Advanced search options

Advanced Search Options 🞨

Browse by author name (“Author name starts with…”).

Find ETDs with:

in
/  
in
/  
in
/  
in

Written in Published in Earliest date Latest date

Sorted by

Results per page:

Sorted by: relevance · author · university · dateNew search

You searched for subject:( Judicial Politics). Showing records 1 – 30 of 83 total matches.

[1] [2] [3]

Search Limiters

Last 2 Years | English Only

Languages

Country

▼ Search Limiters

1. Avelino, Pedro Buck. Fidelidade, álibi ou traição: ressignificação e perspectivas sobre o comportamento decisório do STF.

Degree: PhD, Direito do Estado, 2015, University of São Paulo

A tese apresenta modelo de classificação de ações judiciais categorias e de ressignificação escalas da decisão judicial em categoria dicotômica (Liberal e Garantista), calcada em… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Ação judicial (análise); Analytic models; Decisão judicial; Direito constitucional; Judicial behavior; Judicial politics; Judicial review; Tribunal superior

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Avelino, P. B. (2015). Fidelidade, álibi ou traição: ressignificação e perspectivas sobre o comportamento decisório do STF. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of São Paulo. Retrieved from http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/2/2134/tde-09122015-074432/ ;

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Avelino, Pedro Buck. “Fidelidade, álibi ou traição: ressignificação e perspectivas sobre o comportamento decisório do STF.” 2015. Doctoral Dissertation, University of São Paulo. Accessed August 08, 2020. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/2/2134/tde-09122015-074432/ ;.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Avelino, Pedro Buck. “Fidelidade, álibi ou traição: ressignificação e perspectivas sobre o comportamento decisório do STF.” 2015. Web. 08 Aug 2020.

Vancouver:

Avelino PB. Fidelidade, álibi ou traição: ressignificação e perspectivas sobre o comportamento decisório do STF. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of São Paulo; 2015. [cited 2020 Aug 08]. Available from: http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/2/2134/tde-09122015-074432/ ;.

Council of Science Editors:

Avelino PB. Fidelidade, álibi ou traição: ressignificação e perspectivas sobre o comportamento decisório do STF. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of São Paulo; 2015. Available from: http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/2/2134/tde-09122015-074432/ ;


Louisiana State University

2. Sill, Kaitlyn Louise. Institutional design and the economy: disentangling the effects of judicial independence and judicial review on economic development.

Degree: PhD, Political Science, 2010, Louisiana State University

 Scholars, politicians, and economic leaders widely believe that an independent, efficient judiciary facilitates economic growth. However, relatively few empirical studies have been conducted to evaluate… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Credible Commitment; Comparative Judicial Politics; Judiciary; Economic Growth; Judicial Independence; Judicial Review

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Sill, K. L. (2010). Institutional design and the economy: disentangling the effects of judicial independence and judicial review on economic development. (Doctoral Dissertation). Louisiana State University. Retrieved from etd-04142010-134016 ; https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/3494

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Sill, Kaitlyn Louise. “Institutional design and the economy: disentangling the effects of judicial independence and judicial review on economic development.” 2010. Doctoral Dissertation, Louisiana State University. Accessed August 08, 2020. etd-04142010-134016 ; https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/3494.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Sill, Kaitlyn Louise. “Institutional design and the economy: disentangling the effects of judicial independence and judicial review on economic development.” 2010. Web. 08 Aug 2020.

Vancouver:

Sill KL. Institutional design and the economy: disentangling the effects of judicial independence and judicial review on economic development. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Louisiana State University; 2010. [cited 2020 Aug 08]. Available from: etd-04142010-134016 ; https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/3494.

Council of Science Editors:

Sill KL. Institutional design and the economy: disentangling the effects of judicial independence and judicial review on economic development. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Louisiana State University; 2010. Available from: etd-04142010-134016 ; https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/3494


University of Oxford

3. Quesada-Alpízar, Tomás. Informal mandates & judicial power : the constitutional courts of Costa Rica, Chile, and Uruguay (1990-2016).

Degree: PhD, 2017, University of Oxford

 Standard explanations of judicial behaviour (i.e. legal, rational-choice, attitudinal, and institutional models) are overly static and exogenous, interested in instances of sudden change in judicial(more)

Subjects/Keywords: 320; Judicial power; Judicial politics; Comparative Constitutional Law; Constitutional courts

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Quesada-Alpízar, T. (2017). Informal mandates & judicial power : the constitutional courts of Costa Rica, Chile, and Uruguay (1990-2016). (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Oxford. Retrieved from https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:8c42baa4-cdd4-4e05-86a4-4725074244c5 ; https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.740895

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Quesada-Alpízar, Tomás. “Informal mandates & judicial power : the constitutional courts of Costa Rica, Chile, and Uruguay (1990-2016).” 2017. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Oxford. Accessed August 08, 2020. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:8c42baa4-cdd4-4e05-86a4-4725074244c5 ; https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.740895.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Quesada-Alpízar, Tomás. “Informal mandates & judicial power : the constitutional courts of Costa Rica, Chile, and Uruguay (1990-2016).” 2017. Web. 08 Aug 2020.

Vancouver:

Quesada-Alpízar T. Informal mandates & judicial power : the constitutional courts of Costa Rica, Chile, and Uruguay (1990-2016). [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Oxford; 2017. [cited 2020 Aug 08]. Available from: https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:8c42baa4-cdd4-4e05-86a4-4725074244c5 ; https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.740895.

Council of Science Editors:

Quesada-Alpízar T. Informal mandates & judicial power : the constitutional courts of Costa Rica, Chile, and Uruguay (1990-2016). [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Oxford; 2017. Available from: https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:8c42baa4-cdd4-4e05-86a4-4725074244c5 ; https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.740895


Princeton University

4. Johnson, Benjamin Bryant. Essays on Supreme Court Agenda-Setting .

Degree: PhD, 2018, Princeton University

 The Supreme Court is an important political institution and a frequent subject of study in both the social sciences and law. And while political science… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Certiorari; Judicial Behavior; Judicial Politics; Public Law; Supreme Court

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Johnson, B. B. (2018). Essays on Supreme Court Agenda-Setting . (Doctoral Dissertation). Princeton University. Retrieved from http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01th83m202t

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Johnson, Benjamin Bryant. “Essays on Supreme Court Agenda-Setting .” 2018. Doctoral Dissertation, Princeton University. Accessed August 08, 2020. http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01th83m202t.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Johnson, Benjamin Bryant. “Essays on Supreme Court Agenda-Setting .” 2018. Web. 08 Aug 2020.

Vancouver:

Johnson BB. Essays on Supreme Court Agenda-Setting . [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Princeton University; 2018. [cited 2020 Aug 08]. Available from: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01th83m202t.

Council of Science Editors:

Johnson BB. Essays on Supreme Court Agenda-Setting . [Doctoral Dissertation]. Princeton University; 2018. Available from: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01th83m202t


Washington University in St. Louis

5. Uribe, Alicia Bernice. Power to Appoint: A Model of Appointments to the United States Federal Judiciary.

Degree: PhD, Political Science, 2014, Washington University in St. Louis

  This dissertation project considers judicial appointments in a new light. The project, first, considers how appointments to the United States Federal Judiciary might be… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Computational Models; Judicial Appointments; Judicial Politics; Political Science

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Uribe, A. B. (2014). Power to Appoint: A Model of Appointments to the United States Federal Judiciary. (Doctoral Dissertation). Washington University in St. Louis. Retrieved from https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/art_sci_etds/374

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Uribe, Alicia Bernice. “Power to Appoint: A Model of Appointments to the United States Federal Judiciary.” 2014. Doctoral Dissertation, Washington University in St. Louis. Accessed August 08, 2020. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/art_sci_etds/374.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Uribe, Alicia Bernice. “Power to Appoint: A Model of Appointments to the United States Federal Judiciary.” 2014. Web. 08 Aug 2020.

Vancouver:

Uribe AB. Power to Appoint: A Model of Appointments to the United States Federal Judiciary. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Washington University in St. Louis; 2014. [cited 2020 Aug 08]. Available from: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/art_sci_etds/374.

Council of Science Editors:

Uribe AB. Power to Appoint: A Model of Appointments to the United States Federal Judiciary. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Washington University in St. Louis; 2014. Available from: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/art_sci_etds/374


University of Tennessee – Knoxville

6. Smith, Andrew H. The Effect of Ideology and Litigant Advantage on Appeals to, and Grants of <i>Certiorari</i> by, the US Supreme Court.

Degree: 2018, University of Tennessee – Knoxville

 Scholars examining the relationship between the federal appellate courts and the US Supreme Court have heretofore explored a myriad of explanations for how the Supreme… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: judicial review; federal courts; law; judicial politics; resource inequality; appeals

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Smith, A. H. (2018). The Effect of Ideology and Litigant Advantage on Appeals to, and Grants of <i>Certiorari</i> by, the US Supreme Court. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Tennessee – Knoxville. Retrieved from https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/4909

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Smith, Andrew H. “The Effect of Ideology and Litigant Advantage on Appeals to, and Grants of <i>Certiorari</i> by, the US Supreme Court.” 2018. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Tennessee – Knoxville. Accessed August 08, 2020. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/4909.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Smith, Andrew H. “The Effect of Ideology and Litigant Advantage on Appeals to, and Grants of <i>Certiorari</i> by, the US Supreme Court.” 2018. Web. 08 Aug 2020.

Vancouver:

Smith AH. The Effect of Ideology and Litigant Advantage on Appeals to, and Grants of <i>Certiorari</i> by, the US Supreme Court. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Tennessee – Knoxville; 2018. [cited 2020 Aug 08]. Available from: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/4909.

Council of Science Editors:

Smith AH. The Effect of Ideology and Litigant Advantage on Appeals to, and Grants of <i>Certiorari</i> by, the US Supreme Court. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Tennessee – Knoxville; 2018. Available from: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/4909


Texas A&M University

7. Merrill, Alison Higgins. The Dynamics of Issue Attention on the United States Supreme Court.

Degree: PhD, Political Science, 2018, Texas A&M University

 Throughout history, the United States Supreme Court has served as a major player in shaping the character and direction of public policy through the decisions… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Supreme Court; Agenda Setting; Judicial Politics; Certiorari

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Merrill, A. H. (2018). The Dynamics of Issue Attention on the United States Supreme Court. (Doctoral Dissertation). Texas A&M University. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/174166

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Merrill, Alison Higgins. “The Dynamics of Issue Attention on the United States Supreme Court.” 2018. Doctoral Dissertation, Texas A&M University. Accessed August 08, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/174166.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Merrill, Alison Higgins. “The Dynamics of Issue Attention on the United States Supreme Court.” 2018. Web. 08 Aug 2020.

Vancouver:

Merrill AH. The Dynamics of Issue Attention on the United States Supreme Court. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Texas A&M University; 2018. [cited 2020 Aug 08]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/174166.

Council of Science Editors:

Merrill AH. The Dynamics of Issue Attention on the United States Supreme Court. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Texas A&M University; 2018. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/174166


Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro

8. Júlio Canello. Judicializando a Federação?: O Supremo Tribunal Federal e os atos normativos estaduais.

Degree: PhD, 2016, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro

 Em que condições Governadores, partidos políticos, entidades representativas e o Procurador Geral da República recorrem ao Supremo Tribunal Federal para contestar os resultados do processo… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Política estadual; Política judicial; Federalismo; Supremo Tribunal Federal; State politics; Judicial Politics; Federalism; CIENCIA POLITICA

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Canello, J. (2016). Judicializando a Federação?: O Supremo Tribunal Federal e os atos normativos estaduais. (Doctoral Dissertation). Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Retrieved from http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=10716 ; http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=10717 ;

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Canello, Júlio. “Judicializando a Federação?: O Supremo Tribunal Federal e os atos normativos estaduais.” 2016. Doctoral Dissertation, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Accessed August 08, 2020. http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=10716 ; http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=10717 ;.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Canello, Júlio. “Judicializando a Federação?: O Supremo Tribunal Federal e os atos normativos estaduais.” 2016. Web. 08 Aug 2020.

Vancouver:

Canello J. Judicializando a Federação?: O Supremo Tribunal Federal e os atos normativos estaduais. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro; 2016. [cited 2020 Aug 08]. Available from: http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=10716 ; http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=10717 ;.

Council of Science Editors:

Canello J. Judicializando a Federação?: O Supremo Tribunal Federal e os atos normativos estaduais. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro; 2016. Available from: http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=10716 ; http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=10717 ;


Louisiana State University

9. Dumas, Tao Lotus. Community preferences and trial court decision-making: the influence of political, social, and economic conditions on litigation outcomes.

Degree: PhD, Political Science, 2011, Louisiana State University

 During the ratification debates the Federalists and Anti-federalists contested the merits of the civil jury. The Anti-federalists, preferring strong local government, argued that civil juries… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: state politics; trial courts; judicial politics; state courts

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Dumas, T. L. (2011). Community preferences and trial court decision-making: the influence of political, social, and economic conditions on litigation outcomes. (Doctoral Dissertation). Louisiana State University. Retrieved from etd-09302011-133240 ; https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/3421

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Dumas, Tao Lotus. “Community preferences and trial court decision-making: the influence of political, social, and economic conditions on litigation outcomes.” 2011. Doctoral Dissertation, Louisiana State University. Accessed August 08, 2020. etd-09302011-133240 ; https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/3421.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Dumas, Tao Lotus. “Community preferences and trial court decision-making: the influence of political, social, and economic conditions on litigation outcomes.” 2011. Web. 08 Aug 2020.

Vancouver:

Dumas TL. Community preferences and trial court decision-making: the influence of political, social, and economic conditions on litigation outcomes. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Louisiana State University; 2011. [cited 2020 Aug 08]. Available from: etd-09302011-133240 ; https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/3421.

Council of Science Editors:

Dumas TL. Community preferences and trial court decision-making: the influence of political, social, and economic conditions on litigation outcomes. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Louisiana State University; 2011. Available from: etd-09302011-133240 ; https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/3421


University of Minnesota

10. Bryan, Amanda Clare. Vox Populi Vox Curiae: public opinion and the U.S. Supreme Court.

Degree: PhD, Political Science, 2014, University of Minnesota

 Chapter 1: Public Opinion and Counter-Attitudinal Voting.For decades, Supreme Court scholars have asked whether the Court is responsive to public opinion. Despite the importance of… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: American politics; Judicial politics; Political science; Public opinion

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Bryan, A. C. (2014). Vox Populi Vox Curiae: public opinion and the U.S. Supreme Court. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Minnesota. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11299/166957

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Bryan, Amanda Clare. “Vox Populi Vox Curiae: public opinion and the U.S. Supreme Court.” 2014. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Minnesota. Accessed August 08, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/11299/166957.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Bryan, Amanda Clare. “Vox Populi Vox Curiae: public opinion and the U.S. Supreme Court.” 2014. Web. 08 Aug 2020.

Vancouver:

Bryan AC. Vox Populi Vox Curiae: public opinion and the U.S. Supreme Court. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Minnesota; 2014. [cited 2020 Aug 08]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11299/166957.

Council of Science Editors:

Bryan AC. Vox Populi Vox Curiae: public opinion and the U.S. Supreme Court. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Minnesota; 2014. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11299/166957


University of Minnesota

11. Sorenson, Maron. The Impact of Institutional Rules on the U.S. Supreme Court.

Degree: PhD, Political Science, 2018, University of Minnesota

 Assessing Judicial Certainty: The Supreme Court's Use of Questions and Statements During Oral Arguments The United States Supreme Court hears oral arguments for every case… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: American Politics; Judicial Politics; Supreme Court Decision-Making

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Sorenson, M. (2018). The Impact of Institutional Rules on the U.S. Supreme Court. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Minnesota. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11299/200253

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Sorenson, Maron. “The Impact of Institutional Rules on the U.S. Supreme Court.” 2018. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Minnesota. Accessed August 08, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/11299/200253.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Sorenson, Maron. “The Impact of Institutional Rules on the U.S. Supreme Court.” 2018. Web. 08 Aug 2020.

Vancouver:

Sorenson M. The Impact of Institutional Rules on the U.S. Supreme Court. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Minnesota; 2018. [cited 2020 Aug 08]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11299/200253.

Council of Science Editors:

Sorenson M. The Impact of Institutional Rules on the U.S. Supreme Court. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Minnesota; 2018. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11299/200253


Washington University in St. Louis

12. Krehbiel, Jay. Institutions and the Performance of Liberal Democracy: Judicial Procedures and the Efficacy of Constitutional Review.

Degree: PhD, Political Science, 2016, Washington University in St. Louis

  Modern liberal democracies typically depend on courts with the power of constitutional review to ensure that elected officials do not breach their constitutional obligations.… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Comparative Judicial Politics; Comparative Political Institutions; Comparative Politics; German Constitutional Court; Judicial Politics; Separation of Powers

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Krehbiel, J. (2016). Institutions and the Performance of Liberal Democracy: Judicial Procedures and the Efficacy of Constitutional Review. (Doctoral Dissertation). Washington University in St. Louis. Retrieved from https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/art_sci_etds/863

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Krehbiel, Jay. “Institutions and the Performance of Liberal Democracy: Judicial Procedures and the Efficacy of Constitutional Review.” 2016. Doctoral Dissertation, Washington University in St. Louis. Accessed August 08, 2020. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/art_sci_etds/863.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Krehbiel, Jay. “Institutions and the Performance of Liberal Democracy: Judicial Procedures and the Efficacy of Constitutional Review.” 2016. Web. 08 Aug 2020.

Vancouver:

Krehbiel J. Institutions and the Performance of Liberal Democracy: Judicial Procedures and the Efficacy of Constitutional Review. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Washington University in St. Louis; 2016. [cited 2020 Aug 08]. Available from: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/art_sci_etds/863.

Council of Science Editors:

Krehbiel J. Institutions and the Performance of Liberal Democracy: Judicial Procedures and the Efficacy of Constitutional Review. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Washington University in St. Louis; 2016. Available from: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/art_sci_etds/863


University of Oxford

13. Pereira, José Roberto Gabriel. Judicial decision in hostile environments : judges, executives, and the public in Argentina (2004-2010).

Degree: PhD, 2014, University of Oxford

 The central argument of this work is that the level of aggression of judges sitting in vulnerable courts is a function of their attempt to… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: 347; Political science; Socio-legal studies; judicial politics; judicialisation of politics; law and politics

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Pereira, J. R. G. (2014). Judicial decision in hostile environments : judges, executives, and the public in Argentina (2004-2010). (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Oxford. Retrieved from http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:77e42a70-016e-466e-b726-4cc300bc9070 ; http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.635216

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Pereira, José Roberto Gabriel. “Judicial decision in hostile environments : judges, executives, and the public in Argentina (2004-2010).” 2014. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Oxford. Accessed August 08, 2020. http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:77e42a70-016e-466e-b726-4cc300bc9070 ; http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.635216.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Pereira, José Roberto Gabriel. “Judicial decision in hostile environments : judges, executives, and the public in Argentina (2004-2010).” 2014. Web. 08 Aug 2020.

Vancouver:

Pereira JRG. Judicial decision in hostile environments : judges, executives, and the public in Argentina (2004-2010). [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Oxford; 2014. [cited 2020 Aug 08]. Available from: http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:77e42a70-016e-466e-b726-4cc300bc9070 ; http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.635216.

Council of Science Editors:

Pereira JRG. Judicial decision in hostile environments : judges, executives, and the public in Argentina (2004-2010). [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Oxford; 2014. Available from: http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:77e42a70-016e-466e-b726-4cc300bc9070 ; http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.635216

14. Clarissa Tassinari. Ativismo judicial: uma análise da atuação do Judiciário nas experiências brasileira e norte-americana.

Degree: 2011, Universidade do Vale do Rio do Sinos

Following a worldwide tendency, Brazilian constitutionalism is characterized by the important role of the Judicial power in defining social and political controversies. In this context,… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: ativismo judicial; judicialização da política; constitucionalismo; judicial activism; judicialization of politics; constitutional law; DIREITO

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Tassinari, C. (2011). Ativismo judicial: uma análise da atuação do Judiciário nas experiências brasileira e norte-americana. (Thesis). Universidade do Vale do Rio do Sinos. Retrieved from http://bdtd.unisinos.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=1894

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Tassinari, Clarissa. “Ativismo judicial: uma análise da atuação do Judiciário nas experiências brasileira e norte-americana.” 2011. Thesis, Universidade do Vale do Rio do Sinos. Accessed August 08, 2020. http://bdtd.unisinos.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=1894.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Tassinari, Clarissa. “Ativismo judicial: uma análise da atuação do Judiciário nas experiências brasileira e norte-americana.” 2011. Web. 08 Aug 2020.

Vancouver:

Tassinari C. Ativismo judicial: uma análise da atuação do Judiciário nas experiências brasileira e norte-americana. [Internet] [Thesis]. Universidade do Vale do Rio do Sinos; 2011. [cited 2020 Aug 08]. Available from: http://bdtd.unisinos.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=1894.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Tassinari C. Ativismo judicial: uma análise da atuação do Judiciário nas experiências brasileira e norte-americana. [Thesis]. Universidade do Vale do Rio do Sinos; 2011. Available from: http://bdtd.unisinos.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=1894

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

15. ARAUJO, Luiz Henrique Diniz. Judicialização da política, ativismo e discricionariedade judicial: existem constrangimentos eficazes? .

Degree: 2016, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

 O presente trabalho, inserido na Linha de Pesquisa Constituição e Processo Constitucional, tem por objetivo, de um lado, analisar o controle judicial de constitucionalidade como… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: judicialization of politics, judicial activism, judicial discretion, countermajoritari-an conflict.; judicialização da política, ativismo judicial, discricionariedade, conflito con-tramajoritário.

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

ARAUJO, L. H. D. (2016). Judicialização da política, ativismo e discricionariedade judicial: existem constrangimentos eficazes? . (Doctoral Dissertation). Universidade Federal de Pernambuco. Retrieved from https://repositorio.ufpe.br/handle/123456789/17433

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

ARAUJO, Luiz Henrique Diniz. “Judicialização da política, ativismo e discricionariedade judicial: existem constrangimentos eficazes? .” 2016. Doctoral Dissertation, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco. Accessed August 08, 2020. https://repositorio.ufpe.br/handle/123456789/17433.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

ARAUJO, Luiz Henrique Diniz. “Judicialização da política, ativismo e discricionariedade judicial: existem constrangimentos eficazes? .” 2016. Web. 08 Aug 2020.

Vancouver:

ARAUJO LHD. Judicialização da política, ativismo e discricionariedade judicial: existem constrangimentos eficazes? . [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Universidade Federal de Pernambuco; 2016. [cited 2020 Aug 08]. Available from: https://repositorio.ufpe.br/handle/123456789/17433.

Council of Science Editors:

ARAUJO LHD. Judicialização da política, ativismo e discricionariedade judicial: existem constrangimentos eficazes? . [Doctoral Dissertation]. Universidade Federal de Pernambuco; 2016. Available from: https://repositorio.ufpe.br/handle/123456789/17433


Boston University

16. Morel, Melissa Nicole. A woman’s place is in the House, the Senate, just not the Judiciary? An empirical analysis of the relationship between a nominee’s gender and the Senate confirmation process.

Degree: 2016, Boston University

 A rampant supposition exists that the judicial nominations of females are less successful due to the nominee’s gender (Martinek 2002). It is thus paramount to… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Political science; District Court; Lower Federal Court; Gender and race politics; Judicial politics; Senate confirmation

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Morel, M. N. (2016). A woman’s place is in the House, the Senate, just not the Judiciary? An empirical analysis of the relationship between a nominee’s gender and the Senate confirmation process. (Thesis). Boston University. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2144/17855

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Morel, Melissa Nicole. “A woman’s place is in the House, the Senate, just not the Judiciary? An empirical analysis of the relationship between a nominee’s gender and the Senate confirmation process.” 2016. Thesis, Boston University. Accessed August 08, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/2144/17855.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Morel, Melissa Nicole. “A woman’s place is in the House, the Senate, just not the Judiciary? An empirical analysis of the relationship between a nominee’s gender and the Senate confirmation process.” 2016. Web. 08 Aug 2020.

Vancouver:

Morel MN. A woman’s place is in the House, the Senate, just not the Judiciary? An empirical analysis of the relationship between a nominee’s gender and the Senate confirmation process. [Internet] [Thesis]. Boston University; 2016. [cited 2020 Aug 08]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/2144/17855.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Morel MN. A woman’s place is in the House, the Senate, just not the Judiciary? An empirical analysis of the relationship between a nominee’s gender and the Senate confirmation process. [Thesis]. Boston University; 2016. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/2144/17855

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation


Texas A&M University

17. Craig, Mckinzie. Legal Doctrine and Self Imposed Norms: Examining the Politics of Stare Decisis.

Degree: 2012, Texas A&M University

 The "law versus politics" debate is central in the study of the Supreme Court's institutional role in US democracy and law making. Research has sought… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: judicial politics; stare decisis; gender equal protection; us supreme court

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Craig, M. (2012). Legal Doctrine and Self Imposed Norms: Examining the Politics of Stare Decisis. (Thesis). Texas A&M University. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2012-08-11588

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Craig, Mckinzie. “Legal Doctrine and Self Imposed Norms: Examining the Politics of Stare Decisis.” 2012. Thesis, Texas A&M University. Accessed August 08, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2012-08-11588.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Craig, Mckinzie. “Legal Doctrine and Self Imposed Norms: Examining the Politics of Stare Decisis.” 2012. Web. 08 Aug 2020.

Vancouver:

Craig M. Legal Doctrine and Self Imposed Norms: Examining the Politics of Stare Decisis. [Internet] [Thesis]. Texas A&M University; 2012. [cited 2020 Aug 08]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2012-08-11588.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Craig M. Legal Doctrine and Self Imposed Norms: Examining the Politics of Stare Decisis. [Thesis]. Texas A&M University; 2012. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2012-08-11588

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

18. Ndawana, Duduzile. The role of the judiciary in protecting the right to freedom of expression in difficult political environments: a case study of Zimbabwe.

Degree: Faculty of Law, 2008, University of Fort Hare

 The right to freedom of expression is with no doubt one of the most important rights in all democratic societies. The southern African sub-region is… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Zimbawe – politics and government – Freedom of expression – Judicial power – Human rights

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Ndawana, D. (2008). The role of the judiciary in protecting the right to freedom of expression in difficult political environments: a case study of Zimbabwe. (Thesis). University of Fort Hare. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10353/99

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Ndawana, Duduzile. “The role of the judiciary in protecting the right to freedom of expression in difficult political environments: a case study of Zimbabwe.” 2008. Thesis, University of Fort Hare. Accessed August 08, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/10353/99.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Ndawana, Duduzile. “The role of the judiciary in protecting the right to freedom of expression in difficult political environments: a case study of Zimbabwe.” 2008. Web. 08 Aug 2020.

Vancouver:

Ndawana D. The role of the judiciary in protecting the right to freedom of expression in difficult political environments: a case study of Zimbabwe. [Internet] [Thesis]. University of Fort Hare; 2008. [cited 2020 Aug 08]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10353/99.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Ndawana D. The role of the judiciary in protecting the right to freedom of expression in difficult political environments: a case study of Zimbabwe. [Thesis]. University of Fort Hare; 2008. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10353/99

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation


Virginia Tech

19. Judson, Lauren Joyce. A Compliant Court: The Political Effects of the Addition of Judgeships to the United States Supreme Court Following Electoral Realignments.

Degree: MA, Political Science, 2014, Virginia Tech

 During periods of turmoil when ideological preferences between the federal branches of government fail to align, the relationship between the three quickly turns tumultuous. Electoral… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Judicial Politics; Electoral Realignment; Alteration to the Supreme Court

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Judson, L. J. (2014). A Compliant Court: The Political Effects of the Addition of Judgeships to the United States Supreme Court Following Electoral Realignments. (Masters Thesis). Virginia Tech. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10919/50530

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Judson, Lauren Joyce. “A Compliant Court: The Political Effects of the Addition of Judgeships to the United States Supreme Court Following Electoral Realignments.” 2014. Masters Thesis, Virginia Tech. Accessed August 08, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/50530.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Judson, Lauren Joyce. “A Compliant Court: The Political Effects of the Addition of Judgeships to the United States Supreme Court Following Electoral Realignments.” 2014. Web. 08 Aug 2020.

Vancouver:

Judson LJ. A Compliant Court: The Political Effects of the Addition of Judgeships to the United States Supreme Court Following Electoral Realignments. [Internet] [Masters thesis]. Virginia Tech; 2014. [cited 2020 Aug 08]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10919/50530.

Council of Science Editors:

Judson LJ. A Compliant Court: The Political Effects of the Addition of Judgeships to the United States Supreme Court Following Electoral Realignments. [Masters Thesis]. Virginia Tech; 2014. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10919/50530


University of Illinois – Chicago

20. Da Ros, Luciano. Mayors in the Dock: Judicial Responses to Local Corruption in Brazil.

Degree: 2014, University of Illinois – Chicago

 This dissertation proposes an explanation of the variation of judicial responses to political corruption. It asks why some judicial systems are more active than others… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Judiciary; Courts; Judicial politics; Legal Accountability; Mayors, Brazil

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Da Ros, L. (2014). Mayors in the Dock: Judicial Responses to Local Corruption in Brazil. (Thesis). University of Illinois – Chicago. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10027/19149

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Da Ros, Luciano. “Mayors in the Dock: Judicial Responses to Local Corruption in Brazil.” 2014. Thesis, University of Illinois – Chicago. Accessed August 08, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/10027/19149.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Da Ros, Luciano. “Mayors in the Dock: Judicial Responses to Local Corruption in Brazil.” 2014. Web. 08 Aug 2020.

Vancouver:

Da Ros L. Mayors in the Dock: Judicial Responses to Local Corruption in Brazil. [Internet] [Thesis]. University of Illinois – Chicago; 2014. [cited 2020 Aug 08]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10027/19149.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Da Ros L. Mayors in the Dock: Judicial Responses to Local Corruption in Brazil. [Thesis]. University of Illinois – Chicago; 2014. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10027/19149

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation


University of South Carolina

21. Lineberger, Monica. Dynamic Environments and Judicial Power.

Degree: PhD, Political Science, 2019, University of South Carolina

  The study of judicial independence in comparative environments is an increasingly important endeavor for scholars and policy-makers. Scholars seek to understand how an institution… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Political Science; judicial power; policy makers; politics; Supreme Court

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Lineberger, M. (2019). Dynamic Environments and Judicial Power. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of South Carolina. Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/5329

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Lineberger, Monica. “Dynamic Environments and Judicial Power.” 2019. Doctoral Dissertation, University of South Carolina. Accessed August 08, 2020. https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/5329.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Lineberger, Monica. “Dynamic Environments and Judicial Power.” 2019. Web. 08 Aug 2020.

Vancouver:

Lineberger M. Dynamic Environments and Judicial Power. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of South Carolina; 2019. [cited 2020 Aug 08]. Available from: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/5329.

Council of Science Editors:

Lineberger M. Dynamic Environments and Judicial Power. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of South Carolina; 2019. Available from: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/5329


University of Southern California

22. Bridge, David. Supreme Court decision-making in slavery cases.

Degree: MA, Politics & International Relations, 2007, University of Southern California

 This paper looks at Supreme Court decision-making by examining cases that involved issues of slavery. After developing a population of 14 cases, I test the… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Supreme Court; judicial politics; slavery

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Bridge, D. (2007). Supreme Court decision-making in slavery cases. (Masters Thesis). University of Southern California. Retrieved from http://digitallibrary.usc.edu/cdm/compoundobject/collection/p15799coll127/id/534633/rec/6235

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Bridge, David. “Supreme Court decision-making in slavery cases.” 2007. Masters Thesis, University of Southern California. Accessed August 08, 2020. http://digitallibrary.usc.edu/cdm/compoundobject/collection/p15799coll127/id/534633/rec/6235.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Bridge, David. “Supreme Court decision-making in slavery cases.” 2007. Web. 08 Aug 2020.

Vancouver:

Bridge D. Supreme Court decision-making in slavery cases. [Internet] [Masters thesis]. University of Southern California; 2007. [cited 2020 Aug 08]. Available from: http://digitallibrary.usc.edu/cdm/compoundobject/collection/p15799coll127/id/534633/rec/6235.

Council of Science Editors:

Bridge D. Supreme Court decision-making in slavery cases. [Masters Thesis]. University of Southern California; 2007. Available from: http://digitallibrary.usc.edu/cdm/compoundobject/collection/p15799coll127/id/534633/rec/6235


University of North Texas

23. Laoye, Oluwagbemiso. The Relationship between Judicial Independence and Ethnic Conflict.

Degree: 2017, University of North Texas

 The relationship between judicial independence and the levels of ethnic conflicts in developing countries has remained a significant research area due to increased cases of… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Judicial Independence Ethnic Politics; Political Science, General; Political Science, General

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Laoye, O. (2017). The Relationship between Judicial Independence and Ethnic Conflict. (Thesis). University of North Texas. Retrieved from https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc984193/

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Laoye, Oluwagbemiso. “The Relationship between Judicial Independence and Ethnic Conflict.” 2017. Thesis, University of North Texas. Accessed August 08, 2020. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc984193/.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Laoye, Oluwagbemiso. “The Relationship between Judicial Independence and Ethnic Conflict.” 2017. Web. 08 Aug 2020.

Vancouver:

Laoye O. The Relationship between Judicial Independence and Ethnic Conflict. [Internet] [Thesis]. University of North Texas; 2017. [cited 2020 Aug 08]. Available from: https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc984193/.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Laoye O. The Relationship between Judicial Independence and Ethnic Conflict. [Thesis]. University of North Texas; 2017. Available from: https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc984193/

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation


University of South Carolina

24. Fix, Michael P. Judging the Bureaucrats: Understanding the Dynamics of Court-Agency Interaction.

Degree: PhD, Political Science, 2011, University of South Carolina

  The policy outputs resulting from the interaction between U.S. Courts of Appeals and federal administrative agencies impact the lives of thousands of individuals on… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Political Science; Social and Behavioral Sciences; Administrative Law; Judicial Decision Making; Judicial Politics; Separation of Powers

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Fix, M. P. (2011). Judging the Bureaucrats: Understanding the Dynamics of Court-Agency Interaction. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of South Carolina. Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/1778

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Fix, Michael P. “Judging the Bureaucrats: Understanding the Dynamics of Court-Agency Interaction.” 2011. Doctoral Dissertation, University of South Carolina. Accessed August 08, 2020. https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/1778.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Fix, Michael P. “Judging the Bureaucrats: Understanding the Dynamics of Court-Agency Interaction.” 2011. Web. 08 Aug 2020.

Vancouver:

Fix MP. Judging the Bureaucrats: Understanding the Dynamics of Court-Agency Interaction. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of South Carolina; 2011. [cited 2020 Aug 08]. Available from: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/1778.

Council of Science Editors:

Fix MP. Judging the Bureaucrats: Understanding the Dynamics of Court-Agency Interaction. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of South Carolina; 2011. Available from: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/1778

25. Manacsa, Rodelio. Gavels Defying Guns: The Judicial Control of State Power in Authoritarian Systems.

Degree: PhD, Political Science, 2012, Vanderbilt University

 GAVELS DEFYING GUNS: THE JUDICIAL CONTROL OF STATE POWER IN AUTHORITARIAN SYSTEMS By Rodelio Dela Cruz Manacsa ABSTRACT When do judges rein in those who… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: authoritarianism; judicial politics; judging; judicial independence

…7.0 TAMING THE SWORD IN THE APARTHEID STATE: JUDICIAL NEGATION IN THE SOUTH AFRICAN… …Law and Structure of the South African Judicial System . …240 Regime Duration, Mechanism… …Selection, and Judicial Negation in South Africa, 1950-1994… …244 7.5 Judicial Negation in the South African Appellate Division:. An Empirical Analysis… …Statistics ..…...204 Table 6.3 Logistic Estimation of Judicial Negation at the… 

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Manacsa, R. (2012). Gavels Defying Guns: The Judicial Control of State Power in Authoritarian Systems. (Doctoral Dissertation). Vanderbilt University. Retrieved from http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-12072007-145535/ ;

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Manacsa, Rodelio. “Gavels Defying Guns: The Judicial Control of State Power in Authoritarian Systems.” 2012. Doctoral Dissertation, Vanderbilt University. Accessed August 08, 2020. http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-12072007-145535/ ;.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Manacsa, Rodelio. “Gavels Defying Guns: The Judicial Control of State Power in Authoritarian Systems.” 2012. Web. 08 Aug 2020.

Vancouver:

Manacsa R. Gavels Defying Guns: The Judicial Control of State Power in Authoritarian Systems. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Vanderbilt University; 2012. [cited 2020 Aug 08]. Available from: http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-12072007-145535/ ;.

Council of Science Editors:

Manacsa R. Gavels Defying Guns: The Judicial Control of State Power in Authoritarian Systems. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Vanderbilt University; 2012. Available from: http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-12072007-145535/ ;

26. Vande Kamp, Garrett Nathaniel. Essay on Judicial Review.

Degree: PhD, Political Science, 2019, Texas A&M University

 The existence of judicial review confronts scholars of political institutions, particularly scholars of law and judicial politics, with several important questions. Why do democracies like… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Judicial Review; Judicial Politics; Separation of Powers

…Pildes 2010). This creates a puzzle for scholars of judicial politics: why do democratic… …79 4. SEVERABILITY DOCTRINE AND THE EXERCISE OF JUDICIAL REVIEW .... 84 4.1. Introduction… …Figure 3-2: Average Marginal Effect of Mechanisms of Majoritarian Judicial Review on the… …Effect of Mechanisms of Majoritarian Judicial Review on the Probability of the Court… …Judicial Review ....... 26 Table 2-2: Heckman Probit Model of Additive Independence and Judicial… 

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Vande Kamp, G. N. (2019). Essay on Judicial Review. (Doctoral Dissertation). Texas A&M University. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/186222

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Vande Kamp, Garrett Nathaniel. “Essay on Judicial Review.” 2019. Doctoral Dissertation, Texas A&M University. Accessed August 08, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/186222.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Vande Kamp, Garrett Nathaniel. “Essay on Judicial Review.” 2019. Web. 08 Aug 2020.

Vancouver:

Vande Kamp GN. Essay on Judicial Review. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Texas A&M University; 2019. [cited 2020 Aug 08]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/186222.

Council of Science Editors:

Vande Kamp GN. Essay on Judicial Review. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Texas A&M University; 2019. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/186222


Cornell University

27. Goldbach, Toby. Rethinking The Judicial Function: Law Reform, Politics, And Legal Instrumentalism In Contemporary Judicial Activity .

Degree: 2016, Cornell University

Subjects/Keywords: Court Reform and Legal Instrumentalism; Judicial Politics; Judicial Function

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Goldbach, T. (2016). Rethinking The Judicial Function: Law Reform, Politics, And Legal Instrumentalism In Contemporary Judicial Activity . (Thesis). Cornell University. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1813/45378

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Goldbach, Toby. “Rethinking The Judicial Function: Law Reform, Politics, And Legal Instrumentalism In Contemporary Judicial Activity .” 2016. Thesis, Cornell University. Accessed August 08, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/1813/45378.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Goldbach, Toby. “Rethinking The Judicial Function: Law Reform, Politics, And Legal Instrumentalism In Contemporary Judicial Activity .” 2016. Web. 08 Aug 2020.

Vancouver:

Goldbach T. Rethinking The Judicial Function: Law Reform, Politics, And Legal Instrumentalism In Contemporary Judicial Activity . [Internet] [Thesis]. Cornell University; 2016. [cited 2020 Aug 08]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1813/45378.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Goldbach T. Rethinking The Judicial Function: Law Reform, Politics, And Legal Instrumentalism In Contemporary Judicial Activity . [Thesis]. Cornell University; 2016. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1813/45378

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation


University of Colorado

28. Denniston, Mark W. When the U.S. Supreme Court is Not the Last Word: Dialogue Between State Supreme Courts and its Role in State Constitutionalism.

Degree: PhD, Political Science, 2012, University of Colorado

  State supreme courts occasionally rely on the provisions of their own state constitutions to expand rights for their citizens beyond the protections that the… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: judges and judging; judicial politics; New Judicial Federalism; state constitutionalism; state constitutional law; state supreme courts; Courts; Law; Political Science

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Denniston, M. W. (2012). When the U.S. Supreme Court is Not the Last Word: Dialogue Between State Supreme Courts and its Role in State Constitutionalism. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Colorado. Retrieved from https://scholar.colorado.edu/psci_gradetds/21

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Denniston, Mark W. “When the U.S. Supreme Court is Not the Last Word: Dialogue Between State Supreme Courts and its Role in State Constitutionalism.” 2012. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Colorado. Accessed August 08, 2020. https://scholar.colorado.edu/psci_gradetds/21.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Denniston, Mark W. “When the U.S. Supreme Court is Not the Last Word: Dialogue Between State Supreme Courts and its Role in State Constitutionalism.” 2012. Web. 08 Aug 2020.

Vancouver:

Denniston MW. When the U.S. Supreme Court is Not the Last Word: Dialogue Between State Supreme Courts and its Role in State Constitutionalism. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Colorado; 2012. [cited 2020 Aug 08]. Available from: https://scholar.colorado.edu/psci_gradetds/21.

Council of Science Editors:

Denniston MW. When the U.S. Supreme Court is Not the Last Word: Dialogue Between State Supreme Courts and its Role in State Constitutionalism. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Colorado; 2012. Available from: https://scholar.colorado.edu/psci_gradetds/21

29. Vande Kamp, Garrett Nathaniel. Essay on Judicial Review.

Degree: PhD, Political Science, 2019, Texas A&M University

 The existence of judicial review confronts scholars of political institutions, particularly scholars of law and judicial politics, with several important questions. Why do democracies like… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Judicial Review; Judicial Politics; Separation of Powers

…Pildes 2010). This creates a puzzle for scholars of judicial politics: why do democratic… …79 4. SEVERABILITY DOCTRINE AND THE EXERCISE OF JUDICIAL REVIEW .... 84 4.1. Introduction… …Figure 3-2: Average Marginal Effect of Mechanisms of Majoritarian Judicial Review on the… …Effect of Mechanisms of Majoritarian Judicial Review on the Probability of the Court… …Judicial Review ....... 26 Table 2-2: Heckman Probit Model of Additive Independence and Judicial… 

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Vande Kamp, G. N. (2019). Essay on Judicial Review. (Doctoral Dissertation). Texas A&M University. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/186182

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Vande Kamp, Garrett Nathaniel. “Essay on Judicial Review.” 2019. Doctoral Dissertation, Texas A&M University. Accessed August 08, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/186182.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Vande Kamp, Garrett Nathaniel. “Essay on Judicial Review.” 2019. Web. 08 Aug 2020.

Vancouver:

Vande Kamp GN. Essay on Judicial Review. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Texas A&M University; 2019. [cited 2020 Aug 08]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/186182.

Council of Science Editors:

Vande Kamp GN. Essay on Judicial Review. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Texas A&M University; 2019. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/186182


University of California – Berkeley

30. Salamone, Michael Frank. Public Perceptions of Judicial Unanimity and Dissent: The Impact of Divided Court Decisions on the Mass Media and Public Opinion.

Degree: Political Science, 2011, University of California – Berkeley

 Do judicial dissents affect mass politics? Many people, including judges, scholars, political commentators, and public officials claim that they do. The conventional wisdom is that… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Political Science; dissent; judicial politics; media coverage; public opinion; supreme court; unanimity

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Salamone, M. F. (2011). Public Perceptions of Judicial Unanimity and Dissent: The Impact of Divided Court Decisions on the Mass Media and Public Opinion. (Thesis). University of California – Berkeley. Retrieved from http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/50w6s3vh

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Salamone, Michael Frank. “Public Perceptions of Judicial Unanimity and Dissent: The Impact of Divided Court Decisions on the Mass Media and Public Opinion.” 2011. Thesis, University of California – Berkeley. Accessed August 08, 2020. http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/50w6s3vh.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Salamone, Michael Frank. “Public Perceptions of Judicial Unanimity and Dissent: The Impact of Divided Court Decisions on the Mass Media and Public Opinion.” 2011. Web. 08 Aug 2020.

Vancouver:

Salamone MF. Public Perceptions of Judicial Unanimity and Dissent: The Impact of Divided Court Decisions on the Mass Media and Public Opinion. [Internet] [Thesis]. University of California – Berkeley; 2011. [cited 2020 Aug 08]. Available from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/50w6s3vh.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Salamone MF. Public Perceptions of Judicial Unanimity and Dissent: The Impact of Divided Court Decisions on the Mass Media and Public Opinion. [Thesis]. University of California – Berkeley; 2011. Available from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/50w6s3vh

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

[1] [2] [3]

.