Advanced search options

Advanced Search Options 🞨

Browse by author name (“Author name starts with…”).

Find ETDs with:

in
/  
in
/  
in
/  
in

Written in Published in Earliest date Latest date

Sorted by

Results per page:

Sorted by: relevance · author · university · dateNew search

You searched for subject:( Felix Frankfurter). Showing records 1 – 4 of 4 total matches.

Search Limiters

Last 2 Years | English Only

No search limiters apply to these results.

▼ Search Limiters


University of Arizona

1. Haury, Jessica Ann Danson, 1944-. Felix Frankfurter and judicial self-restraint .

Degree: 1970, University of Arizona

Subjects/Keywords: Frankfurter, Felix, 1882-1965.; United States.  – Supreme Court.; Judicial process.

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Haury, Jessica Ann Danson, 1. (1970). Felix Frankfurter and judicial self-restraint . (Masters Thesis). University of Arizona. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10150/318362

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Haury, Jessica Ann Danson, 1944-. “Felix Frankfurter and judicial self-restraint .” 1970. Masters Thesis, University of Arizona. Accessed November 20, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/318362.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Haury, Jessica Ann Danson, 1944-. “Felix Frankfurter and judicial self-restraint .” 1970. Web. 20 Nov 2019.

Vancouver:

Haury, Jessica Ann Danson 1. Felix Frankfurter and judicial self-restraint . [Internet] [Masters thesis]. University of Arizona; 1970. [cited 2019 Nov 20]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10150/318362.

Council of Science Editors:

Haury, Jessica Ann Danson 1. Felix Frankfurter and judicial self-restraint . [Masters Thesis]. University of Arizona; 1970. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10150/318362


University of Victoria

2. Chira-Pascanut, Constantin. The Schuman plan: vision, power and persuasion.

Degree: Dept. of History, 2012, University of Victoria

 The origins of European integration and the factors that made it possible in the post-1945 era have been examined from different perspectives and interpreted in… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Europe; European history; European integration; Jean Monnet; Felix Frankfurter; Dean Acheson; David E. Lilienthal; John J. McCloy; George W. Ball; Epistemic community; European Coal and Steel Community; European Economic Community; post-war; Schuman Plan; Louis Brandeis; High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community; Unites States foreign policy after 1945; International relations; Robert Schuman; European anti-trust policy; competition

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Chira-Pascanut, C. (2012). The Schuman plan: vision, power and persuasion. (Thesis). University of Victoria. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1828/4314

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Chira-Pascanut, Constantin. “The Schuman plan: vision, power and persuasion.” 2012. Thesis, University of Victoria. Accessed November 20, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/1828/4314.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Chira-Pascanut, Constantin. “The Schuman plan: vision, power and persuasion.” 2012. Web. 20 Nov 2019.

Vancouver:

Chira-Pascanut C. The Schuman plan: vision, power and persuasion. [Internet] [Thesis]. University of Victoria; 2012. [cited 2019 Nov 20]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1828/4314.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Chira-Pascanut C. The Schuman plan: vision, power and persuasion. [Thesis]. University of Victoria; 2012. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1828/4314

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation


University of Texas – Austin

3. Hardee, Benjamin Dawson. A moral psychological primary source analysis of Brown v. Board of Education.

Degree: PhD, Government, 2017, University of Texas – Austin

 This work applies the social intuitionist psychological model of moral judgment to explain the U.S. Supreme Court’s Brown v. Board of Education (1954) decision-making process.… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: U.S. Supreme Court; Brown v. Board of Education; Gebhart v. Belton; Davis v. County School Board; Briggs v. Elliott; Bolling v. Sharpe; Fifth amendment; Fourteenth amendment; Equal protection; Due process; Constitutionalism; Constitutional law; Constitutional interpretation; Segregation; Desegregation; Race; Racial equality; Judicial decision-making; Judicial behavior; Attitudinal model; Attitudinalism; Jonathan Haidt; Social intuitionist model; Moral psychology; Moral decision-making; Deontology; Consequentialism; Utilitarianism; Equality; Inequality; Earl Warren; Hugo Black; Stanley Reed; Felix Frankfurter; William O. Douglas; Robert H. Jackson; Sherman Minton; Tom C. Clark; Harold Burton; Alexander Bickel

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Hardee, B. D. (2017). A moral psychological primary source analysis of Brown v. Board of Education. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Texas – Austin. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2152/63542

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Hardee, Benjamin Dawson. “A moral psychological primary source analysis of Brown v. Board of Education.” 2017. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Texas – Austin. Accessed November 20, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/2152/63542.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Hardee, Benjamin Dawson. “A moral psychological primary source analysis of Brown v. Board of Education.” 2017. Web. 20 Nov 2019.

Vancouver:

Hardee BD. A moral psychological primary source analysis of Brown v. Board of Education. [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Texas – Austin; 2017. [cited 2019 Nov 20]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/2152/63542.

Council of Science Editors:

Hardee BD. A moral psychological primary source analysis of Brown v. Board of Education. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Texas – Austin; 2017. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/2152/63542


University of St. Andrews

4. Miles, David Jonathan. Stability or renewal : the judicialisation of representative democracy in American and German constitutionalism .

Degree: 2017, University of St. Andrews

 This thesis examines how American and German constitutionalism, as shaped by the U.S. Supreme Court and the German Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht), have mediated the tension… (more)

Subjects/Keywords: Constitutionalism; American constitutionalism; German constitutionalism; US Supreme Court; German Constitutional Court; Bundesverfassungsgericht; Law; Society; Civic society; European Parliament; Democracy; Politics; Elections; Electoral law; Reapportionment; Gerrymandering; Malapportionment; Barring clauses; Sperrklauseln; Electoral threshold; Electoral hurdle; Citizens; Citizenship; Civic republicanism; Representative democracy; Hannah Arendt; Thomas Jefferson; Ernst-Wolfgang Böckenförde; Alexis de Tocqueville; Baker v Carr; Reynolds v Sims; Electoral threshold cases; Voters; Parties; Political parties; Liberal democracy; Illiberal democracies; Social forces; Social movements; Institutions; Separation of powers; Courts; Constitutional courts; European Convention on Human Rights; Universal Declaration of Human Rights; Voter exclusion; Voter engagement; Civic engagement; The law of democracy; Political theory; Christian Democratic Union; CDU; Germany; The Federal Republic of Germany; West Germany; The League of Women Voters; The Socialist Reich Party; Social Democratic Party of Germany; Values; Constitutional values; The Bill of Rights; The American Bill of Rights; Majoritarianism; Incorporation; Incorporation of the Bill of Rights; James Madison; Alexander Hamilton; The Federalist Papers; Equality; Progress; Majority rule; Tyranny; Autocracy; Totalitarianism; Rights; Individual rights; Individual; Groups; Political culture; Constitutional culture; Carl Schmitt; Hans Kelsen; The US Constitution; Constitutions; The Basic Law; The German Basic Law; Grundgesetz; Higher law; Interpretation; Constitutional complaints; Democratic suicide; Weimar; The Weimar Republic; Autonomy; Opinions; Restraint; Power; Powers; Polis; Aristotle; Aristotelian polis; Suffrage; Equal Protection Clause; The Civil War; The American Civil War; The Fourteenth Amendment; Liberty; Dignity; Human dignity; Hitler; Adolf Hitler; Konrad Adenauer; Angela Merkel; John Adams; Judges; The judiciary; Judicialisation; Juridification; Public law; Private law; The New Deal; Franklin D Roosevelt; Militant democracy; The French Revolution; Human rights; World War Two; The Second World War; The Green Party of Germany; The Greens; Religion; Nation; Nationalism; Identity; Slavery; Emancipation; Cold War; The Countermajoritarian Difficulty; Jeremy Waldron; Robert Dahl; Justice; Security; Stability; Positive law; Legal positivism; Orwell; George Orwell; Kant; Rechtsstaat; Natural law; Isonomy; Oligarchy; Principles; Hersch Lauterpacht; Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr; Carolene Products footnote four; Ruth Bader Ginsburg; National Socialism; The National Socialist Party; Brown v Board of Education; Republicanism; Republican government; Constituent power; Community; Communitarianism; Free speech; Freedom of speech; Böckenförde dilemma; The Warren Court; Earl Warren; William Brennan; Andreas Voßkuhle; State and society; Civic association; Social cohesion; Vergangenheitsbewältigung; The Holocaust; The Nazi past; Civic space; Institutional space; Racism; Minority rights; Representation; Legitimacy; Democratic participation; Electoral participation; State legislatures; Felix Frankfurter; Federal government; Segregation; Civil rights; Civil rights movement; Voting rights; Lyndon Johnson; John F Kennedy; Joseph McCarthy; The Declaration of Independence; Judicial supremacy; Collective guilt; Checks and balances; The living constitution; Hungary; Poland; Judicial activism; Judicial restraint; Judicial authority; Legislatures; Legislative fragmentation; EU; The European Union; Eurosceptics; Far right; The people; Populism; Democratic deficit; Constitutional government; Arbitrary government

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Miles, D. J. (2017). Stability or renewal : the judicialisation of representative democracy in American and German constitutionalism . (Thesis). University of St. Andrews. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10023/11056

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Miles, David Jonathan. “Stability or renewal : the judicialisation of representative democracy in American and German constitutionalism .” 2017. Thesis, University of St. Andrews. Accessed November 20, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10023/11056.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Miles, David Jonathan. “Stability or renewal : the judicialisation of representative democracy in American and German constitutionalism .” 2017. Web. 20 Nov 2019.

Vancouver:

Miles DJ. Stability or renewal : the judicialisation of representative democracy in American and German constitutionalism . [Internet] [Thesis]. University of St. Andrews; 2017. [cited 2019 Nov 20]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/11056.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

Miles DJ. Stability or renewal : the judicialisation of representative democracy in American and German constitutionalism . [Thesis]. University of St. Andrews; 2017. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/11056

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

.