Advanced search options

Advanced Search Options 🞨

Browse by author name (“Author name starts with…”).

Find ETDs with:

in
/  
in
/  
in
/  
in

Written in Published in Earliest date Latest date

Sorted by

Results per page:

You searched for id:"oai:etd.ohiolink.edu:osu1530005688900126". One record found.

Search Limiters

Last 2 Years | English Only

No search limiters apply to these results.

▼ Search Limiters


The Ohio State University

1. Mizumoto, Ryan M. The accuracy of different digital impression techniques and scan bodies for complete-arch implant-supported reconstructions.

Degree: MS, Dentistry, 2018, The Ohio State University

Statement of problem. While the accuracy of digital implant impressions in single unit and short span situations has been demonstrated, the effect of various scan bodies and scan techniques on the accuracy and scan time in completely edentulous situations is not well understood. Purpose. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of 4 different scanning techniques and 5 different commercially available intraoral scan bodies on the trueness (distance and angular deviation), precision (variance amongst the scans) and scan time in a completely edentulous situation with 4 implants. Materials and Methods. Five different intraoral scan body systems were evaluated: AF ( IO-Flo, Atlantis Denstply Implants), NT (Nt-Trading GmbH & Co. KG), DE (Dess-USA), C3D (Core3Dcentres NA), and ZI (Zimmer Biomet Dental), and 4 different scanning techniques were evaluated: unmodified master model (NO), glass fiduciary markers placed on the edentulous ridge (GB), pressure indicating paste brushed over the ridge and palate (PP), and floss tied between the scan bodies (FL). Five identical polyurethane edentulous maxillary models with 4 parallel dental implant analogs (TSV 4.1, Zimmer Biomet Dental) in the first molar and canine positions. The scan bodies were attached to the models and the entire surface was scanned using a calibrated structured blue light industrial scanner (Carl Zeiss Optotechnik GmbH) to generate a master reference model. Five consecutive digital impressions were made of the model using an intraoral scanner (Trios, 3Shape A/S) and 1 of the 4 techniques (n=5) assigned at random. The test scans were superimposed over the master reference model using a best fit algorithm, and then the distance deviation and angular deviation of the scan bodies was calculated. Scan time was also recorded. A two-factor ANOVA was used to examine the effect of scan body and technique on the trueness and on scan time, with subsequent Tukey or Bonferroni-corrected Student’s t-tests. Precision was evaluated by tests for homogeneity of the variances between groups. An alpha level of 0.05 was used for all statistical tests. Reliability for the entire study was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient.Results. The overall reliability of the study according to intraclass correlations was 0.999. In terms of trueness, no statistically significant interaction was found between the effects of scan body and technique on the distance deviation (F=1.28, P=.246), however, scan body (P=.031) and technique (P=.001) each had a significant effect independently. A statistically significant interaction was found between the effects of scan body and technique on angular deviation (F= 4.31, P=<.001). Testing for the homogeneity of variances demonstrated significant differences between the precision of the groups in terms of both distance deviation (P=.013) and angular deviation (P=.003). No statistically significant interaction was found between the effects of scan body and technique (F=1.73, P=.076) on scan time, however, scan body alone was… Advisors/Committee Members: Yilmaz, Burak (Advisor).

Subjects/Keywords: Dentistry; dentistry; dental implants; digital dentistry; digital impressions; intraoral scan bodies; scan bodies; intraoral scanner

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

Mizumoto, R. M. (2018). The accuracy of different digital impression techniques and scan bodies for complete-arch implant-supported reconstructions. (Masters Thesis). The Ohio State University. Retrieved from http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1530005688900126

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

Mizumoto, Ryan M. “The accuracy of different digital impression techniques and scan bodies for complete-arch implant-supported reconstructions.” 2018. Masters Thesis, The Ohio State University. Accessed November 16, 2018. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1530005688900126.

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

Mizumoto, Ryan M. “The accuracy of different digital impression techniques and scan bodies for complete-arch implant-supported reconstructions.” 2018. Web. 16 Nov 2018.

Vancouver:

Mizumoto RM. The accuracy of different digital impression techniques and scan bodies for complete-arch implant-supported reconstructions. [Internet] [Masters thesis]. The Ohio State University; 2018. [cited 2018 Nov 16]. Available from: http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1530005688900126.

Council of Science Editors:

Mizumoto RM. The accuracy of different digital impression techniques and scan bodies for complete-arch implant-supported reconstructions. [Masters Thesis]. The Ohio State University; 2018. Available from: http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1530005688900126

.