Advanced search options

Advanced Search Options 🞨

Browse by author name (“Author name starts with…”).

Find ETDs with:

in
/  
in
/  
in
/  
in

Written in Published in Earliest date Latest date

Sorted by

Results per page:

You searched for id:"oai:MAXWELL.puc-rio.br:34139". One record found.

Search Limiters

Last 2 Years | English Only

No search limiters apply to these results.

▼ Search Limiters


Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro

1. BHEATRIX BIENEMANN FAVERO. [en] PSYCHOLOGY PROFESSIONALS AND STUDENT S CONCEPTIONS ABOUT SCIENCE AND SCIENTIFIC METHOD.

Degree: 2018, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro

[pt] Apesar dos inúmeros benefícios proporcionados pela prática científica ao mundo nos últimos anos, os profissionais e estudantes da Psicologia ainda se mostram resistentes ao uso do método científico na área. As origens de tais objeções e as variáveis que as influenciam ainda são incertas, fazendo-se necessário estudos que busquem investiga-las. A ideia principal apresentada neste estudo é a de que as concepções de ciência e método científico entre os profissionais e estudantes brasileiros de Psicologia são insuficientes. Para se testar as hipóteses derivadas dessa ideia, buscou-se avaliar essas concepções por meio de duas perguntas abertas sobre o tema e um questionário sociodemográfico. A amostra de respondentes ficou composta por 791 pessoas, estudantes (n = 407) e profissionais (n = 384) de todo Brasil, com idades entre 17 a 67 anos (M = 29,07; DP = 9,02), sendo 68,5 por cento do sexo feminino. As respostas foram analisadas por meio da Classificação Hierárquica Descendente e Análise Fatorial de Correspondências, com o auxílio da interface IRaMuTeQ. Os resultados revelaram que os participantes possuem concepções muito diversas em relação à ciência e ao método científico, predominando a noção de que a ciência é um método de aquisição de conhecimento, porém sem entrar em muitos detalhes sobre como se dá o funcionamento desse método. Ressalta-se a importância de um aprendizado aprofundado sobre metodologia científica nos cursos de Psicologia.

[en] Despite the numerous benefits of scientific practice to the world in recent years, the professionals and students of the Psychology are still resistant to the use of the scientific method in this area. The origins of such objections and the variables that influence them are uncertain, requiring studies to investigate them. The main idea presented in this study is that the conceptions of science and scientific method among Brazilian professionals and students of Psychology are insufficient. In order to test the hypotheses derived from this idea, the aim of this study was to evaluate the psychology professionals and student s conceptions about science and scientific method through two open questions and a sociodemographic questionnaire. The sample of respondents was composed of 791 people, students (n = 407) and professionals (n = 384) from Brazil, aged between 17 and 67 years (M = 29.07, SD = 9.02), 68,5 percent women. The analysis of the texts occurred through the Descending Hierarchical Classification and Correspondence Factor Analysis with the aid of the IRaMuTeQ, an interface of textual analysis. The analysis revealed that the participants have very different conceptions about science and scientific method, dominating the notion that science is a method of acquiring knowledge, but without more details about how this method works. It is important to emphasize the importance of learning about scientific methodology in Psychology courses.

Advisors/Committee Members: JULIANE CALLEGARO BORSA.

Subjects/Keywords: [pt] EPISTEMOLOGIA; [en] EPISTEMOLOGY; [pt] METODOLOGIA; [en] METHODOLOGY; [pt] ANALISE DE CONTEUDO; [en] CONTENT ANALYSIS; [pt] ANALISE TEXTUAL; [en] TEXTUAL ANALYSIS; [pt] IRAMUTEQ; [en] IRAMUTEQ

Record DetailsSimilar RecordsGoogle PlusoneFacebookTwitterCiteULikeMendeleyreddit

APA · Chicago · MLA · Vancouver · CSE | Export to Zotero / EndNote / Reference Manager

APA (6th Edition):

FAVERO, B. B. (2018). [en] PSYCHOLOGY PROFESSIONALS AND STUDENT S CONCEPTIONS ABOUT SCIENCE AND SCIENTIFIC METHOD. (Thesis). Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro. Retrieved from http://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/Busca_etds.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=34139

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition):

FAVERO, BHEATRIX BIENEMANN. “[en] PSYCHOLOGY PROFESSIONALS AND STUDENT S CONCEPTIONS ABOUT SCIENCE AND SCIENTIFIC METHOD.” 2018. Thesis, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro. Accessed December 12, 2018. http://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/Busca_etds.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=34139.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

MLA Handbook (7th Edition):

FAVERO, BHEATRIX BIENEMANN. “[en] PSYCHOLOGY PROFESSIONALS AND STUDENT S CONCEPTIONS ABOUT SCIENCE AND SCIENTIFIC METHOD.” 2018. Web. 12 Dec 2018.

Vancouver:

FAVERO BB. [en] PSYCHOLOGY PROFESSIONALS AND STUDENT S CONCEPTIONS ABOUT SCIENCE AND SCIENTIFIC METHOD. [Internet] [Thesis]. Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro; 2018. [cited 2018 Dec 12]. Available from: http://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/Busca_etds.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=34139.

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

Council of Science Editors:

FAVERO BB. [en] PSYCHOLOGY PROFESSIONALS AND STUDENT S CONCEPTIONS ABOUT SCIENCE AND SCIENTIFIC METHOD. [Thesis]. Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro; 2018. Available from: http://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/Busca_etds.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=34139

Note: this citation may be lacking information needed for this citation format:
Not specified: Masters Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation

.