Advanced search options

Advanced Search Options 🞨

Browse by author name (“Author name starts with…”).

Find ETDs with:

in
/  
in
/  
in
/  
in

Written in Published in Earliest date Latest date

Sorted by

Results per page:

Sorted by: relevance · author · university · dateNew search

You searched for subject:( Administrative responsibilities). Showing records 1 – 2 of 2 total matches.

Search Limiters

Last 2 Years | English Only

No search limiters apply to these results.

▼ Search Limiters


Wichita State University

1. Nance, Erica. A case study of the impact of special education law on the retention of tenured special education teachers .

Degree: 2007, Wichita State University

The purpose of this study was to describe the influence of increased legal requirements on current or former Inter local tenured special education teacher attrition or retention by reporting their reasons for staying or leaving through the theoretical perspectives of organizational learning and organizational culture. I conducted a qualitative multiple case study of two units of analysis through a constructionist epistemology. Data were collected from current and former Inter local tenured special education teachers through focus groups, semi-structured interviews, the Left Hand and Right-Hand Column Case Method (LHRHCCM), and review of appropriate documents. Data collected were analyzed using text analysis software, content analysis, and pattern matching. Four salient findings from my study were: (1) Current tenured special education teachers want to be listened to and have their needs considered, (2) Current tenured special education teachers feel overwhelmed by the workload related to state assessments, (3) Current and former tenured special education teachers believe that legally-required changes affected them in practice, and (4) Current and former tenured special education teachers perceive that time requirements for administrative tasks reduce time for student services. Implications for praxis include organizational learning and organizational culture that encourage listening to the experience of tenured special education teachers and including them in decisions that affect them in an effort to retain them. My study adds to the body of knowledge surrounding special education teacher attrition by describing how tenured special education teachers believe increased legal requirements influence their retention or attrition. Areas for future research include studying the time it takes special education teachers to complete legally-required administrative tasks and why those tasks are perceived as stressful, and the impact of special education administrator leadership on special education teacher retention, including the application of resources within an inter local. During this time of critical shortage of special education teachers, findings from this study may be crucial to understanding the factors related to the retention and attrition of tenured special education teachers in the Inter local and elsewhere. Advisors/Committee Members: Calabrese, Raymond L., 1942- (advisor).

Subjects/Keywords: Special education teachers; Administrative responsibilities; Teachers, legal responsibilities; Surveys

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Nance, E. (2007). A case study of the impact of special education law on the retention of tenured special education teachers . (Doctoral Dissertation). Wichita State University. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10057/1078

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Nance, Erica. “A case study of the impact of special education law on the retention of tenured special education teachers .” 2007. Doctoral Dissertation, Wichita State University. Accessed August 23, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10057/1078.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Nance, Erica. “A case study of the impact of special education law on the retention of tenured special education teachers .” 2007. Web. 23 Aug 2019.

Vancouver:

Nance E. A case study of the impact of special education law on the retention of tenured special education teachers . [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Wichita State University; 2007. [cited 2019 Aug 23]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10057/1078.

Council of Science Editors:

Nance E. A case study of the impact of special education law on the retention of tenured special education teachers . [Doctoral Dissertation]. Wichita State University; 2007. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10057/1078

2. Fras, Blanka. Subsidiarna in smiselna uporaba Zakona o splošnem upravnem postopku v postopkih pri uveljavljanju pravic in dolžnosti študentov pri nas in ureditev v izbranih evropskih državah.

Degree: 2016, Univerza v Mariboru

V magistrski nalogi je obravnavano ključno vprašanje, ali gre za prekoračitev avtonomije slovenskih univerz pri sprejemanju in uporabi internih procesnih predpisov in posledično, v katerih postopkih pri uveljavljanju pravic in dolžnosti študentov se Zakon o splošnem upravnem (ZUP) postopku uporablja subsidiarno ali le smiselno. Pravica do izobraževanja je ustavna pravica, ki določa, da država ustvarja možnosti, da si državljani lahko pridobijo ustrezno izobrazbo, pri čemer mora biti upoštevano načelo enakosti pred zakonom. Univerze so avtonomne na podlagi Ustave Republike Slovenije, poudarek v tem prispevku pa je na avtonomiji v smislu samostojnosti pri sprejemanju predpisov ter na stopnji avtonomije univerz, saj le-te zaradi nujnosti upoštevanja ostalih ustavno zagotovljenih pravic ne morejo imeti popolne avtonomije. Avtonomija je prednost, a tudi slabost v smislu, da je potrebno posamezna področja še posebej skrbno urediti z internimi predpisi, ki niso v nasprotju z nadrejenimi zakonskimi predpisi in ustavo. Na splošno velja, da je upravni postopek sistem procesnih pravil, po katerih ravnajo upravni in drugi organi (tudi univerze kot izvajalci javnih služb), kadar odločajo v upravnih zadevah o pravicah, obveznostih ali pravnih koristih strank. Splošna pravila upravnega postopka na vseh upravnih področjih v vseh upravnih zadevah ureja ZUP. V kolikor zaradi posebnosti nekega upravnega področja splošna pravila ZUP ne ustrezajo ali niso zadostna, se lahko posamezno postopkovno vprašanje ali več posebnih pravil upravnega postopka uredijo drugače ali na novo s posebnim zakonom, ZUP pa se uporablja podrejeno oziroma dopolnilno. ZUP se uporablja tudi v drugih javnopravnih, torej »neupravnih« zadevah, a v teh primerih le smiselno. Sem sodijo postopki v zvezi z uveljavljanjem večine pravic in dolžnosti študentov, kot jih opredeljujejo Zakon o visokem šolstvu (ZVis) in interni akti univerz, pri čemer pa sledi obveza univerz in drugih izobraževalnih institucij, da ravnajo po ZUP (ravnanje z nepopolno vlogo, obrazložitev odločitve ipd.). Vendarle pa so na visokošolskem področju odstopanja nujna, potrebna in upravičena. ZVis kot posebni zakon na področju visokega šolstva ne vsebuje postopkovnih določb glede uveljavljanja pravic in dolžnosti študentov, ampak posamezne postopke, razen prijavno-sprejemnega postopka ter vpisnega postopka, prepušča avtonomnemu urejanju univerz. Pri vpisu na fakultete je sicer določeno, da univerze oz. fakultete avtonomno določijo pogoje za vpis, sam postopek pa je določen na nacionalni ravni s pravilnikom pristojnega ministra, moral pa bi biti urejen z zakonom kot »lex specialis« v odnosu do ZUP (»lex generalis«).

The master thesis deals with the key question regarding the potential excess of autonomy of Slovene universities when passing and using internal processes and consequently, in which proceedings that deal with student rights and responsibilities, the General Administrative Procedural Act is to be used subsidiary or just sensibly. The right to education is a constitutional right stating…

Advisors/Committee Members: Kobal, Aleš.

Subjects/Keywords: avtonomija univerze; posebni upravni postopki; subsidiarna raba ZUP; smiselna raba ZUP; interni akti univerz; pravice in dolžnosti študentov; izhodišča za procesni zakon; pravni predpisi v visokem šolstvu.; university autonomy; special administrative procedures; subsidiary use of the General Administrative Procedural Act; sensible use of the General Administrative Procedural Act; internal university regulations; student rights and responsibilities; procedural act principles; legal regulations in higher education.; info:eu-repo/classification/udc/378:341.077.3(043.3)

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Fras, B. (2016). Subsidiarna in smiselna uporaba Zakona o splošnem upravnem postopku v postopkih pri uveljavljanju pravic in dolžnosti študentov pri nas in ureditev v izbranih evropskih državah. (Masters Thesis). Univerza v Mariboru. Retrieved from https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=58607 ; https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?id=95436&dn= ; https://plus.si.cobiss.net/opac7/bib/5125931?lang=sl

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Fras, Blanka. “Subsidiarna in smiselna uporaba Zakona o splošnem upravnem postopku v postopkih pri uveljavljanju pravic in dolžnosti študentov pri nas in ureditev v izbranih evropskih državah.” 2016. Masters Thesis, Univerza v Mariboru. Accessed August 23, 2019. https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=58607 ; https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?id=95436&dn= ; https://plus.si.cobiss.net/opac7/bib/5125931?lang=sl.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Fras, Blanka. “Subsidiarna in smiselna uporaba Zakona o splošnem upravnem postopku v postopkih pri uveljavljanju pravic in dolžnosti študentov pri nas in ureditev v izbranih evropskih državah.” 2016. Web. 23 Aug 2019.

Vancouver:

Fras B. Subsidiarna in smiselna uporaba Zakona o splošnem upravnem postopku v postopkih pri uveljavljanju pravic in dolžnosti študentov pri nas in ureditev v izbranih evropskih državah. [Internet] [Masters thesis]. Univerza v Mariboru; 2016. [cited 2019 Aug 23]. Available from: https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=58607 ; https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?id=95436&dn= ; https://plus.si.cobiss.net/opac7/bib/5125931?lang=sl.

Council of Science Editors:

Fras B. Subsidiarna in smiselna uporaba Zakona o splošnem upravnem postopku v postopkih pri uveljavljanju pravic in dolžnosti študentov pri nas in ureditev v izbranih evropskih državah. [Masters Thesis]. Univerza v Mariboru; 2016. Available from: https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=58607 ; https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?id=95436&dn= ; https://plus.si.cobiss.net/opac7/bib/5125931?lang=sl

.