Full Record

New Search | Similar Records

Author
Title Whom We Shall Welcome: Immigration Reform During the Great Society
URL
Publication Date
Degree PhD
Discipline/Department History
Degree Level doctoral
University/Publisher Bowling Green State University
Abstract This work examines the economic debate over the passage of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 and the end of the bracero program. Although the United States was still experiencing the post-World War II economic boom in the 1960's, the John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson administrations became increasingly concerned with poverty. Through the assistance of a friendly Congress, Kennedy and Johnson signed legislation designed to provide opportunities for employment for the nation's impoverished and unemployed. As unemployment numbers dropped, geographical pockets of unemployment remained high. Yet, business needs for skilled workers persisted. Economic planners and policymakers viewed immigration as a means to meet business needs and strengthen the American economy by removing nation-based quotas and favoring occupational skills and innovation in the immigration code. However, reform detractors successfully altered the final wording of the bill away from its initial intentions, putting more emphasis on family reunification and unintentionally opening immigration increasingly to Latin America and Asia. Despite Congress's altering of the bill and the subsequent unintended consequences, my dissertation seeks to reorient the focus of the study of this piece of legislation on what Congress initially intended. By investigating War on Poverty legislation, I argue that policymakers viewed immigration reform in the 1960's as a means to further the economic planning of this decade. By studying these intentions, I hope to shed light on the economic debate surrounding immigration reform today.
Subjects/Keywords American History; History; Labor Economics; Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965; Hart-Celler Act; Bracero Program; War on Poverty; Great Society; Immigration Policy; McCarran-Walter Act; Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952; Employment Policy; Poverty Policy
Contributors Challú, Amílcar (Advisor)
Language en
Rights unrestricted ; This thesis or dissertation is protected by copyright: all rights reserved. It may not be copied or redistributed beyond the terms of applicable copyright laws.
Country of Publication us
Format application/pdf
Record ID oai:etd.ohiolink.edu:bgsu1404673565
Repository ohiolink
Date Indexed 2020-10-19
Grantor Bowling Green State University

Sample Search Hits | Sample Images

…program arose out of the McCarran-Walter Act. It provided special visas to individuals desiring to temporarily come to the United States as agricultural laborers. 2 Kirk Johnson, “Hiring Locally for Farm Work is No Cure-All” in The New York Times. October…

…the Displaced Persons Act as anti-Semitic for allowing the admission of 205,000 immigrants while placing restrictions that greatly affected the eligibility of potential Jewish immigrants, he signed the bill into law. But Senator Pat McCarran (D-NV…

…recruiting from the beginning. This is not necessarily a malevolent act. According to Dawn D. Thilmany, professor of agricultural economics at Colorado State University, the only way to prove that domestic labor is not available is to “literally have a field…

…Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) of 1965, Congress moved to reform agricultural labor and to bolster all sectors of the nation’s economy. By reorienting the nation’s immigration system toward skilled laborers and depriving farmers of access to…

…coupling the opening of bottlenecks with economic policies such as the War on Poverty’s Economic Opportunity Act of 1964, legislators hoped to not only address business needs, but also to alleviate domestic unemployment amongst low- and unskilled workers…

…the bill were able to agree on a comprehensive immigration act. These economic assumptions led congressional representatives and the president to uncritically conclude that the Hart-Celler Act was “not a revolutionary bill.” Instead, immigration…

…widely used by immigration scholars today. However, like Briggs, Reimers only briefly engages the debate over the passage of the 1965 act and does not fully explore the way that the macroeconomic orthodoxy reflected in the War on Poverty planning that…

…Minority Rights Revolution, engages the INA of 1965 within the realm of other civil rights reforms. Skrentny argues that since this act passed about the same time as civil rights legislation, within the U.S. and on the world stage, that scholars should…

.