório; Civil citation process; Slowness; Efficacy; Safety; Adversarial principle; Law

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Vieira, A. M. d. A. (2016). Centralidade da citação em processo civil no contexto judicial: Relatório profissional. (Thesis). RCAAP. Retrieved from https://www.rcaap.pt/detail.jsp?id=oai:repositorio.uportu.pt:11328/1570

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Vieira, Ana Márcia do Amaral. “Centralidade da citação em processo civil no contexto judicial: Relatório profissional.” 2016. Thesis, RCAAP. Accessed April 21, 2019. https://www.rcaap.pt/detail.jsp?id=oai:repositorio.uportu.pt:11328/1570.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Vieira, Ana Márcia do Amaral. “Centralidade da citação em processo civil no contexto judicial: Relatório profissional.” 2016. Web. 21 Apr 2019.

Vancouver:

Vieira AMdA. Centralidade da citação em processo civil no contexto judicial: Relatório profissional. [Internet] [Thesis]. RCAAP; 2016. [cited 2019 Apr 21]. Available from: https://www.rcaap.pt/detail.jsp?id=oai:repositorio.uportu.pt:11328/1570.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Vieira AMdA. Centralidade da citação em processo civil no contexto judicial: Relatório profissional. [Thesis]. RCAAP; 2016. Available from: https://www.rcaap.pt/detail.jsp?id=oai:repositorio.uportu.pt:11328/1570

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation


Vytautas Magnus University

3. Spudytė, Vaiva. Ar ribotas rungimosi principo veikimas ikiteisminio tyrimo metu nepažeidžia proceso šalių lygybės principo?.

Degree: Master, Law, 2010, Vytautas Magnus University

Darbe nagrinėjamas rungimosi principas ir jo įgyvendinimas ikiteisminio tyrimo stadijoje. Per rungtyniškumo prizmę atskleidžiamas procesinio šalių lygiateisiškumo principas, nagrinėjant atskirus proceso veiksmus, atliekamus ikiteisminiame tyrime.… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Ikiteisminis tyrimas; Rungimosi principas; Procesinis šalių lygiateisiškumo principas; Kaltinimas; Gynyba; Pre-trial investigation; Adversarial principle; Principle of equality of arms; Prosecution; Defence

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Spudytė, Vaiva. (2010). Ar ribotas rungimosi principo veikimas ikiteisminio tyrimo metu nepažeidžia proceso šalių lygybės principo?. (Masters Thesis). Vytautas Magnus University. Retrieved from http://vddb.laba.lt/obj/LT-eLABa-0001:E.02~2010~D_20100614_120036-75404 ;

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Author name may be incomplete

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Spudytė, Vaiva. “Ar ribotas rungimosi principo veikimas ikiteisminio tyrimo metu nepažeidžia proceso šalių lygybės principo?.” 2010. Masters Thesis, Vytautas Magnus University. Accessed April 21, 2019. http://vddb.laba.lt/obj/LT-eLABa-0001:E.02~2010~D_20100614_120036-75404 ;.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Author name may be incomplete

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Spudytė, Vaiva. “Ar ribotas rungimosi principo veikimas ikiteisminio tyrimo metu nepažeidžia proceso šalių lygybės principo?.” 2010. Web. 21 Apr 2019.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Author name may be incomplete

Vancouver:

Spudytė, Vaiva. Ar ribotas rungimosi principo veikimas ikiteisminio tyrimo metu nepažeidžia proceso šalių lygybės principo?. [Internet] [Masters thesis]. Vytautas Magnus University; 2010. [cited 2019 Apr 21]. Available from: http://vddb.laba.lt/obj/LT-eLABa-0001:E.02~2010~D_20100614_120036-75404 ;.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Author name may be incomplete

Council of Science Editors:

Spudytė, Vaiva. Ar ribotas rungimosi principo veikimas ikiteisminio tyrimo metu nepažeidžia proceso šalių lygybės principo?. [Masters Thesis]. Vytautas Magnus University; 2010. Available from: http://vddb.laba.lt/obj/LT-eLABa-0001:E.02~2010~D_20100614_120036-75404 ;

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Author name may be incomplete

4. Carvajal-Del Mar, Zunilda. La réforme de la procédure pénale chilienne : le principe du contradictoire, pivot d’une transformation démocratique : The reform of the Chilean criminal procedure : the adversarial principle, the cornerstone of a democratic process.

Degree: Docteur es, Droit privé, 2013, Université Paris X – Nanterre

En 2000, le Chili a promulgué un nouveau Code de procédure pénale qui a bouleversé les fondements de l’ancienne procédure. Cette réforme s’est appuyée sur… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Procès pénal; Chili; Principe du contradictoire; Réforme; Ministère Public; Code de procédure pénale; Criminal trial; Chile; Adversarial principle; Reform; Public Prosecutor; Criminal Code; 340

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Carvajal-Del Mar, Z. (2013). La réforme de la procédure pénale chilienne : le principe du contradictoire, pivot d’une transformation démocratique : The reform of the Chilean criminal procedure : the adversarial principle, the cornerstone of a democratic process. (Doctoral Dissertation). Université Paris X – Nanterre. Retrieved from http://www.theses.fr/2013PA100123

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Carvajal-Del Mar, Zunilda. “La réforme de la procédure pénale chilienne : le principe du contradictoire, pivot d’une transformation démocratique : The reform of the Chilean criminal procedure : the adversarial principle, the cornerstone of a democratic process.” 2013. Doctoral Dissertation, Université Paris X – Nanterre. Accessed April 21, 2019. http://www.theses.fr/2013PA100123.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Carvajal-Del Mar, Zunilda. “La réforme de la procédure pénale chilienne : le principe du contradictoire, pivot d’une transformation démocratique : The reform of the Chilean criminal procedure : the adversarial principle, the cornerstone of a democratic process.” 2013. Web. 21 Apr 2019.

Vancouver:

Carvajal-Del Mar Z. La réforme de la procédure pénale chilienne : le principe du contradictoire, pivot d’une transformation démocratique : The reform of the Chilean criminal procedure : the adversarial principle, the cornerstone of a democratic process. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Université Paris X – Nanterre; 2013. [cited 2019 Apr 21]. Available from: http://www.theses.fr/2013PA100123.

Council of Science Editors:

Carvajal-Del Mar Z. La réforme de la procédure pénale chilienne : le principe du contradictoire, pivot d’une transformation démocratique : The reform of the Chilean criminal procedure : the adversarial principle, the cornerstone of a democratic process. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Université Paris X – Nanterre; 2013. Available from: http://www.theses.fr/2013PA100123

5. Meynaud-Zeroual, Ariane. L’office des parties dans le procès administratif : The parties office in administrative lawsuit.

Degree: Docteur es, Droit public, 2017, Paris 2

La procédure suivie devant le juge administratif est traversée par une double évolution qui justifie qu’une étude soit consacrée à l’office des parties. A mesure… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Parties; Office; Droit du procès administratif; Droit processuel; Faculté; Charge; Intérêt; Loyauté; Action en justice; Contradiction; Parties; Office; Administrative litigation; Procedural law; Faculty; Charge; Interest; Loyalty; Legal action; Adversarial principle

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Meynaud-Zeroual, A. (2017). L’office des parties dans le procès administratif : The parties office in administrative lawsuit. (Doctoral Dissertation). Paris 2. Retrieved from http://www.theses.fr/2017PA020067

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Meynaud-Zeroual, Ariane. “L’office des parties dans le procès administratif : The parties office in administrative lawsuit.” 2017. Doctoral Dissertation, Paris 2. Accessed April 21, 2019. http://www.theses.fr/2017PA020067.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Meynaud-Zeroual, Ariane. “L’office des parties dans le procès administratif : The parties office in administrative lawsuit.” 2017. Web. 21 Apr 2019.

Vancouver:

Meynaud-Zeroual A. L’office des parties dans le procès administratif : The parties office in administrative lawsuit. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Paris 2; 2017. [cited 2019 Apr 21]. Available from: http://www.theses.fr/2017PA020067.

Council of Science Editors:

Meynaud-Zeroual A. L’office des parties dans le procès administratif : The parties office in administrative lawsuit. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Paris 2; 2017. Available from: http://www.theses.fr/2017PA020067

6. Mouallem, Ziad. Le principe du contradictoire, cause de contrôle étatique des sentences arbitrales internationales : The adversarial principle, case for state control of international arbitral awards.

Degree: Docteur es, Droit privé, 2018, Paris 2

Le principe du contradictoire post-arbitral en matière d’arbitrage international est établi dans la majorité des systèmes juridiques. Toutefois, les décisions des juges étatiques montrent que… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Principe du contradictoire; Procès équitable; Sentences arbitrales internationales; Irrégularité procédurale; Convention d'arbitrage; Autonomie des parties; Révision au fond; Convention de New York; Principe d'égalité; Ordre public international; Contrôle étatique; Adversarial principle; Fair trial; International arbitral awards; Procedural irregularity; Party autonomy; Review of the merits; New York convention; Equality principle; International public policy; State control

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Mouallem, Z. (2018). Le principe du contradictoire, cause de contrôle étatique des sentences arbitrales internationales : The adversarial principle, case for state control of international arbitral awards. (Doctoral Dissertation). Paris 2. Retrieved from http://www.theses.fr/2018PA020030

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Mouallem, Ziad. “Le principe du contradictoire, cause de contrôle étatique des sentences arbitrales internationales : The adversarial principle, case for state control of international arbitral awards.” 2018. Doctoral Dissertation, Paris 2. Accessed April 21, 2019. http://www.theses.fr/2018PA020030.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Mouallem, Ziad. “Le principe du contradictoire, cause de contrôle étatique des sentences arbitrales internationales : The adversarial principle, case for state control of international arbitral awards.” 2018. Web. 21 Apr 2019.

Vancouver:

Mouallem Z. Le principe du contradictoire, cause de contrôle étatique des sentences arbitrales internationales : The adversarial principle, case for state control of international arbitral awards. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Paris 2; 2018. [cited 2019 Apr 21]. Available from: http://www.theses.fr/2018PA020030.

Council of Science Editors:

Mouallem Z. Le principe du contradictoire, cause de contrôle étatique des sentences arbitrales internationales : The adversarial principle, case for state control of international arbitral awards. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Paris 2; 2018. Available from: http://www.theses.fr/2018PA020030


Universidade de Brasília

7. Guilherme Henrique de La Rocque Almeida. O controle judicial da regulação : o caso do Setor Elétrico.

Degree: 2009, Universidade de Brasília

 Em decorrência de sérias restrições fiscais e de outros motivos expostos no curso da presente dissertação, o Estado brasileiro, a partir do final do século… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Estado regulador; regulation; regulatory entities; regulatory state; regulação; entes reguladores; delegação de serviços públicos; poder judiciário; controle; setor elétrico; argumentos de princípio e de política; delegation of public services; judiciary; control; electricity sector; adversarial regulatory style; policy and principle argument; DIREITO

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Almeida, G. H. d. L. R. (2009). O controle judicial da regulação : o caso do Setor Elétrico. (Thesis). Universidade de Brasília. Retrieved from http://bdtd.bce.unb.br/tedesimplificado/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=5470

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Almeida, Guilherme Henrique de La Rocque. “O controle judicial da regulação : o caso do Setor Elétrico.” 2009. Thesis, Universidade de Brasília. Accessed April 21, 2019. http://bdtd.bce.unb.br/tedesimplificado/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=5470.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Almeida, Guilherme Henrique de La Rocque. “O controle judicial da regulação : o caso do Setor Elétrico.” 2009. Web. 21 Apr 2019.

Vancouver:

Almeida GHdLR. O controle judicial da regulação : o caso do Setor Elétrico. [Internet] [Thesis]. Universidade de Brasília; 2009. [cited 2019 Apr 21]. Available from: http://bdtd.bce.unb.br/tedesimplificado/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=5470.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Almeida GHdLR. O controle judicial da regulação : o caso do Setor Elétrico. [Thesis]. Universidade de Brasília; 2009. Available from: http://bdtd.bce.unb.br/tedesimplificado/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=5470

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation


Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro

8. Leonardo Faria Schenk. Legitimidade constitucional da cognição sumária: limites impostos pelo contraditório participativo.

Degree: PhD, 2012, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro

A tese objetiva estruturar os pressupostos constitucionais impostos pelo conteúdo atual e humanizado do contraditório participativo às técnicas de sumarização da cognição. A primeira parte… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Processo Civil; Contraditório participativo; Cognição plena; Celeridade; Técnicas de tutela diferenciada; Cognição sumária; Pressupostos constitucionais; Civil procedure; Adversarial principle; Full cognition; Expeditiousness; techniques for differentiated relief; Summary cognition; Constitutional assumptions; DIREITO

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Schenk, L. F. (2012). Legitimidade constitucional da cognição sumária: limites impostos pelo contraditório participativo. (Doctoral Dissertation). Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Retrieved from http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=4274 ;

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Schenk, Leonardo Faria. “Legitimidade constitucional da cognição sumária: limites impostos pelo contraditório participativo.” 2012. Doctoral Dissertation, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Accessed April 21, 2019. http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=4274 ;.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Schenk, Leonardo Faria. “Legitimidade constitucional da cognição sumária: limites impostos pelo contraditório participativo.” 2012. Web. 21 Apr 2019.

Vancouver:

Schenk LF. Legitimidade constitucional da cognição sumária: limites impostos pelo contraditório participativo. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro; 2012. [cited 2019 Apr 21]. Available from: http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=4274 ;.

Council of Science Editors:

Schenk LF. Legitimidade constitucional da cognição sumária: limites impostos pelo contraditório participativo. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro; 2012. Available from: http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=4274 ;

9. Jobert, Sylvain. La connaissance des actes du procès civil par les parties : The parties' knowledge of the acts of the civil trial.

Degree: Docteur es, Droit privé, 2016, Paris 2

En procédure civile, la connaissance des actes du procès par les parties est essentielle ; des garanties importantes y sont attachées, à commencer par le… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Procédure civile; Droit judiciaire privé; Modélisation; Formalisme; Actes de procédure; Notification; Signification; Droits de la défense; Principe du contradictoire; Procédure du défaut; Civil law procedure; Private judicial law; Modelling; Legal formalism; Acts of the civil trial; Service of process; Rights of defence; Adversarial principle; Default proceeding

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Jobert, S. (2016). La connaissance des actes du procès civil par les parties : The parties' knowledge of the acts of the civil trial. (Doctoral Dissertation). Paris 2. Retrieved from http://www.theses.fr/2016PA020070

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Jobert, Sylvain. “La connaissance des actes du procès civil par les parties : The parties' knowledge of the acts of the civil trial.” 2016. Doctoral Dissertation, Paris 2. Accessed April 21, 2019. http://www.theses.fr/2016PA020070.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Jobert, Sylvain. “La connaissance des actes du procès civil par les parties : The parties' knowledge of the acts of the civil trial.” 2016. Web. 21 Apr 2019.

Vancouver:

Jobert S. La connaissance des actes du procès civil par les parties : The parties' knowledge of the acts of the civil trial. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Paris 2; 2016. [cited 2019 Apr 21]. Available from: http://www.theses.fr/2016PA020070.

Council of Science Editors:

Jobert S. La connaissance des actes du procès civil par les parties : The parties' knowledge of the acts of the civil trial. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Paris 2; 2016. Available from: http://www.theses.fr/2016PA020070

10. Coulibaly, Ibrahima. Les droits de la défense en droit mauritanien. : Mathematical and numerical analysis of yield stress fluid flows.

Degree: Docteur es, Droit privé, 2018, Paris 8

L’universalisme des droits a fait accéder au concept des droits de la défense des diversités procédurales. Au niveau de chaque pays, qu’il soit petit ou… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Droits de la défense; Principe du contradictoire; Principe de l'égalité des armes; Procédure pénale; Procédure équitable; Droit à un avocat; Rights of the defence; Lawis; Adversarial principle; Criminal proceeding; Due process; Right to a lawyer

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Coulibaly, I. (2018). Les droits de la défense en droit mauritanien. : Mathematical and numerical analysis of yield stress fluid flows. (Doctoral Dissertation). Paris 8. Retrieved from http://www.theses.fr/2018PA080008

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Coulibaly, Ibrahima. “Les droits de la défense en droit mauritanien. : Mathematical and numerical analysis of yield stress fluid flows.” 2018. Doctoral Dissertation, Paris 8. Accessed April 21, 2019. http://www.theses.fr/2018PA080008.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Coulibaly, Ibrahima. “Les droits de la défense en droit mauritanien. : Mathematical and numerical analysis of yield stress fluid flows.” 2018. Web. 21 Apr 2019.

Vancouver:

Coulibaly I. Les droits de la défense en droit mauritanien. : Mathematical and numerical analysis of yield stress fluid flows. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Paris 8; 2018. [cited 2019 Apr 21]. Available from: http://www.theses.fr/2018PA080008.

Council of Science Editors:

Coulibaly I. Les droits de la défense en droit mauritanien. : Mathematical and numerical analysis of yield stress fluid flows. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Paris 8; 2018. Available from: http://www.theses.fr/2018PA080008

11. Garinot, Jean-Marie. Le secret des affaires : Confidentiality in business law.

Degree: Docteur es, Droit, 2011, Université de Bourgogne

En dépit de son importance pratique, le secret des affaires n’est guère pris en compte par le droit français. Bien que mentionné par quelques textes… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Secret des affaires; Confidentialité économique; Clause de confidentialité; Prinicipe du contradictoire; Bien; Propriété intellectuelle; Arbitrage; Techniques contractuelles; Transparence financière; Concurrence déloyale; Droit comparé; Publicité des débats; Business secrecy; Commercial secrecy; Trade secrets; Confidentiality of business data; Confidentiality clause; Confidentiality agreement; Principle of adversarial proceedings; Good; Intellectual property; Arbitration; International arbitration; Contractual issues; Financial transparency; Unfair competition; Comparative law; Public hearings; 346

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Garinot, J. (2011). Le secret des affaires : Confidentiality in business law. (Doctoral Dissertation). Université de Bourgogne. Retrieved from http://www.theses.fr/2011DIJOD007

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Garinot, Jean-Marie. “Le secret des affaires : Confidentiality in business law.” 2011. Doctoral Dissertation, Université de Bourgogne. Accessed April 21, 2019. http://www.theses.fr/2011DIJOD007.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Garinot, Jean-Marie. “Le secret des affaires : Confidentiality in business law.” 2011. Web. 21 Apr 2019.

Vancouver:

Garinot J. Le secret des affaires : Confidentiality in business law. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Université de Bourgogne; 2011. [cited 2019 Apr 21]. Available from: http://www.theses.fr/2011DIJOD007.

Council of Science Editors:

Garinot J. Le secret des affaires : Confidentiality in business law. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Université de Bourgogne; 2011. Available from: http://www.theses.fr/2011DIJOD007

12. Metenier, Julian. La protection pénale de l'accusé : The criminal protection of the accused.

Degree: Docteur es, Droit privé, 2014, Aix Marseille Université

Le thème de la protection pénale de l'accusé, connu des pénalistes, mérite aujourd'hui d'être renouvelé sous un angle essentiellement probatoire, au regard de l'évolution actuelle… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Procédure pénale; Phase préparatoire du procès pénal; Preuve pénale; Présomption d'innocence; Présomptions de culpabilité; Comparution sur reconnaissance préalable de culpabilité; Droits de la défense; Droit à l'avocat; Principe du contradictoire; Procédure d'équilibrage; Criminal Procedure; Pre-Trial stage; Criminal Evidence; Presumption of innocence; Presumptions of guilt; Plea Bargaining; Rights of the defence; Right to counsel; Principle of adversarial process; Balance procedure

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Metenier, J. (2014). La protection pénale de l'accusé : The criminal protection of the accused. (Doctoral Dissertation). Aix Marseille Université. Retrieved from http://www.theses.fr/2014AIXM1065

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Metenier, Julian. “La protection pénale de l'accusé : The criminal protection of the accused.” 2014. Doctoral Dissertation, Aix Marseille Université. Accessed April 21, 2019. http://www.theses.fr/2014AIXM1065.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Metenier, Julian. “La protection pénale de l'accusé : The criminal protection of the accused.” 2014. Web. 21 Apr 2019.

Vancouver:

Metenier J. La protection pénale de l'accusé : The criminal protection of the accused. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Aix Marseille Université 2014. [cited 2019 Apr 21]. Available from: http://www.theses.fr/2014AIXM1065.

Council of Science Editors:

Metenier J. La protection pénale de l'accusé : The criminal protection of the accused. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Aix Marseille Université 2014. Available from: http://www.theses.fr/2014AIXM1065

13. Kardimis, Théofanis. La chambre criminelle de la Cour de cassation face à l’article 6 de la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme : étude juridictionnelle comparée (France-Grèce) : The criminal division of the Court of Cassation and the article 6 of the European convention of human rights : a comparative jurisdictional study (France-Greece).

Degree: Docteur es, Droit pénal et sciences criminelles, 2017, Lyon

 La première partie de l’étude est consacrée à l’invocation, intra et extra muros, du droit à un procès équitable. Sont analysés ainsi, dans un premier… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Cedh; Absence d’obligation d’incorporation de la Convention européenne; Caractère objectif des droits de l’homme; Droit naturel; Clause de réciprocité; Applicabilité directe de l’article 6; Justiciabillité; Effet direct; Présomption d’effet direct; Invocation de l’article 6 devant les juridictions nationales; Chambre criminelle de la Cour de cassation; Aréopage; Recours en cassation; Principe de subsidiarité; Subsidiarité de la Convention; Subsidiarité de la Cour Européenne des Droits de l’Homme; Règle de l’épuisement préalable des voies de recours nationales; Recours individuel; Invocabilité des arrêts de la Cour EDH; Réexamen de la décision pénale définitive; Autorité de la chose jugée; Autorité de la chose interprétée; Précédent non obligatoire; Dialogue des juges; Dialogue entre la Cour EDH et la Cour de cassation; Renvoi préjudiciel; Elargissement de la compétence consultative de la Cour Européenne; Droit de l’accusé à un procès équitable; Notion d’accusation en matière pénale; Bonne administration de la justice; Droit à un tribunal indépendant, impartial et établi par la loi; Délai raisonnable; Egalité des armes; Droit à une procédure contradictoire; Droit de la défense d’avoir la parole en dernier; Publicité de l’audience et du prononcé des jugements et arrêts; Devoir de motiver les décisions; Présomption d’innocence; Droit de mentir; Droit de se taire; Droit de ne pas s’auto-Incriminer; Opérations d’infiltration policière; Provocation policière; Droit de l’accusé d’être informé de la nature et de la cause l’accusation portée contre lui et de la requalification envisagée des faits; Droit au temps et aux facilités nécessaires à la préparation de la défense; Droit d’accès au dossier; Confidentialité des communications avec l’avocat; Droit de comparaître en personne au procès; Droit à la défense avec ou sans l’assistance d’un avocat; Droit à la représentation par avocat; Droit à l’assistance gratuite d’un avocat; Droit d’interroger ou faire interroger les témoins à charge et d’obtenir la convocation et l’interrogation des témoins à décharge dans les mêmes conditions que les témoins à charge; Autonomisation du témoin; Témoin anonyme; Droit à l’interprétation et à la traduction des pièces essentielles.; European Convention of Human Rights; No obligation for incorporation of the Convention; Objective nature of the human rights; Natural law; Reciprocity clause; Direct applicability of Article 6; Justiciability; Direct effect; Presumption of direct effect; Invocation of article 6; Criminal division of the Court of Cassation; Areopagus; Appeal in cassation; Subsidiarity principle; Subsidiarity of the Convention; Subsidiarity of the European Court of Human Rights; Rule of prior exhaustion of domestic judicial remedies; Individual application; Invocability of judgements of the European Court; Review of the final criminal judgment made in violation of the Convention; The authority of res interpretata; Dialogue between the ECHR and the Court of Cassation; Preliminary ruling procedure; Expanding the European Court’s consultative jurisdiction; Right to a fair trial; Concept of criminal charge; Proper administration of justice; Right to an independent and impartial tribunal established by law; Rright to a hearing within a reasonable time; Principle of equality of arms; Right to adversarial proceedings; Right of the defence to the last word; Public hearing and public pronouncement of the judgement; Duty to state the reasons for the decision; Presumption of innocence; Accused’s right to lie; Right to remain silent; Right against self-Incrimination; Undercover operations; Entrapment; Right to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation and the potential re-Characterisation of the facts; Right to adequate time and facilities for the preparation of the defence; Right of access to the case-File; Free and confidential communication with the lawyer; Right to appear in person at the trial; Right to defend himself in person or through legal assistance; Right to be represented by counsel; Right to free legal aid; Right to examine or have examined witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him; The definition of the term “witness”; Anonymous witness; Right to the free assistance of an interpreter and the translation of the key documents; Echr; 340

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Kardimis, T. (2017). La chambre criminelle de la Cour de cassation face à l’article 6 de la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme : étude juridictionnelle comparée (France-Grèce) : The criminal division of the Court of Cassation and the article 6 of the European convention of human rights : a comparative jurisdictional study (France-Greece). (Doctoral Dissertation). Lyon. Retrieved from http://www.theses.fr/2017LYSE3004

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Kardimis, Théofanis. “La chambre criminelle de la Cour de cassation face à l’article 6 de la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme : étude juridictionnelle comparée (France-Grèce) : The criminal division of the Court of Cassation and the article 6 of the European convention of human rights : a comparative jurisdictional study (France-Greece).” 2017. Doctoral Dissertation, Lyon. Accessed April 21, 2019. http://www.theses.fr/2017LYSE3004.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Kardimis, Théofanis. “La chambre criminelle de la Cour de cassation face à l’article 6 de la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme : étude juridictionnelle comparée (France-Grèce) : The criminal division of the Court of Cassation and the article 6 of the European convention of human rights : a comparative jurisdictional study (France-Greece).” 2017. Web. 21 Apr 2019.

Vancouver:

Kardimis T. La chambre criminelle de la Cour de cassation face à l’article 6 de la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme : étude juridictionnelle comparée (France-Grèce) : The criminal division of the Court of Cassation and the article 6 of the European convention of human rights : a comparative jurisdictional study (France-Greece). [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Lyon; 2017. [cited 2019 Apr 21]. Available from: http://www.theses.fr/2017LYSE3004.

Council of Science Editors:

Kardimis T. La chambre criminelle de la Cour de cassation face à l’article 6 de la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme : étude juridictionnelle comparée (France-Grèce) : The criminal division of the Court of Cassation and the article 6 of the European convention of human rights : a comparative jurisdictional study (France-Greece). [Doctoral Dissertation]. Lyon; 2017. Available from: http://www.theses.fr/2017LYSE3004

.